The arms of the See underwent no change from the time of their earliest

appearance to the present day, and were reproduced in many parts of the

new cathedral at its rebuilding, and may be seen exquisitely carved by

Grinling Gibbons over the entrance to St. Dunstan's Chapel; but with the

arms of the City it was very different, and, in fact, they do not appear

even now to have reached finality. When, early in the seventeenth

century, the seal of 1380 became too worn for further use, a new one was

made, which reproduced on the obverse all the essential features of the

earlier one, the details being somewhat classicised, the shield in the

base was repeated, and the lions on each side crowned; but the reverse

showed a new departure, of which no record exists in the College of

Arms. This was the addition of a crest, which consisted of a cross set

between two dragons' wings displayed, placed on a peer's helmet. It will

be seen by reference to the example preserved in the British Museum,

taken from a deed of 1670, that the shield, which is placed couchee,

bears the present arms, and is surrounded by a tasselled mantling and a

motto, which reads, "Londini defende tuos deus optime cives" (fig. 3).

No such use of a peer's helmet has ever been officially allowed to any

town or city, and it can only be presumed that as the mayors of London

were always addressed as "My Lord," the assumption of a peer's helmet

might be permitted. But it may be remarked that, at least in recent

years, the helmet is sometimes displaced by a fur cap, the headgear of

the sword-bearer to his lordship, for which there does not appear to be

the shadow of a warranty. For instance, the official invitation card to

the Lord Mayor's Banquet of 1882 has the fur cap hovering in the air

between the shield and the crest, whilst the card of 1896 reproduces the

helmet with its crest and mantling arranged in the earlier fashion.

[Illustration: FIG. 3--THE CITY SEAL IN MDCLXX.]

[Illustration: FIG. 4--THE CITY ARMS, AS PORTRAYED BY WALLIS, IN THE

REIGN OF CHARLES II.]

The crest which shows on this seal of 1670 introduces the dragon for the

first time to the City arms. The association of St. George with the

dragon is, of course, obvious, and this may have suggested its wings as

an appropriate crest to surmount his cross upon the shield, and from

this it was naturally an easy transition to the dragon supporters. They

are not known to occur before they were represented by Wallis in his

_London's Armory_, published in 1677, a work dedicated to Charles II.,

who, in accepting it, said of its author that he "hath with much Pains

and Charge endeavoured to attain a perfect and general collection of the

Arms proper to every Society and Corporation within our City, and hath

at length finished the same in a most exact and curious manner." Whether

this royal imprimatur can be held to override the absence of any grant

from the College of Arms may seem doubtful to many, but the fact

remains--from that day to this, dragons, or some fabulous monsters akin

to them or to griffins, have appeared as the supporters of the City

arms. Another point to notice in Wallis's representation, of which we

give a sketch (fig. 4), is that although he retains the peer's helmet

over the shield, he shows the fur cap, together with the mace, sword and

other official symbols, grouped as ornamental accessories at the base of

his device. The crest also has been modified, and consists of only one

dragon's wing, upon which the cross has been charged, as well as upon

the wings of the supporters, which, if descendants of the original

dragon of St. George, show thereby that they have become "Christen"

beasts.

Such is the history, shortly, of the arms now used by the City of London

to decorate its buildings and seal its documents, and which Wallis,

their inventor, in the true meaning of that word, pronounces correct,

"having by just examinations and curious disquisitions now cleared them

from many gross absurdities contracted by ignorance and continued along

by implicit tradition committed contrary to Art, Nature and Order, and

repugnant to the very principles of Heraldry."

* * * * *

_END OF VOLUME I._

* * * * *

Bemrose & Sons Limited, Printers, Derby and London.

Memorials of Old London. Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 18 / 18 段