5. In every suppuration of the middle ear combined with inflammation of

the mastoid process in which fever, vertigo and headache are developed

during the course of the affection, which may indicate a dangerous

complication. In such cases the indication for the operation is vital.

(Politzer, Roosa, Buck.)

As to the time when the operation should be performed, writers do not

agree. While one proposes that the operation should be done as soon

as there are symptoms of inflammation of the mastoid process, another

defers it till the dangerous symptoms (fever, headache, vertigo, etc.,)

set in. The latter proposal must not be followed, as in many cases it

would be too late; on the other hand, many cases will recover without

an operation. As far as it can be formulated, I would say that in a

given case of acute purulent inflammation of the mastoid process I

would first apply leeches, poultices, cathartics, antiflogistics.

If the inflammation is not promptly subdued, I would make a Wilds'

incision, including the periosteum, if the bone is found softened; or

if a fistulous opening is found, this should be enlarged at once. If

the bone is found healthy and not roughened, if there is no fever,

vertigo, headache, etc., I would wait a few days; if the symptoms,

pain, tenderness, etc., do not subside, I would then perforate the

mastoid process.

For the performance of the operation trepans were formerly used, which

were replaced by drills which are still used by Buck, Jacobi, Lucae

and others, but by most operators they have been set aside, owing to

their uncertain and dangerous advance in the deep parts, and on account

of their soiling the wound with splinters. The most rational and safe

method is by means of the chisel, as recommended by Schwartz, and is

performed as follows: The patient being anæsthetized, a perpendicular

incision beginning a little above the linea temporalis, extending an

inch and a half in length immediately behind the attachment of the

auricle. Formerly I employed a straight incision, but recently have

followed the suggestion of Politzer, and from the superior end of the

perpendicular incision a second one is made backward at right angles,

thus forming a flap, which I have found to simplify the operation very

much, as it affords a better view of the locality and extent of any

pathological changes which may have taken place, and gives more room

for operative procedures, and the periosteum can readily be removed

to any desired extent. The linea temporalis and the more or less

strongly developed protuberance on the posterior superior orifice of

the osseous meatus, so strongly urged by authors, are very nice guides

theoretically or to point out on an exceptional skull in the class

room, but practically are seldom well enough developed to be of any use

to the operator. The best guide to go by is to take the superior wall

of the meatus as the upper boundary, and the angle formed by the plane

of the mastoid with the posterior wall of the external meatus for the

anterior boundary when opening the mastoid. This is best determined by

pressing the finger into the meatus. Often in children, and when the

bone is diseased in adults, the cortical plate of bone can be removed

with the hand chisel, and we come at once upon the pus cavity, or

diplœ, or cholesteatomatous epidermic masses, or a sequestrum of dead

bone, or bleeding granulation tissue, or whatever the case may present.

Sometimes the external plate is very thick and we have to chisel our

way carefully for almost half an inch before reaching the diplœ, or

may find the entire mastoid process sclerossed. No absolute rule can

be given as to the depth it is safe to penetrate. Schwartz says "never

to go deeper than 25 mm." Buck says "it is better to place the extreme

limit at 20 mm," about three-fourths of an inch.

Although I do not consider the operation a particularly dangerous

one, especially with the chisel where we can watch each step of the

operation; and even though we opened into the lateral sinus or the

duramater, the injury would not be necessarily fatal. Yet I would not

advise any one to attempt it (unless the indications are imperative)

who has not performed the operation on the dead subject. Politzer

says "no one should operate on the living before having performed the

operation at least forty or fifty times on the dead." I cannot close

this article better than in the words of Dr. St. John Roosa, to whose

admirable work I am indebted for a large portion of this article.

"Yet, hesitation, when the way is plain, or when the chances are

largely on the side of the necessity of the removal of pus, cannot be

too sternly condemned. No drug has yet been discovered which can be

substituted for the scalpel or trephine when pus has actually formed in

the mastoid cells. I wish, however, to repeat what I have said before

on the subject of surgical operations. I am in full accord with the

great English surgeon, Sir James Paget, who, in his admirable lectures,

expresses many times his hesitation to perform any surgical operation,

however trivial, that is not absolutely required. We have no right,

I think, to perform operations to clear up doubtful diagnosis. If in

case the operation proves to have been unnecessary, the patient will

be decidedly the worse for it. If we put ourselves in the place of our

patients, what we may regard as a trifling thing--"a mere cut"--will

not be so esteemed. A mere cut, when unnecessary, may have the most

serious consequences, and all the history and symptoms should be

carefully weighed before even that is undertaken. Such care will never

prevent prompt, rapid and thorough surgical interference when demanded.

In teaching medical students, I have always found them, when fully

awakened to the dangers of neglecting certain diseases, to be more apt

to do too much than too little, especially with the knife and active

drugs. It is possible, also, that the crying ignorance and neglect of

the previous decades in regard to the treatment of aural disease has

had a tendency to cause us, who see many of the afflictions of the ear,

to lean toward the side of surgical operations upon the drum, head and

mastoid. This is a leaning no less dangerous to the cure of some cases

than was the steering toward Scylla or Charybdis to the safe navigation

of ancient mariners."

----------

A CASE OF ANOMALOUS DEVELOPMENT OF THE

ANTERIOR PILLARS OF THE SOFT PALATE.

BY B. L. MILLIKIN, M. D.,

Oculist and Aurist to Charity Hospital, Cleveland, O.

Some time since, Mrs. G. D., age about 23, applied to me on account of

deafness and tinnitus of both ears. In pursuing my examination I found

the following unusual anatomical relations of the anterior pillars of

the soft palate, which I deem not unworthy of record.

The uvula and posterior border of the soft palate are normal in

appearance and formation; but, beginning about the middle of the

anterior pillars, these gradually widen out into thick, heavy, broad,

muscular folds, which attach themselves firmly to the sides and dorsum

of the tongue, extending two or three lines upon the dorsum. They seem

to be intimately connected with the muscle of the tongue itself, making

them very firm. The posterior pillars are much less well developed than

the anterior, and do not control or prevent the drawing forward of the

soft palate when the tongue is protruded. The tonsils are small in size

but normally located.

The attachments of these bands give a peculiar appearance to the

throat. When the tongue is in a state of rest, in the bottom of the

mouth, or, better still, when the tongue is depressed, these bands hang

like two large curtains, narrowing very much the faucial opening. When

the tongue is protruded they are put upon the stretch, and narrow very

greatly the faucial opening by drawing forward and downward the whole

of the soft palate, so that the posterior border of the soft palate and

uvula rest firmly upon the dorsum of the tongue. When the tongue is

thus protruded the attachments of these membranes are brought forward

almost to the teeth.

In a state of relaxation there is formed back of these folds, on

either side, quite a deep cavity, which often collects quantities of

solid food, to the great annoyance of the patient. She even sometimes

is obliged to remove these obstructions with the fingers, or, by

gulping or swallowing frequently, is able to dislodge them. She has no

difficulty in swallowing liquids.

There is some impediment in her speech, a peculiar lisping as if

she did not have good control of her tongue, which she has always

attributed to the fact that she is of German parentage. Her English is,

however, very good, other than as above indicated.

In looking up what anatomical literature is at my command, I find

no reference to any anomalies of this kind, although I have been

able to consult the standard French, German and English works on

general anatomy. I myself have never seen a case with an anatomical

construction approaching this, so I, therefore, present it for record.

----------

HINTS ON VOCAL TRAINING--THE BREATH.

By BERNARD W. FISHER, A. M.

The prevalence of throat troubles is so marked in America, and by no

means least so in this city, that if one hundred individuals, collected

at random, had their throats examined, it is probable that four out of

every five would be found to have these delicate organs more or less

affected. Whatever cause may be assigned by the medical expert in each

particular case, the importance of a thorough mastery of the art of

correct breathing can hardly be insisted upon too strongly. If it be

urged that the widely distributed works of Behnke and others must have

put an end to any general ignorance of the importance of this branch of

vocal training, I can only reply that a defective style of breathing is

by no means uncommon even in public singers, while among amateurs it is

so rare that a perfect management of the breath excites in a critical

observer a feeling of gratified surprise. The name and works of Behnke

have, of course, been known in this country for a considerable time,

but some of his statements are too striking to be omitted in an article

on this subject. When lecturing at the Tonic Sol-fa College, London,

he took ten students and measured their lung capacity in cubic inches,

by means of the spirometer, with wrong or "collar-bone" breathing. He

then showed them how to breathe correctly, that is, midriff and rib

breathing. The average increase among the ten was twenty-five cubic

inches of air; the least increase twelve inches, and the greatest

forty-five. He adds: "I imagine that these figures are more eloquent

than any words, and I think it superfluous to make any further comment

on them."--('Mechanism of the Human Voice,' page 20.) Now, putting

aside the extreme increase of forty-five inches, let anyone consider

what an increase in lung capacity of twenty-five cubic inches of air

must mean to the vocalist in the execution of difficult passages, to

the speaker using his voice by the hour, and, lastly, to the running

athlete. It will surprise a young man commencing vocal training to

inform him that, at the same time, he will become a better man in the

gymnasium and the race; but unless good lungs are an advantage to

the athlete in name only, the above figures tell their own tale. I

may add that, in teaching young men and boys, I always put this view

of the subject before them, knowing that it will be an incentive to

their acquiring a thorough mastery over the interesting art of "taking

breath."

Correct breathing cannot _cure_ disease. The medical expert must do

that. But it will _prevent_ disease; and when the throat, under proper

treatment, has been brought to a healthy state, it will assuredly be

the chief means of keeping it in that condition. The following is a

striking instance to the same effect:

Some years since, an English clergyman had to give up all ministerial

duty from "Clerical Sore Throat." Acting under the absurd advice of

a London teacher of elocution, he resided in Spain for five years

without the slightest benefit. He then returned, and at the house of

the elocutionist who had made him an exile saw a copy of Behnke's

celebrated work. Coming to the conclusion that the author must be

rather clever, he at once consulted him. Following his advice he had

his throat made medically sound by Lennox Browne, and then took the

usual course in breathing and voice production under Behnke. A short

time after I was with Herr Behnke, when a post card arrived from the

clergyman: "I preached yesterday in Chichester cathedral, and was

congratulated on the strength of my voice and the ease with which I

filled the building."

A few weeks since I heard a sermon in a Cleveland church. The preacher

took short "collar-bone" breathings, using twice the power necessary

for the building, and towards the conclusion was in evident distress

(which naturally communicated itself to his hearers), a failing voice

and perspiring face. If before entering the ministry he had learned

to breathe and use his voice properly, such troubles could never have

existed.

There is yet another unpleasant affliction which correct breathing will

rarely fail to cure, a high-pitched and effeminate voice in a man. I

quote again a case from the same work:

Mr. M----, a tall, thin young man, engaged in evangelistic work,

suffered from "weakness of voice." He spoke chiefly in a "child voice,"

over which he had very little control. His breathing power increased

by sixty cubic inches in two lessons. "In one week more," adds Herr

Behnke, "I could dismiss him with a full, sonorous man's voice in place

of the uncertain child's squeak with which he had come to me."

I must lastly point out that the cure of stammering often entirely

depends on the management of the breath, and in all cases it must be an

important agent.

The limits of this paper allow but a brief notice of the best course

for a breathing instructor to follow. Let the pupil lie down on his

back, place the hand lightly on the lower part of the lungs, and tell

him to inhale easily through the nostrils, allowing the air to fill

the lower part of the lungs, avoiding all motion of the shoulders and

heaving up of the chest. When the lungs are fully inflated count four

with deliberation, and let the pupil inhale all the air as suddenly as

possible. Gradually increase the counting week by week up to twelve,

which marks a real control over the unused muscles. The next course is

for the pupil to inhale suddenly and exhale slowly. The instruction

given is of necessity meagre, but it need hardly be pointed out, no

written directions can take the place of personal teaching. From four

to six weeks is usually sufficient for the young and vigorous to gain

command over the breathing apparatus; older pupils have sometimes great

difficulty in mastering the muscles, unruly through disuse.

Herr Behnke allows no use of the voice beyond ordinary speaking while

the breathing exercises are going on. I have followed this rule much

modified, and do not find the results unsatisfactory.

The total neglect of this important subject in both American and

English schools is to me perfectly astounding. Half an hour a week for

three months would be ample for the purpose. These few hours would

confer a benefit of the highest value, and lasting a lifetime.

The Cleveland Medical Gazette.

_A MONTHLY JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY._

----------

One Dollar per Annum in Advance.

----------

All letters and communications should be addressed to the Cleveland Medical

Gazette, No. 5 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio.

A. R. BAKER, M. D., _Editor_. S. W. KELLEY, M. D., _Associate Editor_.

====================================================================

EDITORIAL.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

We have mailed the Gazette regularly to a number of our

friends who have not remitted their dollar. We hope they will do so

soon.

----------

MEDICAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION.

Last month we urged the necessity of the profession organizing a

medical defense association. We publish this month the proceedings of

the Chicago Medical Society, in which the same question is discussed

very fully.

----------

STATE SOCIETY REORGANIZATION.

The editor of the Cincinnati Medical Journal asks the secretaries

of local societies to bring the matter before their respective

organizations, and suggests that they invite expression upon the

following propositions:

1. To so change the constitution of the State Society as to make the

members of county societies members of the State Society simply by

virtue of their local membership.

2. Present members of the State Society to remain members without

reference to membership in local societies.

3. All members to stand upon an equal footing, thus doing away with the

delegate system.

4. All papers to be presented to the State Society must first be

presented to the local society, by which it may be referred to the

State Society.

----------

MEDICAL PRACTICE BILL.

A bill to establish a medical board of examiners and licenses, and to

regulate the practice of medicine and surgery in the State of Ohio, and

to define the duties and powers of such board, will be presented to the

Legislature of Ohio. It provides for:

1. A mixed board so far as schools are concerned.

2. No attache of a medical college is eligible to a place on the board.

3. All candidates for the practice of medicine in Ohio shall submit to

an examination by this board.

4. None but graduates in medicine and surgery shall be eligible to

examination.

5. Licenses may be refused or revoked for criminal or dishonorable

conduct.

6. Graduates at present practicing in the State may continue without

submitting to an examination, but must register in the office of the

probate judge.

These are the essential features of the bill, and on the whole good.

It does not interfere with physicians already in practice, which

has caused the failure of nearly every bill presented to the Ohio

Legislature becoming a law. Excluding college professors from becoming

members of the board is fair to the profession, and saves the bill from

being the tool of the medical colleges, unlike the Pennsylvania law,

and yet it does not ignore the medical schools entirely as educational

and graduating bodies, like the Illinois and West Virginia laws. It is

impracticable, even if desirable, to ignore denominational lines in

medical legislation.

----------

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF YOUNG GIRLS.

The following remarks were made by the president of the Royal College

of Physicians, December 28, and were the result of an inquiry into the

conduct of Dr. Haywood Smith, by the college, for having physically

examined the girl, Eliza Armstrong, without the consent of parent or

guardian:

"It is, in the opinion of this college, a grave professional and moral

offence for any physician to examine physically a young girl, _even_

at the request of a parent, without having first satisfied himself

that some decided medical good is likely to accrue to the patient

from the examination, and, also, without having first explained to

the parent or legal guardian of the girl the advisability of such

examination in general and the special objections that exist to their

being made. Moreover, the college feels that a young girl should on

no consideration be examined, excepting in the presence of a matron

of mature age, and, so far as the physician knows, of good moral

character...." The rest of the remarks were put direct to Dr. Smith,

and are of no general interest.

The decision of the college was favorable to Dr. Smith; his name was

_not_ erased from the roll.

----------

SUET BANDAGES.

"These are admirable for dressing. You can make them by melting mutton

tallow over a slow fire. Have your bandages of close cloth, ready cut

the proper length and breadth, dip them into the suet; when saturated,

hold them so as to let them drip off, or the grease may be spread upon

the cloth. Hang them over a line where they may be protected from

dust; let them cool, fold them, put away for use. These bandages are

especially adapted to dress old ulcers and wounds. They are smooth

and adapt themselves perfectly to the surface; are agreeable to

the patient, and can be medicated with any therapeutical agent you

wish."--_American Medical Digest_, quoting Dr. Edwin Brock in _New

England Medical Monthly_.

A disadvantage of the tallow bandage is its becoming rancid. Vaseline,

not becoming rancid, has been tried, but melts too easily. For most

purposes the wax bandage is as good as the tallow, perfectly smooth and

does not become rancid, but cannot very well be medicated. A useful

material for a bandage of this kind is the paraffine, as recommended by

Tait.

The tallow bandage can be put to another use by those who do not live

convenient to an instrument dealer. When made wide the tallow bandage

can be rolled into a very good rectal bougie, large or smaller as you

wish by a few more or less thicknesses of the cloth. By the same means

a very good vaginal dilator can be extemporized for cases of stricture

or vaginismus. But where it is to remain long _in situ_ for these

cases beeswax or a mixture of beeswax and tallow, which are generally

available in the country, make a better substitute. "Cere cloth" was

formerly much used by gynecologists.

----------

We observe that Dr. Piffard has retired from his editorial connection

with the Journal of Cutaneous and Venereal Diseases. The Journal

will be continued under the sole editorial charge of Dr. P. A.

Morrow. We may remind our readers that this is the only publication

in the English language devoted to Skin and Venereal Diseases, and

during the three years of its existence it has won for itself a high

reputation for scientific excellence as well as practical utility. In

addition to presenting all that is new and valuable in these special

departments, the colored lithographs and wood engravings with which

the original articles are illustrated are worth more than the price

of subscriptions. Judging from the handsome appearance of the January

number, which is enriched by an admirable chromo-lithograph and a

number of well-executed woodcuts, and the eminently practical character

of its contents, this high standard will be maintained in the future.

SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICAGO MEDICAL SOCIETY.

OFFICIAL REPORT.

_Stated Meeting, January 18th, 1886._

President pro. tem., D. W. Graham, M. D., in the chair.

Dr. E. J. Doering read a paper entitled

MUTUAL PROTECTION AGAINST BLACKMAIL.

The Cleveland Medical Gazette, Vol. 1, No. 4, February 1886 · 第 2 / 4 段