I shall have to ask your careful attention for a few moments to the
leader who arose out of the first French Revolution, and whose military
and diplomatic fame is still fresh in the recollection of many of the
present generation. That leader was Napoleon Bonaparte. In the days
of his greatest prosperity, nothing was so distasteful to him as to
be reminded of his Jacobin past. He then wished to _pose_ as another
Charlemagne, or Rudolph of Hapsburg. He wished to be considered the
friend of religion, and of the Catholic religion in particular. He did
a something for the restoration of the Church in France, but it was as
little as he could help. It, perhaps, prevented a more wholesome and
complete reaction in favour of the true religious aspirations of the
population. It was done grudgingly, parsimoniously, and meanly. And when
it had been done, Napoleon did all he could do to undo its benefits. He
soon became the persecutor—the heartless, cruel, ungrateful persecutor
of the Pontiff, and an opponent to the best interests of religion in
France, and in every country which had the misfortune to fall under
his sway. The reason of all this was, that Napoleon had commenced
his career as a Freemason, and a Freemason he remained in spirit and
in effect to the end of his life. It is known that he owed his first
elevation to the Jacobins, and that his earliest patron was Robespierre.
His first campaign in Italy was characterized by the utmost brutality
which could gratify Masonic hatred for the Church. He suppressed the
abodes of the consecrated servants of God, sacked churches, cathedrals,
and sanctuaries, and reduced the Pope to the direst extremities. His
language was the reflex of his acts and of his heart. His letters
breathe everywhere the spirit of advanced Freemasonry, gloating over the
wounds it had been able to inflict upon the Spouse of Christ. Yet this
adventurer has, with great adroitness, been able to pass with many, and
especially in Ireland, as a good Catholic. Because he was the enemy of
England, or rather that England led by the counsels of Pitt and Burke
constituted herself the implacable enemy of the Revolution of which
he was the incarnation and continuation, many opposed to England for
political reasons, regard Bonaparte as a kind of hero. No one can doubt
the military genius of the man, nor indeed his great general ability; but
he was in all his acts what Freemasonry made him. He was mean, selfish,
tyrannical, cruel. He was reckless of blood. He could tolerate or use the
Church while that suited his policy. But he had from the beginning to the
very end of his career that thorough indifference to her welfare, and
want of belief in her doctrines, which an early and life-long connection
with the Illuminati inspired.
Father Deschamps writes of him: “Napoleon Bonaparte was in effect an
advanced Freemason, and his reign has been the most flourishing epoch
of Freemasonry. During the reign of terror, the Grand Orient ceased its
activity. The moment Napoleon seized upon power the lodges were opened in
every place.”
I have said that the revolutionary rulers in France were all
Illuminati—that is Freemasons of the most pronounced type—whose ultimate
aim was the destruction of every existing religion and form of secular
government, in order to found an atheistic, social republic, which
should extend throughout the world and embrace all mankind. Freemasonry
welcomes, as we have seen, the Mahommedan, the Indian, the Chinese,
and the Budhist, as well as the Christian and the Jew. It designs to
conquer all, as a means of bringing all into the one level of Atheism
and Communism. When, therefore, its Directory, in their desire to get
rid of Napoleon, planned the expedition to Egypt and Asia, they meant
the realization of a part of this programme, as well as the removal of
a troublesome rival. A universal monarchy is, in their idea, the most
efficacious means for arriving at a universal republic. Once obtained,
the dagger with which they removed Gustavus III. of Sweden, or the
guillotine by which they rid France of Louis XVI., can at any moment
remove Cæsar and call in Brutus. They are not the men to recoil before
deeds of blood for the accomplishment of their purposes.
Now Napoleon, who was, as Father Deschamps informs us, a member of the
lodge of the Templars, the extreme Illuminated lodge of Lyons, and had
given proof of his fidelity to Masonry in Italy, was the very man to
extend the rule of Republicanism throughout Asia. He appeared in Egypt
with the same professions of hypocritical respect for the Koran, the
Prophet, and Mahommedanism, as he afterwards made when it suited his
policy for Catholicism. His address to the people of Egypt will prove
this. It ran as follows, with true Masonic hypocrisy:—
“Cadis, Chieks, Imans, tell the people that we are the friends of true
Mussulman; that we respect more than the Mamelukes do, God, His Prophet,
and the Alkoran. Is it not we who have destroyed the Pope, who wished
that war should be made against the Mussulman? Is it not we who have
destroyed the Knights of Malta, because these madmen thought that God
willed them to make war upon the Mussulman? Is it not we who have been in
all ages the friends of the Grand Seigneur—may God fulfil his desires—and
the enemy of his enemies. God is God, and Mahomet is his Prophet! Fear
nothing above all for the religion of the Prophet, which I love.”
The cool hypocrisy of this Address is manifested by a proclamation he
made on that occasion to his own soldiers. The same proclamation also
shows the value we may place on his protestations of attachment to, and
respect for, the usages of Christianity. The following is a translation
of it:—
“Soldiers! the peoples with whom we are about to live are Mahommedan.
The first article of their faith is this: ‘There is no God but God, and
Mahomet is his Prophet.’ Do not contradict them. Act with them as you
have acted with the Jews and with the Italians. Have the same respect for
their Muftis and their Imans, as you have had for Rabbis and Bishops.
Have for the ceremonies prescribed by the Alkoran, for the Mosques, the
same tolerance you had for Convents, for Synagogues, and for the religion
of Moses, and of Jesus Christ.”
We read in the correspondence of Napoleon I., published by order of
Napoleon III. (t. v., pp. 185, 191, 241), what he thought of this
proclamation to the very end of his career:—
“After all, it was not impossible that circumstances might have brought
me to embrace Islam,” he said at St. Helena. “Could it be thought that
the Empire of the East, and perhaps the subjection of the whole of
Asia, was not worth a turban and pantaloons, for it was reduced to so
much solely. We would lose only our breeches and our hats. I say that
the army, disposed as it was, would have lent itself to that project
undoubtedly, and it saw in it nothing but a subject for laughter and
pleasantry. Meanwhile you see the consequences. I took Europe by a back
stroke. The old civilization was beaten down, and who then thought to
disturb the destinies of our France _and the regeneration of the world_?
Who had dared to undertake it? Who could have accomplished it?”
Neither prosperity nor adversity changed Napoleon. He was a sceptic to
the end. He said at St. Helena to Las Cases:
“Everything proclaims the existence of a God—that is not to be
doubted—but all our religions are evidently the children of men.
“Why do these religions cry down one another, combat one another? Why has
that been in all ages, and all places? It is because men are always men.
It is because the Priests have always insinuated, slipped in lies and
fraud everywhere.
“Nevertheless,” he continued, “from the moment that I had the power, I
had been eager to re-establish religion. I used it as the base and the
root. It was in my eyes the support of good morality, of true principles,
of good manners.
“I am assuredly far from being an Atheist; but I cannot believe all that
they teach me in spite of my reason, under penalty of being deceitful and
hypocritical.
“To say whence I come, what I am, where I go, is above my ideas. And
nevertheless all that _is_, I am the watch which exists and does not know
itself.
“No doubt,” he continued, “but my spirit of mere doubt was, in my quality
of Emperor, a benefit for the people. Otherwise how could I equally
favour sects so contrary, if I had been dominated over by one alone? How
could I preserve the independence of my thoughts and of my movements
under the suggestions of a confessor who could govern me by means of the
fear of hell.
“What an empire could not a wicked man, the most stupid of men, under
that title of confessor, exercise over those who govern nations?
“I was so penetrated with these truths that I preserved myself well to
act in such a manner, that, in as far as it lay in me, I would educate my
son in the same religious lines in which I found myself.”
Two months later the ex-Emperor said that from the age of thirteen he had
lost all religious faith.
Thiers (_Histoire du Consulatet de l’Empire_, iv. p. 14), says: that
when Napoleon intended to proclaim himself Emperor, he wished to give
the Masons a pledge of his principles, and that he did this by killing
the Duke d’Enghien. He said, “They wish to destroy the Revolution in
attacking it in my person. I will defend it, for I am the Revolution. I,
myself—I, myself. They will so consider it from this day forward, for
they will know of what we are capable.”
A less brave but still more accomplished relative of his, Napoleon III.,
in his _Idées Napoleoniennes_, says:—
“The Revolution dying, but not vanquished, left to Napoleon the
accomplishments of its last designs. Enlighten the nations, it would have
said to him. Place upon solid bases the principal result of our efforts.
Execute in extent that which I have done in depth. Be for Europe what I
have been for France. That grand mission Napoleon accomplished even to
the end.”
When Napoleon obtained power, it was we know principally by means of the
Illuminated Freemason, Talleyrand.[10] By him and his confederates of
the Illuminati, he was recalled from Egypt and placed in the way of its
attainment. His brothers were—every one of them—deep in the secrets of
the sect. Its supreme hidden directory saw that a reaction had set in,
which, if not averted, would speedily lead to the return of the exiled
Bourbons, and to the disgorgement of ill-gotten goods on the part of the
revolutionists. As a lesser evil, therefore, and as a means of forwarding
the unification of Europe which they had planned, by his conquests, they
placed supreme power in the hands of Bonaparte, and urged him on in his
career, watching, at the same time, closely, their own opportunities for
the development of the deadly designs of the sect. Then, they obtained
the first places in his Empire for themselves. They put as much mischief
into the measures of relief given to conscience as they could. They
established a fatal supremacy for secularism in the matter of education.
They brought dissension between the Pope and the Emperor. They caused
the second confiscation of the States of the Church. They caused and
continued to the end, the imprisonment of Pius VII. They were at the
bottom of every attack made by Napoleon while Emperor upon the rights of
the Church, the freedom and independence of the Supreme Pontiff, and the
well-being of religion.
But the chief mistake of Napoleon was the encouragement he gave to
Freemasonry. It served his purpose admirably for awhile, that is so
long as he served the present and ultimate views of the conspiracy; for
a conspiracy Masonry ever was and ever will be. Even if Cambaceres,
Talleyrand, Fouché, and the old leaders of the Illuminati, whom he had
taken into his confidence and richly rewarded, should be satisfied, there
was a mass of others whom no reward could conciliate, and who, filled
with the spirit of the sect, were sure to be ever on the look out for
the means to advance the designs of Weishaupt and his inner circle. That
inner circle never ceased its action. It held the members of the sect,
whom it not only permitted but assisted to attain high worldly honours,
completely in its power, and hence in absolute subjection. For them as
well as for the humblest member of the secret conclave, the poisoned
_aqua tophana_ and the dagger were ready to do the work of certain death
should they lack obedience to those depraved fanatics of one diabolical
idea, who were found worthy to be selected by their fellow-conspirators
to occupy the highest place of infamy and secret power. These latter
scattered secretly amidst the rank and file of the lodges, hundreds of
Argus-eyed, skilled plotters, who kept the real power of inner or high
Masonry in the hands of its hidden masters. Masonry from this secret
vantage ground ceaselessly conspired during the Empire. It assisted the
conquests of the victor of Austerlitz and Jena; and if Deschamps, who
quotes from the most reliable sources, is to be trusted, it actually did
more for these victories than the great military leader himself. Through
its instrumentality, the resources of the enemies of Napoleon were never
at hand, the designs of the Austrian and other generals opposed to him
were thwarted, treason was rife in their camps, and information fatal
to their designs was conveyed to the French commander. Masonry was then
on his side, and as now the secret resources of the Order, its power of
hidden influence and espionage were placed at the disposal of the cause
it served. But when Masonry had reason to fear that Napoleon’s power
might be perpetuated; when his alliance with the Imperial Family of
Austria, and above all, when the consequence of that alliance, an heir to
his throne, caused danger to the universal republic it could otherwise
assure itself of at his death; when, too, he began to show a coldness
for the sect, and sought means to prevent it from the propagandism of
its diabolical aims, then it became his enemy, and his end was not far
off.[11] Distracting councils prevailed in his cabinet. His opponents
began to get that information regarding his movements, which he had
obtained previously of theirs. Members of the sect urged on his mad
expedition to Moscow. His resources were paralyzed; and he was, in one
word, sold by secret, invisible foes into the hands of his enemies. In
Germany, Weishaupt and his party, still living on in dark intrigue,
prepared secretly for his downfall. His generals were beaten in detail.
He was betrayed, hoodwinked, and finally led to his deposition and ruin.
He then received with a measure, pressed down and overflowing, and shaken
together, the gratitude of the father of lies, incarnate in Freemasonry,
in the Illuminati, and kindred Atheistic secret societies. Banished to
Elba he was permitted to return to France only in order to meet the fate
of an outcast and a prisoner upon the rock of St. Helena, where he died
abandoned and persecuted by the dark sect which had used, abused, and
betrayed him. So it has continued, as we shall see, to use, to abuse, and
to betray every usurper or despot whom it lures into its toils. We shall
now glance at its action, the action of—