BY WILLIAM MARION REEDY.

Mr. Brann, who was killed in Waco last Friday, was a

much greater man than even his admirers knew. He had

many virtues which, in a way, his peculiar tactics in

journalism belied. For instance, his paper was read, for

the most part, by people who took a delight in his calling

a spade a spade, and, in fact, in his seeking out spades to

write about. This was not the true Brann at all. The

man was clean-minded in his conversation. He thought

cleanly. He lived cleanly as a gentleman should, though

he did not leave off sack. He was not a brawling, boisterous

ruffian, reveling in the slums. He was essentially

a family man and a student who "scorned delights and

lived laborious days." His regard for the purity of

women amounted almost to a monomania, and he lived up

to his own preachment on all the various forms of integrity

with much more strictness than people who affected

to believe he was leper. Furthermore the man was an

ascetic in his essential spirit. He had the true taste for

the finely done thing in letters and if he did not devote

himself to what might be called the more refined literary

artistry, it was because he felt that there was danger

of drawing too fine the lessons he thought it his duty to

impart. There was no use, he said, in writing to the

few. One should write so that all might read, running.

He maintained that the way to instill principles in the

people was to secure their attention first, and he did not

hesitate to secure their attention by any device that seemed

available. Therefore he felt himself justified in appealing

to the lower instincts in men in order that, while they were

all unsuspecting, he might inculcate something better.

And so there ran through his publication the strangest

contrasts of sweetness and salacity, of eloquence and

bombast, of purity and pornography, of jewel-phrases and

gutter slang, excerpts of enthralling poetry and brothel

billingsgate. He pointed his morals with putridity and

he adorned his really beautiful style with barbarities and

banalities which make one shudder. He set his fine

thoughts like jewels in compost. He ravished the classics

to mix them up with sentences that stunk of the stews.

The man seemed to indulge in special flights of poesy with

no other purpose than to achieve a disgusting anti-climax

of muckery and mockery. The person who read Brann

intelligently was impressed most by this habit of irony in

the Waconian. It was of the essence of his iconoclasm.

He had something in his effects in this line that was

piteous. There was no denying his appreciation of the pure

air, of the beautiful in life and nature, of the truth

as thinkers see and feel it. It seemed to me that when

he had soared up towards the ever vanishing ideal, he

reached a point whereat he turned in disgust and hurled

himself madly back to the dungiest part of this dungy

earth. There was a mighty dissatisfaction, even a despair,

in Brann, and a touch of sadness in his writing as in his

face. The more I read of his deliberate pandering to the

literarily excrementitious appetite, the more I saw, or

thought I saw, that he was afflicted with a mighty ennui,

and was chiefly trying to escape from his own torture as

one who knew not whether solace was to be found either

in the spiritual or the earthly nature of man. Such a

one as he might have been expected to take up any cause

that assailed the existing condition of things politically

and sociologically. While he was an ascetic his asceticism

was only a wreaking of his own bitterness upon himself.

He was a man in whom strong emotions were easily excited

and he put into his writing all the passion which he

suppressed in his dealings with his fellows socially. He never

felt malice towards people whom he assailed most

maliciously. He saw them simply as representatives of some

fault in our social or political system, and he felt that he

was doing his duty by his own conception of what the

world should be, by pillorying them as object lessons of

characters to be eliminated in his good time coming. When

he saw a foul wrong he saw it personified in some man or

woman. Then he went abroad in search of foul things to

say about it. And he found them and he hurled them at

the object, and he polluted the atmosphere for a mile

around. When he wrote about the abstractions of poetry

and philosophy he wrote with a sweeping, swinging rhythm

that thrilled anyone. He was master of the diapason.

His ear was not attuned particularly to minor chords.

He loved cyclonic clashes of words and he would strike out

fecal flashes to illuminate them. His correggiosity was

at times overpowering. His vocabulary overcame him

often, bore him away from his thought and landed him in

some swamp out of which he was wont to extricate himself,

to the great delight of the semi-educated reader by some

quip or quirk equally meretricious and mephitic. Thus

would he, metaphorically, throw filth at himself. He felt

all the time that he was pursuing the best course, bending

things he despised and loathed to better purposes. Mr.

Brann believed that the country was, if not in itself

decadent and degenerate, under the control of decadent,

degenerate and depraved men. He believed that society

was a social cesspool. He thought that most religion was

hypocrisy. He believed that most wealth represented

nothing more than the superior and diabolic genius of

dishonesty. So believing he so preached and he preached with

a vehemence that was in a sense vicious. His terribly

irony made his work an engine of anarchy. Not that he

meant anarchy at all, but because the people who were

caught by his banalities could not differentiate sufficiently

to extract the core of truth from the great superstructure

of extravagances with which he hid it. Mr. Brann meant

only to lift the world up, and one of his queer conceptions

was, that his own dragging down of things pure to the

lowest levels of life and thought and feeling was calculated

to make his multitudinous clientele look upward. He

was mistaken. He came to know it, too, for he said to

me one evening, "I am only a fad." "I'll pass away when

my vogue is done, like brick pomeroy." He wished he

could believe that the best way to help people up was to

take a stand and view a little above them. He said, when

it was suggested that he try this tack, that he feared it

was too late. Not that he wholly abandoned his belief

in his own plan, but it seemed to me that he felt sorry that

once attention could be attracted by being shocking it

could only be held by a continuance of the shocks.

. . .

In my personal dealings with Mr. Brann I found him a

person of almost feminine fineness. It was amusing to

meet him after some particularly atrocious issue of the

ICONOCLAST, either personally or by letter, and have him

"roar as gently as a sucking dove." In such moods he

revealed a character that was really sweet--though I must

apologize for that misused word. He was impressed with

the pity of life. He loved to toy intellectually with

subtleties of thought. He had intuitions in art and poetry,

and music touched him truly and deeply. I never have seen

such a gentle man with women and his estimate of woman,

either in conversation or writing, was a high and noble one.

If at times he wrote so that his conception of virtuous

womanhood was unpleasantly associated with ideas that

revolted you, it was his peculiar belief that purity was all

the purer for the contrast and antithesis. He loved

children, too, and in his more familiar moods, according

to his intimates, he was like one whose heart was as a little

child. He cared no more for money after he began to

make it than he cared in his bohemian days when he was

readier to give than to take. He loved his friends blindly.

He did not hate his enemies, he despised them. He had

all the manly virtues, courage, generosity, modesty. Yes,

modesty; for egoism such as he had was not foolish pride.

His egotism was only his own force asserting itself. His

friendship was almost foolish. He praised too generously.

He was inclined to help everybody he could and I am sure

that he never assailed anyone or anything that did not

represent to him uncharity and snobbery. He was not

envious. His mind was on the Texas scale; he knew no

meanness. His was Kentucky origin and he was tainted

with Kentucky's quixotism. He loved liberty and he

loved love. He was the friend of the people as he dreamed

they should be. He was the advocate of the greatest

enlargement of rights. With little of what he strove for in

immediate political issues did I sympathize. He believed

more in what is called socialism than I do, but he believed

it most earnestly. He was the greatest force in this

country, with his 80,000 issues of his magazine per month,

for all the things that go with free silver. His following

included all the thinking followers of Bryan and his work

had no little effect, in its powerful music and color, upon

many people to whom Bryanism represented the political

abomination of desolation.

. . .

As to the manner of Mr. Brann's death there is only to

be said that he expected it. He judged from the characters

of those he attacked, that they would assassinate

him. He died as he expected to die, without any cringing

to his enemies. Some people he attacked who did not

deserve his vitriolic attentions, but he thought they did. In

the main he scourged and sacrificed only those who deserved.

The manner in which he was killed and the cause in which

he was killed--the cause of an institution in which a girl

was debauched in the name of Christ and turned out of

doors to starve to the glory of religion--glorify him. He

who fought in the open was shot by a sneak from behind.

The sneak himself was shot in his act of cowardice. Mr.

Brann was brilliant and brave. He partook of the qualities

of the men who immortalized the Alamo. He was the

first man who identified Texas with thought. He loved

Texas so well that he defended the code of private and

public mobbery for righting wrongs. To that cruel

coward code he fell a victim. With all his faults as I see

them, I can think of him only as worthy of being buried

in some high place, to the strains of Sigfried's Funeral

March, and can only say, with Browning of the dead

"grammarian"--

Here, here's his place, where meteors shoot, clouds form,

lightnings are loosened

Stars come and go! Let joy break with the storm,

peace let the day send!

Lofty designs must close in life effects:

loftily lying,

Leave him--still loftier than the world suspects,

living and dying.

--The Mirror for April 7, 1898.

The Complete Works of Brann, the Iconoclast — Volume 12 · 第 39 / 51 题