VI

It is perfectly clear that the Countess of Somerset was led to confess

on the promise of the King's mercy. It is equally clear that she did not

know what she was confessing to. Whatever might have been her conspiracy

with Anne Turner it is a practical certainty that it did not result in

the death of Thomas Overbury. There is no record of her being allowed

any legal advice in the seven months that had elapsed since she

had first been made a virtual prisoner. She had been permitted no

communication with her husband. For all she knew, Overbury might indeed

have died from the poison which she had caused to be sent to the Tower

in such quantity and variety. And she went to trial at Westminster

guilty in conscience, her one idea being to take the blame for having

brought about the murder of Overbury, thinking by that to absolve her

husband of any share in the plot. She could not have known that her plea

of guilty would weaken Somerset's defence. The woman who could go to

such lengths in order to win her husband was unlikely to have done

anything that might put him in jeopardy. One can well imagine with what

fierceness she would have fought her case had she thought that by doing

so she could have helped the man she loved.

But Frances Howard, no less than her accomplice Anne Turner, was the

victim of a gross subversion of justice. That she was guilty of a cruel

and determined attempt to poison Overbury is beyond question, and, being

guilty of that, she was thoroughly deserving of the fate that overcame

Anne Turner, but that at the last she was allowed to escape. Her

confession, however, shackled Somerset at his trial. It put her at the

King's mercy. Without endangering her life Somerset dared not come to

the crux of his defence, which would have been to demand why Loubel had

been allowed to go free, and why the King's physician, Mayerne, had not

been examined. To prevent Somerset from asking those questions, which

must have given the public a sufficient hint of King James's share in

the murder of Overbury, two men stood behind the Earl all through his

trial with cloaks over their arms, ready to muffle him. But, whatever

may be said of Somerset, the prospect of the cloaks would not have

stopped him from attempting those questions. He had sent word to King

James that he was "neither Gowrie nor Balmerino," those two earlier

victims of James's treachery. The thing that muffled him was the threat

to withdraw the promised mercy to his Countess. And so he kept silent,

to be condemned to death as his wife had been, and to join her in the

Tower.

Five weary years were the couple to eat their hearts out there, their

death sentences remitted, before their ultimate banishment far from the

Court to a life of impoverished obscurity in the country. Better for

them, one would think, if they had died on Tower Green. It is hard to

imagine that the dozen years or so which they were to spend together

could contain anything of happiness for them--she the confessed would-be

poisoner, and he haunted by the memory of that betrayal of friendship

which had begun the process of their double ruin. Frances Howard died

in 1632, her husband twenty-three years later. The longer lease of life

could have been no blessing to the fallen favourite.

There is a portrait of Frances Howard in the National Portrait Gallery

by an unknown artist. It is an odd little face which appears above

the elaborate filigree of the stiff lace ruff and under the

carefully dressed bush of dark brown hair. With her gay jacket of red

gold-embroidered, and her gold-ornamented grey gown, cut low to show the

valley between her young breasts, she looks like a child dressed up. If

there is no great indication of the beauty which so many poets shed ink

over there is less promise of the dire determination which was to pursue

a man's life with cruel poisons over several months. It is, however, a

narrow little face, and there is a tight-liddedness about the eyes which

in an older woman might indicate the bigot. Bigot she proved herself

to be, if it be bigotry in a woman to love a man with an intensity that

will not stop at murder in order to win him. That is the one thing that

may be said for Frances Howard. She did love Robert Carr. She loved him

to his ruin.

She Stands Accused · 第 16 / 42 题