CHAPTER V

MAKING A MOTION PICTURE

Once I was turned loose in New York City with thirty-odd thousand

dollars and a novel by a popular author, and told to make a movie out

of them.

Suppose that should happen to you. How would you begin?

Of course you would want to make a better picture than so many of these

other fellows seem able to turn out. But how would you start? Just by

hiring some actors and a camera man and telling them to get busy?

It is not so easy as that.

The first thing for me, to be sure, was getting together the men

who would help make the photoplay. Re-writing the story into a

scene-by-scene continuity, hiring a studio and attending to all the

business details, selecting a cast, picking out the “locations” for

scenes, designing the “sets” and supervising the construction of them,

and “directing” the scenes, is more than any one person can do. The

Swiss Family Robinson itself couldn’t do it alone.

So I selected and hired a director, and a camera man, and a continuity

writer, and an art director to design the sets. That took quite a while.

Then the trouble began.

The director decided he wanted an assistant director; the camera man

decided he wanted an assistant camera man; the art director decided

that I didn’t know what I was doing, and the “owners” decided that

everything done so far was all wrong.

That brought out two very interesting things about motion pictures that

apply to lots of other businesses as well. And sports, too, if you

like, and almost everything else.

The first is the matter of coöperation.

When the rowers in a boat pull only when they feel like it, the boat

goes wabbling all over the place, instead of straight ahead, and

everybody gets his knuckles barked. Everybody has to pull together.

Imagine a football team without any teamwork!

Movies are so complicated, in the making, that dozens of people,

hundreds often, have to pull together when they are being made.

That very thing is one of the big reasons why moving pictures to-day

aren’t any better than they are. Mostly movie people haven’t yet

learned to pull well together, or how exceedingly important it is in

the making of pictures.

If you can’t work with other fellows without bucking and kicking,—don’t

ever try motion-picture work.

The other trouble was with the owners. There were too many bosses on

the job, which always makes a mess.

That quaint, humorous philosopher, “Josh Billings,” once said, “It

ain’t ignorance that makes so much trouble; it’s so many people knowing

too many things that ain’t so.”

With movies, that’s an ever-present danger.

Mostly, we’re all of us so sure of things, that we saw or heard or

thought or remember, that we just know we’re right, about this or

that, and can’t be wrong. If we know a little bit about surveying, we

feel we can tell surveyors how to survey, and so on. And the less we

know about a thing (as long as we do know something about it) and the

more indefinite that thing and the knowledge about it are, the more we

think we know about it.

Take stories: when you read one, you know whether you like it or not;

but could you tell how it would be apt to strike other people? It’s

easy to think you can do that—and most motion-picture producers and

financiers are sure they can. But as a matter of fact, an editor,

trained for years in the selection of stories, could probably do a lot

better.

In motion pictures, the man who puts up the money for a production has

to be pretty wise to realize how much less he probably knows about

motion pictures than the men he hires to make the pictures for him.

As yet, few owners or producers of motion pictures know enough to

keep their hands off all the things that they ought to leave to their

employees.

Well, to get back to this particular movie.

We got another director, and then decided to give him an assistant

after all. And we got another camera man—and then gave him an

assistant. We got a cast, and started off to the city where most of the

work was to be done.

I say “we.” That is correct. The owners insisted on “sitting in” on

everything, so that each decision was a compromise, instead of being

the best judgment of the one they had hired to make that picture for

them.

When we came to taking the first scenes we made a discovery.

Our hero was a sissy.

He looked like a regular fellow—we had every reason to suppose he was

at least as much of a regular fellow as most actors can be. But he

threw a baseball the way a girl does.

He couldn’t even throw a custard pie. Luckily we didn’t want him to.

But we did want him to look and act like a man’s man, and mostly it was

mighty hard for him.

He had fifteen or twenty different suits, but no sign of a

tennis-racket, or baseball glove, or golf-stick.

He couldn’t drive an automobile. But he was supposed to be a wonderful

actor—just the man to play a hero!

Then, along came the property man.

You will remember that a chain is no stronger than its weakest link. A

motion picture, that is made by the combined efforts of a whole group

of people, all pulling together, is much the same way. If any one

of the group, on whom some particular duty depends, is ignorant, or

inexperienced, or lazy, or pig-headed, the defects of his work will mar

the finished film.

If the actors can’t act well, the picture will be laughed at; if the

camera man is poor, the photography will be poor, and so on.

The property man is the one who has to see that the details of a

picture are correct; that if the hero has a handkerchief showing in his

pocket when he walks out of one scene, he has it when he walks into the

next, and so on.

When you realize that a picture is usually taken location by location

and set by set, instead of in the natural order of the scenes, you

can realize how important it is to have some one check up on all the

details.

[Illustration: _Courtesy W. W. Hodkinson Corporation._

GETTING A COMEDY CLOSE-UP FOR A LAUGH.

In this scene, where detail of expression is important, the big

reflector is brought close to the subject and held in place by the

property man, whose head is just outside the “camera angle.”]

[Illustration: _Courtesy Goldwyn Pictures Corporation._

A “LOCATION” WHERE REFLECTORS ARE ESSENTIAL.

Under the big trees of a forest there is never very much illumination

for quick photography, and reflectors to throw additional light on

the actors’ faces are doubly important.]

The first interior scenes to be taken, we will say, are those in a

drawing-room set, that the carpenters completed first. They are,

perhaps, the scenes that in the script are numbered 22, 23, 49, 107,

108, 109, 191, 224, and 225. In Scene 22 the hero comes into the

drawing-room and finds that his father has just had a severe paralytic

stroke. In Scene 21, perhaps, he said good-by to a companion on

the front steps and then entered the house. Scene 21 was taken “On

location” three months before Scene 22 is to be taken in the studio.

But in the finished picture, the hero will walk through the front door

and immediately come into the drawing-room.

It is the duty of the property man to see that he isn’t wearing a golf

suit when he goes in the door on one side and riding-breeches when he

comes out on the other side of the door.

Our property man was a friend of the owners, who had no previous

experience to speak of. They wanted him to learn the business (or art,

if you prefer) and insisted on his appointment.

That is no unusual thing in picture-making; it would amaze people to

know how far, in the case of the great majority of all pictures that

are made, the owners influence things.

If you have a good director, and assistant director, and photographer,

and actors, what difference does a property man make? It would seem,

would it not, that the various assistants would look out for all the

details necessary, dividing the work up among them?

But they can’t. There was the cat, for instance.

We were taking some of the early scenes in a city of the Middle West

(one of the great charms about movie-making is that you often travel to

the places you want to photograph, instead of trying to “fake” them in

the country around the studio) and the script called for a cat.

The hero, according to the story, would not desert his old cat when he

left town, so he took her along in his automobile.

All correct as far as the written story was concerned—but now to

get the genuine purring and mewing or scratching cat. The assistant

director couldn’t do it, because he was busy sticking with the director

and helping him in the scenes, keeping the numbers of the scenes, the

“takes” (or different shots of the same scene) and so on. The assistant

camera man also had to be on the set, holding the number-board,

reloading cameras, and all the rest. The continuity writer was making

some changes in the script. The owners were buying an automobile. The

art director, and everybody else available except the property man,

were out hunting for locations.

So the new property man must get the cat. And he had no experience.

He had plenty of time, to start with. But instead of securing a likely

candidate and trying it out, he decided that the cat of a friend of his

would do.

It wouldn’t. Friend wouldn’t let cat act. The property man only found

that out the day we wanted to have the scenes taken. If he’d been

experienced, he wouldn’t have let an “unimportant” detail wait so long.

But there was a big grocery store near the hotel where we were staying,

where they had a wonderful big tiger Tommy—tame as anything. Property

man, in a hurry, decided he would do nicely.

But he didn’t. Tommy was well-mannered enough, and friendly, in the

store, among his friends and customers and customary surroundings; but

after he had been shut up in a basket half the morning, and all jolted

up in the automobile getting out to “location” besides, he was another

Tom entirely.

He would push like an elephant to get his big striped head out of the

basket, and once his head was out the rest of him would follow it; and

once the whole of him was out he would scratch and claw until he got

clear of all hands that tried to reason with him or delay him; and once

he got clear he was on his way to somewhere else at about ninety miles

an hour.

It would have taken a mighty fast shutter, with a telescope lens behind

it, to have photographed Thomas that day. He wasn’t sitting for his

portrait.

So the property man, desperate now, because he was holding up the

whole company, tried again. This time he drew a white angora lady cat,

with a kitten five inches long to keep her from brooding on living in

a basket. She was contentment itself, and because he couldn’t waste

another day we had to use her.

Result of two days’ cat-hunting by a new property man: a

garage-mechanic hero with a beautiful mother-cat shedding long Persian

fur over him.

The cat always looked in one direction. People who watched the picture

afterward wondered why. We knew. She was looking at the kitten. To make

her shift her lovely eye we had to move the kitten.

The director wanted a metal aeroplane with a propeller that would whirl

in the wind for the radiator cap of the hero’s automobile. Before

the property man found one he had to put two cities with a combined

population of nearly half a million on their respective ears, and we

nearly all of us had to turn in and help him do it. But in the end we

got the little aeroplane, and the director was happy.

It is interesting work, this “shooting” picture out on “location.”

There were nearly twenty of us in the party—owners, cameramen,

writers, and assistants, besides the actors. Only the actors taking

the principal parts were along with us, on account of the expense. For

“bits” or “extras”—characters that appeared only once or twice for a

moment or so in the finished picture—we relied on finding people in the

cities and towns we visited, ready and able to take the parts.

Indeed, it would surprise you—or maybe it wouldn’t—to know how far the

lure of picture-making has spread. Set up a camera almost anywhere in

the country, and interested spectators will come out of the air from

nowhere at all, as mosquitoes seem to come to a fisherman. And for the

parts in your picture, if you want them, you can have almost any one,

from the leader of the sewing circle to the village derelict.

More work for the property man!

Mostly, the boys that you find do the best work of all. A youngster of

six or eight, if he once gets the spirit of the thing, falls into a

part wonderfully, and acts as naturally as a pup in a barnyard.

We would start out in the morning from the front of the hotel where

we happened to be staying. Spectators, few or many, always gathered

in a fringe as soon as they saw the cameras being carried out to the

machines.

There were two machines that we needed to use in the picture—both

roadsters. Then there was a big “work car,” some old seven-passenger,

to take the camera men and actors and as much of the duffle as could

be crowded in. There was always a tremendous amount of stuff to be

lugged—cameras, and film-boxes, and big mirrors and reflectors to use

in getting additional light, and so on.

If we were to take any “inside shots” as well, there was also a truck

to take along a load of lights—big metal standards with intricate

carbon lights and their reflectors above—with transformers and

yards and yards of cable to connect them up with, and mechanics and

electricians to do the work. Or perhaps a generator on a truck—a big

150-horse-power motor and electric generator to provide a current that

could be taken anywhere the truck could go.

Almost always there was a delay about the start; sometimes one thing,

sometimes another. A reflector broken and not yet returned repaired—a

property gravestone to be taken along, and late—the everlasting cat

gone from its basket. Sometimes five minutes, sometimes fifteen; once

in a while a whole beautiful morning lost, representing, say, a loss,

or additional expense to the picture, of possibly hundreds of dollars.

Then at last away we would go—a whole young cavalcade of autos, bulging

with people and duffle, heads of actors and legs of camera tripods

sticking out in every direction—bumping and jouncing along out into the

country to our selected “location”—perhaps an old farmhouse, twelve

miles out.

For a week or so it is always fascinating; then it gets to be just

the usual routine of work, like almost everything else, and the real

joy of it is in the ability to keep open-minded for the sight and

appreciation of new things—in the enthusiasm of work to be done, and in

the satisfaction of getting good results. Folks standing at the curb

to see us start from the hotel probably wished that they too might be

journeying off into the open country, with all the glamor of adventure

surrounding the expedition—but they knew nothing of the long, long

hours of waiting through the day, while the director rehearsed and

rehearsed one or two actors in a particular scene, or the whole company

just shifted from one foot to the other, hour after hour, ready to be

on the job the moment the sun came from behind the passing clouds—if it

ever did.

Sometimes, though, there were new and entirely different experiences,

as the picture gradually progressed from stage to stage, and scene

was added to scene in all the thousands of feet of film sent to the

laboratories to be developed and printed.

For instance, for a time I went on ahead, acting as “location man” in

advance of the company, as we went from locality to locality where our

scenes were to be filmed.

In one little Montana town the only car I could get to take me around

for a day was a “closed” Ford. It was “closed” by having the top

and body of a sedan, but all the glass was broken out, including

the windshield, and the floor-boards were gone besides, so that you

propped your feet on whatever rods came handy, while the road rushed

past beneath you, and occasionally tossed a pebble into your lap. The

fenders were dilapidated, and the poor little old buggy looked like

an utter wreck, but we covered nearly two hundred miles in it before

dark, over prairie roads that were hardly more than wheel-ruts through

the grass. Twice we ferried across the Yellowstone, and once over the

Missouri, before that valiant little wreck of a bus got back to the

bleak prairie town, amid all the glory of a marvelous western sunset.

Well, I have been running along this line for a reason.

When an actor comes on the screen, in the early scenes of a photoplay,

we look at him without much interest. But if we see him chop wood, or

come through a fight, or learn what a time he had selling papers when

he was a youngster, we unconsciously begin to get more interested in

him. We like him better. Because we know him better. It is the same in

real life. Old friends are the best friends; we know them better.

If I were going to school with some new arrival who was sure to be

something of a leader, and who was going to have a lot to do with me,

and influence me, and whom I might influence in a measure in return,

you better believe that the sooner I became really acquainted with him,

and liked him, and really knew his weaknesses and disliked them—why,

the better it would be for both of us.

That is the way it is with this great new arrival—the motion-picture

industry. It is a sort of big newcomer at the school, and we are

going to see a lot of it, and be influenced a lot by it, and possibly

influence it a bit ourselves, sooner or later.

It is worth while to get better acquainted with it as soon as possible.

That is why I’ve taken you along on this all-forenoon ramble, as it

were, through some of the paths of picture-making. And having gone

so far, when next you watch a photoplay, you can think of how many

people, doing so many different things, had to take part in the making

of that picture, and how many problems they had; and how perhaps they

had to stand around, day after day, waiting for the sun to come from

behind a cloud at just the right time. And you can notice the clothes

the actors wear, and the other properties, and wonder how much of a job

the property man had keeping them all straight, and how good he was on

his job. And if the film is an unusually good one, and everybody seems

to have pulled together particularly well, you can praise it all the

more; and if it’s poor, you can analyze it, and perhaps decide where

the trouble, or part of it, lies.

Then, taken all in all, you’ll know motion pictures a little better,

and be more interested in them, and like them better, and find they’re

a little more useful to you, while you’re a little closer to the point

where you’ll be useful to them.

[Illustration: _Courtesy W. W. Hodkinson Corporation._

WHERE SCENIC BEAUTY IS REQUIRED.

This scene was taken in Western Montana by a New York company. The

way the heroine is handling the rod in this picture betrays the fact

she is an actress instead of an expert.]

[Illustration: _Courtesy W. W. Hodkinson Corporation._

A PROPOSAL ON A MOUNTAIN TOP.

To secure this picture the cameras were carried up to a height of

nearly ten thousand feet on horseback. Two cameras were taken to

minimize the risk of having to take the hard trip again and make the

scene over.]

With the movie makers · 第 5 / 10 章