Inexperienced humanitarians long for the time when eating will be

superfluous, when a few pills of concentrated albumin combined with a

few drops of some essential ferment will supply the necessary energy

for our mental and physical labours. What a stupid dream! If such a

time ever came, how unhappy humanity would be! The most of mankind,

truth compels me to say, live only to eat. For them “eating” is

synonymous with “life.” With the discovery of such pills the wine of

life would be drawn. No! No! No! If there were no such thing as eating

we should have to invent it to save man from despairing. Eating enables

one who has suffered shipwreck on Life’s voyage to withdraw into a

sphere which once meant the greatest happiness to all human beings and

still means it to all animals. One takes refuge in the primal instincts

where one is safe and comfortable, until Mother Earth again devours and

assimilates him before she awakes him to new life. We are all eternal

links in an unending chain of links.

And that is the whole meaning of eating: life and death. Every bite we

eat means a quick death for myriads of living things. They must die

that we may live. And so we live by death until our death gives life to

others.

It’s no mere accident that Don Juan is summoned from the feast to his

death.

ARE WE ALL MEGALOMANIACS?

There is no sharp dividing line between health and disease. One shades

off into the other by imperceptible gradations. Disease grows out of

health organically. There are a thousand transitions from the one to

the other; a thousand fine threads link them together, and often not

even the best physicians can determine where health ceases and disease

begins. As Feuchtersleben says, there is no lyric leap in the epic of

life. Nor do delusions make their entry unheralded into a well ordered

mental life. Delusions slumber in all of us and wait for their prey.

The quiet normal being is just as subject to them as the raving maniac

with rolling congested eyes. We need only open our eyes understandingly

upon the bustle and tumult of life to be able to exclaim with Hans

Sachs: “Madness! Everywhere madness!”

Every form of insanity, one may say, has a physiological prototype.

Melancholia takes for its model the little depressive attacks of

everyday life; mania has its prototype in the unrestrained enthusiasm

of the baseball “fan”; and even the various forms of paranoia, the true

insanity, have their typical representatives among normal persons.

To bring out this kinship we need no better example than that offered

by the delusion of greatness. This delusion is so bound up with the

requirements of the human psyche, so organically knit together with

the ego, that it constitutes an indispensable element of our ethical

consciousness. Every one of us thinks himself the wisest, best, most

conscientious, and so forth. Each one thinks himself indispensable.

It is this delusional greatness of the normal person which makes life

tolerable under even the hardest conditions. It gives us the strength

to bear all our humiliations, disappointments, failures, and the “whips

and scorns of time.”

Of course we are very careful to conceal this delusional greatness from

the rest of the world. We all have our secret chapels in which we offer

daily prayers and into which no one, not even our nearest, is permitted

even to glance. In this chapel our idol sits enthroned, the prototype

of majesty, “our ego,” before whom we bend our knees in humble

supplication. But out there--in the world without--it is different.

There we play the role of the humble, respectful, subservient fellow.

We swear allegiance to alien gods and mock our ego and its powers.

But sometimes the delusional greatness breaks out with pathological

elementary force. We ought to keep our light under a bushel, trudge

along with the multitude, day in, day out. Then all would be well.

But destiny must not lift us to heights where our behaviour cannot

escape observation and every one of our thoughts will be deduced from

our actions. Success must not narcotise us to the extent of depriving

us of that vestige of self-criticism which we so imperatively need

in whatever situation life may place us. Success does not pacify the

roaring of our megalomania. Success goads it with a thousand lashes

of the whip so that it becomes restive and escapes from the security

of the preserves of the soul. Is this still a healthy manifestation?

Or are we already in the realm of the pathological? Is it the first

delusion or the ultimate wisdom?

The delusion of greatness penetrates whole classes of humanity,

infecting them like a subtle poison against which there is almost

no immunity. We have only to refer to the “affairs” of all kinds of

artists of the first, second, and third rank. The delusional greatness

of the artist usually appears along with the belittling mania displayed

by his confreres, his immediate competitors. The higher we esteem

ourselves, the more we depreciate our fellow climbers. That is the

reason why the artist, drunk with his own ego, loses the power to be

just, to measure the work of others by any but an egocentric standard.

Should any one venture to show this megalomania its true image in the

calm mirror of justice, he would be characterized a malicious enemy.

In the struggle to maintain the hypertrophied ego-consciousness the

delusion of greatness is assisted by a willing servant: the delusion of

persecution.

Along with the artist class there are many other vocations which to a

certain extent gratify the delusion of greatness. In some callings this

is a kind of idealistic compensation for the poor material returns. The

megalomania of the Prussian officer, or the American professor (who are

the butts of even the so-called harmless comic-journals) is an example.

A close second to this is the megalomania of certain exclusive student

organizations, patriotic megalomania, etc.

We can no longer escape a generalization. We note that delusional

greatness is a compensation for some privation or hardship. This is

especially illuminating with reference to that patriotic delusional

greatness which has nothing whatever to do with a wholly justifiable

self-consciousness. The self-consciousness of the Briton emanates from

his proud history and the imposing power of his nation. But we note

that it is especially small nations, who ought in reason to be very

modest, who are guilty of a tremendous self-overestimation. And they do

not scruple to invent an illustrious past which is calculated to lend

some show of historic justification for the national delusion. _Exempla

sunt odiosa._

This mechanism teaches us how to estimate folk-psychology. A people

behaves like an individual. So that our findings with reference to the

psychology of individuals may be applied to whole races, and _vice

versa_.

And here we note that the individual’s delusional greatness invariably

has one and the same root: it is an over-compensation for an oppressive

diminution of the ego-consciousness. The daily life about us offers

innumerable proofs of this assertion. Persons particularly prone to

delusional greatness are those who suffer from certain defects and

who in youth had been subjected to painful, derisive, scornful, or

depreciative criticism. Amongst these we find especially the halt, the

lame, the partly blind, the stutterer, the humpbacked, the red-haired,

the sick, etc.--in short, persons with some stigma. By the mechanism of

over-compensation such individuals may manifest inordinately ambitious

natures. Is it accidental that so many celebrated generals--Cæsar,

Napoleon, Prince Eugene, Radetzky--were of small stature? Was it not

precisely this smallness of stature which furnished the driving power

that made them “great”? Instead of looking for the essence of genius in

peculiar bodily proportions (which Popper finds to be in a long trunk

and short legs!) it would prove a more gratifying task to ferret out

those primary factors that have brought about an unusual expenditure of

psychic energy in one particular direction.

A very brilliant and suggestive hypothesis (advanced by Dr. Alfred

Adler) attempts to account for all superior human gifts as an

over-compensation for some original “inferiority.” Even if this

principle may not prove true in every case, it can be demonstrated to

have played a part in the development of many a case of superior merit

in some field of mental endeavour. We are all familiar with largely

authentic anecdotes about distinguished scholars, who have just managed

to squeeze through in their final professional examinations. In their

case, too, by over-compensation a conviction of their inferiority

brought about a heightened interest in their work and this interest

then became permanently fixed.

Unawares we have wandered from the delusional greatness to true

greatness. But who will presume to decide what is true greatness and

what delusion? How many discoverers and inventors were ridiculed

and their imposing greatness stigmatized as delusion, and how many

intellectual ciphers rejoiced in the applause and the worship of their

contemporaries! It is this fact which encourages a megalomaniac to

permit the criticism of his contemporaries to “fly by him as the idle

wind which he respects not.” If it is not true that all greatness is

ignored, the opposite is true: every ignored person is one of the great

ones. At least he is so to himself. Delusional greatness unites both

criticism and recognition in a single tremendous ego-complex.

The roots of this delusion, as of all purely psychic maladies, are

infantile. There was a time in the lives of all of us when we were the

victims of a genuinely pathological delusion of greatness. In the days

of our childhood we were consumed by a longing to be “big.” At first it

was only the desire to be a “big man,” to be grown up. A little later

and our desires fluttered across the sea of our thoughts like sea-gulls

or flew like falcons into the unknown vast. We were kings, ministers

of state, princes, ambassadors, generals, trapeze artists, conductors,

firemen, or even butlers.

And yet we are all surprised when a butler plants himself squarely

before the door and assumes the easy port of a person of some standing

and identifies himself with the master of the house and graciously

dispenses his domestic favours. Are we then, much better, more

sensible, or freer from prejudice? We too stand before the doors of our

desires and act as if we believed that they are realities which we are

obliged to guard.

RUNNING AWAY FROM THE HOME

Once more the physician felt the young woman’s pulse. “But it’s

impossible: you must not go out to-day; you are running the risk of a

relapse. You stay in your beautiful home that you have furnished so

cosily, so comfortably, and with such good taste. I have no objection,

however, to your inviting a few friends, having a little music,

chatting, gossiping, but--stay home!”

The pretty self-willed woman pursed her lips at this and though her

grimace was very becoming to her it seemed a little to vex her old

doctor who had known her from her infancy. Somewhat irritated, he

continued:--

“I don’t just know what you mean by the moue. Must I point out the

dangers of exposing yourself to a ‘fresh cold’? Do you insist on making

a Sunday of every week-day? First, it’s a café, then, a restaurant!

From a hot room into the cold, moist, windy atmosphere of a winter

night!”

“But staying home is so stale and unprofitable,” wailed the young

woman. “Home! I’m home all the live-long week! Sunday, one wants a

change! I want to see human beings! You are very disagreeable to-day,

Doctor!”

The old doctor gently patted the young woman’s cheek. “Still the same

self-willed, obstinate child that will butt its head against the wall.

Ah, you seem to have forgotten how nice and sociable your parents’ home

was. Those never-to-be-forgotten Sundays! How we used to congregate

there, a group of intimates--the young ones chatting and singing while

the older ones played cards,--and every Sunday was a real holiday!

And when things got a little more lively, then young and old romped

together. Do you remember? Now and then someone would read us a new

poem or the latest novel. How we did enjoy those Sundays! And how

unforced and unconventional it all was! We would get our cup of tea

or coffee and were as happy as happy as could be. But the things that

are going on now seem to me, in my rôle as physician, to be a kind of

neurosis, a something that I should call ‘the flight from home!’”

“But, my dear doctor, must it be a neurosis? Is it necessary to brand

everything as a disease?”

“But it is a disease and its character as such is very clearly

established by this one element: its compulsive character. The flight

from the home is a compulsive idea, that is, an idea against which

logic, persuasion, and appeals are of no avail.”

“I think you are going too far,” replied the young woman. “If I insist

upon going to the café to-day, I do it not because I do not like my

home; no, I do it because at the café I get a kind of stimulation

which I do not get at home. There I can look through various journals

and papers that I cannot afford to have at home. I get a chance to

see friends and acquaintances whom I could not receive at home so

often. And the main thing, at any rate for a young woman who still

wishes to please--and that, I am sure you won’t resent, you dear

old psychologist!--the main thing is that there I see new people

and--am seen by them. I know that in return I must put up with a few

unpleasantnesses. Yes, there is the stuffy and smoky atmosphere, the

continual din and noise, and so forth. But I really do think that we

moderns need these things. We are not born to rest.”

The physician shook his head.

“No! Never! You will pardon, I hope, my telling you that yours is a

very superficial psychology and does not go down to the heart of the

problem. To the modern civilized human being his home seems to be an

extremely disagreeable place. All his life he is fleeing from his

home, from his environment, and--yes!--even from himself. An inner

restlessness, a discontent that cannot be quenched, a nervous stress

permeates the people of our time. What they possess seems to them

stale, worthless. What they pursued madly disappoints them when they

have attained it. They crave for change because they do not know how to

make the best use of the present and of their possessions. How else can

we understand the phenomenon that the whole world is happy to get away

from the home and those who are incapable of running away long to do

so? For, I am sure if you will give it careful thought you will confess

that you call ‘experience’ only what happens to you away from home. The

days at home don’t count. Am I right?”

“Only partly so, my dear doctor. It does not tally with the

facts--because nothing can be experienced at home. And I would be only

too happy to receive my friends here daily, if it were possible. Don’t

you know that servants would rebel at it? That they want to have their

day off? That I must not expect them to do such work as waiting on my

guests every Sunday? Why even on week days the invitation of guests

causes a little rebellion in the ordinary household!”

“And why must there be invitations? Must your visitors always be

guests? Just look at Paris! There you may drop in on any of your

acquaintances after 9 p.m. You may or you may not get a cup of tea. You

chat a few hours and then depart. With us that’s impossible, because

our so-called ‘Teas’ have assumed proportions which were formerly

unknown. You invite one to come and have tea with you but instead

of that you serve a luncheon and make a veritable banquet of it,

going to a lot of trouble and expense, a course which must have bad

consequences.”

“Do you know, doctor, I think you are a magician! It’s only

conventional politeness that makes us receive our guests cordially. But

you must serve your friends something when you invite them for a little

chat, mustn’t you?”

“There you are again! How beautifully you chatter away so

superficially! No, my dear! Nowadays one no longer invites friends to

spend a pleasant time with them, but to show them a new gown or to

impress them with the new furnishings. The main thing is to poison the

friend’s peace of mind. If the guest’s face betrays all the colours

of envy then the hostess has attained the acme of delight. One might

almost say that their dissatisfaction with their lot in life drives

human beings on to stir up discontent in the hearts of others. This

sowing of dragon’s teeth bears evil fruit. For at the next ‘tea’ the

friend has a more beautiful dress, perhaps some other new sensation,

and her husband’s achievements and income mount to supernatural

heights, if one is to believe the hostess’ eloquent speeches. Finally,

there is no possibility of out-trumping her and there is nothing left

to do but, in a more moderate tone, to fight out the rivalry on a

neutral soil. The restaurant or the café is this neutral soil.”

“And what are your objections to this neutral soil?”

“My objections? The people lose the greatest pleasure that they could

derive from one another. At home it must happen now and then that the

walls which separate the inmates from one another fall, the wrappings

that encase our inmost being burst, and soul speaks to soul. At home

it is possible to devote the time to the nobler delights that life has

to offer. At one time there can be--as there was in your own parents’

home--a reading, on another occasion singing or music. And would it be

such a terrible misfortune to spend one’s holiday with one’s family, to

be one with them, reviewing the week that is past or playing with the

children and being a child again? Don’t you see that you are giving up

the gold of home-life and pursuing the fool’s-gold of pleasure outside

the home? You do see it, you know I am right, and a little voice within

you implores and pleads: ‘Stay home! Stay home! here you are safe and

comfortable!’ But another power, a power that is stronger than you,

drives you out, rushes you away from peace and quiet to restlessness,

and whirls you about. And this whirl, you call ‘life.’ What have these

empty pleasures to offer us? What inspiration for the work-a-day life

do they leave behind? Is this anything less than just simply killing

the hours? I don’t want to spin out the old stuff about the dangers

of pleasures, getting over-heated, catching cold, overtaxing one’s

nervous energies, losing one’s sleep, etc. As to these things, I must

admit, there is a great deal of exaggeration. One ought not to fly from

pleasures. But they ought to serve as inspiring exceptions to break, as

it were, the day, just as a trip does.”

“But, my dear doctor, now you’ve caught yourself in your own springe.

Is not a trip a flight from the home?”

The young woman laughed hilariously. But the doctor--now that he had

assumed the rôle of preacher--did not permit himself to be put off or

confused.

“Of course, the ordinary journey does belong to my theme. A trip may,

in fact, constitute the crisis in our neurosis. A crisis that we must

all go through, for we all--I am sorry to say, I too--suffer from this

compulsive idea. As after every other crisis the invalid is for a time

restored to health, so is it also after a trip. But only for a short

time. A few weeks--and the compulsive idea is again manifest and the

flight from the home begins again.”

“Come, now, doctor!” interrupted the convalescent, “travelling is a

necessity. As you so aptly said, we want to break the monotony of the

day--to get out of the customary environment.”

“That’s just what I want to designate as the chief symptom of the

neurosis of our time. Everyone wants to get away from the customary

environments. Everybody makes attempts at flight. Whether they succeed

depends upon other social factors. Why is the customary environment

repugnant to you?”

“Because I crave a change. I do not know why. But I have an instinctive

longing for it.”

“There you have it, my dear. It’s just as I said: It’s a compulsive

idea. The flight from one’s environment, from one’s home, from one’s

furniture, is the same as the flight from one’s house. To me every

piece of furniture that I have used a long time has become so dear

and so much a part of myself that I do not like to give them away and

can only with difficulty part with them. And if I were to come into

possession of a vast fortune to-day I could not renounce these dear

associates to whom I am bound by so many memories. With all their

shortcomings and modesty they are a thousand times dearer to me than

the most beautiful English or secessionist furnishings. I’ll confess

that in these matters I am not at all modern. For the moderns are glad

when they can change something, and so they change their furniture,

their carpets, their pictures, etc. About every ten years there is a

change in the fashions and your housewife cannot bear not to be in

style. One day you enter her house and you find new rooms. And just

as the furnishings in the house are changed from time to time, so the

residence too must be changed frequently--in fact, everything that can

be changed is changed: The servants, the family physician, the music

teacher, and, where it is possible, the husband and even the wife.”

The young woman reflected a little. “There is much truth in what you

say. It is in fact a tremendous flight that we see enacted everywhere

about us, a flight from oneself and from one’s environment. If I were

to judge by my own feelings I should say that this fleeing has its

origin in our life’s needs. We women all have a large ‘Nora’ element

in us and are waiting for the ‘miracle.’ Inasmuch as we cannot find

it at home we look for it elsewhere. Believe me, doctor, most women

do not fall because of sensual appetites. No! they fall because they

crave for some experience. We experience too little. The monotony of

the days asphyxiates us. And this great whirl of life, this senseless

running after a change--as you call it--is only because our hearts

are discontented, because our spirits are wrecked by the monotony and

insipidity of our lives. Do you think that it will ever be different?”

“Why not, pray? Some day a great physician must arise, an apostle of

human love, whose voice will pierce the whirl and who will be capable

of opening man’s stupid eyes: A new religion would do it, a religion

that would satisfy all of humanity’s longings, a religion of work

and the joy of life. Our time is ripe for a Messiah. Whether he will

come----.”

“Ah, he has come,” said the charming young woman, her face beaming.

“For me you are the Messiah of domesticity! You have cured me of my

flight neurosis. I shall stay home to-day, and as often as I can do so.”

The old doctor took his leave with animated steps. With the power of

his words he had once again reformed a human being.

But his joy was short-lived. That afternoon, as he walked by a café on

the main thoroughfare his eyes fell on a vivacious group within. And

there he saw his recalcitrant patient who had evidently gone out only

to get a chance to discuss thoroughly with her friends the theme: “The

flight from the house.”

DEAD-HEADS

“Are there any people who still pay for tickets?” I was asked in all

seriousness by a man, who, as a result of his numerous connections,

had been able to develop the art of getting passes to its utmost

possibilities.

The Depths of the Soul: Psycho-Analytical Studies · 第 5 / 12 段