[1] Nom. Etymol. ad Calcem. Cat. Cant. p. 43. item Hist. Plant. p. 680.
[2] Bella-donna dicitur quod imaginationes non injucundas efficiat, vel
ut honeste satis Plinius, quod lusum generet. Bod. Comment. in Theophr.
p. 586 quod in somnis pulchras ostendat virgines feminasque. Ibid. p.
1078.
[3] Locis citatis.
[4] Oper. omnia edit C.B. p. 756.
[5] Ruell. in Dioscor. p. 536.
[6] Nomina generica quæ ex Græca vel Latina lingua radicem non habent
rejicienda sunt.
[7] Atropos una furiarum. Crit. Botan. p. 75.
[8] See Lin. Syst. Naturæ, edit. Lugd. Bat. 1756. p. 97. No. 222.
[9] Mat. Med. lib. iv. cap. 69.
[10] See Sennert. lib. vi. par. 7. cap. 9.
[11] Stirpium Adversar. p. 103.
[12] Oper. Omn. p. 754.
[13] Rerum Scoticar. lib. vii.
[14] Ger. em. p. 341.
[15] Page 586.
[16] Quadripart. Botan. p. 488.
[17] Cicut. Aquat. Historia et Noxæ. Basil. 1716. p. 228.
[18] Histoire de l’Academie Royale. 1703.
[19] Hist. Plant. Lugd. Bat. Hort. p. 510.
[20] For August and September 1747, and for Sept. 1748.
[21] Page 329.
[22] Raii Hist. Plant. I. p. 681.
[23] Enumerat. Stirp. Helvet. p. 507.
[24] See Forestus, Etmuller, and the old chirurgical writers.
[25] Bibliotheque des Sciences et des beaux Arts pour les mois Jan.
Fevr. Mars. 1755.
[26] Tiberii Lambergen Lectio inauguralis, sisters Ephemeriden
persanati Carcinomatis. Groning. 1754.
[27] Dr. Van Swieten Comment. in Aphor. Boerh. sect. 492.
[28] Hom. Iliad. 23. _v._ 88.
[29] _Ut enim----si hoc fingamus, esse quasi finem----ita jacere talum,
ut rectus assistat; qui ita talus erit jactus, ut cadat rectus_----Cic.
de Fin. L. 3. §. 16. Ed. Verb.
[30] Vid. Dacier not. on Hor. L. ii. Od. 7, _v._ 25, &c.
[31] Τὸ δέ σχῆμα τοῦ κατά τὸν Ἀϛράγαλον Πτώματος Ἀριθμοῦ Δόξαν εἶχεν.
Jul. Pollux. L. ix. c. 7.
[32] _Quatuor tali jacti casu venereum efficiunt._ Cic. de Div. L. i.
§. 13. Ed. Verb.
[33] Mart. L. xiv. epig. 14.
[34] _Nec regna vini sortiere talis._ L. i. od. 4. _v._ 18.
[35] _Quem Venus artbitrum dicet bibendi?_ L. ii. od. 7. _v._ 25. Some
think, that this cast was also named _basilicus_ from the usage here
mentioned. Sanad. in Loc.
[36] Prop. L. iv. el. 9. _v._ 18.
[37] Jul. Pollux. L. ix. c. 7. Lubin. on Pers. sat. 3. _v._ 49, &c.
[38]
----_Quid dexter_ senio _ferret_,
----_Damnosa_ canicula _quantum_
Raderet----
Pers. sat. 3. _v._ 48.
[39] Dial. Ἀϛραγαλισμὸς.
[40] Sueton. C. Aug. §. 71.
[41] Sat. 3. _v._ 48. See Prat. not. in us. Delph. in loc.
[42] Hor. L. ii. sat 7. _v._ 17.
[43] Mart. L. xiv. epig. 16.
[44] Germ. Ant. Mon. p. 38.
[45] Not. on Hor. L. i. ep. 20. _v._ 2.
[46] Mem. lit. de l’Acad. des Inscrip. V. 9.
[47] Rerum Mem. L. ii. tit. 13.
[48] _Deum ipsum (Serapidem) multi Æsculapium--quidam Osirim--plerique
Jovem--plurimi Ditem patrem insignibus, quæ in ipso manifesta, aut per
ambages, conjectant._ Tac. His. L. iv. Εἷς Ζεὺς, εἷς Ἀΐδης, εἷς Ἥλιος
ἐστὶ Σάραπις, Oraculum Apollinis apud M.A. Caus. Museum Rom. vol. ii. §
6. tab. 13.
[49] Antiq. T. ii. P. 2. pl. 121, 122.
[50] Porphyr. apud Euseb. Præp. Evang. L. iv. c. 23. Τοὺς δὲ πονηροὺς
δαίμονας οὐκ εἰκῇ ὑπὸ Σάραπιν ὑποπτεύομεν, &c.
[51] Suppl. T. ii. L. vi. c. 10. Tab. xlviii.
[52] Montfaucon, ibid.
[53] Montfaucon, ibid.
[54] Vid. Observations sur les Antiquités d’Herculaneum, _&c._ par
Mess. Cochin & Bellicard, p. 83, Paris 1755.
[55] Within two miles of this place there is a steel Spaw of good
repute for the performance of several extraordinary cures, which gives
the same tincture with galls, and appears in every respect to be the
same with the water, that flows from this level.
[56] The proportions were adjusted according to the carat weights, as
it is by these, that the fineness of gold is usually expressed: A carat
is the twenty-fourth part of the whole compound: thus gold of so many
carats is a composition, of which so many twenty-fourths are fine gold,
and the rest an inferior metal.
[57] Observations sur les Antiquités d’Herculaneum, _&c._ p. 82
[58] For a more particular account of this statue, now in the palace at
Portici, I beg leave to refer you to a paper of mine read before the
Royal Society on Feb. 24, last.
[59] Dio. L. xl.
[60] Suet. Vesp. c. 7.
[61] For authorities, see Middleton’s Germana Antiq. Mon. p. 152.
[62] Pliny (L. ix. ep. 39.) acquainting his architect with his purpose
to repair a temple of Ceres, which was upon his estate, says, _Nullum
in proximo suffugium aut imbris, aut solis. Videor ergo munifice simul
religioseque facturum, si ædi, quam pulcherrimam exstruxero, addidero
porticus: illam ad usum deæ, has ad hominum._ That these portico’s
commonly inclosed the whole site of the ancient temples, as in this at
Pozzuoli, seems implied in what follows: _Quantum ad porticus, nihil
interim occurrit, quod videatur esse istinc repetendum: nisi tamen, ut
formam secundum rationem loci scribas; neque enim possunt circumdari
templo: nam solum templi hinc flumine--hinc viâ cingitur._
[63] Mess. Cochin and Bellicard seem to think this room was intended
for another purpose, by their calling the funnels under the holes
in the seats of it, _conduits des fosses d’aisance_. Which of the
two hypothesis’s is to be preferred, I submit to the judgment of the
learned; or rather, whether both of them may not be admitted, as in
no-wise incompatible the one with the other.
[64] Vitruvius Lib. iii. cap. 3. _Gradus in fronte ita constituendi
sunt, uti sint semper impares: namque cum dextro pede primus gradus
ascendatur, item in templo primus erit ponendus._
[65] The learned Abbate de Venuti, F.R.S. and Antiquary to the Pope at
Rome, has lately by letter favoured me with an ingenious account of
this phænomenon; tho’ he mentions the granite columns only as affected
by it. _Cùm columnæ, quæ circumibant templum, excavarentur e terrâ,
quâ erant partim abrutæ----minutissimæ conchæ, quæ ex testaceorum
genere sunt, atque in saxorum rimulis prope mare reperiuntur, ideoque a
vulgo_ Trutti di Mare _appellatæ, columnas hasce (i. e. Thebaicas) quam
sæpissimè perforaverant, sese componentes, veluti apes in alveari, cùm
essent sejunctæ integumentis ex ipso lapide subtilissimis_.--
[66] Vid. p. 168.
[67] Nec alius a Διονύσω sive sole est Δυσάρης, sive Δουσάρης, vel
Δευσάρης. Quæ vox (ut suspicor) conflata ex דוץ _Dutz_ et ארץ _Aretz_.
Quorum prius (_gaudium_) alterum notat (_terram_) ut notat _lætitiam
terræ_, sive mortalium. Nam Liber sive sol lætitiâ implet mortales,
maturando fruges, et uvas, unde de vino sic Maro,
_Munera lætitiamque Dei._ Æn. i.
Dusarem verò esse Arabum numen indicat locus ille Tertulliani in
Apolog. c. 24. “Unicuique etiam provinciæ et civitati suus deus est. Ut
Syriæ Astartes; _ut Arabiæ Disares_.”
Etiam apud Stephanum sive Hermolaum Byzantium--Δυσάρη--σκόπελος ϗ
κορυφὴ ὑψηλοτάτη Αραβίας. Ἒιρηται δὲ ἀπό τοῦ Δυσάρου. Θεὸς δὲ οὗτος
παρὰ Ἂραψι ϗ Δαχαρηνοῖς τιμώμενος----Vossius de Idololat. L. ii. c. 8.
[68] Nicol. Haym Roman. _Del. Tesor. Britan._ Vol. ii. p. 36, 37. In
Londra, 1720.
[69] J. Foy Vaill. in _Arsacid. Imper._ Parisiis, 1728. _Numism.
Antiqu. Collect. a_ Thom. Pembroch. et Montis Gomer. Com. P. 2. T. 76.
Nicol. Haym Roman. ubi sup. p. 30-38.
[70] Montfauc. _Palæograph. Græc._ p. 123, 124, 125. Parisiis, 1708.
[71] Idem ibid.
[72] J. Foy Vaill. ubi sup.
[73] J. Foy Vaill. ubi sup. p. 335, 341.
[74] Montfauc. ubi sup. p. 118, 119. Hadrian. Reland. _Palæstin.
Illustrat._ Tom. ii. p. 1014, 1015, 1055. Trajecti Batavorum, 1714.
I have a Latin dissertation in the press here, almost printed off,
containing an explication of a considerable number of coins of Tyre and
Sidon, with Phœnician legends upon them.
[75] _De Num. quibusd. Sam. et Phœn. &c. Dissert._ p. 53-56. Oxon. 1750.
[76] _Philosoph. Transact._ Vol. xlix. p. 593-607.
[77] _Philosoph. Transact._ Vol. xlviii. p. 693.
[78] _Philosoph. Transact._ Vol. xlviii. p. 693, 740.
[79] _Philosoph. Transact._ ubi sup.
[80] _Philosoph. Transact._ ibid.
[81] _Philosoph. Transact._ ubi sup. p. 693, 740.
[82] Chard. _Voyages en Perse_, &c. Tom. iii. p. 119. A Amsterdam 1711.
_Philosoph. Transact._ Vol. xlix. p. *597, *598.
[83] That the plural termination of PADESHAH, or SHAH, which, according
to Khojah Asdhalo’ddîn, denoted originally the same thing, was AN, or
perhaps ANE, in the days of Ammianus Marcellinus, there is good reason
to believe; the word SAANSAA, KING OF KINGS, having been then used
by the Persians, and handed down to us by that author. The term ΣΑΑ,
SAA, equivalent to the Persic SHAH, KING, likewise occurs in Agathias,
a writer of the sixth century. Should my explication of the Parthian
legend of the coin before me meet with the approbation of the learned,
it will perhaps be granted me, that the plural of PADESHAH, or PADESHA,
amongst the Parthians was PADESHAN, if not PADESHANE, in the second
century after CHRIST. Hyd. _Hist. Rel. Vet. Pers._ p. 416. Khojah
Asdhalo’ddîn, D’Herbel. _Biblioth. Orient._ p. 767. Hadr. Reland.
_Dissert._ viii. _de Vet. Ling. Pers._ p. 221, 222. Ammian. Marcellin.
Lib. xix. cap. 2. Agath. Lib. iv. p. 135, 136. Parisiis, 1660. Ezech.
Spanhem. _De Præstant. et Us. Numism. Antiquor._ Tom. i. p. 463-466.
Lond. 1706.
[84] Hyd. _Hist. Rel. Vet. Pers._ p. 79. Oxon. 1700.
[85] D’Herbel. _Biblioth. Orient._ p. 699, 767. Hyd. ubi sup. Hadr.
Reland. _Dissert._ viii. _de Vet. Ling. Pers._ p. 147. Trajecti ad
Rhenum, 1707.
[86] Hyd. ubi sup. p. 326.
[87] Hyd. ubi sup. p. 18, 312.
[88] Matth. Hiller. _Onomast. Sacr._ p. 619. Hadr. Reland. ubi sup. p.
259-262.
[89] Nicol. Haym Roman. ubi sup. p. 33.
[90] J. Foy Vaill. & Nicol. Haym Roman. ubi sup. & alib.
[91] Esth. c. x. _v._ 1.
[92] Scalig. _Prolegom. in Lib. de Emend. Temp._ p. 41. Col. Allobrog.
1629. & _Can. Isag._ s. 317. Matth. Hiller. ubi sup. p. 619, 620.
[93] Moses Chorenens. _Hist. Armen._ Lib. ii. iii. Theophil. Sigefr.
Bayer. _Hist. Osrhoen. &c._ p. 97. Petropoli, 1734.
[94] Herodot. Lib. iv. c. 87.
[95] Epiphan. _Adv. Hær._ Lib. ii. Tom. ii. p. 629. Paris. 1622.
[96] J. Foy Vaill. ubi sup. p. 339.
[97] Maffeius, in _Gall. Antiqu. Quæd. Select._ Epist. 22. p. 106.
Parisiis, 1733.
[98] J. Foy Vaill. ubi sup. p. 334, 335, 336, 339.
[99] Dio, Lib. lxxi. p. 802. _Imperator. Romanor. Numism. &c. Stud.
& Cur._ Francisc. Mediobarb. Birag. p. 218. J. Foy Vaill. _Can.
Chronologic. Reg. Parthor._ p. 41.
[100] Jul. Capitolin. in _M. Antonin. Philos._ et in _Ver._
[101] _Imperator. Romanor. Numism. &c. Stud. & Cur._ Francisc.
Mediobarb. Birag. S.R.I. Com. &c. p. 220. Mediolani, 1683.
[102] J. Foy Vaill. ubi sup. & in _Arsacid. Imper._ p. 338.
[103] Dio, Lib. lxxv. p. 853. J. Foy Vaill. in _Arsacid. Imper._ p.
356. & in _Can. Chronologic_. p. 42. Ludovic. Du Four de Longuerüe,
Ab. S. Joan. de Jardo ad Melod. et Sept. Font. in Therasc. _Annal.
Arsacidar._ p. 51. Argentorati, 1732. Erasm. Froelich, S. J. S. in
_Dub. de Minnisar. Aliorumque Armen. Reg. Num. et Arsecidar, Epoch.
nuper vulgat._ p. 66. Viennæ Austriæ, 1754.
[104] Edv. Corsin. Cl. Reg. Scholar. Piar. in Acad. Pisan. Humanior.
Litterar. Profess. _De Minnisar. Aliorumq; Armen. Reg. Num. et Arsacid.
Epoch. Dissertat._ p. 13-29. Liburni, 1754.
[105] Maff. in _Gall. Antiqu. Epist._ 22. p. 106.
[106] J. Foy Vaill. ubi sup. p. 338.
[107] Arrian. in _Parthic._ apud Photium, _Cod._ 58. & apud Syncell. in
_Chronograph._ p. 226.
[108] Just. Lib. xli. c. 4.
[109] Athen. _Deipnosoph._ Lib. iv. c. 13.
[110] Corsin. ubi sup.
[111] Corsin. ubi sup. p. 2.
[112] Erasm. Froel. ubi sup. p. 72.
[113] Corsin. in _Ded. Nob. Vir._ Phil. Venut. p. 5.
[114] _Philosoph. Transact._ Vol. xlviii. p. 693, 740.
[115] Ptol. _Tab. Urb. Insign._ p. 39. Ed. Huds. Oxon. 1712.
[116] J. Foy Vaill. in _Arsacid. Imper._ pass.
[117] Hamdalla Ism. Abu’lfed. Mohammed Al Firauzabad. Nassîr Al Tûsi,
Ulugh Beik, &c. Golii not. ad Alfragan. p. 200-204.
[118] Upon inquiry, I find, that no such thing was taken notice of in
Northumberland; so it probably has not extended any further to the
eastward, than the skirts of our own county.
[119] In an adjoining bleach-yard, a piece of cloth, which had been
left out all night, was turned yellow; and was not without some
difficulty washed out again. Some also, which was spread out the next
day, contracted the same colour.
[120] The wind was westerly, and consequently would sweep the Irish sea.
[121] No rain, or however very little, during the hurricane.
[122] Mr. Derham, in his Physico Theology.
[123] Distance about thirty miles.
[124] _Viz._ About four feet long, and one inch square.
[125] Philosoph. Transact. Vol. xlvii. p. 48. and Essay on the Virtues
of Lime water, _&c._ edit. 2d. p. 197.
[126] Philosoph. Transact. Vol. xlvii. p. 48 and 473. and Essay on
Lime-water, p. 157 and 200.
[127] The two stones found in Lord Walpole’s bladder were of this size,
and weighed one of them 22 and the other 21 grains.
[128] Philosoph. Transact. Vol. xlvii. p. 47.
[129] The stone found in the beginning of the passage from the bladder
was of this size, and weighed about a grain.
[130] It is printed in this volume of the Philosoph. Transactions,
under the 28th of April, p. 221, & seqq.
[131] Essay on the Virtues of Lime-water, 2d edit. p. 140.
[132] Phil. Transact. Vol. xlvii. p. 46.
[133] Phil. Transact. Vol. xlvii. p. 472, 473.
[134] Essay on Lime-water, _&c._ p. 200, 201.
[135] Physical Experiments, p. 19.
[136] Essay on Lime-water, _&c._, 2d edit. p. 171, 201.
[137] Essay on Lime-water, _&c._ 2d edit. p. 170.
[138] Ibid. p. 24, 25, 30 & 31.
[139] The celebrated Dr. Scheuchzer has arranged the fossile plants
botanically, by Tournefort’s system, in his folio work, intituled,
_Herbarium Diluvianum_; and Dr. Woodward’s fossile plants, Catalogue B,
he informs us, were botanically considered and arranged by those famous
botanists Dr. Plukenet, and Mess. Doody, Buddle, and Stonestreet.
[140] Woodward, Catalogue B. p. 104. specimen _q._ 1. was of 6 1-half
feet in length; and Catalogue D. p. 60. specimen _h._ 38. was a yard
long; _et alibi passim_. In the collieries at Swanvich in Derbyshire,
in 1752. a plant of the cane kind was found 14 feet long: it ended in
a point at one end, and at the root in a large knob, and in the middle
measured nine inches about.
[141] Zirizææ, quæ, in insula Scaldiæ, secundum Zelandiæ oppidum est.
[142] Dominus Ellis, anno 1755. Lond. in 8º edidit _Essay on the
Natural History of Corals_, &c. quem librum Gallice versum in 4º
recudit P. de Hond Hagæ Comitum, sub titulo _Essay sur l’Histoire
Naturelle des Corallines, &c. par J. Ellis_, 1756.
[143] Il y a une sorte de Lithophyte, qui veritablement est curieuse,
et bien extraordinaire: elle n’a point d’ecorce continuée, mais bien
quelques fragmens, par ci par la interrompus d’un glu, qui fleurit dans
l’eau. Hist. de la Mer. pag. 89. fig. 101. 179, 1.
[144] Bonnet sur l’usage des Feuilles, pag. xviii. & 286.
[145] Id. ibid. pag. 66.
[146] Tab. VII. fig. I, II.
[147] Ibid. fig. III.
[148] Tab. VIII. fig. V.
[149] Vide talem delineatam in Mem. de l’Acad. p. 394, anni 1711.
[150] Mem. de l’Academie, 1742.
[151] Tab. VIII. fig. II, IV.
[152] Tab. VIII. fig. IV.
[153] Sic Dˢ. _Ellis_ in una eademque planta diversos, polypos
delineat, tab. IV. fig. C. tab. V. fig. A. tab. XIV. fig. A. B. tab.
XXXVIII. F. N. E.
[154] Tab. IX. fig. A, B, C.
[155] Sic Clar. _Ellis_ eosdem etiam polypos invenit in corallina
astaci cornicularum æmula Nº. 14. et in corallina setacea instar
arundinis geniculara Nº. 16.
[156] Tab. VII. fig. VI.
[157] Ibid. fig. VII.
[158] Ibid. fig. VIII.
[159] Tab. IX. fig. IV, V, VI.
[160] Tab. VIII. fig. VI.
[161] Psalm. civ. vers. 16, 17, 18.
[162] Memoir. des Insect. tom. ii. tab. iv. fig. 6, 8.
[163] Id. ibid. tab. iii. fig. xv.
[164] Id. tom. iii. mem. xi. tab. xxxii. fig. 1.
[165] Id. tom. v. mem. iii. tab. xv. fig. 1, 2, 3.
[166] Id. tom. ii. mem. ii. tab. iii. tom. iv. tab xxxvii. fig. 11, 12,
19, 20.
[167] Id. tom. iv. tab. xliv. fig. 8.
[168] Id. tom. ii. mem. ii. pag. 163. tab. iv. fig. 11, 12, 13. Ellis
Essay, pag. 100. tab. xxxiii. _a_ A.
[169] Tab. VIII. fig. VI. _a_ A.
[170] Ellis passim in figuris, præsertim tab. v. fig. A.
[171] Mem. de l’Acad. viii. pag. 253. tab. vi. fig. 1, 2, 3, 4.
[172] Lesser, Theologie des Insect. tom. ii. p. 112.
[173] Tab. VIII. fig. II. IV.
[174] Tab. VIII. fig. III.
[175] Tab. VII. fig. III.
[176] Idem observat Cel. Jussiæus, licet corillinas a polypis tamen
fabrifatas autumat. Vide Mem. de l’Acad. 1742. et figuram inspice,
quomodo corporis extremitate corallinæ insident.
[177] Tab. IX. fig. II. _a_ A.
[178] Tab. IX. fig. II A. _c._
[179] Ibid. _b. b._
[180] Ibid. A. _c._
[181] Ibid. B.
[182] Ibid. C. _c._
[183] Ibid. fig. III.
[184] Ibid. fig. III.
[185] Ibid. _c. c._
[186] _Vionelli_ nuove luci coperte. _Linnæi_ Amæn. Acad. tom. iii. de
noctiluca marina.
[187] Tab. VIII. fig. VII.
[188] Tab. X. fig. I.
[189] Ibid. fig. 6.
[190] Ibid. fig. 8.
[191] Tab. X. fig. II. B.
[192] Ibid. C.
[193] Ibid. fig. III.
[194] See Phil. Transact. Vol. xlix. Part 2. p. 509.
[195] Original Letters to Sir Hans Sloane, Bart. vol. A-B. in the
British Museum.
[196] Journal, vol. xi. p. 143.
[197] In this treatise, L. 2. p. 80. is the following passage: _In pago
Rorbachio non procul Heydelbergâ, Paræi etiam relatu, gemini utriusque
sexûs obversis tergoribus annexis orti sunt._
[198] The two figures shew a fore and back view of this subject.
[199] See above, Nº. X, p. 53.
[200] After this paper was read at the Society, Dr. Pringle having
acquainted Dr. Whytt, that Mr. Patrick Brydone had omitted, in his
account, the name of the parish, where the woman lived, the time when
she was cured, and also that he had not fully dated his paper; Dr.
Whytt some time after wrote to Dr. Pringle, that having desired Mr.
Brydone to furnish him with these particulars, he had received for
answer, “That the woman, on whom the cure was performed, had lived all
her life in the parish of Coldinghame, and for the last twelve years in
that town: That her father had died of the palsy seven years ago, after
having been subject to that distemper for several years: That the cure
was performed in his father’s house at Coldinghame, on the 4th, 5th,
6th, and 11th of days of April 1757. a circumstance he had noted down:
That as to the date of his paper, presented to the Royal Society, he
only recollects it was written some day in the beginning of November
last; but as the woman still continued well, he hoped the precise day
of the month was no material omission.” This letter to Dr. Whytt is
dated, Coldinghame, January 9th, 1758.
[201] See above, p. 209, & seqq.
[202] Vid. Essay on the Virtue of Lime-water, 2d edit. p. 176, 177.
[203] Essay on Lime-water, 2d edit. p. 208, &c.
[204] Ibid. p. 176 and 177.
[205] Since my writing this discourse, Dr. Mason informs me, that these
are found no other than recent nuts and laryxes.
[206] Vol. xlviii.
[207] No error arises from considering the triangles E A _e_ and AEH,
as being formed on the surface of a sphere, tho’ the earth itself is
not accurately such. The angle (E A _a_) representing the effect of the
solar force, is properly referred to the surface of a sphere; therefore
(after the measure thereof is truly determined) the figure AP _ap_ is
itself taken as a sphere, in order to avoid the trouble of introducing
a new scheme.
[208] Part I. p. 161.
[209] Page 806.
[210] See TAB. XVII. where this specimen is exactly delineated.
[211] This is likewise called the Malacca Bean, from its growing in
great plenty on that coast, near the equinoctial line.
[212] See above, p. 356.
[213] Page 887.