JOHN FORSYTH.

_Mr. Fox to Mr. Forsyth_.

WASHINGTON, _January 10, 1838_.

Hon. JOHN FORSYTH, etc.:

The undersigned, Her Britannic Majesty's envoy extraordinary and

minister plenipotentiary, is directed by his Government to make the

following observations to Mr. Forsyth, Secretary of State of the United

States, with reference to certain points connected with the question of

the northeastern boundary, which question forms the subject of the

accompanying note, which the undersigned has the honor this day to

address to Mr. Forsyth:

The British Government, with a view to prevail upon that of the United

States to come to an understanding with Great Britain upon the river

question, had stated that the King of the Netherlands in his award had

decided that question according to the British interpretation of it and

had expressed his opinion that the rivers which fall into the Bay of

Fundy are not to be considered as Atlantic rivers for the purposes of

the treaty.

Mr. Forsyth, however, in his note to Sir Charles Vaughan of the 28th of

April, 1835, controverts this assertion and maintains that the King of

the Netherlands did not in his award express such an opinion, and Mr.

Forsyth quotes a passage from the award in support of this proposition.

But it appears to Her Majesty's Government that Mr. Forsyth has not

correctly perceived the meaning of the passage which he quotes, for in

the passage in question Mr. Forsyth apprehends that the word "_alone_"

is governed by the verb "_include_" whereas an attentive examination of

the context will show that the word "_alone_" is governed by the verb

"_divide"_ and that the real meaning of the passage is this: That the

rivers flowing north and south from the highlands claimed by the United

States may be arranged in two genera, the first genus comprehending the

rivers which fall into the St. Lawrence, the second genus comprehending

those whose waters in some manner or other find their way into the

Atlantic; but that even if, according to this general classification

and in contradistinction from rivers flowing into the St. Lawrence, the

rivers which fall into the bays of Chaleurs and Fundy might be comprised

in the same genus with the rivers which fall directly into the Atlantic,

still the St. John and the Restigouche form a distinct species by

themselves and do not belong to the species of rivers which fall

_directly_ into the Atlantic, for the St. John and Restigouche are not

divided in company with any such last-mentioned rivers. And the award

goes on to say that, moreover, if this distinction between the two

species were confounded an erroneous interpretation would be applied

to a treaty in which every separate word must be supposed to have a

meaning, and a generic distinction would be given to cases which are

purely specific.

The above appears to be the true meaning of the passage quoted by

Mr. Forsyth; but if that passage had not been in itself sufficiently

explicit, which Her Majesty's Government think it is, the passage which

immediately follows it would remove all doubt as to what the opinion

of the King of the Netherlands was upon the river question, for that

passage, setting forth reasons against the line of boundary claimed by

the United States, goes on to say that such line would not even separate

the St. Lawrence rivers immediately from the St. John and Restigouche,

and that thus the rivers which this line would separate from the St.

Lawrence rivers would need, _in order to reach the Atlantic_, the aid

of _two intermediaries_--first, the rivers St. John and Restigouche,

and, _secondly, the bays of Chaleurs and Fundy_.

Now it is evident from this passage that the King of the Netherlands

deemed the bays of Fundy and Chaleurs to be, for the purposes of the

treaty, as distinct and separate from the Atlantic Ocean as are the

rivers St. John and Restigouche, for he specifically mentions those

rivers and those bays as the channels through which certain rivers would

have to pass in their way from the northern range of dividing highlands

down to the Atlantic Ocean; and it is clear that he considers that the

waters of those highland rivers would not reach the Atlantic Ocean

until after they had traveled through the whole extent either of the

Restigouche and the Bay of Chaleurs or of the St. John and the Bay of

Fundy, as the case might be; and for this reason, among others, the King

of the Netherlands declared it to be his opinion that the line north of

the St. John claimed by the United States is not the line intended by

the treaty.

The undersigned avails himself of this occasion to renew to Mr. Forsyth

the assurances of his high respect and consideration.

A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 3, part 2: Martin Van Buren · 第 198 / 521 题