Sionskih zhidovskih mudrecov, ves' plan zavoevanija
vsego mira, budet pomeshheno v VII-m sledujushhem tome
"Talmud i evrei". K dejstvijam tajnago sionskago zmija
otnositsja i kleveta naglaja, vzvedennaja na uvazhaemago
vo vsej Rossii o. protoiereja Ioanna Kronshtadtskago. Vse
eto dejstvie zhidov, obnaglevshih v poslednee vremja
dlja podryva pravoslavnoj religii i pokolebanija very narodov,
uvazhenija svjatosti cerkvi i predannosti Carju
i otechestvu. Vse gazety, pechat' i knizhnaja torgovlja nahodjatsja
uzhe v zhidovskih rukah, chego zhe im bol'she?
Vsja G. Duma byla uzhe pod zhidovskoj komandoju. Teper'
ostaetsja tol'ko pokolebat', a potom oprokinut' hri-
]
In my investigation I naturally examined the works of the Russian arch
anti-Semite, Ippolit Lutostansky, who first accused the Jews of the most
despicable crimes, and then, in 1882, after the occurrence of the
pogroms in the south of Russia, wrote a volume retracting all his
previous anti-Jewish accusations, and declaring anti-Semitism to be
nothing but an outgrowth of ignorance and malice. Several years later he
resumed his anti-Semitic agitation and became one of the most vicious
vilifiers of the Jewish people on the eve of the notorious Beilis affair
which was staged by the Russian government for the purpose of
discrediting the Jews and of justifying the Russian governmental
anti-Jewish policy before the world. After the collapse of the Beilis
prosecution, which involved the absurd charge of ritual murder,
Lutostansky approached several prominent wealthy Jews with an offer to
retract his new charges against the Jews, provided they would pay him a
certain amount of money for his book. The Jews declined to have anything
to do with the charlatan who had caused so much harm to the Jews of
Russia by his monstrous accusations. His works attracted special
attention because of the fact that they were endorsed and supported by
Russian Grand Dukes and by the Dowager Empress of Russia.
While examining one of his books entitled, "The Talmud and the Jews,"
published in 1907, in which he promised the publication of "the
Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion" in his forthcoming volume, I came
upon an amazing passage in his introduction, outlining an alleged secret
plan of the Jews to gain world domination, which I find reproduced,
word for word, with but a few phrases changed, in the epilogue of "the
Russian mystic," Sergius Nilus. Did Sergius Nilus plagiarize
Lutostansky? Or was it Lutostansky who plagiarized Nilus? Or were they
one and the same person? At any rate, both served the purposes of the
"Black Hundreds" against the Jews, and both employed the same weapons.
Here is a translation of Lutostansky's introduction:
From Lutostansky's Introduction, 1907
EXPLANATION OF THE ZIONIST SYMBOLIC SNAKE
"The political plan represented in the form of a snake is very old
and was devised by the Judaean sages in theory, and in the course
of historical developments it is elaborated and augmented by their
initiated followers. These sages decided to conquer the world
peacefully for Zion, by the cunning of the symbolic snake. The head
of the snake represents the sages of Zion, and the body--the Judaean
nation. Crawling into the bosoms of governments, this snake
undermines eats away all non-Judaean governmental forces, as they
grow on various continents, but especially in Europe, which it is
to do also in the future, carefully following the outlined plan,
until the cycle of the road travelled by it is completed by the
return of the head of the snake to Zion,--that is until this snake
will include within the sphere of its circle the whole of Europe,
and through Europe the whole world. First of all they are
endeavoring to introduce everywhere irreligion and moral decadence,
utilizing all forces they have won economically in order to drag
the other continents into the sphere of their cycle. As the return
of the head of the snake could be accomplished only over the razed
ruins of the governmental power of all European countries, through
the collapse of this power, through economic disorganization and
ruin, introduced by Zion everywhere by means of moral decadence.
Corruption is introduced with the aid of Jewesses under the guise
of French or Italian women, who even undergo fictitious baptism for
these purposes and then become the wives of prominent men, like the
biblical Esther, and they are always accompanied by their
Mordecais, and make their politics for the good of the Jews. These
so-called French and Italian women are the best carriers of
immorality from place to place. These women are used for those who,
because of them, are always in need of money, and therefore
willingly barter their conscience to secure money at any cost. The
money is reality only loaned to such conscience-barterers, for it
quickly comes back to the hands of those loaned the money, as it
is squandered with the aid of these women soon after they receive
it. The Zionist nets are spread out on all the roads of the goyim
(gentiles) and the cycle of the snake is moving along in the
Twentieth century with the speed of an express train towards its
goal.
"The complete outline of all the secret protocols of the Zionist
Jewish sages, the entire plan of the conquest of the whole world,
will be included in the next (seventh) volume of 'The Talmud and
the Jews.'"
And this is a facsimile reproduction and translation of Sergius Nilus's
epilogue taken from the copy of the "Protocols" in the British Museum,
from which the American translation was made.
[Illustration: Cyrillic
FACSIMILE OF PAGE OF SERGE NILUS'S BOOK CONTAINING THE PROTOCOLS SHOWING
THE SAME PASSAGE AS IN LUTOSTANSKY'S BOOK.]
[Transliteration:
-395-
toryja v Maloj Azii budut podderzhivaemy francuzskoj
diplomatiej.
Konechno, eto trebovanie l'goty ne kasaetsja katolicheskih
uchrezhdenij, izgonjaemyh iz Francii neskol'kimi
poslednimi sostavami eja pravitel'stva, a dokazyvaet lish',
chto Drejfusarovskaja diplomatija vystupaet za interesy
Siona i otkryvaet put' dlja kolonizacii francuzskimi evrejami
Maloj Azii.
Sion vsegda zavoevyval sebe mesta i vlijanie cherez
svoj rabochij skot s chelovecheskimi licami, kak nazyvaet
Talmud vse ne-evrejskoe chelovechestvo.
Po dannym tajnago evrejskago Sionizma, Solomonom i
drugimi Iudejskimi mudrecami eshhe za 929 let do Rozhdestva
Hristova byl izmyshlen v teorii politicheskij
plan mirnago zavoevanija dlja Siona vselennoj. Po mere
razvitija istoricheskih sobytij, plan etot byl razrabatyvaem
i popolnjaem posvjashhennymi v eto delo posledovateljami[1].
Eti mudrecy reshili mirno zavoevat' mir dlja Siona
hitrost'ju Simvolicheskago Zmija, glavu kotorago dolzhno bylo
sostavljat' posvjashhennoe v plany mudrecov pravitel'stvo
evreev (vsegda zamaskirovannye dazhe ot svoego naroda),
a tulovishhe--narod Iudejskij. Pronikaja v nedra vstrchaemyh
im na puti gosudarstv, Zmij etot podtachival
i pozhiral (svergaja ih) vse gosudarstvennyja, ne-evrejskija,
sily, po mere ih rosta. Eto zhe dolzhen on delat'
i v budushhem pri tochnom sledovanii prednachertanijam
plana, do teh por, poka cikl projdennago im puti
ne somknetsja vozvratom Glavy ego na Sione i poka, takim
obrazom, Zmij ne zakljuchit, ne sosredotochit v
sfere svoego kruga vsej Evropy, a cherez nee i
ostal'noj mir, pol'zujas' vsemi silami--zavoevaniem i
ekonomicheskim putem, chtoby podchinit' svoemu vlijaniju,
vlijaniju svoego cikla, i ostal'nye kontingenty. Vozvrat
[Footnote 1: Ap. Pavel, kak odin iz naibolee darovityh
uchenikov farisejskoj
shkoly, ne mog ne byt' posvjashhen v etu "tajnu bezzakonija,
nahodivshujusja v dejstvii" i v ego vremja. Otsjuda osobaja zloba
gonenija na nego so storony voinstvujushhago Izrailja.]
]
From the Nilus Epilogue, 1917
"According to secret Jewish Zionism, a political plan was devised
in theory for the peaceful conquest of the world for Zion, by
Solomon and other sages already 929 years before the birth of
Christ. In the course of historical developments, the plan was
elaborated and augmented by their followers initiated in this
affair. These sages decided to conquer the world peacefully for
Zion, by the cunning of the symbolic snake, whose head should
constitute the government of the Jews initiated in the plans of the
sages (always masked even from their own people) and the body--the
Judean nation. Penetrating the bosoms of the governments
encountered on the way, this snake has undermined and eaten away
(overthrowing) all governments, non-Jewish forces according to
their growth.
"This it should also do in the future, carefully following the
outlined plan, until the cycle of the road travelled by it is
completed by the return of the head of the snake to Zion, and until
the snake will thus include and concentrate in the sphere of its
circle the whole of Europe, and through Europe the rest of the
world, utilizing all forces of conquest and by economic means in
order to subject also the other continents to its influence, to the
influence of its cycle. The return of the head of the snake could
be accomplished only over the razed plains of the governmental
power of all the European countries,--that is through economic
disorganization and ruin, introduced by Zion everywhere by means of
spiritual decadence and moral turpitude, chiefly, with the aid of
Jewish women under the guise of French, Italian and Spanish women,
the best introducers of immorality into the conduct of the rulers
of nations. Women in the hands of Zion serve as bait for those, who
owing to them are always in need of money, and therefore barter
their conscience in order to get money at any cost. This money, in
fact, is only loaned to them, for it quickly comes back to the
hands of bribing Zion through these very women, and at the same
time they have secured slaves for Zion."
A comparison of these pages shows that Nilus merely added to
Lutostansky's version the statement to be found in Butmi's version that
the political plan for the peaceful conquest of the world for Zion, was
devised in theory by Solomon and other sages _929 years before the birth
of Christ_. Lutostansky said in 1907 that "the head of the snake
represents the sages of Zion, and the body--the Judean nation," while
Nilus said that the "head should constitute the government of the Jews
initiated in the plans of the sages (always masked even from their own
people) and the body--the Judean nation." Thus the sages of Zion were
transformed by Nilus into "the government of the Jews" in order to
connect the "political plan" all the more closely with the "protocols."
The American editors have omitted this part of the Nilus epilogue,
evidently because it seemed even to them too absurd for American
consumption.
All of the literature about the "protocols" that appeared in various
parts of the world in 1920 is based on the "documents" vouched for by
the mysterious Sergius Nilus, and fortified by the irresponsible
Jew-baiter and intellectual pervert Ippolit Lutostansky.
That the Nilus-Lutostansky-Butmi campaign was just what the Tsarist
government desired may be seen from the photographic reproduction of
the letter sent to Lutostansky by Grand Duke Michael, who was regarded
as the most liberal among the Russian Grand Dukes. The letter appears
together with other letters of congratulation from members of the
Imperial family in the volume containing the passages quoted above.
[Illustration: Cyrillic
LETTER OF THANKS SENT BY GRAND DUKE MICHAEL TO LUTOSTANSKY FOR HIS
ANTI-SEMITIC WORK.]
[Transliteration:
Sostojashhij pri
Ego Imperatorskom Vysochestve
Gosudare Naslednike
i
velikom knjaze
Mihaile Aleksandroviche
7 Nojabrja 1902 g.
Nš 1443.
S.-Peterburg.
Ego Vysokoblagorodiju
I. I. Ljutostanskomu.
Kopija.
Milostivyj Gosudar'
Ippolit Iosifovich.
EGO IMPERATORSKOE VYSOCHESTVO
GOSUDAR' NASLEDNIK I VELIKIJ
KNJAZ' MIHAIL ALEKSANDROVICH
soizvolil blagosklonno prinjat'
podnesennyj Vami trud "Talmud i evrei",
prichem EGO VYSOCHESTVU blagougodno
bylo poruchit' mne peredat' Vam EGO
iskrennjuju priznatel'nost' za Vashe podnesenie.
Blagovolite prinjat' i moju lichnuju
glubokuju priznatel'nost' za prislannyj
mne ekzempljar Vashej knigi.
Proshu Vas prinjat' uverenie v sovershennom
moem uvazhenii i iskrennej
predannosti.
Vsegda gotovyj k uslugam D. Dashkov.
]
For the benefit of the antisemitic agitators in England, such as the
editors of The Morning Post, The New Witness, The Spectator, Blackwood's
Magazine, and a number of irresponsible publications needless to name,
it will prove instructive and interesting to reproduce a few additional
passages from the same volume, in order that they may know and
appreciate not only what that authority said concerning the Jews but
also what he thought of the English.
On pages 279, 282 and 283 of volume six of "The Talmud and the Jews,"
after outlining the alleged Jewish plot to gain world dominion,
Lutostansky wrote, in 1907:
"The English are typical pure-blooded Israelites. In ancient times
they were all red-headed, as we see from the descriptions in the
Bible and the New Testament. The characteristic of the Israelites
is known to the whole world under the sun. The characteristic of
the English, if we follow it closely, does not differ from the
Jewish in the slightest degree. Who are the English? This question
has long occupied the minds of many people in Europe, as well as in
England itself. The universal trading traits of the sons of Albion,
their looting politics, based on unfair business, and many other
characteristic traits of the nation which are not peculiar to any
of the other European nations that are even less cultured and
civilized that the English--all these have long seemed very
suspicious and have drawn attention to a certain kinship between
the Anglo-Saxons and the Jews. During the past two decades, in
England and America, also on the European continent, particularly
in France, a whole literature has been created, proving on the
basis of many facts, suppositions and historical references, that
the origin of the Anglo-Saxon race is not Germanic, but Semitic,
that the English are the direct descendants of the Israelites,
thrown by historic fate to the shores of the distant Albion....
"Indeed, the lion of Judah, has become the British lion and adorns
the coat of arms of the King of England. The harp of King David to
this day represents the coat of arms of Ireland....
"But not only are the kings of England the direct descendants of
Jewish Kings, they are even seated on the throne of David, on which
the ancient Jewish kings were married. This throne, on which Jacob
fell asleep on that night when he dreamt of the ladder and when the
Lord promised the kingdom to his posterity. This stone, called 'the
Stone of Fate,' which served for the weddings of Jewish Kings, was
brought to Ireland by the prophet Jeremiah. Tergus (?) transferred
it to Scotland, whence it was taken to London.
"It is curious to note that many prophecies about this fate of
Israel fit England absolutely, as for instance, the prophesy that
Israel will become a great nation, a kingdom on islands, ruling
over large colonies.
"North America is inhabited by the tribe of Menasseh of whom it was
said in ancient prophesy that he will become a 'separate great
nation.' The very word _saxon_ is derived from _Isaacson_, that is
the son of Israel....
"As one of the signs of kinship between the population of England
and ancient Israel, we cannot help pointing out the close
similarity between the English and Jewish tribes, the similarity in
their manner of speech, and above all, trading as the fundamental
characteristic of both nations....
"The particular reverence in which the English hold the Bible
smacks of the Old Testament of the Jews. Even the preference on the
part of the English for long clothes indicates something
Asiatic....
"Arousing of late the unanimous indignation of the whole civilized
world, the English at the same time call forth amazement at their
traits, instincts and aspirations which positively make them a
monster in the family of cultured and civilized European nations.
As the proverb says, there is no family without a black sheep.
Every monstrosity, however, is to be explained--Jews come from
Jews."
* * * * *
This interesting information is taken from Lutostansky's book. Nilus and
other writers of the Black Hundred camp pictured England in the same
manner immediately after 1905. It was then the Russian governmental
policy to discredit England and the Jews in the eyes of the Russian
people, and the Black Hundreds were employed by the Tsar as the medium
through which to carry on this agitation.
The "Black Hundreds" started their campaign in 1905, but their work was
so venomous, so absurd and so steeped in ignorance that there were few
people even in Russia who paid any attention to it.
That the Nilus protocols which were published by the Black Hundreds were
not taken seriously in Russia by the reactionaries or even by the Black
Hundreds who sought every means of discrediting the Jews, may be
gathered from the fact that in the most stupendous anti-Jewish plot ever
devised by the Russian government to justify Jewish massacres,--the
notorious Beilis case,--the protocols published eight years previously
were never used by the prosecution, even though it resorted to every
foul means that could be conjured up of slandering and vilifying the
Jewish people. The very persons who were instrumental in spreading the
"protocols" in Russia in 1905 seemed to have realized that the false
accusations which they contained were too transparent and too clumsy to
deceive even the most credulous, and so they were discarded.
But suddenly, after the armistice, a new edition of the Nilus book
containing the "protocols," dated 1917, made its appearance as suitable
to the chaotic conditions that prevailed in Russia and during the past
two years, as has been shown, it was reproduced in various countries.
This time the antisemitic propagandists are trying to connect the
"protocols" directly with Theodore Herzl and the Zionist movement. The
war, the peace treaty and bolshevism are characterized as the
fulfillment of these "protocols" which they say had been devised no less
than 929 years before the birth of Christ, by Solomon and other Sages.
The present "protocols" have been elaborated from the
"Retcliffe-Goedsche" versions by the Russian secret police department
and the Black Hundreds who ascribed all the evils in the world to the
Jews.
The Black Hundred writer, G. Butmi, whose book "Enemies of the Human
Race," containing the fabricated speech by a "famous Rabbi" side by side
with the "protocols," gives several characteristic passages in his
introduction that will convey to the reader a clear conception of the
type of men who have stood behind the movement to discredit the Jews
through the so-called "protocols."
On page 36 of this volume, Butmi wrote:
"The French Revolution, which ended in the execution of Louis XVI
in 1793, was engineered by England with the aid of the Jews and the
Judaized Masons. Only the Jews profited by the French Revolution,
even as they profited by the English Revolution, attaining in the
general turmoil equal rights with the native population of France."
Discussing the traits of the English people and finding a similarity
between them and the Jews, Butmi said on page 38:
"The British traits are well known all over the world--their
exceptional selfishness, their inhuman cruelty to foreigners, their
inherent instinct of exploitation, their theoretical stupidity are
mingled with practical shrewdness and utter brazenness."
On page 39 he said:
"Meanwhile the Britons have not distinguished themselves in
anything, if we are not to take into consideration the fact that
being thoroughly incapable of creating their own language, they
have by their talent to distort languages given to the present
English people a repulsive Judeo-Carthaginian imprint through their
shameless self-satisfaction, arrogance and treacherous
inclinations."
On page 41 he said:
"In 1843 the first lodge of the new Jewish union 'Bnai Brith' was
organized in New York. Gradually this Jewish 'Bnai Brith'
concentrates in its hands the direction of all Masonic lodges in
America, and through them it directs American politics."
[Illustration: Cyrillic
FACSIMILE OF A NILUS PROTOCOL PUBLISHED IN 1905. PHOTOGRAPHED FROM THE
BOOK IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM.]
[Transliteration:
-364-
Kto zapodozrit togda, chto vse eti problemy byli podstroeny
nami po politicheskomu planu, kotorago nikto ne
raskusil v techenii mnogih vekov?!. ....
Eshhe protokol.
Kogda my vocarimsja nam ne zhelatel'no budet sushhestvovanie
drugoj religii, krome nashej o Edinom Boge,
s Kotorym nasha sud'ba svjazana ego izbraniem i Kotorym
ta zhe nasha sud'ba ob'edinena s sud'bami mira.
Poetomu my dolzhny razrushit' vsjakija verovanija.
Esli ot etogo rodjatsja sovremennye ateisty, to, kak perehodnaja
stupen' eto ne pomeshaet nashim vidam, a posluzhit
primerom dlja teh pokolenij, kotoryja budut
slushat' propovedi nashi o religii Moiseja,
privedshej svoej stojkoj i obdumannoj sistemoj
k pokoreniju nam vseh narodov. V etom my
podcherknem i misticheskuju eja pravdu, v kotoroj, skazhem
my, osnovyvaetsja vsja eja vospitatel'naja sila.... .
Togda pri kazhdom sluchae my budem publikovat' stat'i,
v kotoryh budem sravnivat' nashe blagoe pravlenie s
proshlymi. Blagodejanija pokoja, hotja i vynuzhdennago vekami
volnenij, posluzhat k novomu rel'efu skazannago blaga.
Oshibki goevskih administracij budut opisyvat'sja nami
v samyh jarkih kraskah. My poseem takoe k nim
otvrashhenie, chto narody predpochtut pokoj v krepostnom
sostojanii pravam preslovutoj svobody, stol'
ih izmuchivshim i istoshhivshim samye istochniki chelovecheskago
sushhestvovanija, kotorye eksploatirovalis' tolpoju
prohodimcev, ne vedavshih, chto tvorjat...... Bezpoleznyja
peremeny pravlenij, k kotorym my podbivali goev,
kogda podkapyvali ih gosudarstvennyja zdanija, do togo nadoedjat
k tomu vremeni narodam, chto oni predpochtut
terpet' ot nas vse, lish' by ne riskovat' pereispytyvat'
perezhityja volnenija i nevzgody. My zhe osobenno budem
podcherkivat' istoricheskija oshibki goevskih pravlenij,
stol'ko vekov promuchivshih chelovechestvo otsutstviem
-365-
soobrazitel'nosti vo vsem, chto kasaetsja istinnago ego
blaga, v pogone za fantasticheskimi proektami social'nyh
blag, ne zamechaja, chto eti proekty vse bolee uhudshali,
a ne uluchshali polozhenie vseobshhih otnoshenij, na kotoryh
osnovyvaetsja chelovecheskaja zhizn'...
Vsja sila nashih principov i meroprijatij budet zakljuchena
v tom, chto oni nami vystavjatsja i istolkujutsja,
kak jarkij kontrast razlozhivshimsja starym porjadkam
obshhestvennago stroja.
Nashi filosofy budut obsuzhdat' vse nedostatki goevskih
verovanij, no nikto nikogda ne stanet obsuzhdat'
nashu veru s eja istinnoj tochki zrenija, tak kak ee
nikto osnovatel'no ne uznaet, krome nashih, kotorye
nikogda ne posmejut vydat' eja tajny.
V stranah, nazyvaemyh peredovymi, my sozdali
bezumnuju, grjaznuju, otvratitel'nuju literaturu.
Eshhe nekotoroe vremja posle vstuplenija nashego
vo vlast' my stanem pooshhrjat' eja sushhestvovanie,
chtoby ona rel'efnee obrisovala kontrast
rechej, programm, kotoryja razdadutsja s vysot
nashih....... Nashi umnye ljudi, vospitannye dlja
rukovodstva gojami, budut sostavljat' rechi, proekty,
zapiski, stat'i, kotorymi my budem vlijat' na
umy, napravljaja ih k namechennym nami ponjatijam
i znanijam.
Eshhe protokol.
Kogda my, nakonec okonchatel'no vocarimsja pri pomoshhi
gosudarstvennyh perevorotov, vsjudu podgotovlennyh
k odnomu i tomu zhe dnju, posle okonchatel'nago priznanija
negodnosti vseh sushhestvujushhih pravitel'stv (a
do etogo projdet eshhe ne malo vremeni, mozhet byt' i
celyj vek), my postaraemsja, chtoby protiv nas uzhe ne
bylo zagovorov. Dlja etogo my nemiloserdno kaznim vseh
kto vstretit nashe vocarenie s oruzhiem v rukah. Vsjakoe
novoe uchrezhdenie kakogo-libo tajnago obshhestva budet
]
[_Translation of the Nilus Protocol published in Russia in 1905._]