GEORGE EARL OF MACCLESFIELD

to

_Martin Folkes_ Esq; _President_ of the _Royal Society_,

and by him communicated to the same,

_May_ 10. 1750.

_LONDON_:

Printed for CHARLES DAVIS, Printer to the

_Royal Society_.

M.DCC.LI.

A TABLE, shewing, by means of the Golden Numbers, the several Days on

which the Paschal Limits or Full Moons, according to the _Gregorian_

Account, have already happened, or will hereafter happen; from the

Reformation of the Calendar in the Year of our Lord 1582, to the Year

4199 inclusive.

To find the Day on which the Paschal Limit or Full Moon falls in any

given Year; Look, in the Column of Golden Numbers belonging to that

Period of Time wherein the given Year is contained, for the Golden

Number of that Year; over-against which, in the same Line continued to

the Column intitled _Paschal Full Moons_, you will find the Day of the

Month, on which the Paschal Limit or Full Moon happens in that Year.

And the _Sunday_ next after that Day is _Easter_ Day in that Year,

according to the _Gregorian_ Account.

+-----------------------------------------------------------+

|Golden Numbers from the Year 1583 to 1699, and so on to |

| 4199, all inclusive. |

+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+

|1583|1700|1900|2200|2300|2400|2500|2600|2900|3100|3400|3500|

| to | to | to | to | to | to | to | to | to | to | to | to |

|1699|1899|2199|2299|2399|2499|2599|2899|3099|3399|3499|3599|

+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+

| 3 | 14 | .. | 6 | 17 | 6 | 17 | .. | 9 | .. | 1 | 12 |

| .. | 3 | 14 | .. | 6 | .. | 6 | 17 | .. | 9 | .. | 1 |

| 11 | .. | 3 | 14 | .. | 14 | .. | 6 | 17 | .. | 9 | .. |

| .. | 11 | .. | 3 | 14 | 3 | 14 | .. | 6 | 17 | .. | 9 |

| 19 | .. | 11 | .. | 3 | .. | 3 | 14 | .. | 6 | 17 | .. |

| 8 | 19 | .. | 11 | .. | 11 | .. | 3 | 14 | .. | 6 | 17 |

| .. | 8 | 19 | .. | 11 | .. | 11 | .. | 3 | 14 | .. | 6 |

| 16 | .. | 8 | 19 | .. | 19 | .. | 11 | .. | 3 | 14 | .. |

| 5 | 16 | .. | 8 | 19 | 8 | 19 | .. | 11 | .. | 3 | 14 |

| .. | 5 | 16 | .. | 8 | .. | 8 | 19 | .. | 11 | .. | 3 |

| 13 | .. | 5 | 16 | .. | 16 | .. | 8 | 19 | .. | 11 | .. |

| 2 | 13 | .. | 5 | 16 | 5 | 16 | .. | 8 | 19 | .. | 11 |

| .. | 2 | 13 | .. | 5 | .. | 5 | 16 | .. | 8 | 19 | .. |

| 10 | .. | 2 | 13 | .. | 13 | .. | 5 | 16 | .. | 8 | 19 |

| .. | 10 | .. | 2 | 13 | 2 | 13 | .. | 5 | 16 | .. | 8 |

| 18 | .. | 10 | .. | 2 | .. | 2 | 13 | .. | 5 | 16 | .. |

| 7 | 18 | .. | 10 | .. | 10 | .. | 2 | 13 | .. | 5 | 16 |

| .. | 7 | 18 | .. | 10 | .. | 10 | .. | 2 | 13 | .. | 5 |

| 15 | .. | 7 | 18 | .. | 18 | .. | 10 | .. | 2 | 13 | .. |

| 4 | 15 | .. | 7 | 18 | 7 | 18 | .. | 10 | .. | 2 | 13 |

| .. | 4 | 15 | .. | 7 | .. | 7 | 18 | .. | 10 | .. | 2 |

| 12 | .. | 4 | 15 | .. | 15 | .. | 7 | 18 | .. | 10 | .. |

| 1 | 12 | .. | 4 | 15 | 4 | 15 | .. | 7 | 18 | .. | 10 |

| .. | 1 | 12 | .. | 4 | .. | 4 | 15 | .. | 7 | 18 | .. |

| 9 | .. | 1 | 12 | .. | 12 | .. | 4 | 15 | .. | 7 | 18 |

| .. | 9 | .. | 1 | 12 | 1 | 12 | .. | 4 | 15 | .. | 7 |

| 17 | .. | 9 | .. | 1 | .. | 1 | 12 | .. | 4 | 15 | .. |

| 6 | 17 | 17 | 9 | .. | 9 | .. | 1 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 15 |

| 14 | 6 | 6 | 17 | 9 | 17 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 |

| | | | | | | | | | | | |

+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+

+---------------------------------------------------------+

|Golden Numbers from the Year 1583 to 1699,| Paschal |

|and so on to 4199, all inclusive. | Full Moons. |

+----+----+----+----+----------------------+--------------+

|3600|3700|3800|4100| Days of the |

| to | to | to | to | Month, and |

|3699|3799|4099|4199| Sunday Letters|

+----+----+----+----+----------------------+--------------+

| 1 | 12 | .. | 4 | March 21. C |

| .. | 1 | 12 | .. | 22. D |

| 9 | .. | 1 | 12 | 23. E |

| .. | 9 | .. | 1 | 24. F |

| 17 | .. | 9 | .. | 25. G |

| 6 | 17 | .. | 9 | 26. A |

| .. | 6 | 17 | .. | 27. B |

| 14 | .. | 6 | 17 | 28. C |

| 3 | 14 | .. | 6 | 29. D |

| .. | 3 | 14 | .. | 30. E |

| 11 | .. | 3 | 14 | 31. F |

| .. | 11 | .. | 3 | April 1. G |

| 19 | .. | 11 | .. | 2. A |

| 8 | 19 | .. | 11 | 3. B |

| .. | 8 | 19 | .. | 4. C |

| 16 | .. | 8 | 19 | 5. D |

| 5 | 16 | .. | 8 | 6. E |

| .. | 5 | 16 | .. | 7. F |

| 13 | .. | 5 | 16 | 8. G |

| 2 | 13 | .. | 5 | 9. A |

| .. | 2 | 13 | .. | 10. B |

| 10 | .. | 2 | 13 | 11. C |

| .. | 10 | .. | 2 | 12. D |

| 18 | .. | 10 | .. | 13. E |

| 7 | 18 | .. | 10 | 14. F |

| .. | 7 | 18 | .. | 15. G |

| 15 | .. | 7 | 18 | 16. A |

| 4 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 17. B |

| 12 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 18. C |

| | | | | 19. D |

| | | | | 20. E |

| | | | | 21. F |

| | | | | 22. G |

| | | | | 23. A |

| | | | | 24. B |

| | | | | 25. C |

+----+----+----+----+-------------------------------------+

_Remarks upon the_ Solar _and the_ Lunar _Years_, _the_ Cycle _of

19 Years_, _commonly called the_ Golden Number, _the_ Epact, _and

a Method of finding the Time of_ Easter, _as it is now observed

in most Parts of_ Europe. _Being Part of a Letter from the Right

Honourable_ George _Earl of_ Macclesfield _to_ Martin Folkes _Esq_;

President _of the_ Royal Society.

_Of the_ Solar Year.

[_Read_ May 10. 1750.]

THE mean _Tropical Solar Year_, or that mean Space of Time wherein the

Sun, or Earth, after departing from any Point of the Ecliptic returns

to the same again, consists, according to Dr. _Halley_'s Tables, of

365d, 5h, 48´, 55´´: Which is less by 11´, 5´´, than the mean _Julian_

Year, consisting of 365d, 6h, 0´, 0´´.

Hence the Equinoxes and Solstices anticipate, or come earlier than the

_Julian_ Account supposes them to do by 11´, 5´´, in each mean _Julian_

Year; or 44´, 20´´ in every four; or 3d, 1h, 53´, 20´´, in every four

hundred _Julian_ Years.

In order to correct this Error in the _Julian_ Year, the Authors of

the _Gregorian_ Method of regulating the Year, when they reformed

the Calendar in the Beginning of _October 1582_, directed that three

intercalary Days should be omitted or dropped in every four hundred

Years; by reckoning all those Years, whose Date consists of a Number

of entire Hundreds not divisible by 4, such as 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100,

_&c._ to be only Common, and not Bissextile or Leap Years, as they

would otherwise have been; and consequently omitting the intercalary

Days, which, according to the _Julian_ Account, should have been

inserted in the Month of _February_ in those Years. But at the same

time they order'd that every fourth hundredth Year, consisting of a

Number of entire Hundreds, divisible by 4, such as 1600, 2000, 2400,

2800, _&c._ should still be consider'd as Bissextile or Leap Years,

and, of consequence, that one Day should be intercalated as usual in

those Years.

This Correction, however, did not entirely remove the Error: For the

Equinoxes and Solstices still anticipate 1h, 53´, 20´´ in every four

hundred _Gregorian_ Years.

But that Difference is so inconsiderable as not to amount to

twenty-four Hours, or to one whole Day, in less than 5082 _Gregorian_

Years.

_Of the_ Lunar Year, Cycle of 19 Years, _and the_ Epact.

The Space of Time betwixt one mean Conjunction of the Moon with the Sun

and the next following, or a mean _Synodical Month_, is equal to 29d,

12h, 44´, 3´´, 2´´´, 56{IV} according to Mr. _Pound_'s Tables of mean

Conjunctions.

The Common Lunar Year consists of 12 such Months.

The Intercalary or _Embolimæan_ Year consists of 13 such Months.

In each Cycle of 19 Lunar Years, there are 12 Common, and 7 Intercalary

or _Embolimæan_ Years, making together 235 Synodical Months.

It was thought, at the time of the General Council of _Nice_, which was

holden in the Year of our Lord 325, that 19 _Julian_ Solar Years were

exactly equal to such a Cycle of 19 Lunar Years, or to 235 Synodical

Months; and therefore, that, at the End of 19 Years, the New Moons

or Conjunctions would happen exactly at the same Times, as they did

19 Years before: And upon this Supposition it was, that, some time

afterwards, the several Numbers of that Cycle, commonly called the

Golden Numbers, were prefixed to all those Days in the Calendar, on

which the New Moons then happened in the respective Years corresponding

to those Numbers; it being imagined, that whensoever any of those

Numbers should for the future be the Golden Number of the Year, the New

Moons would invariably happen on those Days in the several Months, to

which that Number was prefixed.

But this was a Mistake:

d h ´ ´´ ´´´

For 19 _Julian_ Solar Years contain 6939, 18, 0, 0, 0

Whereas 235 Synodical Months

contain only 6939, 16, 31, 56, 30

----------------------

And are therefore less than 19

_Julian_ Solar Years by 0, 1, 28, 3, 30.

This Difference amounts to a whole Day very nearly in 310.7 Years, the

New Moons anticipating, or falling earlier, by 24 Hours in that Space

of Time, than they did before: And therefore now in the Year 1750, the

New Moons happen above four Days and a half sooner, than the Times

pointed out by the Golden Numbers in the Calendar.

In order therefore to preserve a sort of regular Correspondence betwixt

the Solar and the Lunar Years, and to make the Golden Numbers, prefixed

to the Days of the Month, useful for determining the Times of the New

Moons, it would be necessary, when once those Golden Numbers should

have been prefixed to the proper Days, to make them anticipate a Day

at the End of every 310.7 Years, as the Moons will actually have done;

that is to set them back one Day, by prefixing each of them to the Day

preceding that, against which they before stood.

But as such a Rule would neither be so easily comprehended or retained

in Memory, as if the Alteration was to be made at the End or at the

Beginning of complete Centuries of Years; the Rule would be much more

fit for Practice, and keep sufficiently near to the Truth, if those

Numbers should be set back nine Days in the Space of 2800 Years; by

setting them back one Day, first at the End of 400 Years, and then at

the End of every 300 Years for eight times successively: whereby they

would be set back, in the whole, nine Days in 2800 Years. After which

they must again be set one Day back at the End of 400 Years, and so on,

as in the preceding 2800 Years. By which means the Golden Numbers would

always point out the mean Times of the New Moons, within a Day of the

Truth.

It is plain however that the Lunar Year will have lost one Day more

than ordinary, with respect to the Solar Year, whenever the New Moons

shall have anticipated a whole Day; as they will have done at those

times, when it is necessary that the Golden Numbers should, by the

Rule just now given, be set back one Day: and consequently the Epact,

for that and the succeeding Years, must exceed by an Unit the several

corresponding Epacts of the preceding 19 Years.

For the Epact is the Difference, in whole Days, betwixt the common

_Julian_ Solar and the Lunar Year; the former being reckoned to consist

of 365, and the latter of only 354 Days. If therefore the Solar and

the Lunar Year at any time should commence on the same Day, the Solar

would, at the End of the Year, have exceeded the Lunar by 11 Days;

which Number 11 would be the Epact of the next Year: 22 would be

the Epact of the Year following, and 33 the Epact of the Year after

that, the Epacts increasing yearly by 11. But as often as this yearly

Addition makes the Epact exceed 30, those 30 are rejected as making

an intercalary Month, and only the Excess of the Epact above 30 is

accounted the true Epact for that Year. Thus when the Epact would

amount to 31, 32, 33, 34, _&c._ the 30 is rejected, and the Epact

becomes 1, 2, 3, 4, _&c._

Since therefore the Lunar Year will have lost a Day more than ordinary,

in respect of the Solar Year, whenever it is necessary to set the

Golden Numbers one Day back, as was before observed; it follows, that

the Epact must at the same time be increased by an Unit more than

usual: the Difference betwixt the Solar and the Lunar Year having been

just so much greater than usual. That is, 12 must be added, instead of

11, to the Epact of the preceding, in order to form what will be the

Epact of the then present Year. Which Addition of an Unit extraordinary

to one Epact will occasion all the subsequent Epacts (which will follow

each other in the usual manner, each exceeding the foregoing by 11) to

be greater by an Unit than their respectively corresponding Epacts of

the preceding 19 Years.

If therefore, instead of the Golden Numbers, the Epacts of the several

Years were prefixed, in the manner the _Gregorians_ have done, to the

Days of the Calendar, in order to denote the Days on which the New

Moons fall in those Years whereof those Numbers are the Epacts; there

would never be Occasion to shift the Places of those Epacts in the

Calendar; since the Augmentation by an Unit extraordinary of the Epacts

themselves would answer the Purpose, and keep all tolerably right.

Thus in a very easy Method may the Course of the New Moons be pointed

out, either by the Golden Numbers, or by the Epacts, according to the

_Julian_ Account or Manner of adjusting the Year, which goes on regular

and uniform without any Variation.

But the regulating these things for those who use the _Gregorian_

Account, is an Affair of more Intricacy; and for them it will require

more Consideration to determine, when the Epacts are to be more than

ordinarily augmented, and at what Times they are to continue in

their usual Course; nay, to know when they are not only not to be

extraordinarily augmented, but also when they are to be diminished

by an Unit, by increasing one of them by 10 only instead of 11 as

usual: and this happens much oftener with the _Gregorians_, than the

increasing one of them by 12 instead of 11. For, in every _Gregorian_

Solar Year, whose Date consists of any Number of entire Hundreds

not divisible by 4, it is supposed that the Equinox has anticipated

one whole Day; and therefore one Day, that which ought to be the

intercalary one, is omitted; and consequently the preceding Solar Year,

where one Day was lost, exceeded the Lunar Year by 10 Days only instead

of 11.

In order therefore to adapt the before-mention'd Rule to the

_Gregorian_ Account, and to know in what Years the Epacts should

either be extraordinarily augmented or diminished, and the Golden

Numbers should either be set backwards or forwards in the Calendar; the

following Rules and Directions must be observed.

First. That in the Years 1800, 2100, 2700, 3000, _&c._ where the

Number of entire Hundreds is divisible by 3, but not by 4, the

_Gregorian_ Solar, as well as the Lunar Year, will have lost a Day; and

consequently the Difference betwixt them will be the same as usual:

Therefore in those Years there must be no Alteration, either in the

Epacts or the Golden Numbers; but the former must go on in the same

manner, and the latter stand prefixed to the same Days in the Calendar,

for another, as they did for the last hundred Years.

2dly. The like will happen in the Years 2000, 2800, 3200, _&c._ where

the Number of entire Hundreds is divisible by 4, but not by 3: For

neither the _Gregorian_ Solar nor the Lunar Year is to be altered; and

therefore the Epacts must go on, and the Golden Numbers stand, as they

did before.

But, 3dly, In the Years 2400, and 3600, whose Number of entire Hundreds

is divisible both by 3 and 4, the _Gregorian_ Solar Year goes on as

usual, and the Lunar Year has lost a Day. The Difference therefore

betwixt them being 12, the Epact of the preceding Year must be

augmented by that Number instead of 11, in order to form the Epact of

the then present Year; whereby a new Set of Epacts will be introduced,

exceeding their precedent corresponding Epacts by an Unit: And the

Golden Numbers must be set one Day back in the Calendar.

4thly and lastly, In the Years 1900, 2200, 2300, 2500, _&c._ where the

Number of Hundreds is divisible neither by 3 nor 4; the _Gregorian_

Solar Year having lost one Day, and the Lunar none, the Difference

betwixt them being only 10; that Number only, and not 11, is to be

added to the Epact of the preceding, in order to form the Epact

of that, the then present Year; whereby a new Set of Epacts will

be introduced, all of them less by an Unit than their precedent

corresponding Epacts: And the Golden Numbers must be set a Day

forwarder in the Calendar; that is, be prefixed to the Day following

that, against which they stood in the precedent hundred Years.

This Method would preserve a sort of Regularity betwixt the Solar

and the Lunar Years; and, by means of the Rules and Directions

before-mentioned, the Days of the New Moons might be pointed out,

either by the Golden Numbers or by the Epacts, placed in the Calendar

for that Purpose; according to the _Julian_ Account for ever, and

according to the _Gregorian_ Account till the Year 4199 inclusive,

after which there must be some little Variation made in the four last

Precepts or Rules, but it would be to little Purpose now, to attempt

the framing of a new Set of Rules for so distant a Time.

The _Gregorians_ have chosen to make use of the Epacts to determine the

Days of the New Moons, and follow pretty nearly the Rules prescribed

above; except that they order the Epacts to have an additional

Augmentation of an Unit eight times in 2500 Years, beginning with the

Year 1800, as at the End of 400 Years; to which 400 Years if there be

added three times seven hundred, or 2100 Years, the Period of 2500

Years will be completed in the Year 3900. After which they do not make

their extraordinary Augmentation of an Unit in the Epacts, till at the

End of another Term of 400 Years; which defers that Augmentation from

the Year 4200 to the Year 4300. And this is the Reason that the Rules

above delivered will require a Variation in the Year 4200; whereas

it is directed in this Paper that the Epacts should be augmented,

or (which is the same thing) the Golden Numbers be set back in the

Calendar nine times in 2800 Years. This arises from the _Gregorians_

supposing, that the Difference betwixt 19 Solar and as many Lunar

Years would not amount to a whole Day in less than 312 Years and a

half; whereas it has appeared above, that it would amount to a whole

Day in 310.7 Years. But although the Rule prescribed in this Paper

comes much nearer to the Truth, yet the Error in either Case is very

inconsiderable, being so small as not to amount to a whole Day in many

thousand Years; and therefore is not worth regarding.

_A Method of finding the Time of_ Easter, _as it is observed in most

Parts of_ Europe.

From what has been already said, a Method may be obtained, for fixing,

with sufficient Exactness, the Time of the Celebration of the Feast

of _Easter_, which is governed by the _Vernal Equinox_, and by the

Age of the Moon nearest to it. The former whereof, when once rightly

adjusted, may (by the Corrections mentioned in that Part of this Paper

which relates to the Solar Year) be made to continue to fall at very

near the same time with, or at most not to differ a whole Day from the

true _Equinox_: and the same Rules and Directions, which, as was before

shewn, would, without any great Error, point out the Times of the first

Day of the Moon, would with equal Certainty point out the fourteenth,

fifteenth, or any other: And thus the Times of the Oppositions or

the Full Moons might be as well marked out thereby, as those of the

Conjunctions or the New Moons.

I shall not at present take notice of the Canon of the Council of

_Nice_, in the Year of our Lord 325, which directs the Time of

celebrating the Feast of _Easter_, or of the Reasons upon which that

Canon was founded. Nor shall I endeavour to explain the Rule now in

Use in the Church of _England_ for finding _Easter_: For, besides that

such an Explanation would extend this Paper to an improper Length,

those Points have already been treated of by several much abler

Hands, and particularly by our Countryman the learned Dr. _Prideaux_.

Nor is it my Intention to enter far into the Methods used by the

_Gregorians_, or those of the Church of _Rome_, or by any other Nations

or Countries, for finding the Time of that Feast. As to our own, I

shall only observe, that the Method now used in _England_, for finding

the fourteenth Day of the Moon, or the Ecclesiastical Full Moon, on

which _Easter_ dependeth, is, by Process of Time, become considerably

erroneous: as the Golden Numbers, which were placed in the Calendar, to

point out the Days on which the New Moons fall in those Years of which

they are respectively the Golden Numbers, do now stand several Days

later in the same than those New Moons do really happen. Which Error,

as was before observed, arises from the Anticipation of the Moons since

the Time of the Council of _Nice_: And as the _Vernal Equinox_ has also

anticipated eleven Days since that time; neither that Equinox, nor

the New Moons, do now happen on those Days upon which the Church of

_England_ supposes them so to happen.

When Pope _Gregory_ XIII. reformed the _Julian_ Solar Year, he likewise

made a Correction as to the Time of celebrating the Feast of _Easter_,

by placing the Epacts (which he directed to be made use of for the

future instead of the Golden Numbers) much nearer to the true Times of

the New Moons than the Golden Numbers then stood in the old Calendar:

I say, _much nearer to the true Times_; because in fact the Epacts, as

placed by him, were not prefixed to the exact Days upon which the New

Moons then truly fell. And this was done with Design, and for a Reason

which it is not material to the Purpose of this Paper to mention.

But the Church of _England_, and that of _Rome_ or the _Gregorians_, do

still agree in this; that both of them mark (the former by the Golden

Numbers, and the latter by the Epacts corresponding to them) the Days

on which their Ecclesiastical New Moons are supposed to happen: And

that fourteenth Day of the Moon inclusive, or that Full Moon, which

falls upon, or next after, the 21st Day of _March_, is the Paschal

Limit or Full Moon to both: And the _Sunday_ next following that Limit

or Full Moon, is by both Churches celebrated as _Easter_ Day. But the

21st of _March_ being reckoned, according to the _Gregorian_ Account or

the New Style, eleven Days sooner than by the _Julian_ Account or the

Old Style, which is still in Use amongst us; and their Ecclesiastical

New Moons being three Days earlier than those of the Church of

_England_; it happens that although the Church of _England_ and that of

_Rome_ often do, yet more frequently they do not, celebrate the Feast

of _Easter_ upon the same natural Day.

It might however be easier for both, and could occasion no

Inconvenience, now that Almanacks, which tell the exact Times of the

New Moons, are in most Peoples Hands; if all the Golden Numbers and

Epacts now prefixed to those Days of the Calendar, in our Book of

Common Prayer, and in the _Roman Breviary_, on which the respective

Ecclesiastical New Moons happen, were omitted in the Places where they

now stand; and were set only against those fourteenth Days of the Moon,

or those Full Moons, which happen betwixt the 21st Day of _March_ and

the 18th of _April_, both inclusive. Since no fourteenth Day or Full

Moon, which happens before the 21st of _March_, or after the 18th Day

of _April_, can have any Share in fixing the Time of _Easter_. By which

means the Trouble of counting to the fourteenth Day, and the Mistakes

which sometimes arise therefrom, would be avoided.

We do as yet in _England_ follow the _Julian_ Account or the Old Style

in the Civil Year; as also the Old Method of finding those Moons upon

which _Easter_ depends: Both of which have been shewn to be very

erroneous.

If therefore this Nation should ever judge it proper to correct the

Civil Year, and to make it conformable to that of the _Gregorians_, it

would surely be adviseable to correct the Time of the Celebration of

the Feast of _Easter_ likewise, and to bring it to the same Day upon

which it is kept and solemnized by the Inhabitants of the greatest Part

of _Europe_, that is, by those who follow the _Gregorian_ Account. For

tho' I am aware, that their Method of finding the Time of _Easter_ is

not quite exact, but is liable to some Errors; yet I apprehend, that

all other practicable Methods of doing it would be so too: And if they

were more free from Error, they would probably be more intricate,

and harder to be understood by Numbers of People, than the Method of

determining that Feast either by a Cycle of Epacts, as is practiced by

the _Gregorians_, or by that of 19 Years or the Golden Numbers, in the

manner proposed in the following Part of this Paper: And it is of no

small Importance, that a Matter of so general a Concern, as the Method

of finding _Easter_ is, should be within the Reach of the Generality of

Mankind, at least as far as the Nature of the thing will admit.

For which Reason, in case the Legislature of this Country should before

the Year 1900, think fit to make our Civil Year correspond with that

of the _Gregorians_, and also to celebrate all the future Feasts of

_Easter_ upon the same Days upon which they celebrate them; this last

Particular might be easily effected, without altering the Rule of the

Church of _England_ for the finding of that Feast: And this only by

advancing the Golden Numbers, prefixed to certain Days in the Calendar,

8 Days forwarder for the New Moons, or 21 Days forwarder for the

fourteenth Days or Full Moons, than they now stand in our Calendar.

In order to explain this, it must be observed, that the _Gregorian_

Account or the New Style is eleven Days forwarder than the _Julian_

Account or the Old Style, which we still make use of; that is, the last

Day of any of our Months is the eleventh Day of their next succeeding

Month. If therefore their Ecclesiastical New Moons fell on the same

Days with those of the Church of _England_, the Golden Number 14,

which now stands against the last Day of _February_ in our that is the

_Julian_ Calendar, should, when we should have adopted the _Gregorian_

Calendar, be prefixed to the 11th Day of _March_. But since their

Ecclesiastical New Moons happen 3 Days earlier than our Ecclesiastical

New Moons at present do; so much should be deducted from those 11 Days,

by which the Golden Numbers ought otherwise to be advanced; and the

Golden Number 14 should not be placed against the 11th, but the 8th Day

of _March_: Which being reckoned the first Day of the Moon, if we count

on to the fourteenth Day of the same inclusive, that would be found

to fall on the a 21st Day of _March_; on which Day the _Gregorian_

Paschal Limit or Full Moon will happen when the Golden Number is 14.

And the like Course should be taken with the rest of the 19 Golden

Numbers; which ought to be placed 8 Days forwarder than they now stand,

if they are to point out the New Moon; or 21 Days forwarder than they

are at present, if they are to mark the fourteenth Day of the Moon or

the Full Moon: The latter of which, as has been shewn, would be more

eligible, than to prefix those Numbers to the Days on which the New

Moons happen.

Thus may the Rule and Method now used in the Church of _England_, be

most easily adapted to shew the Time of _Easter_, as it is observed by

the _Gregorians_, till the Year 1900; at which Time, and at the other

proper succeeding Times, if the Golden Numbers in the Calendar shall

either be advanced or set backward a Day, according the foregoing Rules

and Directions for that Purpose, they will continue to shew us the New

or the Full Moons, of the Church of _Rome_ or the _Gregorian_ Calendar

with great Exactness, till the Year 4199: when, as has been already

mentioned, there must be a little Variation made in those Rules and

Directions.

There is however one Exception to those General Rules and Directions,

which will be taken notice of in the next Paragraph.

Upon these Principles I framed the Table accompanying this Paper,

and shewing, by means of the Golden Numbers, all the _Gregorian_

Paschal Limits or Full Moons, from the Reformation of the Calendar,

_&c._ by Pope _Gregory_ to the Year 4199 inclusive. Which Space of

Time is therein divided into sixteen unequal Portions or Periods; at

the Beginning of each of which, all the Golden Numbers, when once

they shall have been properly placed in the Calendar, must either be

advanced or set back one Day, with respect to the Place where they

stood in the preceding Period, agreeably to the foregoing Rules: Except

those Numbers which shall happen to stand against the 4th and 5th of

_April_ to shew the Paschal New Moons, or against the 17th and 18th of

the same Month to mark out the Paschal Full Moons; both which Numbers

at some Times, and only one of them at others, must keep the same Place

for that, which was allotted to them in the immediately preceding

Period.

In order to determine at what Times, and on what Occasions, this

Exception is to take Place; let it be observed, that, in the Months of

_January_, _March_, _May_, and some others in our present Calendar,

as well as in the Table above mentioned, some of the Golden Numbers

stand double or in Pairs, and follow one the other immediately; whilst

others, on the contrary, generally stand single and by themselves.

Now, when any of those Pairs, or two Numbers which usually accompany

each other, happen, in pursuance of the foregoing Rules, to be prefixed

the one to the 4th and the other to the 5th of _April_ for the New

Moons, or the one to the 17th and the other to the 18th of _April_

for the Paschal Limits or Full Moons: And when any of those Numbers,

which generally stand single, are prefixed, according to the said

Rules, to the 5th of _April_ for the New Moons, or to the 18th for the

Full Moons: In these Cases those Pairs or single Numbers that are so

situated; must not be set forward or advanced at the Beginning of the

next Period, but must keep their Places during another Period, if the

foregoing Rules direct all the Golden Numbers to be advanced a Day;

which must be complied with in respect to all the other Golden Numbers,

except those so situated as above. Instances whereof may be seen in

the Table, under the respective Periods beginning with the Years 1900,

2600, 3100, and 3800.

But if, in Conformity to the foregoing Rules, all the Golden Numbers

are to be set one Day backward; those Pairs or single Numbers, tho'

situated as is above-mentioned, must not keep their Places, but must

move one Day backward like all the other Golden Numbers; as they may be

seen to do in the Periods beginning with the Years 2400 and 3600.

To give a plain and intelligible Account of the Reason, on which the

Directions now given with respect to this Exception are founded,

would extend this Paper, already too long, far beyond its due and

proper Bounds. I shall therefore content myself with observing, that

it depends chiefly upon the Nature of the _Menses Pleni_ and _Menses

Cavi_, into which the Lunar Year is usually divided: and that, in

order to make use of the Golden Numbers for finding the Time of the

_Gregorian Easter_, it will be necessary not only to conform to

the general Rules laid down in the former Part of this Paper; but

also to follow the Directions just now given, with respect to the

above-mentioned Exception to those general Rules.

But I should not do Justice to _Peter Davall_ of the _Middle Temple_,

Esq; Secretary of the _Royal Society_, did I not here acknowledge,

that, before I had so fully considered these Matters as I have since

done, I had the first Hint of applying the Golden Numbers to find the

_Gregorian_ Paschal Limit or full Moon, from him; who has since that

time composed and drawn up Tables, _&c._ which may possibly be of

considerable and general Use in this Nation hereafter.

_FINIS._

Remarks upon the solar and the lunar years, the cycle of 19 years, commonly called the golden number, the epact, and a method of finding the time of Easter, as it is now observed in most parts of Europe · 第 4 / 5 题