'A friend of mine connected with the Stock Exchange on one

occasion pointed out to me the great advantage of occasionally

purchasing five thousand consuls on time, knowing that I had

capital unemployed; the certain profits were placed before me in

such an agreeable point of view, that I could not resist the bait.

In the course of two days I received a check for fifty pounds, a

sum by no means unpleasant, considering that I had not advanced

one farthing. The natural consequence was that I repeated the dose

with various success until I was ultimately well plucked. I

sustained a loss of one thousand pounds. I then began to be very

uneasy, until I fortunately discovered that by one _coup_ I had

made two hundred pounds. My broker had waddled of course, without

being able to make up his differences. The parties of whom I had

purchased, through my agent, refused to pay me, as they had no

knowledge of a third person, and were themselves considerable

sufferers by the aforesaid broker. I could not understand the

justice of this measure, for I had always paid my losses to the

moment; so I walked to Temple-Bar, pulled off my hat most

gracefully to that venerable arch, and vowed never again to pass

it in the pursuit of ill-gotten wealth. I had always a perfect

horror of _gambling_, and little imagined I was pursuing it in a

wholesale manner. To satisfy my inordinate curiosity, for

sight-seeing, I have twice or thrice in my life passed the

threshhold of a gambling-house in London, but never felt the least

personal desire to embark the smallest sum, although keenly alive

to the dangerous excitement in others. On one of these occasions

it fell to my lot to witness a most affecting and trying scene.

The names of the parties came to my knowledge afterward, which

from delicacy I of course suppress. A gentleman had for some years

been separated from his wife, in consequence of infidelity on her

part with a man of high fashion, an officer of the Guards. An

action and divorce ensued; but two children whom he had previous

to this unfortunate event, he refused to acknowledge, thus

endeavoring to put the stain of illegitimacy upon them. Years

rolled on, and the father and son never met. Rouge-et-Noir was the

fashionable game of the day, and Pall-Mall and St. James-street

swarmed with gambling-houses. Two gentlemen were quarrelling upon

a point, each accusing the other of taking the stake. The younger

man was the officer on guard that day, and consequently in

uniform. High words ensued; cards were exchanged; and in one

moment, from the most ungovernable rage, they became motionless as

statues. The silence was at length interrupted by an explanation

of 'By Heaven! my son!' This remark was made from the impulse of

the moment, and probably struck a chord in the parent's heart that

let loose all his affections. They retired to another apartment;

explanations ensued; and a reconciliation was the result.'

Elsewhere Mr. ABBOTT describes the gambling-houses of Paris, 'those dens

of iniquity,' as he terms them. 'The varied scenes of frantic joy and

human debasement,' he writes, 'which I witnessed at FRASCATI'S, were truly

appalling. The extremes of excitement were as powerfully exhibited in the

loser of twenty francs as in the man who had lost his twenty thousand.'

The annexed sketch of the lamented career of poor CONWAY, who will be

'freshly remembered' by many of our readers in the Atlantic cities, is

authentic in every particular. It is not without its lesson, in more

regards than one:

'I find I have neglected to mention an actor, who stood

sufficiently forward, both by his position and his misfortunes, to

be entitled to a respectful notice; I mean Mr. CONWAY. He was said

to be the illegitimate offspring of a distinguished nobleman; but

whether his own pride prevented his making advances, and he was

resolved to lay the foundation of his own fame and fortune, or

whether he met with a check upon his natural feelings from one who

was bound to support him, I know not; but, gifted as he was with a

commanding person, a most gentlemanlike deportment, and advantages

peculiarly adapted for the stage, it is no wonder that the

histrionic art held forth inducements and hopes of obtaining a

brighter position than any other career open to him, without the

aid of pecuniary means, and the patronage which was withheld from

him. He made his appearance in 1813, the season previous to KEAN,

in the character of 'Alexander the Great.' He met with a very

flattering reception, and produced a great effect upon the fair

sex. Indeed, the actors, who are upon these occasions lynx-eyed,

could not avoid their remarks upon a certain Duchess, who never

missed one of his performances, and appeared to take the deepest

interest in his success. CONWAY was upward of six feet in height.

He was deficient in strong intellectual expression, yet he had the

reputation of being very handsome. His head was too small for his

frame, and his complexion too light and sanguine for the profound

and varied emotions of deep tragedy. There was a tinge of

affectation in his deportment, which had the effect of creating

among many a strong feeling of prejudice against him. His bearing

was always gentlemanly, and with the exception of a slight

superciliousness of manner, amiable to every body; and his talent,

though not of the highest order, was still sufficiently prominent

to enable him to maintain a distinguished position. And yet this

man, with so little to justify spleen, was literally, from an

unaccountable prejudice, driven from the stage by one of the

leading weekly journals, edited by a gentleman whose biting satire

was death to those who had the misfortune to come under his lash.

In complete disgust, he retired from the boards, and filled the

humble situation of prompter at the Haymarket-Theatre, but

afterward left for the United States, where he became a great

favorite. But the canker was at his heart. He again quitted the

stage, and prepared himself for the Church; but there again he was

foiled. The ministers of our holy religion refused to receive him,

not from any moral stain upon his character, but because he had

been an actor! What is to become of the priesthood, who in the

early periods were the only actors, and selected scriptural

subjects for representation? He left in a packet for Savannah,

overwhelmed with misery and disappointment. 'Ushered into the

world by a parent who would not acknowledge him; driven out of it

in the belief that he was the proscribed of Heaven!' At the moment

they were passing the bar at Charleston, he threw himself

overboard. Efforts were made to save him; a settee was thrown over

for him to cling to until they could adopt more decisive measures

for his rescue. He saw the object; but his resolution was taken.

He waved his hand, and sunk to rise no more. I have reason to

believe, that the gentleman to whom I have alluded as having made

such fearful use of his editorial powers, felt deep remorse when

the news of his ill-timed death arrived. He also is now no more!

Poor CONWAY! Had he possessed more nerve, he might still have

triumphed over the unkindness of his fate:

'Who has not known ill fortune, never knew

Himself or his own virtue.'

In the same chapter we find a bit of artistical grouping in a historical

picture, which the reader will agree with us is well worthy of

preservation:

'The world never witnessed such powerful scenes of exciting

interest as took possession of Great Britain about this period.

The people were drunk with enthusiasm. One victory followed so

rapidly on the heels of another, that they had not time to sober

down. The peninsular campaign had closed, and the hitherto sacred

soil of France was invaded. The restoration of legitimacy, and the

momentary enthusiasm of the French in favor of their exiled

monarch, disturbed the intellects of half mankind. The magnificent

entrée of LOUIS the Eighteenth into London from Heartwell Park,

where he had resided for some years, almost conveyed the idea that

it was his own capital he was entering, after his long and weary

exile. The silken banner with the _fleur de lis_ flaunting from

the walls of Devonshire-House and all the neighboring mansions in

Piccadilly; immense cavalcades of gentlemen superbly mounted, all

wearing the white cockade; the affectionate sympathy and profound

respect shown by all classes toward the illustrious representative

of the Bourbons, was touching in the extreme. On his route from

Heartwell, and through Stanmore, troops of yeomanry turned out to

give him an honorable escort; and what could be _more_ honorable

than the voluntary attendance of the farmers who represented the

very bone and sinew of the country? The large portly figure of the

KING perfectly disabused JOHN BULL of the long-cherished idea that

Frenchmen lived entirely upon frogs. Even that particular fact

interested them, and repeated huzzas greeted him throughout the

whole of his route to London. On his arrival at Guillon's Hotel in

Albermarle-street, which had been most splendidly prepared for his

reception, His Royal Highness the PRINCE REGENT received him with

that delicate attention so worthy of his high and gallant bearing;

and there LOUIS must have met with one of the most touching scenes

that ever thrilled the human heart. One hundred and fifty of the

ancient noblesse were waiting, after years of hopeless

expectation, to greet the head of that illustrious house, the

recollection of whose sufferings awakened the most painful

feelings. Not one of them but had shared in the horrors of that

bloody revolution; and not one of them but truly felt that the

happiness of that moment repaid them for all their sufferings.'

A rich specimen of the pompous ignorance sometimes exhibited by theatrical

managers is afforded in the following anecdote, which has appeared in

England, but which we are sure will be relished by our readers. It may

seem extraordinary that a manager should be such an ignoramus; but 'half

the actors on the English stage,' says a recent writer, 'dare not address

a gentleman a note, lest they should 'show their hands:''

'WHEN I first became a member of Covent-Garden, Mr. FAWCETT held

the reins of management, in consequence of the retirement of Mr.

KEMBLE from that position. He had experience to guide him, but he

unfortunately possessed a dictatorial manner, and a want of that

refinement and education which had so distinguished his great

predecessor. In speaking of his public position, however, let me

pay homage to his private virtues. He was a tender husband, an

affectionate father, and a warm friend. During my first season a

play was produced called the '_Students of Salamanca_.' The author

was Mr. JAMIESON, a member of the bar, who had been particularly

successful in several light pieces produced at the Haymarket. Mr.

JONES and myself were 'The Students,' and it occurred to me in my

character to say, 'My danger was imminent.' These words had

scarcely passed my lips, when a dark and lowering look dimmed the

countenance of the manager. I saw that something was wrong, but

was quite at a loss to guess the cause. At the end of the scene,

unwilling to mortify me in the presence of the company, he

beckoned me aside, and said: 'Young man, do you know what you

said?' I changed color, feeling that something fearful had

occurred. I replied, very much agitated, that I was not aware of

any error. 'I thought so! Do you know where you are? You are in

_London_, not in Bath!' The fact was so self-evident that I did

not attempt to disprove it. 'You will be delivered up to scorn and

contempt; the critics will immolate you; the eyes of this great

metropolis are fixed upon you. I thought you were a well-educated

young man, but I have been deceived--grossly deceived!' The effect

of this tirade may be more easily conceived than described. My

face flushed, my heart beat, and I at length mustered courage to

say, 'For heaven's sake, Sir, pray tell me; I am extremely

sorry--deeply regret--but pray tell me!' The kindness of his

disposition got the better of his pedantry, and seeing the

agitation under which I was really suffering, he replied: 'Do you

remember that you said your danger was _imminent_'? Now, Sir,

there is no such word in the English language: it is _eminent!!_'

Need I mention the unbounded relief this explanation gave me? I

quietly suggested the difference of their significations, and was

never after troubled with any corrections. He was a man of

sterling qualities, somewhat like a melon, as his friend COLMAN

said; 'rough without, smooth within.''

In the way of a hoax, we remember nothing more cleverly performed, than

the rather cruel one whose execution is pleasantly recorded below:

'THERE was a lady attached to the Worthing Theatre, (mark me,

reader, I did not say attached to _me_,) who was very eccentric,

and who was, 'small blame to her,' as the Irishman says, also very

susceptible. I was on very intimate terms with Mr. HARLEY, who was

then at Worthing; and one day, while quietly dining together, we

mutually agreed that there was a fickleness about this lady which

deserved some reproof. We were really liberal in our feelings, and

would not have objected to her shooting an extra dart

occasionally; but it was not to be borne that she should let fly a

whole quiver at once. We had observed that by way of having two or

more strings to her bow, she had got up a flirtation with the

leader of the band, a most respectable man by the way, and of

considerable talent. After giving the affair all due

consideration, we decided upon a mock-duel, in which I was to

personate one of the heroes, my rival being the aforesaid leader.

We carefully and ostentatiously avoided all appearance of

communication, and in such a way that it always reached her

knowledge. Thus by gentle innuendoes she discovered that something

serious was in contemplation, and of course she was not a little

flattered, as she was the object of dispute. Our duelling-pistols

were one day ostentatiously paraded, and evident anxiety took

possession of the company, who were carefully excluded from the

secret. The following morning at five o'clock we each left our

lodgings, accompanied by our seconds, the rain pouring in

torrents. HARLEY then went to the lodgings of the frail or rather

fair one, knocked at the door most violently, and at length she

appeared at the window, in evident alarm. He urged her if she had

the feelings of a woman immediately to accompany him, and prevent

murder; briefly stating, that her 'beauties were the cause and

most accursed effect.' In a state of real excitement, mixed up

with woman's vanity, she rushed out of the house, and accompanied

that wag of wags. A white beaver hat, sweet emblem of her purity,

was on her head, and partially concealed her disordered ringlets,

hastily gathered together. We arranged with HARLEY always to keep

ourselves a certain distance in advance on the pathway bordering

the sands. The first thing that occurred was a sudden gust of wind

which swept the white beaver a considerable distance and covered

it with mud; her flowing locks then fell upon her alabaster neck,

and her romantic appearance was perfect. We most cruelly led her

on a distance of at least two miles, and took our station near

some lime-kilns, close to the sea. When she was sufficiently near,

one of the seconds stepped forward and gave the signal by dropping

a blood-stained handkerchief, prepared for the occasion. Bang!

bang! went the pistols; when she gracefully sank into the arms of

HARLEY, who held her in a fine melo-dramatic attitude. The report

was soon over all the town, and of course in the newspapers. My

adversary put his arm in a sling, and whenever I happened to be

near her, in a perfect state of despair I vowed that I could never

forgive myself for having shot my friend. We mutually repulsed her

by severe looks whenever she approached us; and she soon left the

Worthing Theatre to seek for victims of less sensibility in other

places.'

We once more take our leave of Mr. ABBOTT'S agreeable manuscript volume;

by no means certain, however, that its entertaining pages may not again

tempt us to share with our readers the enjoyment they have afforded us.

GOSSIP WITH READERS AND CORRESPONDENTS.--Will the author of '_Public

Concert-Singing_' favor us with his address? We are desirous of

communicating with him, although he does _not_ 'find his hastily-jotted

thoughts in the pages of the KNICKERBOCKER,' for reasons which perhaps he

can partly divine from the present number, and which we could impart more

directly in a private note. We agree with him entirely in his views; and

if he will permit us, we will here quote a passage from an article which

we penned upon a subject collateral to his general theme, many years ago,

before we were hampered with the professional '_we_,' and could write out

of our 'company dress.' It is a little sketch of the first public singing,

save that of the church, to which we had ever listened: 'How well do I

remember it! It was at the theatre of a country village; a rough,

barn-like edifice, at which several Stentor-lunged Thespians 'from the

New-York and Philadelphia Theatres' split the ears of the groundlings, and

murdered SHAKSPEARE'S heroes and the King's English. I had been watching

with boyish curiosity the play which had just concluded: the mottled,

patched, yellowish-green curtain had descended upon the personages whose

sorrows were my own; and I was gazing vacantly at the long row of tallow

candles placed in holes bored for the purpose in the stage, and at the two

fiddlers who composed 'the orchestra,' and who were reconnoitering the

house. Presently a small bell was rung, with a jerk. There was a flourish

or two from 'the orchestra;' another tinkle of the bell; and up rose the

faded drapery. An interval of a moment succeeded, during which half of a

large mountain was removed from the scenery, and a piece of forest shoved

up to the ambitious wood that had been aspiring to overtop the Alps. At

length a young lady, whom I had just seen butchered in a most horrid

manner by a villain, came from the side of the stage with a smile, which,

while it displayed her white teeth, wrought the rouge upon her face into

very perceptible corrugations, and made a lowly courtesy. She walked with

measured step three or four times across the stage, in the full blaze of

the flaring candles, smiling again, and hemming, to clear her voice.

Presently a perfect stillness prevailed; 'awed Consumption checked his

chided cough;' every urchin suspended his cat-call; and 'the boldest held

his breath for a time.' Our vocalist looked at the leader of the orchestra

and his fellow-fiddlers, and commenced, in harmony with their instruments.

How touching was that song! I shall never have my soul so enrapt again.

That _freshness_ of young admiration possessed my spirit which can come

but once. The air was '_The Braes of Balquither_,' a charming melody,

meetly wedded to the noble lines of TANNEHILL; and enthusiasm was at its

height when the singer had concluded the following stanza, almost sublime

in its picturesque beauty:

'When the rude wintry wind wildly raves round our dwelling,

And the roar of the lion on the night-breeze is swelling,

Then so merrily we'll sing, while the storm rattles o'er us,

Till the dear shealing ring with the light-lilting chorus!'

The air was old as the hills, but like all Scottish melodies, as lasting

too. To every body the songs of Scotland are grateful; and the universal

attachment to them arises from their beautiful simplicity, deep pathos,

and unaffected, untrammelled melody. The romantic sway of the songs of

Scotland over her sons when 'far awa' is to me no marvel. If they possess

the power to thrill or to subdue the hearts of those who have never

stepped upon the soil of that glorious country, is it at all surprising

that they should exert a powerful influence over the native-born, who

associate those airs with the purple heath, the blue loch, the hazy

mountain-top, and the valley sleeping below?

'What sweet tears dim the eyes unshed,

What wild vows falter on the tongue,

When 'Scots wha ha' wi' WALLACE bled,'

Or 'Auld Lang Syne' is sung!'

The association however is touching, not _alone_ because it awakens old

recollections, but because the music is _natural_; it is the language of

the heart. Affectation has not interpopolated tortuous windings and trills

and shakes, to mar its beauty, and to clip the full melodious notes of

their fair proportions. It is pleasant to think that fashion, though never

so potent, can neither divert nor lessen the popular attachment to the

simpler melodies. We have the authority of the WOODS, WILSON, SINCLAIR,

POWER, and other eminent artists for stating that 'Black-eyed Susan,'

'John Anderson my Jo,' 'The Last Rose of Summer,' and kindred airs, could

always 'bring down the house,' no matter what the antagonistical musical

attraction might be. We could wish that the VENERABLE TAURUS, or 'OLD

BULL,' as many persons call him, would take a hint from this. Let him try

it once; and we venture to say that no one, however uninitiated, will

again retire from his splendid performances as a country friend of ours

did lately, assigning as a reason: 'I waited till about ha'-past nine; and

_then_ he hadn't got done _tunin' his fiddle_!' A touch of 'music for the

general heart' would have enchained him till morning. CHRISTOPHER NORTH,

we perceive, in the last BLACKWOOD, fully enters into the spirit of our

predilection. He has just returned from a concert of fashionable music,

where he 'tried to faint, that he might be carried out, but didn't know

how to do it,' and was compelled to sit with compressed lips, and listen

to 'sounds from flat shrill signorinas, quavering to distraction,' for two

long hours. When he gets _home_, however, he 'feeds fat his grudge'

against modern musical affectations. Let us condense a few of his

objurgations:

'It is a perfect puzzle to us by what process the standard of

music has become so lowered, as to make what is ordinarily served

up under that name be received as the legitimate descendant of

harmony. There is but one step from the sublime to the ridiculous,

and this entrancing art, it seems, has taken it; sorely

dislocating its graceful limbs, and injuring its goodly

proportions in the unseemly escapade. We hate your crashing,

clumsy chords, and utterly spit at and defy chromatic passages,

from one end of the instrument to the other, and back again;

flats, sharps, and most appropriate 'naturals,' spattered all over

the page. The essential spirit of discord seems to be let loose on

our modern music. Music to soothe! the idea is obsolete. There is

music to excite, much to irritate one, and much more to drive a

really musical soul stark mad; but none to soothe, save that which

is drawn from the hiding-places of the past. There is no repose,

no refreshment to the mind, in our popular compositions. There is

to us more of touching pathos, heart-thrilling expression, in some

of the old psalm-tunes, feelingly played, than in a whole batch of

modernisms. The strains go _home_, and the 'fountains of the great

deep are broken up;' the great deep of unfathomable feeling, that

lies far, far below the surface of the world-hardened heart; and

as the unwonted yet unchecked tear starts to the eye, the softened

spirit yields to their influence, and shakes off the moil of

earthly care; rising, purified and spiritualized, into a clearer

atmosphere.'

* * * * *

The Knickerbocker, or New-York Monthly Magazine, February 1844 Volume 23, Number 2 · 第 12 / 15 段