INTRODUCTION.

The feelings that lead some men to investigate remains of antiquity and

search into their origin, dates and purposes, are similar to those

actuating lofty minds, when not satisfied with the surface of things,

they inquire into the source and origin of every thing accessible to

human ken, and scrutinize or analize[TN-4] every tangible object. Such

feelings lead us to trace events and principles, to ascend rivers to

their sources, to climb the rugged sides of mountains and reach their

lofty summits, to plough the waves and dive into the sea, or even soar

into the air, to scan and measure the heavenly bodies, and at last to

lift our eyes and souls to the _Supreme Being_, the source of

all.--Applied to mankind the same feelings invite us to seek for the

origin of arts and sciences, the steps of civilization on earth, the

rise of nations, states and empires, tracing their cradles, dispersions

and migrations by the dim records of traditional tales, or the more

certain monumental evidence of human structures.

This last evidence is but a branch of the archeological science,

embracing besides the study of documents, records, medals, coins,

inscriptions, implements, &c., buried in the earth or hidden in

recesses: while the ruins of cities, palaces and temples, altars and

graves, pyramids and towers, walls and roads, sculptures and

idols--reveal to our inquiries not only the existence of their devisers

and framers at their locations, but give us a view of their

civilization, religions, manners and abilities.

If the annals of the Greeks and Romans had been lost, as have been those

of Egypt, of Assyria and many other early empires, we should still have

in the ruins and monuments of Italy, and Greece, complete evidence of

the existence of those nations, their location, power and skill; nay,

even of the extent of their dominion by their colonial monuments,

scattered from Syria to Spain, from Lybia to Britain. If the British

annals should ever be lost hereafter by neglect or revolutions, the

ruins of dwellings, churches, monuments &c., built in the British style,

will reveal the existence or preserve the memory of the wide extent of

British power by colonies sent from North America to Guyana, from

Hindustan to Ceylon, South Africa and Australia.

And thus it is in both Americas where many nations and empires have

dwelt and passed away, risen and fallen by turns, leaving few or no

records, except the traces of their existence, and widely spread

colonies by the ruins of their cities and monuments, standing yet as

silent witnesses of past dominion and great power. It is only of late

that they have begun to deserve the attention of learned men and

historians--what had been stated by Ulloa, Humboldt, Juarros, Delrio,

&c., of some of them, chiefly found in the Spanish part of America, as

well as the scattered accounts of the many fragments found in North

America, from the lakes of Canada to Louisiana, although confined to a

few places or widely remote localities, have begun to excite the

curiosity of all inquiring men, and are soon likely to deserve as much

interest as the famed ruins of Palmyra and Thebes, Babylon and

Persepolis; when the future historians of America shall make known the

wonderful and astonishing results that they have suggested, or will

soon unfold, particularly when accurately surveyed and explored, drawn

and engraved; instead of being hidden and veiled, or hardly noticed by

the detractors of the Americans, the false historians of the school of

Depaw and Robertson, who have perverted or omitted the most striking

features of American history.

The most erroneous conceptions prevail as yet concerning them, and the

most rude or absurd ideas are entertained in our country of their

objects and nature. As in modern Greece, every ruin is now a

_Paleo-castro_ or old castle for the vulgar peasant or herdsman, thus

all our ruins of the West are _Indian forts_ for the settlers of the

Western states; and every traveller gazing at random at a few, exclaims

that _nothing is known about them, nor their builders_. The more refined

writers can be very sentimental on their veiled origin, but scarcely any

one takes the trouble to compare them with others elsewhere, in or out

of America, which would be, however, the only means to attain the object

they seem desirous of, or to unravel their historical riddle. Some

writers speak of them as if they were only a few mounds and graves,

scarcely worthy of notice; yet they are such mounds as are found yet in

the Trojan plains, sung by Homer, dating at least three thousand years

ago, and even by many deemed earlier than the Trojan war, and still

existing to this day to baffle our inquiries: while similar monuments

existing by thousands in the plains of Scythia and Tartary, Persia and

Arabia, as well as the forests and prairies of North America, evince a

striking connexion of purpose and skill by remote ancient nations of

both hemispheres.

But our monuments do not merely consist in such mounds or tumuli, since

we find besides in North America, ruins of cities, some of which were

walled with earth or even stones, real forts or citadels, temples and

altars of all shapes, but chiefly circular, square or polygonal, some

elliptical, hexagonal, octagonal, _&_c., quite regularly pointing to the

cardinal points. We have also traces of buildings, foundations, roads,

avenues, causeways, canals, bridges, dromes, or racecourses, pillars and

pyramids, wells, pits, arenas, _&_c. And of these not a few, but

hundreds of them, many of which are unsurveyed and undescribed as yet.

These, it must be recollected, are all north of Mexico, or the region of

the more perfect monuments of Mexican and Central America, although

often in the same style. There, as in South America, structures are met

of the most elaborate workmanship, of cut and carved stones, with hard

cement, vaulted arches, fine sculptures and even inscriptions. The

materials of our Northern monuments are often ruder, chiefly of earth,

clay, gravel, small stones, or even _shells_ near the sea-shores,

sometimes of _pize_ or beaten and rammed clay, (as in Peru,) unbaked

bricks and rough stones. These facts may confirm the Mexican traditions,

stating that the nations of Anahuac (now Mexico) once dwelt further

north, in our fruitful Western plains, where wood abounded and stones

were scarce, wherefore they built their cities and _t_emples[TN-5] of

wood, raising altars, platforms, walls and entrenchments of earth or

clay.

The dreams and false hypotheses upon America have amused the learned for

ages: in attempting to account for the origin of the Americans and

their monuments, they have generally neglected to compare them with the

monuments and languages of all the other nations scattered over the

whole earth, or else only taking a partial view of them, comparing a few

fragments of two or three nations or regions, a few words of a

centesimal part of the actual languages, the writers or historians have

fallen into egregious mistakes; more fond of systematic errors than

hidden truth, they have indulged, without due consideration, in mere

dreams or systems, based on a few facts, that are overruled by hundreds

of other facts, unknown to them, or neglected when known. It would be

useless and tedious to refute again such false systems, that have been

refuted and upset by each other. It may, however, be needful, perhaps,

to mention three of the most absurd, in order to warn against them, or

show their improbability and impossibility. They may be called for

distinction sake, the _Jewish_ system, the _Mongolic_ system, and the

_American_ system.

Among these the first named is one of the oldest, and at the same time,

has yet a powerful hold upon many minds; it ascribes the whole American

population with one hundred languages and one thousand dialects, myriads

of ruins and monuments, _to the Jews_! either of the ten dispersed

tribes, who were not Jews but Israelites--or of Solomon's time and

voyages, while the Jews only began to exist as such after his death--or

of patriarchal times antecedent to their existence, when they were only

OBRIM, whom we miscall _Hebrews_, or going still further back to the

times of Noah and Peleg, when not even the Obrim had any existence. It

has been proved that the American nations did not possess the use of

the plough, iron, alphabets, or week of seven days, which no Jewish nor

Hebrew descendants could have forgotten. The American languages have as

much, or more affinities with the Sanscrit, Greek, Latin, Celtic,

Persian, Berber, Turkish, &c., languages, than with the old and modern

Hebrew and Arabic. The Jews or IEUDI, who only began two thousand four

hundred years ago were not navigators; therefore it is evident that they

cannot have come to America and produced here the two thousand nations

and tribes of this vast continent: nay, not even a single one of them

perhaps.

The Mongolic opinion, lately revived by Ranking, is the most extravagant

of all, since it ventures to assert seriously, and derive all these

nations and languages from late colonies of Mongols within less than one

thousand years ago, who came to America over the ice, bringing with them

tame elephants for sport, that are since become the fossil elephants and

mammoths buried in our diluvial or alluvial soil--to state these

absurdities is a sufficient refutation, every man of any reading and

scientific knowledge will perceive the impossibility.

Galindo and Josiah Priest have quite lately revived also the opinion of

some dreaming philosophers who had asserted that America was the _cradle

of mankind_ or one of them, instead of Central Asia. Galindo allows,

however, the Caucasian race of men to be distinct; but he says--"_The

hum_a_n[TN-6] race of America I must assert to be the most ancient on

the globe_;[TN-7]"[8-*]

He goes on to state that to the primaeval civilization of America must be

assigned a great and indefinite antiquity, leaving however no palpable

monuments; but sending colonies to civilize China and Japan! is not this

preposterous? where are the proofs either from traditions, languages,

monuments or other sources?

Meantime Josiah Priest, in his compilation on American antiquities, has

boldly asserted that Noah's ark rested in America, (whereabout?) and

that he had three sons, one white, one red and one black! (what was the

color of their wives?) from whom are descended the three races of

mankind, who colonized the whole earth, leaving, however, neither white

nor black in America[TN-8] The glaring incongruity, of these bold

assertions, or of the indefinite origin of Galindo are equally palpable;

but nevertheless it is not improbable that they will find now and

hereafter other advocates, since the absurd Jewish origin of all the

Americans has still many believers, and even Ranking has perhaps some

supporters.

To admit that America was the only cradle of mankind, is based on no

evidence whatever, either historical or philological or monumental:

while on the contrary all the monuments and records of the eastern

oontinent[TN-9] trace this cradle to Central Asia. To suppose that

America was one of the human cradles, is certainly worthy of inquiry;

but such a cradle must be sought for and located somewhere, and neither

the volcanic mountains, nor swampy plains of South America, nor the

frigid wilds of North America, appear calculated to offer it. Others

have been thought of in Africa and Australia; but seldom in the spirit

of seeking truth, rather in that of supporting some favorite doctrine.

Such speculations ought at least to be based on better foundations than

mere assertions, evident philological proofs are required before they

can be listened to, and no total and complete diversity of mankind in

every aspect has been found any where to support the theory of a

plurality of human species and Cradles. Europe and Africa have been

repeatedly invaded by migrations from Asia. In America such migrations

can be traced north and east by the Atlantic ocean, or north west from

Berhring's[TN-10] strait, while we have not the faintest indication of

invasions of Asia from America. The only traditional account of the

invasion of Europe, and North Africa by the _Atlantes_ (probably

Americans, for the great _Atlantis_ was this continent) is involved in

doubt, and besides these very Atlantes were deemed Neptunian colonies;

although it must be confessed that in almost every instance the

colonists to America appear to have found previous inhabitants, who must

have been still earlier and remote colonies, if they were not

indigenous. But the sea-shores of North America from Labrador to

Carolina were desert at a very late period comparatively, when the

Western tribes came there.

The actual purpose does not extend to all the details of these deep

inquiries, but is chiefly confined to ascertain and prove the similarity

of the oldest primitive monuments of both hemispheres, and whereby a

connection of coeval and similar civilization is evinced in the earliest

times before the records of history. This evidence, which may be called

_monumental_, dives into the gloom of past ages, and hence descends to

ours, reaching our understanding by gradual links: while the

_philological_ evidence of spoken modern languages, fragments or

children of older primitive languages, ascends by their means to equal

antiquity; both combining, therefore, to complete the history of

mankind, where annals and traditions cease to lead us or are quite

obscure: these combined bring more certainty to the scrutinising mind

than the mere physical features of men, and their complexions, so

fluctuating and mingled. But neither of them solve the question of the

actual original Cradle or Cradles of mankind. If indeed monuments and

languages of various parts of the earth were quite different, and the

features or colors of men likewise distinct there, we might suppose

there could have been several species and cradles of men: but it is not

so, features and languages are so variable and mingling in our own

times, and so diversified every where, as to baffle and preclude

complete insulation. Monuments are also after all so much alike in many

remote parts, that although divisible into styles of various ages and

stages of improvement, they do evince a great similarity in coeval ages

or stages of civilization.

To prove this great fact and the important results, might be the subject

of a large work, and we have heard that Mr. Warden has been engaged in

Paris in something of this kind. His work has not yet reached us; but

whenever it will be completed, it shall be only one step towards the

elucidation of this deep theme. Many facts are yearly evolved in

America, new researches undertaken and discoveries made: while in

Africa, Lybia, Arabia, Persia, India and even the Oceanic world of

Australia and Polynesia, similar discoveries are progressing and new

facts made known, that will unfold many new and unexpected analogies

with American inquiries. Of the early Monuments of China, Tartary and

Thibet, we know little or nothing, and in the very heart of Asia, the

real Cradle of Arts and Sciences, if not mankind itself, our learned

travellers have not yet penetrated, and the most interesting region of

the globe is thus almost unknown to us. This subject is therefore in a

progressive state of inquiries, and future ages will yet add thereto:

although a number of Ruins and Monuments crumble or disappear under the

plough or the leveling energy of men, little respecting these structures

of antiquity, enough of unexplored sites will be discovered and

surveyed: some of our rudest monuments appear indestructible, the lofty

mounds of earth have withstood like the heavy pyramids of Egypt, the

lapse of countless ages, some even appear now covered with a dress of

new soil, or even diluvial coat, as if they were antediluvian!

Meantime we may endeavor to collect and compare the facts already known,

and deduce therefrom some useful instruction to satisfy curiosity or

gratify the greedy wish to ascend to the origin of every thing, and of

mankind above all. The most proper and obvious way to elucidate American

Antiquities and Monuments, would be by classifying them, which has

however never been attempted, having always been noticed or elucidated

loosely at random, or in a kind of geographical arrangement of the

regions where found. Such classification might be based either on their

styles, forms and materials, or ultimately their ascertained scopes of

purposes which are even now often doubtful or doubted. They might thus

be divided into classes or series easily distinguished between

themselves, but all finding their equivalents or similar structures in

the Eastern Continent, _an important fact_ to be kept in mind. There are

out of America some structures not found in it, but there are none in it

that cannot be detected somewhere else, either in Europe, North Africa

or Asia, Polynesia, &c, among the earliest Monuments or Ruins, or the

rudest structures. None of the latest styles and improved Architecture,

such as Colonnades, roofed temples, Budhist and Mahometan temples,

Gothic or Modern Churches, fortifications with large towers or

bastions--are met in America, being a convincing proof that all the

American structures were of a previous date, or of an earlier style,

than these later.

But even some very ancient Eastern structures are lacking in America, or

only found in a modified form. Thus although the Cyclopian structures

had been denied to America, they are not quite lacking; although their

Tyrinthian style, the rudest of huge unshapen blocks of stone put

together, has not yet been met with, the other Cyclopian styles are

found of rough polygones or irregular squared stones: the most common

however is of rough flat stones put together pretty much as our dry

walls are to this day by us.

If we do not exactly find in this Continent, the Celtic style of

Stonehenge and circles of stones scattered from Persia to Scotland, we

meet several other branches of the Celtic style, standing rough pillars,

massive altars, circles of earth, fortified villages similar to those of

Britain, miscalled _Roman Camps_, although no such camps are found

where the Romans went out of Celtica, and the American camps or forts

are certainly not Roman! Whether the Celtic race ever came to America

has been doubted, and maybe deemed doubtful yet: there are two strong

arguments against it at least, the lack of Monuments like the Stonehenge

temples, and the Celtic structure of Language, or regular series of

interposed ideas not being widely spread in America, and chiefly found

in Brazil and Florida, where nations of another lineage dwelt. Yet it is

pretty certain, notwithstanding that nearly all the writers, omit it or

deny it, that the old Celts had an intercourse of trade in America once,

even from Gaul. It has lately been discovered by Sir A. Brooke, that

there are Celtic monuments in Morocco, he describes a large mound with a

circle of stones around. The N. W. of Africa must in very early time

have been one of the regions whence the _Atlantes_ went or came; this is

an historical fact, and their posterity yet live in Africa from Mount

Atlas to Nubia, their language[TN-11] have the Celtic and Semetic

structure.

They gave name to the Atlantic Ocean, and this name is one of the few

that have reached our times, Africa and Spain once joined, even the

Berbers have a tradition of it. The same Nations filled Lybia and Spain,

the _Bas-Tules_, _As-Tures_ of Spain were _Tulas_, _Turas_, as in

Central Asia and Central America; so were also the _Tur-tules_ or

_Tur-detani_, &c. while the _Cantes_ of Spain were akin to the _Antes_

of Lybia, _Hyantes_ of Greece. The Greeks have stated that their

Atlantes or _Atalantoi_ were formed of the united nations of Atlas and

Antoi or Anteus.

Pyramids exactly similar to those of Egypt, and pillared temples similar

to those of Thebes, are not met with in America; but we have their

equivalent in the pyramidal Teocalis of Anahuac, and the temples of

Peru, similar to the pyramidal temples of Assyria and India, towers in

stages like those of Lybia, Syria and China. In all cases the materials

depend pretty much on the localities, and the kind of stones or proper

materials at hand, although often carried from a distance, and requiring

the joint labors of many thousand men during several years.

But it has been ascertained that there were older inhabitants in the west

of Europe, than these very Celts, Cantes and Atlantes. The _Creons_ a

superior race that erected the annual monumental pillars of Carnac in

Brittany, the Cunis or Cynetes, that dwelt at the S. W. of Spain and

Portugal, the degraded Vassals or outcasts of the Celts called _Cacoux_,

_Cahets_, _Cunigos_, whose posterity is not yet quite extinct. The

Eskuaras now called Basks and Gascons, but formerly Cantabrians were the

Cantas of the river Ebro, they had great affinities of Language with

many American nations. The Atlantic monuments may be distinctly traced

from Syria and Greece to Lybia, Morocco, _&_c. Immense mounds have been

found as far South as the river Nun. Of these Atlantes their countries,

deeds of yore, &c. much has been written, and much more remains to be

elucidated: they can be traced Eastward as far as the very Centre of

Asia, once called Turan, through Scythia, in the North and Persia in

the South, to the utmost verge of Africa and Europe Westwards. Next to

the famed Island Atlantis, or rather _Megatlantides_ which was America!

the smaller Atlantis seated midway between the two continents, has been

supposed to have sunk when the Volcanos of the Azores, Canaries and

other African Islands did explode.

The American Nations connected with these were widely scattered in

America, and chiefly wherever the earliest monuments were spread, even

as far as Chili to the South, in Guyana to the East under the name of

_Atures_ or _Atules_, and Northwards as far as Ohio and Illinois. It is

easy to trace surprising analogies of Languages between the early

languages of South Europe and North Africa, with the Chilians,

Peruvians, Muyzcas, Haytians, Tulans or Tol-tecas, &c., and many other

pre-eminent Nations of this Continent.

By the useful process of generalization we may collect the following

important results concerning our monuments: 1. They are scattered all

over Amer. from lat. 45d. N. to 45d. S. of the Equator, thus occupying

90d. of latitude, which is no where else the case.--2. They chiefly

occupy a flexuose belt from our great Lakes to Mexico, Guatemala,

Panama, Quito, Peru and Chili.--3. There are few or none in Boreal

America, the Eastern Shores of it as far as Virginia, the Western as far

as California, nor in the Antilles, Guyana, Orinoco, Maragnon, Brazil,

Paraguay and Patagonia; although some of these regions not having yet

been properly explored may hereafter offer some likewise.--4. Those

known from our Eastern Shores, the Antilles and Brazil are few, and of a

peculiar character, distinct from the general style of the others. In

New Hampshire concentric castramations have been found as in Peru, but

not of stone nor shaped like stars. In Massachusetts inscribed rocks are

met with, those of Pennsylvania East of the mountains are rude and

small, and such they are as far as Virginia and Carolina. In the

Antilles or West Indies, they are chiefly caves, temples and tombs. In

Brazil we know of but few, but they are of stone and peculiar style.--5.

Therefore the main monuments and structures occupy only one half of

America or even less, they are mostly thickly scattered in the fertile

regions near rivers, from Ohio to Florida, from Missouri to Texas, from

Sonora to Honduras, from Bogota to Chili, &c. being often on high

grounds and mountains, table lands and valleys, seldom in the low

plains.

Such are the most interesting by number and extensive spreading

locations. Yet there are among them various ages and styles, the

Floridan or North American, the Mexican or Anahuac, the Guatimalan or

Tulan, the Peruvian or Inca--Series, are all somewhat different, mingled

with others of earlier or various ages--in Peru the _Pucaras_ or oldest

fortified cities in a stellate form are of earliest ages, the ruins of

Tiahuanaco with sculptures of a remote period, the ruins of Chimu of

another style yet, all different from the style of the Incas. In central

America, the Cave-temples--the fortified cities and Palaces--and the

_Teocalis_ or Pyramids and Towers, offer as many eras and styles.

In North America we have also at least three great Eras and styles of

monuments, the first or most rude, somewhat similar to that of the

Antilles; excavations, small houses &c. and this, although so rude, is

found to have lasted till very lately, as our log-house style is lasting

with us along with large stone buildings. 2. A primitive style using

earth and wood or rough stones for large and fine structures, temples,

_&_c. 3. The most refined employing cut stones and ornaments, &c., rare in

the North, but becoming more common towards Mexico.

We may assert in ultimate result that America had no Monuments of

Grecian or Roman structures, except such as belong to primitive Italy

and Greece, ascribed to their ancestors as a different race the Pelagic,

Curetes, Hyantes, Taulantes, Aones, and other similar old tribes or

nations, long previous to Roman power and Grecian refinement, above all

no colonnades and no baked bricks. None of our monuments were like the

best Celtic structures, but rather similar to the earliest or ruder

Celtic style, if not perhaps previous, such as standing or rocking

stones, rough pillars and pilasters, tumuli and mounds, circular and

angular areas and temples. None were like the Egyptian temples and

pyramids, our American pyramids being rather in stages, as iu[TN-12]

Ethiopia, Assyria, India, &c., or in huge platforms bearing temples and

palaces, as in Balbec and Persepolis, but by no means so ornamented, nor

with such huge stones. None were like the Tyrinthian or Titanic style,

but rather a modification of it. None like the slender pillars and round

towers of India, Persia, Ireland. None like the modern structure of the

Christians, Mahometans, Budhists, Chinese &c., no Gothic or Arabic

style, nor domes were found. The inference cannot trace any of these

religions to America by their peculiar structures.

While on the other side, we can assert and prove that the American

monuments were more or less alike to. 1. The oldest monuments, square

and circular platforms of all shapes and sizes, some as large as hills

or even natural hills cut to shapes for altars, or support of temples

and staged pyramids, _&_c., as are found from Celtica and Ireland to

France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Russia, &c., from Morocco to Senegal,

Lybia and Abyssinia; in Asia, from Natolia and the Trojan plain, to

Syria and Arabia, Persia, Media around the Caspian, and even in India,

Tartary and China; also, the _Morais_ of Polynesia. All of which were

the primitive altars of early men or their imitation, in later times as

in China.--2. Or like the Cave temples, scattered also from Ireland to

India, found in Greece, Syria, Egypt, Persia, &c., sometimes like the

excavated cities of the Troglodyte nations, found in Sicily, Crete,

Cyprus, Syria, Arabia, Cabul at Bamiyan, &c.--3d. Or like the massive

structures of stones of earliest ages, the _Norajes_ or Conical towers

of Sardinia and the Balearic Islands, the angular towers of Lybia, &c.

imitated in Peru, Brazil, Guatimala, Chiapa &c.--4th. Or like the

fortified cities of oldest ages in Persia, India, Arabia, Turan, _&_c.

imitated in Peru, and Central America, often with concentric inclosures

or curious shapes, sometimes with arks or citadels or acropolis, as in

Persia, Greece, Etruria &c.--5th. Or like the vast inclosures and sacred

areas of temples, with peculiar cells or holy recesses, shrines,

oracles, &c., as in India, China, Thibet, formerly in Syria, Egypt,

Assyria, even like the old temples of Mecca and Solomon; such are found

in Peru Tunca, Mexico, North America as far as Missouri, where most

were of wood as were the first temples of Solomon, Tyre, Delphos, and

are yet in China very often.

Then it is evident that the American Monuments are similar to the oldest

and earliest of the Eastern Continent, or the modern ones that are yet

built there on the primitive models. We have some late instances of it

even in Europe, when the huge mound of Waterloo was erected after the

battle of that name. Grecian buildings are often built now in Europe and

America, the Gothic style has travelled from Arabia to Europe and is not

yet quite out of use. The national altars of the Celestial Empire at

Pekin in China are yet exactly similar to those of earliest times, and

found in America.

Architecture and the various styles it has employed for monuments,

temples, cities &c. have undergone several changes and improvements,

from the rude imitations of a tent, or cottage, or hill, to that of

pyramids, towers, pillars, colonnades, caves, _norajes_, _teocalis_,

&c., from irregular inclosures to square, circular, octagon forms, from

heaps of earth forming ditches, canals, to regular walled excavations.

Styles of building are fluctuating with the Nations and times, taste and

religion: some are occasionally revived or improved; yet they have a

certain duration, location, or age, and origin somewhere. Nevertheless

they may happen to be blended by the same people; our own modern

civilization admits yet of the tents in camps, the loghouse, the shed,

the hut, the cottage, the houses of wood, brick or stone, palaces and

temples, theatres, Capitols, and negro huts! We must not be surprised to

see the same incongruity and admixture in various parts of America in

former times. Many tribes followed 300 years ago the style of 3000 years

before, as yet partly done in China.

Every thing on earth follows the universal law of terrestrial mutations,

monuments and arts, as well as languages and human features! they rise

and fall like the nations, mingle or blend as our modern English nation

and language formed out of many others. What diversity in any one of our

cities in complexions, statures and features of men! there are more

differences between some men of our own race, than between negroes, red

or white men. White, black and bay horses, are not peculiar species, nor

are men of different hues, hairs, eyes, noses, &c.

Inscriptions are monuments also, and of the highest value, even when we

cannot read them. Some of these will be hereafter, since those of Egypt

so long deemed inexplicable, have at last found interpreters. So it will

be at a future day, with those of America. Few have been made known as

yet, but there are many all over the range of the monumental regions.

Those sculptured in the temples and palaces of _Otolum_ near Palenque,

are not the only ones. Several in caves, or upon rocks, involve in rude

painting, a symbolic meaning, to which we are obtaining a clue. Several

nations of North America had a language of signs made or written;

although known sometimes to but few, these signs or symbols prevailed

from Origon[TN-13] to Chili--or else _Quipos_ as in China, were used as

records, in coloured strings or knots, wampums, belts, collars. All

these however, appear to belong to the first attempt of mankind to

perpetuate ideas, they seem to have preceded the alphabets of India,

Persia and Europe, or the vocal signs of China, although some of these

date of the earliest ages. Tula, Oaxaca, Otolum, &c., had glyphs or a

kind of combined alphabet, where the letters or syllables were blended

into words, as in our anagrams, and not in serial order. A few traces of

Alphabets have, however, been found in South America on the R. Cauca and

elsewhere, which have not yet obtained sufficient atteution:[TN-14] that

of Cauca given by Humboldt, is nearly Pelagic or Etruscan; traces of

Runic signs were found in Carolina--other signs have occasionally been

met in North America, but neglected.

Painted symbols or hieroglyphies,[TN-15] or sometimes abridged outlines

of them, were used chiefly in Anahuac, from Panuco to Panama; in North

America, from Florida to New Mexico, also in Cuba, Hayti, Yucatan,

Bogota, Peru, by the Panos, Muyzcas and other nations. Those without any

means to convey ideas could even in America, as in Scythia and Africa,

use emblems or objects to which a peculiar meaning was applied, and

trace rude pictures of them on trees or rocks.

The monuments connected with pictures, emblems, hieroglyphics, scattered

in caves, on rocks, on cliffs above human reach--are very curious, and

ought to be collected, sought for, and explained; they will all impart

historical events. The rock of Taunton and a few others, have alone

exercised the ingenuity of antiquarians, and perhaps to little purpose

at yet, since the inscription has been ascribed by turns to the

Phenicians, the Jews, the Atlantes, Norwegians or even to our modern

tribes. It may not be properly understood until all the graphic systems

of America are studied and explained. The late successful attempt of the

Cherokis to obtain a syllabic alphabet for their language, proves that

the Americans were not devoid of graphic ingenuity.

But the contents of mounds, graves, caves, &c., are also very

interesting, affording us a clue to their purpose, and the arts of times

when raised or inhabited. Many kinds of implements, ornaments, tools,

weapons, vases, &c., have been found every where, displaying skill and

taste. Idols and sculptures have given us the features and religious

ideas of some nations. Astronomical stones and calendars have been

found, recovered, and lost again, revealing peculiar systems of

astronomy and chronology. We possess the oomplex[TN-16] calendars of the

Tulans, Mexicans, Chiapans, Muyzcas, Peruvians, &c, that of the Talegas

of North America, a dodecagone with one hundred and forty-four parts and

hieroglyphics, was found on the banks of the Ohio, and has since been

lost or hidden.

Humboldt's labors on American astronomy and his results coincide with

those on antiquity to make the American systems quite different from the

oriental, Hindu, Jewish, Egyptian, Greek, Roman, and Celtic systems of

days, months, zodiac, and cycles; while they are more like those of

Thibet, China, Japan, Lybia, Etruria, &c. At any rate the American

systems were anterior to the admission of the week of seven days, being

the fourth of a lunation, each day dedicated to a planet, and the

Sabatical[TN-17] observance of the Jews based thereon. The American weeks

were of three, five, nine, and even thirteen days, as in some parts of

Asia and Africa, in Java, Thibet, China, Guinea. The week of five days

appears the most ancient of all and the most natural, including exactly

seventy-three weeks in the solar year, and sixty-nine in the lunar year;

that of the three days is only the decimal part of a month; in China the

long week of fifteen days prevails as yet being half a lunation or

month.

Accounts of monuments with dry descriptions and measures, are often

uninteresting, unless with figures and explanations to illustrate their

nature and designs. The writer having himself surveyed many American

sites of ancient cities, may hereafter describe and explain some of

them, with or without figures. He has also collected accounts of similar

monuments all over the earth, and will be able to elucidate thereby our

own monuments. Meantime whoever wishes to become acquainted with such as

have been made known in the United States alone, must consult a host of

writers who have described a few, such as Soto, Charlevoix, Barton,

Belknap, Lewis, Crevecoeur,[TN-18] Clinton, Atwater, Brekenridge,

Nuttal, McCulloh, Bartram, Priest, Beck, Madison, James, Schoolcraft,

Keating, &c.; and in the appendix to the Ancient History of Kentucky

will be found my catalogue made in 1824. Such study in[TN-19] then a task,

and requires the amending hand of a careful compiler at least, before we

can even obtain the complete knowledge of what has been done with us

already on this historical subject.

_Philadelphia, September, 1838._

The Ancient Monuments of North and South America, 2nd ed. · 第 7 / 11 题