CHAPTER II.

COLOUR.

Having considered some of the chief principles involved in the

production of decorative design so far as "expression" goes, we come

to notice that constant adjunct of form which has ever played an

important part in all decorative schemes--namely, colour.

Form can exist independently of colour, but it never has had any

important development without the chromatic adjunct. From a

consideration of history, we should be led to conclude that form alone

is incapable of yielding such enrichments as satisfy; for no national

system of decoration has ever existed in the absence of colour. Mere

outline-form may be good, but it is not satisfying; mere light and

shade may be pleasing, but it is not all that we require. With form

our very nature seems to demand colour; and it is only when we get

well-proportioned forms which are graceful, or noble, or vigorous, in

combination with colours harmoniously arranged, that we are satisfied.

Possibly this feeling results from our contact with nature. The

flowers appear in a thousand hues, and the hills are of ever-varying

tints. What a barren world ours would appear, were the ground, the

hills, the trees and the flowers, the sky and the waters all of one

colour! Form we should have, and that in its richest variety; light

and shade we should have, with ever-varying intensity and change; but

colour would be gone. There would be no green to cheer, no blue to

soothe, no red to excite; and, indeed, there would be a deadness,

although the world be full of life, so appalling that we can scarcely

conceive of it, and cannot _feel_ it.

Colour alone seems to have greater charms than form alone. A sunset is

entrancing when the sky glows with radiant hues; the blue is almost

lost in red, the yellow is as a sea of transparent gold, and the whole

presents a variety and blending of tints which charm, and soothe, and

lull to reverie; and yet all form is indistinct and obscure. If so

charming when separate from form, what is colour when properly

combined with beautiful shapes? It is difficult, indeed, for many of

those for whom I write to answer this question, even by a mental

conception, save by reference to nature; for I could scarcely point to

a single building in England which would be in any way a satisfactory

illustration of what may be done by the combination of forms and

colours. There is a beauty in Art which we in England do not even know

of: it does not exist around us, it is little talked of, rarely

thought about, and never seen. A decorator is called in to beautify a

house, and yet not one in fifty of the so-called decorators know even

the first principles of their art, and would not believe were they

told of the power of the art which they employ. They place on the

walls a few sickly tints--so pale that their want of harmony is not

very apparent. The colours of the wall become the colours of the

cornice and of the doors, because they know not how to produce a

harmony of hues; and the result is a house which may be clean, but

which is in every other respect an offence against good taste. I do

not wonder that persons here in England do not care to have their

houses "decorated," nor do I wonder at their not appreciating the

"decorations" when they are done. Colour, lovely colour, of itself

would make our rooms charming.

There are few objects to which colour may not be applied, and many

articles which are now colourless might be coloured with advantage.

Our reasons for applying colour to objects are twofold, and here, in

fact, we see its true use. 1st. Colour lends to objects a new charm--a

charm which they would not possess if without it; and, 2nd, Colour

assists in the separation of objects and parts of objects, and thus

gives assistance to form. These, then, are the two objects of colour.

Mark, first, it is to bestow on objects a charm, such as they could

not have in its absence. In the hands of the man of knowledge it will

do so--it will make an object lovely or lovable, but the mere

application of colour will not do this. Colour may be so applied to

objects as to render them infinitely more ugly than they were without

it. I have seen many a bowl so coloured at our potteries as to be much

less satisfactory when coloured than when white--the colouring having

marred, rather than improved, its general effect. Here, again, it is

knowledge that we want. Knowledge will enable us to transmute base

materials into works of marvellous beauty, worth their weight in gold.

Knowledge, then, is the true philosopher's stone; for, we may almost

say, if possessed by the artist it does enable him to transmute the

baser metals into gold. But a little knowledge will not do this. In

order that we produce true beauty, we require much knowledge, and this

can only be got by constant and diligent labour, as I have before

said; but the end to be gained is worth the plodding toil. Believe me,

there is a pleasure in seeing your works develop as things of beauty,

delighting all who see them--not the illiterate only, but also the

educated thinker--such as words fail to express. Although there is no

royal road to art-power, and although the road is long, and lies

through much toil and many difficulties, yet as you proceed there is

pleasure in feeling that one obstacle after another is cleared from

your path, and at the end there is inexpressible satisfaction. The

second object of colour is that of assisting in the separation of

form. If objects are placed near to one another, and these objects are

all of the same colour, the beholder will have much more difficulty in

seeing the boundaries or terminations of each than he would were they

variously coloured; he would have to come nearer to them in order to

see the limits of each, were all coloured in the same manner, than he

would were they variously coloured; thus colour assists in the

separation of form. This quality which colour has of separating forms

is often lost sight of, and much confusion thereby results. If it is

worth while to produce a decorative form, it is worth while to render

it visible; and yet, how much ornament, and even good ornament, is

lost to the eye through not being rendered manifest by colour! Colour

is the means by which we render form apparent.

Colours, when placed together, can only please and satisfy the

educated when combined harmoniously, or according to the laws of

harmony. What, then, are the laws which govern the arrangement of

colours? and how are they to be applied? We shall endeavour to answer

these questions by making a series of statements in axiomatic form,

and then we shall enlarge upon these propositions.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.

1. Regarded from an art point of view, there are but three

colours--_i.e._, blue, red, and yellow.

2. Blue, red, and yellow have been termed _primary_ colours; they

cannot be formed by the admixture of any other colours.

3. All colours, other than blue, red, and yellow, result from the

admixture of the primary colours.

4. By the admixture of blue and red, purple is formed; by the

admixture of red and yellow, orange is formed; and by the admixture of

yellow and blue, green is formed.

5. Colours resulting from the admixture of two primary colours are

termed _secondary_: hence purple, orange, and green are secondary

colours.

6. By the admixture of two secondary colours a _tertiary_ colour is

formed: thus, purple and orange produce russet (the red tertiary);

orange and green produce citrine (the yellow tertiary); and green and

purple, olive (the blue tertiary); russet, citrine, and olive are the

three tertiary colours.

CONTRAST.

7. When a light colour is juxtaposed to a dark colour, the light

colour appears lighter than it is, and the dark colour darker.[10]

[10] If a dark grey tint be mixed upon a white slab it will appear

dark in contrast with the white, but if a small portion of this same

grey is applied to black paper it will appear almost white.

8. When colours are juxtaposed, they become influenced as to their

hue. Thus, when red and green are placed side by side, the red appears

redder than it actually is, and the green greener; and when blue and

black are juxtaposed, the blue manifests but little alteration, while

the black assumes an orange tint or becomes "rusty."

9. No one colour can be viewed by the eye without another being

created. Thus, if red is viewed, the eye creates for itself green, and

this green is cast upon whatever is near. If it views green, red is

in like manner created and cast upon adjacent objects; thus, if red

and green are juxtaposed, each creates the other in the eye, and the

red created by the green is cast upon the red, and the green created

by the red is cast upon the green; and the red and the green become

improved by being juxtaposed. The eye also demands the presence of the

three primary colours, either in their purity or in combination and if

these are not present, whatever is deficient will be created in the

eye, and this induced colour will be cast upon whatever is near. Thus,

when we view blue, orange, which is a mixture of red and yellow, is

created in the eye, and this colour is cast upon whatever is near; if

black is in juxtaposition with the blue, this orange is cast upon it,

and gives to it an orange tint, thus causing it to look "rusty."

10. In like manner, if we look upon red, green is formed in the eye,

and is cast upon adjacent colours; or, if we look upon yellow, purple

is formed.

HARMONY.

11. Harmony results from an agreeable contrast.

12. Colours which perfectly harmonise improve one another to the

utmost.

13. In order to perfect harmony, the three colours are necessary,

either in their purity or in combination.

14. Red and green combine to yield a harmony. Red is a primary colour,

and green, which is a secondary colour, consists of blue and

yellow--the other two primary colours. Blue and orange also produce a

harmony, and yellow and purple, for in each ease the three primary

colours are present.

15. It has been found that the primary colours in perfect purity

produce exact harmonies in the proportions of eight parts of blue, 5

of red, and 3 of yellow; that the secondary colours harmonise in the

proportions of 13 of purple, 11 of green, and 8 of orange; and that

the tertiary colours harmonise in the proportions of olive 24, russet

21, and citrine 19.

16. There are, however, subtleties of harmony which it is difficult to

understand.

17. The rarest harmonies frequently lie close on the verge of discord.

18. Harmony of colour is, in many respects, analogous to harmony of

musical sounds.

QUALITIES OF COLOURS.

19. Blue is a cold colour, and appears to recede from the eye.

20. Red is a warm colour, and is exciting; it remains stationary as to

distance.

21. Yellow is the colour most nearly allied to light; it appears to

advance towards the spectator.

22. At twilight blue appears much lighter than it is, red much darker,

and yellow slightly darker. By ordinary gaslight blue becomes darker,

red brighter, and yellow lighter. By this artificial light a pure

yellow appears lighter than white itself, when viewed in contrast with

certain other colours.

23. By certain combinations colour may make glad or depress, convey

the idea of purity, richness, or poverty, or may affect the mind in

any desired manner, as does music.

TEACHINGS OF EXPERIENCE.

24. When a colour is placed on a gold ground, it should be outlined

with a darker shade of its own colour.

25. When a gold ornament falls on a coloured ground, it should be

outlined with black.

26. When an ornament falls on a ground which is in direct harmony with

it, it must be outlined with a lighter tint of its own colour. Thus,

when a red ornament falls on a green ground, the ornament must be

outlined with a lighter red.

27. When the ornament and the ground are in two tints of the same

colour, if the ornament is darker than the ground, it will require

outlining with a still darker tint of the same colour; but if lighter

than the ground no outline will be required.

ANALYTICAL TABLES OF COLOUR.

When commencing my studies both in science and art, I found great

advantage from reducing all facts to a tabular form so far as

possible, and this mode of study I would recommend to others. To me

this method appears to have great advantages, for by it we see at a

glance what otherwise is difficult to understand; if carefully done,

it becomes an analysis of work; and by preparing these tabular

arrangements of facts the subject becomes impressed on the mind, and

the relation of one fact to another, or of one part of a scheme to

another, is seen.

The following analytical tables will illustrate many of the facts

stated in our propositions. The figures which follow the colours

represent the proportions in which they harmonise:--

_Primary Colours._ _Secondary Colours._ _Tertiary Colours._

Blue 8 Purple 13 Olive 24

Red 5 Green 11 Russet 21

Yellow 3 Orange 8 Citrine 19

_Primary Colours._ _Secondary Colours._ _Tertiary Colours._

Red 5 }

} Orange 8 }

Yellow 3 } }

} Citrine, or Yellow Tertiary 19

Blue 8 } }

} Green 11 }

Yellow 3 }

Blue 8 }

} Purple 13 }

Red 5 } }

} Russet, or Red Tertiary 21

Red 5 } }

} Orange 8 }

Yellow 3 }

Blue 8 }

} Green 11 }

Yellow 3 } }

} Olive, or Blue Tertiary 24

Blue 8 } }

} Purple 13 }

Red 5 }

This latter table shows at a glance how each of the secondary and

tertiary colours is formed, and the proportions in which they

harmonise. It also shows why the three tertiary colours are called

respectively the yellow tertiary, the red tertiary, and the blue

tertiary, for into each tertiary two equivalents[11] of one primary

enter, and one equivalent of each of the other primaries. Thus, in

citrine we find two equivalents of yellow, and one each of red and

blue; hence it is the yellow tertiary. In russet we find two

equivalents of red, and one each of blue and of yellow; and in olive

two of blue, and one each of red and yellow. Hence they are

respectively the red and blue tertiaries.

[11] An equivalent of blue is 8, of red 5, of yellow 3.

[Illustration: Fig. 24.]

[Illustration: Fig. 25.]

Figs 24 and 25 are diagrams of harmony. I have connected in the

centre, by three similar lines, the colours which form a harmony;

thus, blue, red, and yellow harmonise when placed together. Purple,

green, and orange also harmonise (I have connected them by dotted

lines in the first of the two diagrams). But when two colours are to

produce a harmony, the one will be a primary colour, and the other a

secondary formed of the other two primary colours (for the presence of

the three primary colours is necessary to a harmony), or the one will

be a secondary, and the other a tertiary colour formed of the two

remaining secondary colours. Such harmonies I have placed opposite to

each other; thus blue, a primary, harmonises with orange, a secondary;

yellow with purple; and red with green; and the secondary colour is

placed between the two primary colours of which it is formed; thus,

orange is formed of red and yellow, between which it stands; green, of

blue and yellow; and purple, of blue and red. In the second of the two

diagrams we see that purple, green, and orange produce a harmony, so

do olive, russet, and citrine. We also see that purple and citrine

harmonise, and green and russet, and orange and olive.

Continuing this diagrammatic form of illustration, we may set forth

the quantities in which the various colours harmonise: thus:--

_Blue._ _Red._ _Yellow._

O O O O O O O O O O O

O O O O O

_Blue._ _Orange._

O O O O harmonises with O O O O

O O O O O O O O

_Red._ _Green._

O O O O harmonises with O O O O

O O O O O

O O O

_Yellow._ _Purple._

O O O harmonises with O O O O

O O O O

O O O O

O

_Purple._ _Citrine._

O O O O harmonises with O O O O

O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O O

O O O O O

O O O

_Green._ _Russet._

O O O O harmonises with O O O O

O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O

O O O O

O O O O

O

_Orange._ _Olive._

O O O O harmonises with O O O O

O O O O O O O O

O O O O

O O O O

O O O O

O O O O

To those who are about to practise ornamentation, it is very important

that they have in the mind's eye a tolerably accurate idea of the

relative quantities of the various colours necessary to harmony, even

where the colours are considered as existing in a state of absolute

purity. We have rarely, however, to use the brightest blues, reds, and

yellows which pigments furnish, and even these are but poor

representatives of the potent colours of light as seen in the rainbow,

and with the agency of the prism; nevertheless, a knowledge of the

quantities in which these pure colours harmonise is very desirable.

The proportions in which we have stated that colours perfectly

harmonise, and in which the primary colours combine to form the

secondaries, and the secondaries the tertiaries, are given in respect

to the colours of light, and not of pigments or paints, which, as we

have just said, are more or less base representatives of the pure

colours of light. Yet certain pigments may, for our purpose, be

regarded as representing pure colours. Thus, the purest real

ultramarine we will regard as blue (cobalt is rather green, that is,

it has a little yellow in it, and the French and German ultramarines

are generally rather purple, or have a little red in them, yet the

best of these latter is a tolerably pure colour), the purest French

carmine as red (common carmine is frequently rather crimson, that is,

has blue in it; vermilion is much too yellow), and lemon-chrome as

yellow (the chrome selected must be without any green shade, and

without any orange shade, however slight); and these pigments will be

found to represent the colours of the prism as nearly as any that can

be found. I would recommend the learner to get a small quantity of

these colours in their powder form, substituting the best pale German

ultramarine for real ultramarine, as the latter is of high price,[12]

and to fill the various circles of our diagrams, which represent the

primary colours, with these pigments, mixing them with a little

dissolved gum arabic and water--just ufficient to prevent the colours

from rubbing off the paper. The secondary colours will be fairly

represented by pale-green lake, often called drop-green, by

orange-chrome--that of about the colour of a ripe, rather

deep-coloured, orange-rind--and the purple by the admixture of pale

German ultramarine and crimson-lake, in about equal proportions, with

a little white to bring it to the same depth as the green. I cannot

name any pigments which would well represent the tertiary colours.

Citrine is about the colour of candied _lemon_-peel; olive about the

colour of candied citron-peel, and russet is often seen on the skin of

certain apples called "russet apples," in the form of a slight

roughness; but this russet is in many cases not quite sufficiently red

to represent the colour bearing the same name. Iron rust is rather too

yellow. This colour should bear the same relation to red that the

candied lemon-peel does to yellow.

[12] Real ultramarine is sold at L8 per ounce. The best imitation, or

German ultramarine, is procurable at any oil-shop at about 3s. to 4s.

per pound. The best carmine should be procurable at 6s. per ounce, but

artists' colourmen often charge L1 1s., owing to the small demand for

this pigment. The best chrome yellow (chrome yellow is kept in many

shades) is about 1s. 6d. per pound.

If the student will try carefully to realise these colours, and will

fill up the circles in our diagrams with them, he will thereby be much

assisted in his studies; but it will be still better if he prepare

fresh diagrams on a larger scale, and use squares instead of circles.

I should recommend, and that I do strongly, that the student work out

all the diagrams which I have suggested on a tolerably large scale,

using the colours where I have used words. I should also advise him to

do an ornament, say in red on a gold ground, and outline this red

ornament with a deeper red; to do a gold ornament on a coloured

ground, and outline it with black; and indeed to carefully work out an

ornamental illustration of our propositions, Nos. 24, 25, 26, and 27,

and to keep these before him till he is so impressed by them as to

_feel_ the principle which they set forth. This should be done on a

large scale in all our designing-rooms and art-workshops.

As we shall have to refer to colours by naming pigments, and as I am

constantly asked what pigments I employ, I shall enumerate the paints

in my colour-box; but I shall place a dagger against those which I

have in my private box, and which I do not supply in my offices; but

these I seldom use. Of yellows I have [14]king's yellow (not a permanent

colour), [14]very pale chrome, lemon-chrome (about the colour of a ripe

lemon), middle-chrome (half-way between the lemon and orange-chrome),

orange-chrome (about the colour of the rind of a ripe orange),

[14]yellow-lake, [14]Indian yellow. Of reds--vermilion, carmine,

crimson-lake. Of blues--[14]cobalt, German ultramarine, both deep and

pale, Antwerp blue, indigo. Of greens--emerald, green-lake, pale and

deep. Of browns--raw Turkey umber, vandyke, Venetian red,

purple-brown, brown-lake. Besides these I have what is called

celestial blue, which is a very pure and intense turquoise, vegetable

black, flake white, and gold bronze.[13]

[13] Some of these colours are not of a permanent character and could

not be used in work intended to be lasting. I use them for patterns

for our manufactures, where when the drawing is once copied in a

fabric it is destroyed. Some of the brightest colours are

unfortunately the most fleeting.

There are certain facts connected with the mixing of colours which

must never be lost sight of; thus, while the colours of light

co-mingle without any deterioration, or loss of brilliancy, pigments

or paints will not do so, but by admixture tend to destroy one

another. This takes place only to a small extent when but two primary

colours are combined; but if any of the third primary enters into the

composition of a tint, a decided deterioration, or loss of intensity,

occurs.

For this reason we employ many pigments, so as to avoid as far as

possible the mixing of colours. But there is another reason why the

great admixture of colours is undesirable. Colours are chemical

agents, and in some cases the various pigments act chemically on one

another. Of all colours yellows suffer most by admixture with other

colours: but this is accounted for by their delicacy and purity. For

this reason I use a greater variety of yellow pigments than of red or

blue.[14]

[14] Of all mediums in which colours can be mixed, paraffine is the

safest; it is without chemical affinities, and is therefore well

calculated to preserve pigments in their original condition.

Were it possible to procure three pigments devoid of chemical

affinities, and each of the same physical constitution, as of equal

degrees of transparency or opacity, one truly representing the blue of

light, another the red, and another the yellow, we should need no

others, for of these we could form all other colours; but as no

pigments come even near to the fulfilment of these conditions, we have

to employ roundabout and clumsy methods of arriving at desired

results.

There is one statement which I have made that, perhaps, needs a little

elucidation, although the careful student may have seen the reason of

my assertion. I said that purple harmonised with citrine, green with

russet, and orange with olive. I might have expressed it (and many

would have done so) thus:--The complement of citrine is purple, the

complement of russet is green, and the complement of olive is orange.

A colour which is complementary to any other is that which, with it,

completes the presence of the three primary colours: thus green is the

complement of red, and red of green, for each, together with the

colour to which it is the complement, completes the presence of the

three colours. But in order to a harmony, the complement must be made

up in certain proportions. Let us now refer to our second diagrammatic

table, and we there see that citrine is formed of two equivalents of

yellow and only one equivalent of red and of blue. Now, in order to a

harmony, each primary should be present in two equivalents, as one is

present in this quantity--_i.e._, the yellow. One equivalent of blue

and one of red (both of which are wanting in the citrine) form purple;

hence purple is the complement of citrine, or the colour that with it

produces a harmony. In russet one equivalent of blue and one of yellow

are wanting, and these in combination are green--green, then, is the

complement of russet. And in olive one equivalent of red and one of

yellow are wanting--red and yellow form orange, hence orange is the

complement of olive.

I have spoken of all colours as of full intensity and purity, but we

have to deal also with other conditions. All colours may be darkened

by black, when _shades_ are produced; or reduced by white, when

_tints_ are produced. Besides these alterations in intensity, a

portion of one colour may be added to another. Thus, if a small

portion of blue be mingled with red, the red becomes a crimson or

blue-red; or if a small portion of yellow be added to the red, the

latter becomes a scarlet or yellow-red. In like manner, when yellow is

in excess in a green, we have a yellow-green; or when blue is in

excess, a blue-green; and so with the other colours. Such alterations

produce _hues_ of colour.

We now come to the subtleties of harmony. Thus, if we have a

yellow-red or scarlet--a red with yellow in it--the green that will

harmonise with it will be a blue-green; or if we have a blue-red or

crimson--a red with blue in it--the green that will harmonise with it

will be a yellow-green. This is obvious, for the following

reasons:--Let us suppose a red represented by the equivalent number,

five, with one part of blue added to it, thus causing it to be a

blue-red or crimson. Were the red pure, there should be eleven parts

of green as a complement to the five of red, of which green eight

parts would be blue and three yellow; but the blue-red occurs in six

parts, one of which is blue--there are, then, but seven parts of blue

remaining in the equivalent quantity to combine with the three of

yellow, one being already used; hence the green formed is a

yellow-green, one of the equivalents of blue necessary to the

formation of a true green being already in combination with the red,

and thus absent from the green.

The same reasoning will apply to the scarlet-red and blue-green, and,

indeed, to all similar cases; but to take the case of the crimson-red

and yellow-green, as just given, and carry it a stage further, we

might add two parts (out of the eight) of blue to the red, and make it

more blue, and then form the complementary green of six parts of blue

and three of yellow, and thus make it more yellow. Or we may go

further still, and add to the red six of the eight parts of blue, when

the admixture would appear as a red-purple rather than as a blue-red,

in which case the complementary green--or, rather, green-yellow--would

consist of two parts of blue and three of yellow. These facts are

diagrammatically expressed in the following:--

Red O O O O O } Yellow { O O O Yellow

} Crimson harmonises with {

Blue O } Green { O O O O O O O Blue

Or,

Red O O O O O } Blue Very { O O O Yellow

} harmonises with Yellow {

Blue O O } Crimson Green { O O O O O O Blue

Or,

Red. O O O O O } Red Green { O O O Yellow

} harmonises with {

Blue. O O O O O O } Purple Yellow { O O Blue

In all these cases it will be seen that we have eight parts of blue,

five of red, and three of yellow, only the mode of combination varies.

This variation may occur to any extent, provided the totals of each be

always the equivalent proportions.

These remarks will apply equally to hues of colour, shades, and tints,

and to shades and tints of hues.

Care, and a little practice, will enable the learner to arrange

colours into a number of degrees of depth, or shades, as they are

generally called. (We do not here use the term as signifying pure

colours darkened with black.) Ten shades of each colour differing

obviously in degree of depth can readily be arranged by the

experienced, the ten shades being equidistant from each other as

regards depth--that is, shade 3 will be as much darker than shade 2 as

shade 2 is darker than shade 1, and so on throughout the whole. Purple

is a colour intermediate between blue and red. Imagine ten hues

between the purple and the red, and ten more between the purple and

the blue: thus we should have purple, then a slightly red purple, then

a rather redder purple, then a purple still redder, and so on till we

get purple-reds, and finally the pure red; and the same variations of

hue at the blue side also. Imagine, further, the green having ten hues

extending towards the blue, and ten more stretching towards the

yellow; and the orange having ten hues towards the red, and ten

towards the yellow--in all cases I count the colour from which we

start as one of the ten, thus:--

Blue Purple Red

0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0

--and we shall have 54 colours and hues of colour. Of each of these 54

colours and hues imagine 10 degrees of depth, and we get 540 colours,

hues, tints, and shades, all differing from one another to an obvious

degree.

Mark this fact, that any colour, tint, hue, or shade of such a diagram

has its complement in one other of the colours, tints, hues, or shades

of the diagram, and that only two of this series of 540 are

complementary to each other; thus, if you fix on any one colour of the

540, there is but one colour in the whole that is complementary to it,

and it is complementary to but this one other colour.

The student will do well to try and make a colour-diagram of this

kind, of a simple character, say such as the following, only using

pigments for my numbers; but in doing so he must exercise the utmost

care, in order that he secure some degree of accuracy of tint or

shade, and if he can call to his aid an experienced colourist it will

be of great assistance to him.

[Illustration]

This table is highly valuable, as it gives ninety harmonies, if

carefully prepared in colour; and the preparation of such a table is

the very best practice that a student can possibly have.

Let us for a moment consider this table, and suppose that we want to

find the complement to some particular colour, as the third shade of

red. We find the complement of this in the third shade of green

opposite. If we want the complement of the second shade of

orange-yellow, we find it in the second shade of blue-purple opposite,

and so on. Thus we have a means of at once judging of the harmony of

colours.

It must ever be borne in mind that pigments mixed in the proportions

given will not yield results such as would occur when the coloured

rays of light are combined; thus three parts, either by weight or

measure, of chrome yellow when combined with eight parts of

ultramarine would not form a colour representing the secondary green,

nor would the result be more satisfactory were other pigments combined

in the proportions given. What we have said in respect to the

proportions in which colours combine to form new colours applies only

to the coloured rays of light.

It must now be noticed that while colours harmonise in the proportions

stated, the areas occupied by the different colours may vary if there

be a corresponding alteration in intensity. Thus eight of blue and

eight of orange form a perfect harmony when both colours are of

prismatic intensity; but we shall still have a perfect harmony if the

orange is diluted to one-half its strength with white, and thus formed

into a tint, provided there be sixteen parts of this orange of half

strength to the eight parts of blue of full strength.

The orange might be further diluted to one-third of its full power,

but then twenty-four parts would be necessary to a perfect harmony

with eight parts of prismatic blue; or to one-fourth of its strength,

when thirty-two parts would be necessary to the harmony.

It is not desirable that I occupy space with diagrams of these

quantities, but the industrious student will prepare them for himself,

and will strive to realise a true half-tint, quarter-tint, etc., which

is not a very easy thing to do. By practice, however, it will readily

be accomplished, and anything achieved is a new power gained.

What I have said respecting the harmony of blue with tints of orange

will apply in all similar cases. Thus red will harmonise with tints of

green, provided the area of the tint be increased as the intensity is

decreased; and so will yellow harmonise with tints of purple under

similar conditions.

But we may reverse the conditions, and lower the primary to a tint

retaining the secondary in its intensity. Thus blue, if reduced to a

half-tint, will harmonise with orange of prismatic intensity in the

proportion of sixteen of blue to eight of orange; or, if reduced to a

quarter-tint, in the proportion oL thirty-two of blue to eight of

orange. Red, if reduced to a half-tint, will harmonise in the

proportion of ten red to eleven of green; and yellow as a half-tint in

the proportion of six yellow to thirteen of purple.

The same remarks might be made respecting the harmony of shades of

colour with colours of prismatic intensity. Thus, if orange is diluted

to a shade of half intensity with black, it will harmonise with pure

blue in the proportion of sixteen of orange to eight of blue, and so

on, just as in the case of tints; and this principle applies to the

harmony of all hues of colour also.

To go one step further: we scarcely ever deal with pure colours or

their shades or tints, or even come as near them as we can. With great

intensity of colour we seem to require an ethereal character, such as

we have in those of light; but our pigments are coarse and

earthy--they are too real-looking, and are not ethereal--they may be

said to be corporeal rather than spiritual in character. For this

reason we have to avoid the use of our purest pigments in such

quantities as render their poverty of nature manifest, and to use for

large surfaces such tints as, through their subtlety of composition,

interest and please. A tint the composition of which is not apparent

is always preferable to one of more obvious formation. Thus we are led

to use tints which are subtly formed, and such as please by their

newness and bewilder by the intricacy of formation.

To do what I here mean it is not necessary that many pigments be mixed

together in order to the formation of a tint. The effect of which I

speak can frequently be got by two well-chosen pigments. Thus a fine

series of low-toned shades can be produced by mixing together

middle-chrome and brown-lake in various proportions, and in all of the

shades thus formed the three primary colours will be represented, but

in some yellow will predominate, and in others red; while in many it

will not be easy to discover to what proportionate extent the three

primary colours are present.

Let us suppose that we make a tint by adding white to cobalt blue.

This blue contains a small amount of yellow, and is a slightly green

blue. But to this tint we add a small amount of raw umber with the

view of imparting a greyness[15] or atmospheric character. Raw umber

is a neutral colour, leaning slightly to yellow--that is, it consists

of red, blue, and yellow, with a slight excess of the latter. In order

that an orange harmonise with this grey-blue of a slightly yellow

tone, the orange must be slightly inclined to red, so as to form the

complement of the little green formed by the yellow in the blue. It

may harmonise with the grey-blue as a pure tint if the area of the

diluted and neutralised primary is sufficiently extended, or may

itself be likewise reduced to a tint of the same depth, when both

tints would have the same area.

[15] Cobalt, raw umber, and white make a magnificent grey, both in

oil-colours, in tempera (powder-colours mixed with gum-water), and in

distemper (powder-colours mixed with size).

I might go on multiplying cases of this character to almost any

extent, but these I leave the student to work out for himself, and

pass to notice that while it is desirable to use subtle tints (often

called "broken tints") it is rarely expedient to make up the full

harmony by a large area of a tertiary tone and a single positive

colour. Thus, we might have a shade or a tint of citrine spreading

over a large surface as a ground on which we wished to place a figure.

This figure would harmonise in pure purple were it of a certain size,

and yet if thus coloured it would give a somewhat common-place effect

when finished, for the harmony would be too simple and obvious. It

would be much better to have the nineteen parts of citrine reduced,

say, to half intensity, when the area would be increased to

thirty-eight, with the figure of eight parts of blue and five of red,

than of thirteen parts of purple.

But it would be better still if there were the thirty-eight parts of

reduced citrine, three parts of pure yellow, thirteen of purple, five

of red, and eight of blue, together with white, black, or gold, or all

three (these may be added without altering the conditions, as all act

as neutrals), for here the harmony is of a more subtle character.

If we count up the equivalents of the colours employed in this scheme

of harmony, we shall see that we have, in the citrine--

Yellow 6 (two equivalents).

Blue 8 (one equivalent).

Red 5 (one equivalent).

In the purple--

Blue 8 (one equivalent).

Red 5 (one equivalent).

Of the pure colours--

Yellow 3 (one equivalent).

Red 5 (one equivalent).

Blue 8 (one equivalent).

Thus we have three equivalents of each primary, which give a perfect

harmony.

I must not say more respecting the laws of harmony, for in the space

of a small work it is impossible to do so, but proceed to notice

certain effects or properties of colours, which I have as yet only

alluded to, or have passed altogether unnoticed.

I have said that black, white, and gold are neutral as regards colour.

This is the case, although many would suppose that gold was a yellow.

Gold will act as a yellow, but it is generally employed as a neutral

in decorative work, and it is more of a neutral than a yellow, for

both red and blue exist largely in it. The pictorial artist frames his

picture with gold because it, being a neutral, does not interfere with

the tints of his work. It has the further advantage of being rich and

costly in appearance, and thus of giving an impression of worth where

it exists.

Black, white, and gold, being neutral, may be advantageously employed

to separate colours where separation is necessary or desirable.

Yellow and purple harmonise, but yellow is a light colour and purple

is dark. These colours not only harmonise, but also contrast as to

depth, the one being light and the other dark. The limit of each

colour, wherever these are used in juxtaposition, is therefore

obvious.

It is not so with red and green, for these harmonise when of the same

depth. This being the case, and red being a glowing colour, if a red

object is placed on a green ground, or a green object on a red ground,

the "figure" and ground will appear to "swim" together, and will

produce a dazzling effect. Colour must assist form, and not confuse

it. It will do this in the instance just named if the figure is

outlined with black, white, or gold, and there will be no loss of

harmony. But experience has shown that this effect can also be averted

by outlining the figure with a lighter tint of its own colour. Thus,

if the figure is red and the ground green, an outline of lighter red

(pink) may be employed. (See Proposition 26, page 34.)

A blue figure on a red ground (as ultramarine on carmine), or a red

figure on a blue ground, will also produce this swimming and

unsatisfactory effect, but this is again obviated by an outline of

black, white, or gold.

Employing the outline thus must not be regarded as a means of merely

rendering what was actually unpleasant endurable, for it does much

more--it affords one of the richest means of effect. A carmine ground

well covered with bold green ornament having a gold outline is, if

well managed, truly gorgeous; and were the figure blue on the red

ground, the lavish use of gold would render the employment of yellow

unnecessary as the yellow formed in the eye and cast upon the gold

would satisfy all requirements.

It is a curious fact that the eye will create any colour of which

there is a deficiency. This it will do, but the colour so created is

of little use to the composition unless white or gold is present; if,

however, there be white or gold in the composition, the colour which

is absent, or is insufficiently represented, will be formed in the eye

and cast upon these neutrals, and the white or the gold, as the case

may be, will assume the tint of the deficient or absent colour. (See

Propositions 8 and 9, page 32.)

While this occurs (and sometimes it occurs to a marked degree, as can

be shown by experiment), it must not be supposed that a composition in

which any element is wanting is as perfect as one which reveals no

want. It is far otherwise; only Nature here comes to our assistance,

and is content to help herself rather than endure our short-comings;

but in the one case we give Nature the labour of completing the

harmony; while in the other, all being prepared, we receive a sense of

satisfaction and repose.

In Proposition 8 we showed that when blue and black are juxtaposed,

the black becomes "rusty," or assumes an orange tint; and in

Proposition 9 we gave the cause of this effect. Let a blue spot be

placed on a black silk necktie, and however black the silk, it will

yet appear rusty. This is a fact; but we sometimes desire to employ

blue on black, and wish the black to look black, and not an

orange-black. How can we do this? Obviously by substituting for the

black a very dark blue, as indigo. The bright blue spot induces orange

(the complement of blue) in the eye. This orange, when cast upon

black, causes the latter to look "rusty;" but if we place in the black

an amount of blue sufficient to neutralise the orange cast upon it,

the effect will be that of a jet-black.

We have now considered those qualities of colour, and those laws of

contrast and harmony, which may be said to be of the grosser sort; but

we have scarcely touched on those considerations which pertain to

special refinement or tenderness of effect. But let me close the part

of my subject of which I have treated, by repeating a statement

already made--a statement, let me say, which first led me to perceive

really harmony of colour--that _those colours, and those particular

hues of colour, which improve each other to the utmost, are those

which perfectly harmonise_. (Consider this statement in connection

with Propositions 8, 9, 10, and 14, pages 32 and 33.)

* * * * *

We come now to consider delicacies and refinements in colour effects,

which, although dependent upon the skilful exercise of the laws

enunciated, are yet of a character, the power to produce which only

results from the consideration of the works of the masters of great

art-nations; but of these effects I can say little beyond pointing out

what should be studied.

This principle however I cannot pass without notice--namely, that the

finest colour effects are those of a rich, mingled, bloomy character.

Imagine a luxuriant garden, the beds in which are filled with a

thousand flowers, having all the colours of the rainbow, and imagine

these arranged as closely together as will permit of their growth.

When viewed from a distance the effect is soft and rich, and full and

varied, and is all that is pleasant. This is Nature's colouring. It is

our work humbly to strive at producing like beauty with her.

This leads me to notice that primary colours (and secondary colours,

also, when of great intensity) should be used chiefly in small masses,

together with gold, white, or black.

Visit the Indian Museum at Whitehall,[16] and consider the beautiful

Indian shawls and scarves and table-covers; or, if unable to do so,

look in the windows of our large drapers in the chief towns, and see

the true Indian fabrics,[17] and observe the manner in which small

portions of intense reds, blues, yellows, greens, and a score of

tertiary tints, are combined with white and black and gold to produce

a very miracle of bloom. I know of nothing in the way of colour

combination so rich, so beautiful, so gorgeous, and yet so soft, as

some of these Indian shawls.

[16] This museum is open free to the public.

[17] These will only be seen in very first-class shops.

It is curious that we never find a purely Indian work otherwise than

in good taste as regards colour harmony. Indian works, in this

respect--whether carpets, or shawls, or dress materials, or lacquered

boxes, or enamelled weapons--are almost perfect--perfect in harmony,

perfect in richness, perfect in the softness of their general effect.

How strangely these works contrast with ours, where an harmonious work

in colours is scarcely ever seen.

By the co-mingling (not co-mixing) of colours in the manner just

described, a rich and bloomy effect can be got, having the general

tone of a tertiary colour of any desired hue. Thus, if a wall be

covered with little ornamental flowerets, by colouring all alike, and

letting each contain two parts of yellow and one part of blue and one

of red, as separate and pure colours, the distant hue will be that of

citrine: the same effect will result if the flowers are coloured

variously, while the same proportions of the primaries are preserved

throughout. I can conceive of no decorative effects more subtle, rich,

and lovely than those of which I now speak.

Imagine three rooms, all connected by open archways, and all decorated

with a thousand flower-like ornaments, and these so coloured, in this

mingled manner, that in one room blue predominates, in another red,

and in another yellow; we should then have a beautiful tertiary bloom

in each--a subtle mingling of colour, an exquisite delicacy and

refinement of treatment, a fulness such as always results from a rich

mingling of hues, and an amount of detail which would interest when

closely inspected; besides which, we should have the harmony of the

general effect of the three rooms, the one appearing as olive, another

as citrine, and the other as russet.

This mode of decoration has this advantage, that it not only gives

richness and beauty, but it also gives purity. If pigments are mixed

together they are thereby reduced in intensity, as we have already

seen; but if placed side by side, when viewed from a distance the eye

will mix them, but they will suffer no diminution of brilliancy.

With the view of cultivating the eye, Eastern works cannot be too

carefully studied. The Indian Museum should be the home of all who can

avail themselves of the opportunity of study which it affords; and the

small Indian department of the South Kensington Museum should not be

neglected, small though it is.[18] Chinese works must also be

considered, for they likewise supply most valuable examples of colour

harmony; and although they do not present such a perfect colour bloom

as do the works of India, yet they are never inharmonious, and give

clearness and sharpness, together with great brilliancy, in a manner

not attempted by the Indians.

[18] It may not be generally known, but nearly all our large

manufacturing towns have, in connection with the Chamber of Commerce,

a collection of Indian fabrics, filling several large volumes, which

were prepared, at the expense of Government, under the superintendence

of Dr. Forbes Watson, and which were given to the various towns on the

condition that they be accessible to all persons who are trustworthy.

Although these collections do not embrace the costly decorated

fabrics, yet much can be learned from them, and the combinations of

colour are always harmonious. A much larger collection is now in

course of formation.

The best works of Chinese embroidery are rarely seen in this country;

but these are unsurpassed by the productions of any other people. For

richness, splendour, and purity of colour, together with a delicious

coolness, I know of nothing to equal them.

The works of the Japanese are not to be overlooked, for in certain

branches of art they are inimitable, and as colourists they are almost

perfect. On the commonest of their lacquer trays we generally have a

bit of good colouring, and their coloured pictures are sometimes

marvels of harmony.

As to the styles of colouring adopted by the nations referred to, I

should say that the Indians produce rich, mingled, bloomy, _warm_

effects--that is, effects in which red and yellow prevail; that the

Chinese achieve clearness, repose, and _coolness_--a form of colouring

in which blue and white prevail; and that the Japanese effects are

_warm_, simple, and quiet.

Besides studying the works of India, China, and Japan, study those

also of Turkey and Morocco, and even those of Algeria, for here the

colouring is much better than with us, although not so good as in the

countries first named. No aid to progress must be neglected, and no

help must be despised.[19]

[19] The South Kensington Museum has a very interesting collection of

art-works from China and Japan; but the latter are chiefly lent. It is

a strange thing that the perfect works of the East are so poorly

illustrated in this national collection, while costly, yea, very

costly works of inferior character, illustrative of Renaissance art,

swarm as thickly as flies in August. This can only be accounted for by

the fact that the heads of the institution have a feeling for

pictorial rather than decorative art, and the Renaissance ornament is

that which has most of the pictorial element. To me, the style appears

to owe its very weakness to this fact, for decorative art should be

wholly ideal. Pictorial art is of necessity more or less imitative.

With the view of refining the judgment further in respect to colour,

get a good colour-top,[20] and study its beautiful effects. See also

the "gas tubes" illuminated by electricity, as sold by opticians, and

let the prism yield you daily instruction. Soap-bubbles may also be

blown, and the beautiful colours seen in them carefully noted. These

and any other available means of cultivating the eye should constantly

be resorted to, as by such means only can we become great colourists.

[20] Not the so-called colour or "chameleon" top sold in the

toy-shops, but the more scientific toy procurable of opticians,

together with the perforated discs of Mr. John Graham, M.R.C.S., of

Tunbridge, Kent.

As to works on colour, we have the writings of Field, to whom we are

indebted for valuable discoveries; of Hay, the decorator, and friend

of the late David Roberts, but some of his ideas are wild and Utopian;

of Chevreul, whose work will be most useful to the student; and the

small catechism of colour by Mr. Redgrave, of the South Kensington

Museum, which is excellent. The student will also do well to carefully

study the excellent manual of "Colour" by Professor Church, of

Cirencester College.

Principles of decorative design · 第 2 / 10 章