In the direct treatment of the facts and principles of mental evolution we

can use exactly the same classification and subdivisions of the materials

of study as heretofore, because psychological data are the correlates of

material organic systems, and also because the former, being natural

phenomena, are subject to the methods of analysis which can be employed

for any series of objects that have undergone evolution. Separating the

matter of fact from the question as to the method, and recalling the main

bodies of evidence as to the reality of evolution, we may establish four

sections of the subject before us: these are (1) the anatomy, (2) the

embryology, and (3) "palæontology" of mind, and (4) an inquiry into the

way nature deals with the psychical characteristics of organisms in

accomplishing their evolution. To specify more particularly, it is

possible in the first place to compare the activities belonging to the

category of mental and nervous operations, displayed by man and other

organisms, and the results form the subject of comparative descriptive

psychology; the second division, namely, developmental or genetic

psychology, deals with the sequence of events in the life of a single

individual by which the infantile and adolescent types of mind become

adult intellectuality; in the third place, in speaking of the palæontology

of mind, the phrase is used to refer to the varied and changing mental

abilities of human races in historic and prehistoric times as they may be

demonstrated and determined by the evidences of the culture of such

earlier epochs. In considering the matter of method, the questions are

whether variation, inheritance, and selection are as real in the world of

mental phenomena as they are in the material world, and whether the laws

are the same or similar in the two cases. We shall learn how the results

of such studies prove with convincing clearness, first, that the contents

of the individual mind and of the minds of various human races are truly

the products of natural evolution, and second, that the human mind differs

only in degree from that of lower organisms, and not in kind or

fundamental nature.

* * * * *

When the operations of human mental life are examined, they include what

are called processes of _reason_ as apparently distinctive elements. The

lower mammalia exhibit a simpler order of "mentality" denoted

_intelligence_, while the nervous processes of still simpler forms are

called _instinctive_ and _reflex_ activities. These are the terms of the

comparative array of psychology which are to be separately examined and

classified, and to be brought into an evolutionary sequence if

common-sense directs us to do so.

Let us begin our comparative study with an example of the simplest animals

that consist of only a single cell, such as the little protozoon

_Amoeba_. We have become familiar with this organism as one that carries

on all of the vital functions within the limits of a single structural

unit; it is a mass of protoplasm enclosing a nucleus, and as a biological

individual it must perform all of the eight tasks that are essential for

life. It does not possess a digestive tract, but it does digest; it does

not have breathing organs, but it does respire; and it is particularly

noteworthy that it must coordinate the different activities of its parts,

and maintain definite relations with the environment, even though its

coordination and sensation are not accomplished by any special parts that

would deserve the name of elementary nervous organs. Its many activities

are simple responses to stimuli that reach it from without, and its

reactions to such stimuli are called reflex processes. Should the light

become too strong, it will slowly crawl to a shady place; should the water

in which it lives become warmer, it responds by displaying greater

activity. It exhibits, in a word, the property of _irritability_--that is,

simply the power of receiving and reacting to stimuli; and being only a

single cell this property is held in common by all of its parts.

We come next to a simple many-celled animal like the polyp _Hydra_, or a

jellyfish. In such an animal the body is composed of numerous cells which

are not all alike either in their make-up or in their functions. Some of

them are concerned primarily with digestion, others with protection, while

still others are exempt from these tasks and as sense-cells they devote

all their energies to the reception of stimuli from without, or, beneath

the outer sheet of cells of the two-layered body, they conduct impulses

from one part of the animal to another, and thus serve as coordinating

members of the community. For the first time, then, a nervous system as

such is set apart and specialized to devote itself to the two tasks of

sensation and coordination that are performed by nervous systems

throughout the entire range of organisms higher in the scale. But the

activities of _Hydra_, like those of _Amoeba_, are reflex and

mechanical,--that is to say, _given similar stimuli and similar

physiological states of the animal, the reactions will be the same_. A

little water-crustacean like _Daphnia_ may swim against the tentacles of

_Hydra_; it is stung to death by the minute cell-batteries which the

animal possesses, and then in a mechanical way the tentacles transport the

food to the mouth, through which it is passed inward to the digestive

cavity. There is nothing that can be called "mentality" throughout these

processes, but the series of activities is much more complex than in

_Amoeba_ because the whole organism is constructed more elaborately, and

because the special and peculiar mechanism directing the activities has

advanced to a far higher condition.

Passing to the jointed animals like worms and insects, we find nervous

mechanisms that are still more intricate, and with their advance in

structural respects there is a corresponding and correlated progress in

their functions. Because the whole organism has developed more highly

differentiated groups of organs to perform the several biological tasks,

such as eating and respiring and moving, it is necessary for the nervous

structures concerned with the direction of these actions to become more

efficient. An earthworm avoids the light of day and digs its burrow and

seeks its food by wonderfully coördinated activities of its muscles and

other parts, which are controlled by a double chain of ganglia along its

ventral side, connected with a similar pair of grouped nerve-cells above

the anterior part of the digestive tract. The ganglia of each segment

exercise immediate supervision over the structures of their respective

territory, while they pass on impulses to other ganglia so that movements

involving many segments can be properly adjusted. Everything an earthworm

does is controlled by the cells grouped in these ganglia, or scattered

along the intervening connecting cords. We speak of its acts as

instinctive, employing a term which seems to indicate a different kind of

operation carried on by the nervous system, but a moment's thought will

show that an instinctive act is simply a complex group of reflex acts. The

physical basis and ultimate unit is a cell, and the functional unit is

likewise a cell act; therefore the seeming difference proves to be one

merely of degree and not of kind. The greater complexity of the worm's

nervous system as compared with that of _Hydra_ gives to the whole

mechanism a plasticity that diverts the attention from the mechanical

nature of the entire instinctive act and of its basic cell elements.

The instinct, like the elementary reflex, is determined by heredity.

Because a certain configuration of the cells and fibers making up a

nervous system is inherited as well as the characters of the constituent

elements themselves, a worm or an insect is enabled to act as it does. A

butterfly does not have to learn how to fly, for it flies instinctively.

When it emerges from its chrysalis with its complete adult series of wings

and muscles, it has also the nervous mechanism by which these parts are

mechanically controlled. A ground-wasp deposits its eggs in a small burrow

in which it places also a caterpillar or a grasshopper paralyzed by

stinging, so that when the larva is hatched from an egg it finds an ample

supply of fresh food provided by a complex series of its mother's acts

that seem to be directed by conscious maternal solicitude. When the larva

passes through the later stages of development and makes its way to the

open air as a fully formed adult, it in its turn may go through the same

course of action as its parent, but it is clear that it cannot have any

remembrance of its mother's work or any personal knowledge of the value of

burying its own eggs in a chamber with a living prisoner to serve as food.

It was an egg when its parent did these things; as a parent itself it does

not remain on watch to see how beneficial or fruitless its acts may be. A

mechanism produced by nature's methods, the ground-wasp behaves as it is

capable of working with its inherited structure and its inherited

instinctive powers of coördination and sensation.

The complex lives of communal insects like ants and bees bring us to the

level of mentality where an understanding of causes and effects seems to

be the guide for conduct. Nevertheless the facts do not warrant the

assumption that reason and intelligence play any part in the mental life

of these creatures, as they do in the lives of man and the apes. Because

we ourselves can see the utility of the definite and peculiar behavior of

the queen and the worker, there is no logical necessity for assuming an

identical form of knowledge as a possession of these insects. Many

investigators have dealt with these fascinating subjects, and they are

almost unanimous in the conclusion that the instinct of an insect is a

mechanical and hereditary synthesis of combined reflex acts.

The lower orders of psychological processes play a far larger part in the

lives of the higher animals than we are wont to believe. A pointer and

sheep dog possess different qualifications in the way of instincts that

make them useful to man in different ways. A bulldog or a game-cock does

not reason out its course of action during a contest, but like a mechanism

when the spring is released, it acts promptly and with effect. A ball

flashing past the human eye causes the lids to close unconsciously, and it

is not always possible to inhibit this instinctive mechanical act by the

exercise of the will. An examination of the workings of the human body

reveals manifold activities of an even lower or reflex nature, like the

movements of the viscera and the adjustments in respect to the amount of

supplies of blood sent to different parts of the body as local needs

arise. Directed always by specific portions of the nervous system, such

reflex actions play their part in human life without any effort on the

part of reason and so-called will, and without coming into consciousness

except indirectly and subsequently.

Passing by many interesting members of the psychological series of

intergrading forms, we reach the familiar animals like the cat and dog and

horse which display what is called intelligence. This is the power to

learn by experience, and to improve the quality and promptitude of

reactions to stimuli. In certain respects intelligence seems to differ

from instinct, inasmuch as it involves a response to stimuli that may be

altered and quickened by repeated experience, but in ultimate analysis the

two forms of psychological processes are fundamentally alike. A single

example chosen from Thorndike's extensive investigation will serve to

bring out the primary characteristics of intelligence. A cat was placed in

a latticed cage provided with a door that could be opened from within when

a catch was pressed down, and meat was put in a dish outside the door

where the cat could see it. At first, the animal escaped from the cage by

freeing the door during its aimless scrambling about the catch, but as

trial after trial was made, the time necessary for the cat to make its way

out was shortened, until after seventy-five or one hundred trials, the

animal immediately opened the door and seized the food. In mechanical

terms, the connection between "scrambling about the door" and "freedom to

get the meat" became established by numerous repetitions until the

originally disconnected elements were physiologically associated and made

inseparable. When animals like horses and seals and dogs are trained for

the circus, it is by exactly the same method, for training consists merely

in the establishment of a psychological sequence so that the performance

of one series of acts leads mechanically to others. Thus we learn that the

psychological property called intelligence is the ability to establish

wide relations between numerous activities which are themselves of a more

or less complex nature; and we find also that because these elements are

ultimately nerve-cell and sense-cell reflexes, an intelligent response is

quite as machine-like as any and all of its elements. A difference in

degree of complexity and extent is the only thing that places intelligence

apart from instinct and reflex action, for the units are the same in all

cases,--so far as science knows.

The apes are of the greatest value in providing the transition from the

grade of intelligence to the human level where reason is found. Whether or

not a chimpanzee can reason at all is less important than the fact that

its total "mental" powers are lower than those of man, and higher than

those of inferior mammalia. Apes are far more susceptible to training than

cats and dogs, because their improved nervous mechanism enables them to

establish a psychological sequence with greater facility. If we are to

judge by the facts at hand, these creatures possess a low order of

mentality, like, but by no means equivalent to, that of man.

At the end of the comparative scale, we reach the human mind which is

characterized by its ability to perceive and recognize far wider relations

than those which are involved in intelligence. Human consciousness is the

stream of thoughts and feelings which constitute the immediate contents of

mind. In our own case, we know both the activities we perform and some of

the internal phenomena with which such activities are connected. Then we

are impelled to compare the objective phenomena of action with the

behavior of other men and of lower organisms, and if their behavior does

not coincide with our own we are justified in believing that its direction

lacks some of the elements we know about in our own case. This is the

method of comparative psychology, which establishes the conclusion that

reason is the more complex term of a series to which reflex action,

instinct, and intelligence directly lead.

Were we to study in detail the psychology of adult human beings, we would

find only more truly that instinct and intelligence play a large part in

our everyday mental life, and more certainly that even the highest

reasoning powers we possess are only more complex in nature than the

nervous processes of lower mammals and invertebrates. Just as the nervous

systems advance in physical or structural respects, so must their

activities become more and more complex until the result is human faculty.

* * * * *

We must now briefly consider what may be called the "comparative

anthropology" of mind which deals with the various degrees of mental

ability displayed by different human races; this subject follows

inevitably upon the comparison of the human mind viewed as a single type

with the psychological processes of lower animals. When we reviewed the

diverse characteristics of human races--the protrusion of the jaws,

greater or lesser stature, and the like--it appeared that so-called

"lower" races could be distinguished which differed from the "higher"

races in the direction of the apes; the question immediately arises

whether similar distinctions and relations are discoverable on the basis

of mental traits. But in the present case there are not so many

well-substantiated differentia at the disposal of the student, and it does

not appear so clearly that the "higher" races are furthest from the lower

primates and lower mammalia as regards their mental processes. What facts

there are, however, prove to be highly significant, and they materially

amplify our conception of human faculty as a product of evolution. The

essential point is that the intellectual attainments of various races are

by no means the same. The calculus is a mental product of the white race

only; gunpowder and printing from movable type were independently invented

by the Caucasian and Mongolian races; but the American Indian and the

Negro never originated them. Human faculty, to employ the most general

term for all that distinguishes man from the brutes, proves to be a very

varied thing when we draw comparisons between and among races with

independent lines of ancestry and heredity occupying widely separated

areas. Should we analyze it, we find it to be composed of three

constituents; namely, the physical elements of the brain, the degree to

which the observational or perceptual and higher elements cooperate in

building up the conceptions peculiar to the type, and the materials with

which the physical mechanism deals, in the way of environmental,

educational, and social "grist for the mental mill." Many anthropologists

accord too great an importance to the third constituent of human faculty,

I believe, and they are therefore led to deny that races differ in mental

respects to so large a degree as the thoroughgoing evolutionist would

contend. They hold that differences in such things as powers of

observation are due to training: that, for example, an American Indian or

a South Sea Islander sees certain things in his environment more quickly

than a white man only because these are the things which the experiences

of his earlier life have accustomed him to look for and to find. This may

be granted, and it may also be admitted that children of so-called "lower"

races can be educated side by side with the youth of white races without

noticeably falling behind, up to a certain point when, at the age of

adolescence, in the classic case of the Australian natives, other factors

prove to be obstacles to further progress. We must also recognize that the

character of the environment of a race determines to a large extent the

mode of life of the people; a forest-dwelling Indian of the interior is a

hunter as well as a warrior, while a South Sea Islander is a navigator and

a fisherman.

But the fact remains that the inhabitants of similar countries have

reached markedly different grades of intellectual and cultural life.

Anglo-Saxon dominance must be referred ultimately to Anglo-Saxon heredity

and not to the peculiarities of the land. Although adaptation is no less

necessary for men as individuals and as social groups than it is for all

other living things, I believe that it is to diversity in constitutional

endowments, however these may have arisen, that we must attribute the

superiority of some races over others. The question is not whether a

savage race can or cannot adopt the higher conceptions of a civilized

people; the fact is that they have not actually become civilized by

themselves. Thus, while evolution in mental respects has not resulted in

the loss of plasticity in the case of the brain and the nervous system as

a whole, wherefore the activities of these organs still remain capable of

individual and racial modifications that are impossible in the case of the

skeleton and in the color and shape of the eye, it remains true that races

do differ intellectually, and that their differences are marks of a mental

evolution quite as definite as their physical natural histories of change.

* * * * *

In my own view the strongest and most impressive evidence bearing upon the

great problem before us is provided by the series of transformations by

which the human intellect develops during an individual life. Mind has an

embryology no less significant than that of the skull or of any other

element of the body; and its investigation leads to the evolutionary

interpretation quite as surely as the study of the various grades of adult

psychology constituting the anatomical sequence, which we have reviewed

previously. When in the earlier part of the book we dealt with embryology

in general, we learned how the changes which take place when an organism

develops from an egg demonstrate the actuality of true organic

transformation without the necessity of concluding or inferring that this

process might occur. It is not superfluous to insist again that the

essential fact in evolution is the alteration of one organic

characteristic into another type; must we not recognize at the very outset

that mental transformation is as real as physical development?

In the first instance we might concern ourselves with the physical basis

of mind and its history. In the earliest stages of human embryology no

nervous system whatsoever is present, and it is unreasonable to suppose

that there is anything going on which corresponds to human thought. A

little later a cellular tube is established as a primitive nerve axis,

which at first is nearly uniform throughout its entire length and displays

no differentiation into brain and spinal cord. Before long an enlargement

of the anterior end expands and develops into a primitive three-parted

brain. It is not yet a real brain, however, and it is entirely incapable

of functioning in such a way as to justify the use of the word _mental_

for the results of its operations. We know that it is only in the cerebral

hemisphere of the adult brain that the processes of true human

consciousness go on. But it is not until long after the three-parted stage

that the cerebral hemispheres make their appearance therefore we cannot

speak of mind as present when the cell and tissue basis of mind is not

present. When, now, the cerebral hemispheres do appear, they are small

bean-shaped structures no larger relatively than those of a fish. Later

they enlarge so as to attain the relative size of the cerebral hemispheres

of an amphibian, and still later they are like those of a reptilian brain.

Continuing to enlarge, they begin to fold so that the total surface is

increased without very much addition to their bulk. At this time the

cerebral hemispheres of the brain of the human embryo are like those of an

adult cat or dog. The process of general enlargement and of progressive

convolution are continued, and stages are reached and passed which

correspond with the monkey and ape conditions.

Nothing in human development is more impressive than the origin of the

cerebrum and its development by passing through successive stages which

are counterparts in the main of the adult brains of other and lower

animals. The alteration of a tissue-mechanism constructed in one way into

a tissue-mechanism of a more complex nature, provides the most conclusive

evidence of the reality of brain evolution, because the process of

transformation actually takes place.

But in the present connection we are more interested in the dynamic or

functional aspects of mental evolution, which it must be remembered are

inseparably bound up with the physical structures and their modifications.

After a human infant is born its activities are reflex and mechanical like

those of the adult members of lower groups. As it grows it performs

instinctive acts because its inherited nervous system operates in the

purely mechanical manner of a lower mammal's nervous system. For these

reasons an eminent psychologist has said that the mental ability of an

infant six months old is about that of a well-bred fox terrier. The same

infant at nine months displays an intelligence of a higher order equal to

that of a well-trained chimpanzee; it has become what it was not, and in

so far it has truly evolved in mental respects. At two years of age the

child is incapable of solving problems of the calculus, for its reasoning

powers are elementary and restricted, but these same powers change and

intensify so as to render the older mind quite capable of grasping the

highest of human conceptions and ideas. In my judgment the unbroken

transformation of a child's mind that exhibits only instinct and

intelligence into an adult's mind with its power of reasoning, is far more

conclusive as proof of mental evolution than the inference drawn from the

comparisons we have made above of the adult psychological phenomena of

man, ape, cat, and fish. It is surely natural for such mental

transformations to take place, for they do take place in the vast majority

of human beings; when they do not, in cases where the brain fails to

mature, we speak of unnatural or diseased minds.

The Doctrine of Evolution: Its Basis and Its Scope · 第 14 / 22 段