(_Arranged in Question and Answer Form._)
_Question_. I may take it that the backbone of the British Army
(especially in the time of peace) are those commissioned warriors who
obtained admission to the Service by paying for their footing?
_Answer_. Indeed you may.
_Q._ And, at the time when these warriors were admitted, I fancy the
scientific branches of the Force (the "Gunners" and the "Sappers")
were rather looked down upon than otherwise?
_A._ Certainly, for you see they obtained their Commissions by brains,
and not through money-bags.
_Q._ And now you have to complain that the Generals' Establishment has
been reduced from 275 to 68?
_A._ A scandal and a shame! For this means that only a certain number
of us can hope to wear sashes round the waist, instead of hanging down
from the left shoulder.
_Q._ Does not promotion by selection, instead of seniority, cause you
also considerable loss?
_A._ Unquestionably. The Purchase Officer had a right to suppose that
once gazetted he would go up to the top of the tree, always supposing
he was able to pay his way like an officer and a gentleman.
_Q._ Is it not also sad that Officers who accept half-pay should be
called upon to serve in the Auxiliary Forces?
_A._ Not only sad, but confoundedly undignified.
_Q._ And do you not object to your condition generally?
_A._ Yes, certainly. And let me tell you the subject is _the_ burning
one of the hour!
_Q._ And what do you think of other matters affecting the welfare of
the Army?
_A_. That they are merely details that can safely wait indefinitely
the consideration of the Authorities!
* * * * *