III. Of Repentance.

This office [of the Law] the New Testament retains and urges,

as St. Paul, Rom. 1, 18 does, saying: The wrath of God is

revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and

unrighteousness of men. Again, 3, 19: All the world is guilty

before God. No man is righteous before Him. And Christ says,

John 16, 8: The Holy Ghost will reprove the world of sin.

This, then, is the thunderbolt of God by which He strikes in a

heap [hurls to the ground] both manifest sinners and false

saints [hypocrites], and suffers no one to be in the right

[declares no one righteous], but drives them all together to

terror and despair. This is the hammer, as Jeremiah says, 23,

29: Is not My Word like a hammer that breaketh the rock in

pieces? This is not activa contritio or manufactured

repentance, but passiva contritio [torture of conscience],

true sorrow of heart, suffering and sensation of death.

This, then, is what it means to begin true repentance; and

here man must hear such a sentence as this: You are all of no

account, whether you be manifest sinners or saints [in your

own opinion]; you all must become different and do otherwise

than you now are and are doing [no matter what sort of people

you are], whether you are as great, wise, powerful, and holy

as you may. Here no one is [righteous, holy], godly, etc.

But to this office the New Testament immediately adds the

consolatory promise of grace through the Gospel, which must be

believed, as Christ declares, Mark 1,15: Repent and believe

the Gospel, i.e., become different and do otherwise, and

believe My promise. And John, preceding Him, is called a

preacher of repentance, however, for the remission of sins,

i.e., John was to accuse all, and convict them of being

sinners, that they might know what they were before God, and

might acknowledge that they were lost men, and might thus be

prepared for the Lord, to receive grace, and to expect and

accept from Him the remission of sins. Thus also Christ

Himself says, Luke 24, 47: Repentance and remission of sins

must be preached in My name among all nations.

But whenever the Law alone, without the Gospel being added

exercises this its office there is [nothing else than] death

and hell, and man must despair, like Saul and Judas; as St.

Paul, Rom. 7, 10, says: Through sin the Law killeth. On the

other hand, the Gospel brings consolation and remission not

only in one way, but through the word and Sacraments, and the

like, as we shall hear afterward in order that [thus] there is

with the Lord plenteous redemption, as Ps. 130, 7 says against

the dreadful captivity of sin.

However, we must now contrast the false repentance of the

sophists with true repentance, in order that both may be the

better understood.

Of the False Repentance of the Papists.

It was impossible that they should teach correctly concerning

repentance, since they did not [rightly] know the real sins

[the real sin]. For, as has been shown above, they do not

believe aright concerning original sin, but say that the

natural powers of man have remained [entirely] unimpaired and

incorrupt; that reason can teach aright, and the will can in

accordance therewith do aright [perform those things which are

taught], that God certainly bestows His grace when a man does

as much as is in him, according to his free will.

It had to follow thence [from this dogma] that they did [must

do] penance only for actual sins such as wicked thoughts to

which a person yields (for wicked emotion [concupiscence,

vicious feelings, and inclinations], lust and improper

dispositions [according to them] are not sins ), and for

wicked words and wicked deeds, which free will could readily

have omitted.

And of such repentance they fix three parts contrition,

confession, and satisfaction, with this [magnificent]

consolation and promise added: If man truly repent, [feel

remorse,] confess, render satisfaction, he thereby would have

merited forgiveness, and paid for his sins before God [atoned

for his sins and obtained a plenary redemption]. Thus in

repentance they instructed men to repose confidence in their

own works. Hence the expression originated, which was employed

in the pulpit when public absolution was announced to the

people: Prolong O God, my life, until I shall make

satisfaction for my sins and amend my life.

There was here [profound silence and] no mention of Christ nor

faith; but men hoped by their own works to overcome and blot

out sins before God. And with this intention we became priests

and monks, that we might array ourselves against sin.

As to contrition, this is the way it was done: Since no one

could remember all his sins (especially as committed through

an entire year), they inserted this provision, namely, that if

an unknown sin should be remembered later [if the remembrance

of a concealed sin should perhaps return], this also must be

repented of and confessed etc. Meanwhile they were [the person

was] commended to the grace of God.

Moreover, since no one could know how great the contrition

ought to be in order to be sufficient before God, they gave

this consolation: He who could not have contrition, at least

ought to have attrition, which I may call half a contrition or

the beginning of contrition, for they have themselves

understood neither of these terms nor do they understand them

now, as little as I. Such attrition was reckoned as contrition

when a person went to confession.

And when it happened that any one said that he could not have

contrition nor lament his sins (as might have occurred in

illicit love or the desire for revenge, etc.), they asked

whether he did not wish or desire to have contrition [lament].

When one would reply Yes (for who, save the devil himself,

would here say No?), they accepted this as contrition, and

forgave him his sins on account of this good work of his

[which they adorned with the name of contrition]. Here they

cited the example of St. Bernard, etc.

Here we see how blind reason, in matters pertaining to God,

gropes about, and, according to its own imagination, seeks for

consolation in its own works, and cannot think of [entirely

forgets] Christ and faith. But if it be [clearly] viewed in

the light, this contrition is a manufactured and fictitious

thought [or imagination], derived from man's own powers,

without faith and without the knowledge of Christ. And in it

the poor sinner, when he reflected upon his own lust and

desire for revenge, would sometimes [perhaps] have laughed

rather than wept [either laughed or wept, rather than to think

of something else], except such as either had been truly

struck by [the lightning of] the Law, or had been vainly vexed

by the devil with a sorrowful spirit. Otherwise [with the

exception of these persons] such contrition was certainly mere

hypocrisy, and did not mortify the lust for sins [flames of

sin]; for they had to grieve, while they would rather have

continued to sin, if it had been free to them.

As regards confession, the procedure was this: Every one had

[was enjoined] to enumerate all his sins (which is an

impossible thing). This was a great torment. From such as he

had forgotten [But if any one had forgotten some sins] he

would be absolved on the condition that, if they would occur

to him, he must still confess them. In this way he could never

know whether he had made a sufficiently pure confession

[perfectly and correctly], or when confessing would ever have

an end. Yet he was pointed to his own works, and comforted

thus: The more fully [sincerely and frankly] one confesses,

and the more he humiliates himself and debases himself before

the priest, the sooner and better he renders satisfaction for

his sins; for such humility certainly would earn grace before

God.

Here, too, there was no faith nor Christ, and the virtue of

the absolution was not declared to him, but upon his

enumeration of sins and his self-abasement depended his

consolation. What torture, rascality, and idolatry such

confession has produced is more than can be related.

As to satisfaction, this is by far the most involved

[perplexing] part of all. For no man could know how much to

render for a single sin, not to say how much for all. Here

they have resorted to the device of imposing a small

satisfaction, which could indeed be rendered, as five

Paternosters, a day's fast, etc.; for the rest [that was

lacking] of the [in their] repentance they were directed to

purgatory.

Here, too, there was nothing but anguish and [extreme] misery.

[For] some thought that they would never get out of purgatory,

because, according to the old canons seven years' repentance

is required for a single mortal sin. Nevertheless, confidence

was placed upon our work of satisfaction, and if the

satisfaction could have been perfect, confidence would have

been placed in it entirely, and neither faith nor Christ would

have been of use. But this confidence was impossible. For

although any one had done penance in that way for a hundred

years, he would still not have known whether he had finished

his penance. That meant forever to do penance and never to

come to repentance.

Here now the Holy See at Rome, coming to the aid of the poor

Church, invented indulgences, whereby it forgave and remitted

[expiation or] satisfaction, first, for a single instance, for

seven years, for a hundred years and distributed them among

the cardinals and bishops, so that one could grant indulgence

for a hundred years and another for a hundred days. But he

reserved to himself alone the power to remit the entire

satisfaction.

Now, since this began to yield money, and the traffic in bulls

became profitable he devised the golden jubilee year [a truly

goldbearing year], and fixed it at Rome. He called this the

remission of all punishment and guilt. Then the people came

running, because every one would fain have been freed from

this grievous, unbearable burden. This meant to find [dig up]

and raise the treasures of the earth. Immediately the Pope

pressed still further, and multiplied the golden years one

upon another. But the more he devoured money, the wider grew

his maw.

Later, therefore, he issued them [those golden years of his]

by his legates [everywhere] to the countries, until all

churches and houses were full of the Golden Year. At last he

also made an inroad into purgatory among the dead, first, by

founding masses and vigils, afterwards, by indulgences and the

Golden Year, and finally souls became so cheap that he

released one for a farthing.

But all this, too, was of no avail. For although the Pope

taught men to depend upon, and trust in, these indulgences

[for salvation], yet he rendered the [whole] matter again

uncertain. For in his bulls he declares: Whoever would share

in the indulgences or a Golden Year must be contrite, and have

confessed, and pay money. Now, we have heard above that this

contrition and confession are with them uncertain and

hypocrisy. Likewise, also no one knew what soul was in

purgatory, and if some were therein, no one knew which had

properly repented and confessed. Thus he took the precious

money [the Pope snatched up the holy pence], and comforted

them meanwhile with [led them to confidence in] his power and

indulgence, and [then again led them away from that and]

directed them again to their uncertain work.

If, now [although], there were some who did not believe

[acknowledge] themselves guilty of such actual sins in

[committed by] thoughts, words, and works,--as I, and such

as I, in monasteries and chapters [fraternities or colleges of

priests], wished to be monks and priests, and by fasting,

watching, praying, saying Mass, coarse garments, and hard

beds, etc., fought against [strove to resist] evil thoughts,

and in full earnest and with force wanted to be holy, and yet

the hereditary, inborn evil sometimes did in sleep what it is

wont to do (as also St. Augustine and Jerome among others

confess),--still each one held the other in esteem, so that

some, according to our teaching, were regarded as holy,

without sin and full of good works, so much so that with this

mind we would communicate and sell our good works to others,

as being superfluous to us for heaven. This is indeed true,

and seals, letters, and instances [that this happened] are at

hand.

[When there were such, I say] These did not need repentance.

For of what would they repent, since they had not indulged

wicked thoughts? What would they confess [concerning words not

uttered], since they had avoided words? For what should they

render satisfaction, since they were so guiltless of any deed

that they could even sell their superfluous righteousness to

other poor sinners? Such saints were also the Pharisees and

scribes in the time of Christ.

Here comes the fiery angel, St. John [Rev. 10], the true

preacher of [true] repentance, and with one [thunderclap and]

bolt hurls both [those selling and those buying works] on one

heap, and says: Repent! Matt. 3, 2. Now, the former [the poor

wretches] imagine: Why, we have repented! The latter [the

rest] say: We need no repentance. John says: Repent ye, both

of you, for ye are false penitents; so are these [the rest]

false saints [or hypocrites], and all of you on either side

need the forgiveness of sins, because neither of you know what

true sin is not to say anything about your duty to repent of

it and shun it. For no one of you is good; you are full of

unbelief, stupidity, and ignorance of God and God's will. For

here He is present of whose fulness have all we received, and

grace for grace, John 1, 16, and without Him no man can be

just before God. Therefore, if you wish to repent, repent

aright- your penance will not accomplish anything [is

nothing]. And you hypocrites, who do not need repentance, you

serpents' brood, who has assured you that you will escape the

wrath to come? etc. Matt. 3, 7; Luke 3, 7.

In the same way Paul also preaches, Rom. 3, 10-12: There is

none righteous, there is none that understandeth, there is

none that seeketh after God, there is none that doeth good, no

not one; they are all gone out of the way; they are together

become unprofitable. And Acts 17, 30: God now commandeth all

men everywhere to repent. "All men," he says; no one excepted

who is a man. This repentance teaches us to discern sin,

namely, that we are altogether lost, and that there is nothing

good in us from head to foot [both within and without], and

that we must absolutely become new and other men.

This repentance is not piecemeal [partial] and beggarly

[fragmentary], like that which does penance for actual sins,

nor is it uncertain like that. For it does not debate what is

or is not sin, but hurls everything on a heap, and says: All

in us is nothing but sin [affirms that, with respect to us,

all is simply sin (and there is nothing in us that is not sin

and guilt)]. What is the use of [For why do we wish]

investigating, dividing, or distinguishing a long time? For

this reason, too, this contrition is not [doubtful or]

uncertain. For there is nothing left with which we can think

of any good thing to pay for sin, but there is only a sure

despairing concerning all that we are, think, speak, or do

[all hope must be cast aside in respect of everything], etc.

In like manner confession, too, cannot be false, uncertain, or

piecemeal [mutilated or fragmentary]. For he who confesses

that all in him is nothing but sin comprehends all sins

excludes none, forgets none. Neither can the satisfaction be

uncertain, because it is not our uncertain, sinful work, but

it is the suffering and blood of the [spotless and] innocent

Lamb of God who taketh away the sin of the world.

Of this repentance John preaches, and afterwards Christ in the

Gospel, and we also. By this [preaching of] repentance we dash

to the ground the Pope and everything that is built upon our

good works. For all is built upon a rotten and vain

foundation, which is called a good work or law, even though no

good work is there, but only wicked works, and no one does the

Law (as Christ, John 7, 19, says), but all transgress it.

Therefore the building [that is raised upon it] is nothing but

falsehood and hypocrisy, even [in the part] where it is most

holy and beautiful.

And in Christians this repentance continues until death,

because, through the entire life it contends with sin

remaining in the flesh, as Paul, Rom. 7, 14-25, [shows]

testifies that he wars with the law in his members, etc.; and

that, not by his own powers, but by the gift of the Holy Ghost

that follows the remission of sins. This gift daily cleanses

and sweeps out the remaining sins, and works so as to render

man truly pure and holy.

The Pope, the theologians, the jurists, and every other man

know nothing of this [from their own reason], but it is a

doctrine from heaven, revealed through the Gospel, and must

suffer to be called heresy by the godless saints [or

hypocrites].

On the other hand, if certain sectarists would arise, some of

whom are perhaps already extant, and in the time of the

insurrection [of the peasants] came to my own view, holding

that all those who had once received the Spirit or the

forgiveness of sins, or had become believers, even though they

should afterwards sin, would still remain in the faith, and

such sin would not harm them, and [hence] crying thus: "Do

whatever you please; if you believe, it all amounts to

nothing; faith blots out all sins," etc.--they say, besides,

that if any one sins after he has received faith and the

Spirit, he never truly had the Spirit and faith: I have had

before me [seen and heard] many such insane men, and I fear

that in some such a devil is still remaining [hiding and

dwelling].

It is, accordingly, necessary to know and to teach that when

holy men, still having and feeling original sin, also daily

repenting of and striving with it, happen to fall into

manifest sins, as David into adultery, murder, and blasphemy,

that then faith and the Holy Ghost has departed from them

[they cast out faith and the Holy Ghost]. For the Holy Ghost

does not permit sin to have dominion, to gain the upper hand

so as to be accomplished, but represses and restrains it so

that it must not do what it wishes. But if it does what it

wishes, the Holy Ghost and faith are [certainly] not present.

For St. John says, 1 Ep. 3, 9: Whosoever is born of God doth

not commit sin,... and he cannot sin. And yet it is also the

truth when the same St. John says, 1 Ep. 1, 8: If we say that

we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in

us.

The Smalcald Articles · 第 10 / 22 题