Those who are not familiar with crime, whose hands are unstained by

blood, and whose consciences have not been seared and discolored by the

blackness of guilt, may hesitate to give credence to these disgusting

details. Comparatively short as our national existence is, and though

brief the period since we cut loose as a nation from what we deemed the

polluted governments of Europe, still there was a time, even in these

United States, when such deeds as I have related would not and could not

be believed amongst us. There was a time when the ancient Romans did

not think that there existed such a crime as patricide; and hence it is.

that there was no law against it. There was actually no punishment known

to their laws for the commission of such a crime; and why, reader? Did

the ancient Romans encourage their children to kill their parents, or

to commit patricide? No. Far from it. No people in the world venerated

their parents more than the Roman children of the day to which I allude.

They had no law against the crime, because they did not believe it

possible that such a crime could be committed. Nor is it to be wondered

now, that many Americans should consider it almost impossible that

such deeds as I have laid to the charge of Jesuits and nuns, should be

perpetrated amongst us. But time, that exponent of all things, will

soon satisfy our people--as it did the Romans before us--that there is

nothing impossible, or even beyond the range of Jesuitical iniquity. The

archives of Jesuitical intrigue are now in a measure being thrown open

to the world. The diffusion of literature is so general, and human

curiosity, at the present period, so great, that nothing can escape its

searching inquiries. It is therefore to be hoped that our people will

not be much longer in ignorance of the iniquities of Jesuits. Americans

can now learn from historical evidence, which admits of no doubt, that

Jesuits have been expelled, successively, from thirty-nine different

governments; they can also learn, that by intrigue, deception, perjury

and poison, they have survived each and every one of those expulsions.

They may see,--if they can see anything but money,--that the Jesuits are

now making a final struggle for a settlement in this country; and if

they are not so stupid as not to see that similar causes must produce

similar events, they will infer that Jesuits, who have successively

and effectually introduced disunion, discord, and disorganization into

thirty-nine governments, cannot fail to do the same in ours. If by

poison and assassination they have dethroned the rulers of other

countries; if by debauchery and superstition in the confessional, they

have seduced their wives and daughters, can it be supposed that

our rulers shall escape, our government be secure, or our wives and

daughters safe from the daggers or subtle poisons of these notorious

fiends?

Let any American take the "Wandering Jew,"--let him read it attentively,

and reflect that the writer, Eugene Sue, is a Roman Catholic now living

in France,--and say whether there is any crime too daring for a Romish

priest or Jesuit. If he doubts what I relate of a young lady in the

beginning of this book, who was debauched by a Romish priest, and

poisoned by a nun, the mother abbess of a Jesuit seminary of learning,

to get rid of her illicit offspring; let him see the history of

Charlotte De Cordoville, in the Wandering Jew. He will see in the

history of that young lady, distinguished though she was for fortune,

beauty and charity, how she was reduced to misery and unhappiness, by

the intrigues of Jesuits. You will see how her own aunt was made the

instrument of all her misfortunes; but the aunt was first made a Jesuit,

and in that capacity she disregarded honor, truth, the relationship of

blood, and all the alliances of natural friendship. She caused her to be

imprisoned and maltreated. She and her associate Jesuits caused herself

and her lover to be poisoned or drugged into an insane stupor;--all for

the glory of the infallible church, and with a view of adding to its

ill-gotten treasures. For a full account of this transaction, see Eugene

Sue.

But Romish priests will not permit their people to read Eugene Sue; it

is a forbidden book; his royal holiness, the Pope, has cursed the book

and all who read it. He has cursed all who presume to discuss fairly the

merits of Popery; but even this will scarcely be believed by Americans.

Strange infatuation! Will Americans read a report made to the French

Chambers in Paris, by the Duke de Broglie, on the subject of public

instruction and Jesuitism? Will they further read a small work written

by Messrs. Michelet and Quinet, professors in the French national

college? If they do, it may open their eyes to consequences which may be

apprehended from even tolerating Jesuits amongst us. They will see that

Jesuits are the avowed enemies of liberal education, and that they are

sustained in their opposition to it by the curses of the Pope.

Professors Michelet and Quinet, in 1843, were discussing, in public, the

influence of the different religious orders. They had, as we are told,

commented upon that of the Templars, and were speaking of the society

of Jesuits, its origin and its interference in political affairs; and

though the professors themselves were Roman Catholics, though they

lectured in a Roman Catholic country and to Roman Catholic people, under

the sanction of a law of the land, yet Jesuits attempted to disturb

those lectures, by creating an uproar among the audience; just what

they are doing in this country. But what renders their conduct on this

occasion more strange, is the fact, that the very existence of Jesuits,

as a society is illegal in France. There is a law in France against

secret associations, and under this law they cannot exist. How pregnant

with instructions to Americans is this single historical fact! A few

years ago, Charles X. and his family had to fly from France, because,

under the influence of Jesuitism he violated his faith, he broke his

royal word and oath to the people. The people of France hunted him and

the Jesuits out of that country, as they would so many wild beasts. Such

then was the indignation of Popish France against that infernal

society, the Jesuits, that not one of them dared ta show his face in

the streets of Paris, without trembling for his life. Like dastardly

cowards, as all dishonorable and bad men are,--I never knew an

exception,--these wretches moved about like beasts of chase, "stealing

from one cover to another;" the representatives of all that was base

and dishonorable; the embodiment of all that was vile, false and

treacherous; the incarnation, the sentiment and the sediment of all that

was odious in fallen humanity. But see them now, in 1843 and '44, and

see the conduct of these very French people towards them. Though the

law forbids their existence, they have the hardihood to interrupt the

legitimate professors of the college of France, in their inquiries

into the spirit and influence of Jesuitism; and they are supported by a

portion of the very people, who, but a few years ago, pelted them

with rotten eggs and dead cats, through the streets of Paris. And what

effected this extraordinary change in popular sentiment? It is accounted

for in various ways; but I contend that the only fair solution of the

problem is to be found in the fact, that republican, democratic North

America hats opened her hospitable doors, and without suspicion, or

without dreaming that she was entertaining her deadliest foe, has spread

her tables to feed, and opened her purse to build asylums for these

scapegoats of the human family.

In 1830, Jesuits were crushed in France; they fled to the United States,

collected together their broken phalanxes, told brother Jonathan they

were a persecuted people, prevailed on him to build colleges for them,

and they have risen again, not only in this land of the brave, but even

in France, under the present king, Louis Philippe.

But notwithstanding these truths, the inquiry is sometimes made,--the

question has often been put even to myself,--"Are there really any

Jesuits in the United States?" "Do you believe that females are seduced

into nunneries?" "Do you believe they attempt to tamper with our

children or our wives?" I allude to the subject of privately tampering

with the wives and daughters of Americans thus frequently, because I

think it is all-important that they should thoroughly understand the

dangers to be apprehended from having any intercourse whatever with

Jesuits and nuns. Many a man asks this question, who accompanies it with

saying, the nunnery to which my daughter goes to school is not a Jesuit

nunnery. The priest to whom my wife confesses is not a Jesuit. The

priest to whom my daughter and servants go to confession is not, and

never was, a Jesuit; and consequently there is no danger from this

source. Many a man asks this question, and states these circumstances

in good faith, and feels secure that all is right, as nothing in his

opinion is to be feared but from Jesuits. This is a delusion. This

man's wife is already-governed by Jesuits through her confessor. It even

happens sometimes that the confessor himself is unconscious of the

part he is acting. The confessor acts under the immediate advice of his

bishop, to whom alone, in most cases, the Jesuits will entrust their

plans, unless the confessor is personally known to them; and unless the

confessor professes and solemnly swears to observe,--I use the words

of the oath,--"obedience, courage, secrecy, patience, craft, audacity,

perfect union among ourselves, having for our country, the world; for

our family, our order; for our queen, Rome."

Few of the confessors in this country, except the bishops, are entrusted

with the plans of the Jesuits; perhaps not ten, except they are of the

Jesuit order. It is through those confessors, that many of our American

youth, both male and female, are seduced into Popish schools, where

they become, with few exceptions, spiritless, false, slaves of abject

superstition, and the victims of a superficial education. No time is

given, no room left, as a modern writer expresses it, for the energies

of the mind to develop themselves. No sustenance is provided to nourish

the finer feelings of the heart. The intellect is checked, the flow of

imagination is stemmed, and all the warm and generous affections of the

soul are poisoned in their very bud.

For an instance of the fatal consequence of such an education as this, I

would call the attention of Americans, once more, to the Wandering Jew.

See the effects of a Jesuitical education upon the noble and generous

mind of Gabriel, the adopted son of the honest Dagoberth. What could be

more lovely than the disposition of this young man. His sentiments were

as upright and as chaste as fallen humanity would permit. But the Jesuit

society laid its impure hands upon him at an early period of life; they

persuaded his guileless adopted mother to go to confession,--not to a

Jesuit,--but to a _Cure_ of another order of priests; and the bishop of

this Cure gave him his instructions how to manage the mother of Gabriel.

The bishop knew that this adopted son of the virtuous and craftless wife

of Dagoberth, was one among other heirs of an immense estate, and he

directed the Cure to prevail upon this simple woman, while at confession

with him, to send Gabriel to a Jesuit school, and have him become a

Jesuit priest. Americans, read the sequel, and in that you will find a

warning, stronger and louder than I can give you, never to send a

child of yours to a Jesuit seminary. Let mothers read the history of

Dagoberth's wife, and if, after careful and honest perusal of it, they

will again commit their daughters to the care of a nurse who goes to

confession, I must only conclude that they are either infidels or

mad, or both. "_Quem Deus vult perdere prius dementat_." Gabriel,--the

virtuous and good Gabriel,--was nursed by Dagoberth's wife. From his

infancy, it seems he had no inclination to become a Jesuit; he appeared

to have an innate aversion to the order of Jesuits; he struggled against

uniting himself with them, as far as a sense of gratitude and a feeling

of affection for his adopted mother, the nurse of his childhood, would

permit. But all to no purpose; the mother was the dupe of her confessor.

He was instructed to win over the youth by any and every means; and,

with the advice and cooperation of Jesuits, the confessor of this really

honest, but deluded woman, succeeded, by perseverance and increased

fondness for her adopted child, in neutralizing his aversion towards

Jesuit priests.

In an evil hour he joined them; their traps were too well laid, and

without being seen in the business themselves, they accomplished their

iniquitous purposes through the instrumentality of this affectionate

and charitable woman. All was done through the confessional. How many

similar cases have I witnessed myself, in the course of my life, but

particularly while acting as a Romish priest in the confessional! How

often have I known some of the best of women, belonging to the Roman

Catholic church, unconsciously made the dupes of priests! How often have

I seen women, who, had they been properly educated, and under different

circumstances, would be an honor to any religious denomination, made the

instruments of all that was vile and flagitious, by Popish confessors!

How often have I seen Roman Catholic servant-maids in Protestant

families, inveigled by their _ghostly fathers_, in the confessional,

into treachery, deception and ingratitude, towards their employers and

benefactors! How often, as I have stated in my book on Popery, have

these Roman Catholic servants stolen the infants from their Protestant

mothers, and brought them to myself to be baptized!

There is now, in the state of Massachusetts, a young Protestant

clergyman, distinguished for his talents and piety, an honor to

his profession as a minister of the gospel, and to the state of

Massachusetts as a republican citizen, who was baptized by myself in

Philadelphia, when acting as a Roman Catholic priest. The name of the

gentleman and the date of his baptism were duly registered by me; but

the clerical Goths and Vandals, who succeeded me in St. Mary's church in

that city, _expunged_ the register which I kept, not deeming it safe to

leave in existence, if possible, any records of the iniquities taught or

practised in the Romish church.

There are in all bodies and in all denominations of clergymen, certain

individuals by whom it becomes fashionable to get married and baptized;

and during my residence in Philadelphia, I held rather a conspicuous

place among them. The congregation of St. Mary's church was a large

one. Notwithstanding my _schismatic_ doctrines,--I was not then deemed

a heretic,--crowds attended the church, and I believe,--though I cannot

tell the exact number,--that I baptized more children than any

clergyman in the city. Among these there were hundreds of Presbyterians,

Episcopalians, Methodists and Baptists, brought to me for that purpose,

by their Roman Catholic nurses, without the knowledge or consent of

their Protestant mothers.

This has ever been the treacherous practice of the Romish church, from

the days of Hildebrand down to the present moment. Dagoberth's wife is

not a solitary instance of the undue influence which Romish priests have

over those women who go to confession to them. Show me the house of a

Protestant family in the United States where there is a Roman Catholic,

male or female, who goes to confession and communion in the Romish

church, and I will show you a watch, a spy upon every act and deed and

movement of that family. There is not a letter that comes into such a

family, that is not watched by Popish servants. They soon know from whom

it comes, or whether anything is to be gained by intercepting it. The

confessor is immediately consulted, and it is ascertained, from some

servant in the house where it was written or where it was received, what

was its purport, or what it contained.

This practice of domestic _espionage_, we all know, is common in every

country where auricular confession is taught and practised; but it is

carried on more generally here, in proportion to the number of Roman

Catholics, than in any other country in the world; and the reason

is obvious. It is said that Jews never cheat each other; this is not

because they will not cheat as well as others. The reason is, they will

not trust each other. They are always on the watch, or, as Yankees would

express it, on the "look-out" for each other. Neither is it because

other countries or other people are less disposed to indulge in this

species of espionage than we are, that they have less of it: it is

because Catholic countries and Catholics will not trust each other. They

are on the _qui vive_ in all matters of intrigue, whether in domestic or

national affairs, whether in morals or politics. But poor Jonathan, with

all his smartness and all his cleverness, is probably the most gullible

biped that crawls upon this earth. I have known some poor servant-maids

and servant-men, who did not seem to have an idea beyond a Hottentot,

who, after one month's proper training in the confessional by a Romish

priest, could wheedle them out of all they possessed, except their

money; and never have I known a Romish confessor, not even the simplest

Reverend Yahoo from the bogs of Ireland or flats of Holland, who could

not filch from them whatever money he wanted for any given purpose.

The cunning of Americans, their knowledge of human nature and of things

in general, cannot be mentioned in the same category with the craft and

knowledge of man which Jesuit priests and confessors possess. This is

exemplified even in the case of American missionaries. Send an American

missionary to France, to Spain, or to any Catholic country, and without

aid from home he will starve. He has no Roman Catholic to come to

confession to him, to give him money to build a church for him; he has

no servant-maid or servant-man, through whom he can persuade, to give

him ten or twelve dollars for saying mass; no dying man or woman will

send for him, and pay him well for taking out of his pockets a set of

_oil stocks_, for the purpose of greasing them over, commencing on the

forehead, the tip of the nose, eyelids, the lips, the breast, the loins

and the soles of the feet. He has no one to send for him and pay highly,

for putting his hand in his breeches pocket and pulling out a box full

of _gods_, viz., wafers made of flower and water, and giving him one of

them. No. He has none, of these resources; he starves amongst them

until bread is sent to him from home. Talk of Yankee cunning! He is a

simpleton compared with a Jesuit. A Jesuit comes amongst us, or he

goes to any Protestant country, without a dollar, but he never travels

without his jackals, male and female. He brings with him his lay sisters

and his lay brothers; they soon scent out prey for him; they hire

themselves, as servant men and women, to Protestant Yankees, and the

first intimation we have of a Jesuit missionary amongst us, is the alarm

of some rich-toned bell, which we hear from the steeple of a church

built for him by Protestant Yankees. In place of sending home for

money to support him, as the American missionary has to do, a Jesuit

is sending home money to pay the passage of others to come out and

help him. He is purchasing some of the most valuable real estate that

Protestant Yankees own, with Yankee money, and writes home to his

royal holiness, the Pope, that Americans are a simple, gullible people.

"Persevere," says the Jesuit in America to his Pope; "already have

you three millions of faithful troops from your own faithful allies of

France and Spain and other Roman Catholic friendly governments, among

them. Besides this, holy father, your holiness will bear in mind that

many of those American heretics, are deserting their own churches and

joining us; and above all, most holy father, you will remember,--and

I pray you will graciously condescend to take note of it,--that these

Americans are all politicians, all fond of offices and would kiss

your----!!!!! as well as your toe, if your subjects will only aid them

in keeping their offices, which, I am happy to inform your holiness, we

are very willing to do, until we have numerical strength enough to

turn all the heretical wretches out, and fill up their places with your

faithful subjects. This, with the aid of the blessed Virgin Mary, we

shall be able to accomplish in a very few years. Press on, most holy

father; your subjects are coming in thousands per day. Send dispatches

to your royal brothers of Austria, Prussia and Spain; urge upon them to

send us help, and the glorious cause of your holy spouse, the infallible

church, the Queen of heaven, will triumph.

"Write to the greatest layman living, Daniel O'Connell, whom your

holiness intends shall receive from your hands a crown as king of

Ireland; urge upon him the necessity of sending over to the United

States all the repealers he can spare. Let him persuade the Irish, that

the union was the cause of all their grievances,--that they would

have nothing to complain of, if the union were repealed. Let not your

faithful son, D. O'Connell, ever allude to the fact,--the poor Irish

would never dream of it,--that the union is not quite fifty years old,

and that, for seven hundred years before its existence, the Irish were

much more quarrelsome, clamorous, litigious than they are now. It won't

do to let them know this; repeal would lose all its charms, and the

greatest layman living, would become,--between you and myself and the

holy Virgin Mary,--what he really is, the greatest scoundrel and the

biggest poltroon living. These heretical Americans are trying to cause

a division between your son Daniel O'Connell and your subjects. Poor

dolts! How little they know about us. We know what we are about Your

son need only go regularly to confession, and attend mass in some public

place, such as at a mass meeting of repealers, and nothing can separate

your subjects from him. I trust the move which we made the other day in

New York, through your faithful subject Lord Bishop Hughs, was highly

satisfactory to your holiness. Your royal holiness will be graciously

pleased to remember, that the first murmurings of repeal thunder,

proceeded from the city of New York, through that humble, pious and

zealous servant of the infallible church, the Lord Bishop Hughs. He

was among the first to call the people together, and, under pretence

of desiring repeal in Ireland, he told them to organize, to weigh well

their own power and influence in the political balance. He advised them

to give their support to no man but a repealer, and very judiciously

instructed his confessors in private, that it should be given only to

those who were most favorable to your holiness' spouse, the infallible

church. He succeeded well. The American heretics swallowed the bait;

the President of the United States for the time being, was the first

political gudgeon he caught. Next followed two young spawns of his. They

shouted repeal throughout the country. Your subjects promised to

elect the three of them presidents in succession; but when the hour of

election came, as in duty and by oath of allegiance to your holiness

bound, we acted as we thought would best serve the interest of our holy

church."

Auricular Confession and Popish Nunneries Volumes I. and II., Complete · 第 8 / 28 段