2. The Colonies may concur and unite in seeking redress for grievances.

3. Sending accused persons away from their own country for trial is an

inexcusable wrong.

4. We will send an address on these things to the King beseeching his

royal interposition.

The resolutions were passed: they did not mean much anyway, the opposition

said. And then another resolution was passed to this effect: "We will send

a copy of these resolutions to every legislative body on the continent."

That was a little stronger, but did not mean much either.

It was voted upon and passed.

Then the Assembly adjourned, having dispatched a copy of the resolutions

to Lord Boutetourt, the newly appointed Governor who had just arrived from

London.

Next day, the Governor's secretary appeared when the Assembly convened,

and repeated the following formula: "The Governor commands the House to

attend His Excellency in the Council-Chamber." The members marched to the

Council-Chamber and stood around the throne waiting the pleasure of His

Lordship. He made a speech which I will quote entire. "Mr. Speaker and

Gentlemen of the House of Burgesses: I have heard your resolves, and augur

ill of their effect. You have made it my duty to dissolve you, and you are

dissolved accordingly."

And that was the end of Jefferson's first term in office--the reward for

all the hand-shaking, all the caressing, all the treating!

The members looked at one another, but no one said anything, because there

was nothing to say. The secretary made an impatient gesture with his hand

to the effect that they should disperse, and they did.

Just how these legally elected representatives and now legally common

citizens took their rebuff we do not know.

Did Washington forget his usual poise and break out into one of those

swearing fits where everybody wisely made way? And how did Richard Henry

Lee like it, and George Wythe, and the Randolphs? Did Patrick Henry wax

eloquent that afternoon in a barroom, and did Jefferson do more than smile

grimly, biding his time?

Massachusetts kept a complete history of her political heresies, but

Virginia chased foxes and left the refinements of literature to

dilettantes. But this much we know: Those country gentlemen did not go off

peaceably and quietly to race horses or play cards. The slap in the face

from the gloved hand of Lord Boutetourt awoke every boozy sense of

security and gave vitality to all fanatical messages sent by Samuel Adams.

Washington, we are told, spoke of it as a bit of upstart authority on the

part of the new Governor; but Jefferson with true prophetic vision saw the

end.

* * * * *

One of the leading lawyers at Williamsburg, against whom Jefferson was

often pitted, was John Wayles. I need not explain that lawyers hotly

opposed to each other in a trial are not necessarily enemies. The way in

which Jefferson conducted his cases pleased the veteran Wayles, and he

invited Jefferson to visit him at his fine estate, called "The Forest," a

few miles out from Williamsburg. Now, in the family of Mr. Wayles dwelt

his widowed daughter, the beautiful Martha Skelton, gracious and rich as

Jefferson in worldly goods. She played the spinet with great feeling, and

the spinet and the violin go very well together. So, together, Thomas and

Martha played, and sometimes a bit of discord crept in, for Thomas was

absent-minded and, in the business of watching the widow's fingers touch

the keys, played flat.

Long years before, he had liked and admired Becca, gazed fondly at Sukey,

and finally loved Belinda. He did not tell her so, but he told John Page,

and vowed that if he did not wed Belinda he would go through life solitary

and alone. In a few months Belinda married that detested being--another.

Then it was he again swore to his friend Page he would be true to her

memory, even though she had dissembled. But now he saw that the widow

Skelton had intellect, while Belinda had been but clever; the widow had

soul, while Belinda had nothing but form. Jefferson's experience seems to

settle that mooted question, "Can a man love two women at the same time?"

Unlike Martha Custis, this Martha was won only after a protracted wooing,

with many skirmishes and occasional misunderstandings and explanations,

and sweet makings-up that were surely worth a quarrel.

Then they were married at "The Forest," and rode away through the woods to

Monticello. Jefferson was twenty-seven, and although it may not be proper

to question closely as to the age of the widow, yet the bride, we have

reason to believe, was about the age of her husband.

It was a most happy mating--all their quarreling had been done before

marriage. The fine intellect and high spirit of Jefferson found their

mate. She was his comrade and helpmeet as well as his wife. He could read

his favorite Ossian aloud to her, and when he tired she would read to him;

and all his plans and ambitions and hopes were hers. In laying out the

grounds and beautifying that home on Monticello mountain, she took much

more than a passive interest. It was "Our Home," and to make it a home in

very sooth for her beloved husband was her highest ambition. She knew the

greatness of her mate, and all the dreams she had for his advancement were

to come true. With her, ideality was to become reality. But she was to see

it only in part.

Yet she had seen her husband re-elected to the Virginia Legislature; sent

as a member to the Colonial Congress at Philadelphia, there to write the

best known of all American literary productions; from their mountain home

she had seen British troops march into Charlottesville, four miles away,

and then, with household treasure, had fled, knowing that beautiful

Monticello would be devastated by the enemy's ruthless tread. She had

known Washington, and had visited his lonely wife there at Mount Vernon

when victory hung in the balance; when defeat meant that Thomas Jefferson

and George Washington would be the first victims of a vengeful foe. She

saw her husband War-Governor of Virginia in its most perilous hour; she

lived to know that Washington had won; that Cornwallis was his "guest,"

and that no man, save Washington alone, was more honored in proud Virginia

than her beloved lord and husband. She saw a messenger on horseback

approach bearing a packet from the Congress at Philadelphia to the effect

that "His Excellency, the Honorable Thomas Jefferson," had been appointed

as one of an embassy to France in the interests of the United States, with

Benjamin Franklin and Silas Deane as colleagues, and, knowing her

husband's love for Franklin, and his respect for France, she leaned over

his chair and with misty eyes saw him write his simple "No," and knew that

the only reason he declined was because he would not leave his wife at a

time when she might most need his tenderness and sympathy.

And then they retired to beloved Monticello to enjoy the rest that comes

only after work well done--to spend the long vacation of their lives in

simple homekeeping work and studious leisure, her husband yet in manhood's

prime, scarce thirty-seven, as men count time, and rich, passing rich, in

goods and lands.

And then she died.

And Thomas Jefferson, the strong, the self-poised, the self-reliant, fell

in a helpless swoon, and was laid on a pallet and carried out, as though

he, too, were dead. For three weeks his dazed senses prayed for death. He

could endure the presence of no one save his eldest daughter, a slim,

slender girl of scarce ten years, grown a woman in a day. By her loving

touch and tenderness he was lured back from death and reason's night into

the world of life and light. With tottering steps, led by the child who

had to think for both, he was taken out on the veranda of beautiful

Monticello. He looked out on stretching miles of dark-blue hills and

waving woods and winding river. He gazed, and as he looked it came slowly

to him that the earth was still as when he last saw it, and realized that

this would be so even if he were gone. Then, turning to the child, who

stood by, stroking his locks, it came to him that even in grief there may

be selfishness, and for the first time he responded to the tender caress,

saying, "Yes, we will live, daughter--live in memory of her!"

* * * * *

When two men of equal intelligence and sincerity quarrel, both are

probably right. Hamilton and Jefferson were opposed to each other by

temperament and disposition, in a way that caused either to look with

distrust on any proposition made by the other. And yet, when Washington

pressed upon Jefferson the position of Secretary of State, I can not but

think he did it as an antidote to the growing power and vaunting ambition

of Hamilton. Washington won his victories, as great men ever do, by wisely

choosing his aides. Hamilton had done yeoman's service in every branch of

the government, and while the chief sincerely admired his genius, he

guessed his limitations. Power grows until it topples, and when it

topples, innocent people are crushed. Washington was wise as a serpent,

and rather than risk open ruction with Hamilton by personally setting

bounds, he invited Jefferson into his cabinet, and the acid was

neutralized to a degree where it could be safely handled.

Jefferson had just returned from Paris with his beloved daughter, Martha.

He was intending soon to return to France and study social science at

close range. Already, he had seen that mob of women march out to

Versailles and fetch the King to Paris, and had seen barricade after

barricade erected with the stones from the leveled Bastile; he was on

intimate and affectionate terms with Lafayette and the Republican leaders,

and here was a pivotal point in his life. Had not Washington persuaded

him to remain "just for the present" in America, he might have played a

part in Carlyle's best book, that book which is not history, but more--an

epic. So, among the many obligations that America owes to Washington, must

be named this one of pushing Thomas Jefferson, the scholar and man of

peace, into the political embroglio and shutting the door. Then it was

that Hamilton's taunting temper awoke a degree of power in Jefferson that

before he wist not of; then it was that he first fully realized that the

"United States" with England as a sole pattern was not enough.

A pivotal point! Yes, a pivotal point for Jefferson, America and the

world; for Jefferson gave the rudder of the Ship of State such a turn to

starboard that there was never again danger of her drifting on to

aristocratic shoals, an easy victim to the rapacity of Great Britain.

Hamilton's distrust of the people found no echo in Jefferson's mind.

He agreed with Hamilton that a "strong government" administered by a few,

provided the few are wise and honorable, is the best possible government.

Nay, he went further and declared that an absolute monarchy in which the

monarch was all-wise and all-powerful, could not be improved upon by the

imagination of man.

In his composition, there was a saving touch of humor that both Hamilton

and Washington seemed to lack. He could smile at himself; but none ever

dared turn a joke on Hamilton, much less on Washington. And so when

Hamilton explained that a strong government administered by Washington,

President; Jefferson, Secretary of State; Hamilton, Secretary of the

Treasury; Knox, Secretary of War; and Randolph, Attorney-General, was

pretty nearly ideal, no one smiled. But Jefferson's plain inference was

that power is dangerous and man is fallible; that a man so good as

Washington dies tomorrow and another man steps in, and that those who have

the government in their present keeping should curb ambitions, limit their

own power, and thus fix a precedent for those who are to follow.

The wisdom that Jefferson as a statesman showed in working for a future

good, and the willingness to forego the pomp of personal power, to

sacrifice self if need be, that the day he should not see might be secure,

ranks him as first among statesmen. For a statesman is one who builds a

State--and not a politician who is dead, as some have said.

Others, since, have followed Jefferson's example, but in the world's

history I do not recall a man before him who, while still having power in

his grasp, was willing to trust the people.

The one mistake of Washington that borders on blunder was in refusing to

take wages for his work. In doing this, he visited untold misery on

others, who, not having married rich widows, tried to follow his example

and floundered into woeful debt and disgrace; and thereby were lost to

useful society and to the world. And there are yet many public offices

where small men rattle about because men who can fill the place can not

afford it. Bryce declares that no able and honest man of moderate means

can afford to take an active part in municipal affairs in America--and

Bryce is right.

When Jefferson became President, in his messages to Congress again and

again he advised the fixing of sufficient salaries to secure the best men

for every branch of the service, and suggested the folly of expecting

anything for nothing, or the hope of officials not "fixing things" if not

properly paid.

Men from the soil who gain power are usually intoxicated by it; beginning

as democrats they evolve into aristocrats, then into tyrants, if kindly

Fate does not interpose, and are dethroned by the people who made them.

And it is not surprising that this man, born into a plenty that bordered

on affluence, and who never knew from experience the necessity of economy

(until in old age tobacco and slavery had wrecked Virginia and Monticello

alike), should set an almost ideal example of simplicity, moderation and

brotherly kindness.

Among the chief glories that belong to him are these:

Little Journeys to the Homes of the Great - Volume 03 Little Journeys to the Homes of American Statesmen · 第 14 / 29 题