CHAPTER XV

ALTERNATIVE SATISFACTIONS FOR THE FIGHTING EMOTIONS

The uniformity of visceral responses when almost any feelings grow

very intense, and under such conditions the identity of these

responses with those characteristically aroused in the belligerent

emotion of anger or rage and its counterpart, fear, offer interesting

possibilities of transformation and substitution. This is especially

true in the activities of human beings. And because men have devised

such terribly ingenious and destructive modes of expressing these

feelings in war, an inquiry into the basis for possible substitution

seems not out of place.

Support for the Militarist Estimate of the Strength of

the Fighting Emotions and Instincts

The business of killing and of avoiding death has been one of the

primary interests of living beings throughout their long history

on the earth. It is in the highest degree natural that feelings

of hostility often burn with fierce intensity, and then, with

astonishing suddenness, that all the powers of the body are called

into action--for the strength of the feelings and the quickness of

the response measure the chances of survival in a struggle where

the issue may be life or death. These are the powerful emotions

and the deeply ingrained instinctive reactions which invariably

precede combat. They are the emotions and instincts that sometimes

seize upon individuals in groups and spread like wildfire into

larger and larger aggregations of men, until vast populations are

shouting and clamoring for war. To whatever extent military plans

are successful in devising a vast machine for attack or defense, the

energies that make the machine go are found, in the last analysis,

in human beings who, when the time for action comes, are animated

by these surging elemental tendencies which assume control of their

conduct and send them madly into conflict.

The strength of the fighting instinct in man has been one of the

main arguments used by the militarists in support of preparation for

international strife. They point to the historical fact that even

among highly civilized peoples scarcely a decade passes without a

kindling of the martial emotions, which explode in actual warfare.

Such fighting, they say, is inevitable--the manifestation of

“biological law”--and, so long as human nature remains unchanged,

decision by battle must be resorted to. They urge, furthermore,

that in war and in the preparations for war important physical

qualities--sturdiness, hardihood, and strength for valorous

deeds--are given peculiarly favorable opportunities for development,

and that if these opportunities are lacking, lusty youth will give

place to weaklings and mollycoddles. In addition the militarists

say that war benefits mankind by its moral effects. Without war

nations become effete, their ideals become tarnished, the people

sink into self-indulgence, their wills weaken and soften in luxury.

War, on the contrary, disciplines character, it sobers men, it

teaches them to be brave and patient, it renews a true order of

values, and its demand for the supreme sacrifice of life brings

forth in thousands an eager response that is the crowning glory of

the human spirit. As the inevitable expression of a deep-rooted

instinct, therefore, and as a unique means of developing desirable

physical and moral qualities, war is claimed by the militarists to

be a natural necessity.[225]

The militarist contention that the fighting instinct is firmly fixed

in human nature receives strong confirmation in the results of our

researches. Survival has been decided by the grim law of mortal

conflict, and the mechanism for rendering the body more competent in

conflict has been revealed in earlier chapters as extraordinarily

perfect and complete. Moreover, the physiological provisions for

fierce struggle are found not only in the bodies of lower animals,

that must hunt and kill in order to live, but also in human beings.

Since this remarkable mechanism is present, and through countless

generations has served the fundamentally important purpose of giving

momentous aid in the struggle for existence, the militarists might

properly argue that, as with other physiological processes, bodily

harmony would be promoted by its exercise. Indeed, they might account

for the periodic outburst of belligerent feelings by assuming that

these natural aptitudes require occasional satisfaction.[*]

*[Footnote: Mr. Graham Wallas has made the interesting suggestion

(The Great Society, New York, 1914, p. 66) that nervous strain

and restlessness due to “baulked disposition” may result from the

absence of circumstances which would call the emotional responses

into action. And he cites Aristotle’s theory that pent passions

may be released by represented tragedy and by music.]

Growing Opposition to the Fighting Emotions and

Instincts as Displayed in War

In spite of the teachings of history that wars have not grown fewer,

and in spite of the militarist argument that war is a means of

purging mankind of its sordid vices, and renewing instead the noblest

virtues, the conclusion that the resort to arms is unavoidable and

desirable is nowadays being strongly contested. The militarists show

only part of the picture. No large acquaintance with the character

of warfare is necessary to prove that when elemental anger, hate

and fear prevail, civilized conventions are abandoned and the most

savage instincts determine conduct. Homes are looted and burned,

women and children are abominably treated, and many innocents are

murdered outright or starved to death. No bland argument for the

preservation of the manly virtues can palliate such barbarities.

Even when fighting men are held within the rules, the devices for

killing and injuring are now made so perfect by devilish ingenuity

that by the pulling of a trigger one man can in a few seconds mow

down scores of his fellow-creatures and send them writhing to agony

or death. War has become too horrible; it is conducted on too

stupendous a scale of carnage and expenditure; it destroys too many

of the treasured achievements of the race; it interferes too greatly

with consecrated efforts to benefit all mankind by discovery and

invention; it involves too much suffering among peoples not directly

concerned in the struggle; it is too vastly at variance with the

methods of fair dealing that have been established between man and

man; the human family has become too closely knit to allow some of

its members to bring upon themselves and all the rest poverty and

distress and a long heritage of bitter hatred and resolution to

seek revenge.

All these reasons for hostility to war imply a thwarting of strong

desires in men--desires for family happiness, devotion to beauty

and to scholarship, passion for social justice, hopes of lessening

poverty and disease. As was pointed out in the previous chapter,

the feeling of hostility has no definite object to awaken it. It is

roused when there is opposition to what we ardently wish to get.

And because war brings conditions which frustrate many kinds of

eagerly sought purposes, war has roused in men a hostility against

itself. There is then a war against war, a willingness to fight

against monstrous carnage and destruction, that grows in intensity

with every war that is waged.

The Desirability of Preserving the Martial Virtues

Although there is increasing opposition to the display of the

fighting emotions and instincts in war, nevertheless the admirable

moral and physical qualities, claimed by the militarists to be

the unique products of war, are too valuable to be lost. As

McDougall[226] has indicated, when the life of ideas becomes richer,

and the means we take to overcome obstructions to our efforts more

refined and complex, the instinct to fight ceases to express itself

in its crude natural manner, save when most intensely excited, and

becomes rather a source of increased energy of action towards the end

set by any other instinct; the energy of its impulses adds itself

to and reënforces that of other impulses and so helps us to overcome

our difficulties. In this lies its great value for civilized man. A

man devoid of the pugnacious instinct would not only be incapable

of anger, but would lack this great source of reserve energy which

is called into play in most of us by any difficulty in our path.

Thus the very efficiency of a war against war, as well as struggle

against other evils that beset civilized society, rests on the

preservation and use of aggressive feeling and the instinct to

attack. From this point of view the insistence by the militarists

that we must accept human nature as we find it, and that the attempt

to change it is foolish, seems a more justifiable attitude than

that of the pacifists who belittle the fighting qualities and urge

that changing them is a relatively simple process. We should not

wish them changed. Even if in the war against war a means should

be established of securing international justice, and if through

coöperative action the decrees of justice were enforced, so that

the occasions which would arouse belligerent emotions and instincts

were much reduced, there would still remain the need of recognizing

their elemental character and their possible usefulness to society.

What is needed is not a suppression of these capacities to feel and

act, but their diversion into other channels where they may have

satisfactory expression.

Moral Substitutes for Warfare

“We must make new energies and hardihoods continue the manliness

to which the military mind so faithfully clings. Martial virtues

must be the enduring cement; intrepidity, contempt of softness,

surrender of private interest, obedience to command, must still

remain the rock upon which states are built.” Thus wrote William

James[227] in proposing a “moral equivalent for war.” This, he

suggested, should consist of such required service in the hard

and difficult occupations as would take the childishness and

superciliousness out of our youth and give them soberer ideas and

healthier sympathies with their fellow-men. He conceived that by

proper direction of its education a people should become as proud

of the attainment by the nation of superiority in any ideal respect

as it would be if the nation were victorious in war. “The martial

type of character,” he declared, “can be bred without war. Strenuous

honor and disinterestedness abound elsewhere. Priests and medical

men are in a fashion educated to it, and we should all feel some

degree of it imperative if we were conscious of our work as an

obligatory service to the state. We should be _owned_, as soldiers

are by the army, and our pride would rise accordingly. We could

be poor, then, without humiliation, as army officers now are. The

only thing needed henceforth is to inflame the civic temper as

past history has inflamed the military temper.”

Similar ideas have been expressed by others.[228] It has been pointed

out that the great war of mankind is that against pain, disease,

poverty and sin; that the real heroes are not those who squander

human strength and courage in fighting one another, but those who

fight for man against these his eternal foes. War of man against

man, in this view, becomes dissension in the ranks, permitting the

common enemies to strike their most telling blows.

These moral considerations, however, are apart from the main intent

of our discussion. Our earlier inquiry confirmed the belief that the

fighting emotions are firmly rooted in our natures, and showed that

these emotions are intimately associated with provisions for physical

exertion. It is particularly in this aspect of the discussion of

substitutes for war that these studies have significance.

Physical Substitutes for Warfare

The idealization of the state and the devotion of service to social

welfare, which have been suggested as moral substitutes for military

loyalty, leave unanswered the claims of the militarists that in

war and in preparations for war opportunities are offered which

are peculiarly favorable to the development of important physical

qualities--bodily vigor, sturdiness, and ability to withstand all

manner of hardships.

In the evidence previously presented, it seems to me there was a

suggestion that offers a pertinent alternative to these claims.

When the body goes onto what we have called a war footing, the

physiological changes that suddenly occur are all adapted to the

putting forth of supreme muscular and nervous efforts. That was

what primitive battle consisted of, through countless myriads of

generations--a fierce physical contest of beast with beast, and of

man with man. Such contests, attended as they were by the thrill

of unpredictable incidents, and satisfying completely the lust of

combat, are to be contrasted with the dull grind in preparation

for modern war, the monotonous regularity of subservience, the

substitution everywhere of mechanism for muscle, and often the

attack on an enemy who lies wholly unseen.[*] As Wallas with nice

irony has remarked, “The gods in Valhalla would hardly choose the

organization of modern lines of military communication, as they chose

the play of sword and spear, to be the most exquisite employment

of eternity.”

*[Footnote: Lord Wolseley, while commander-in-chief of the English

forces, in 1897, secured sanction for not displaying the regimental

colors in battle. “It would be madness and a crime,” he declared,

“to order any soldier to carry colors into action in the future.

You might quite as well order him to be assassinated. We have

had most reluctantly to abandon a practice to which we attached

great importance, and which, under past and gone conditions of

fighting, was invaluable in keeping alive the regimental spirit

upon which our British troops depended so much.” All war has been

transformed by the invention of the far-reaching and fate-dealing

rifle and automatic gun, with which an enemy kills, whose face is

not even seen. War is almost reduced to a mechanical interchange

of volleys and salvoes, and to the intermittent fire of rifles

and machine guns, with short rushes at the last, in which there

is no place for the dignity and grace of the antique battle of

the standard. (See London Times, July 31, 1897, p. 12.)

T. F. Millard, the well-known correspondent of the Russo-Japanese

War, wrote as follows of the characteristics of present day

conflicts: “A large part of modern war is on too great a scale

to give much opportunity for individual initiative. Soldiers can

rarely tell what is going on in their immediate vicinity. They

cannot always see the enemy they are firing at, and where they can

see the object of their fire such an important matter as range

and even direction cannot be left to them.... Troops are clothed

so much alike nowadays that it is very difficult to distinguish

friend from foe at five hundred yards, and large bodies of troops

rarely get that close to each other in modern war while there is

light enough to see clearly.... Battery officers simply see that

their guns are handled according to instructions. They regulate

the time, speed, objective and range as ordered.... The effects

of the fire are observed by officers appointed to that duty,

stationed at various parts of the field, often miles and miles

apart, and who are in constant communication with the chief of

artillery by telephone.” (See Scribner’s Magazine, 1905, xxxvii,

pp. 64, 66.)

The testimony of a captain of a German battery engaged against

the French and English in 1914, supports the foregoing claims.

He is reported as saying: “We shoot over those tree tops yonder

in accordance with directions for range and distance which come

from somewhere else over a field telephone, but we never see the

men at whom we are firing. They fire back without seeing us, and

sometimes their shells fall short or go beyond us, and sometimes

they fall among us and kill and wound a few of us. Thus it goes

on day after day. I have not with my own eyes seen a Frenchman

or an Englishman unless he was a prisoner. It is not so much

pleasure--fighting like this.” (See Philadelphia Saturday Evening

Post, December 26, 1914, p. 27.)]

While it is true that physical strength can be developed by any

form of hard labor, as, for example, by sawing wood or digging

ditches, such labor does not stimulate quickness, alertness, and

resourcefulness in bodily action. Nor does it give any occasion for

use of the emotional mechanism for reënforcement. If this mechanism,

like other physiological arrangements, is present in the body for

use--and previous discussion leaves little doubt of that--then as

a means of exercising it and, in addition, satisfying the strong

instinct for competitive testing of strength and physical skill,

some activity more enlivening than monotonous gymnastics and ordered

marching is required.

In many respects strenuous athletic rivalries present, better than

modern military service, the conditions for which the militarists

argue, the conditions for which the body spontaneously prepares

when the passion for fighting prevails. As explained in an

earlier chapter, in competitive sports the elemental factors are

retained--man is again pitted against man, and all the resources

of the body are summoned in the eager struggle for victory. And

because, under such circumstances, the same physiological alterations

occur that occur in anticipation of mortal combat, the belligerent

emotions and instincts, so far as their bodily manifestations are

concerned, are thereby given complete satisfaction.

The Significance of International Athletic Competitions

For reasons given above, I venture to lay emphasis on a suggestion,

which has been made before by others, that the promotion of great

international athletic contests, such as the Olympic games, would

do for our young men much that is now claimed as peculiar to the

values of military discipline. The substitution of athletic rivalries

for battle is not unknown. In the Philippine Islands, according

to Worcester,[229] there were no athletics before the American

occupation. The natives soon learned games from the soldiers. And

when the sports reached such development that competition between

towns and provinces was possible, they began to arouse the liveliest

enthusiasm among the people. The physical development of the

participants has been greatly stimulated, the spirit of fair play

and sportsmanship, formerly lacking, has sprung into existence in

every section of the Islands, and the annual meets between athletic

teams from various provinces are recognized as promoting a general

and friendly understanding among the different Filipino tribes. The

fierce Igarots of Bontoc, once constantly at war with neighboring

tribes, now show their prowess not in head-hunting, but in baseball,

wrestling, and the tug-of-war.[*]

*[Footnote: It is reported that when these warriors first appeared

at the games, each brought his spear, which he drove into the

ground beside him, ready for use. As the nature of the new

rivalries became known, the spears were left behind.]

Is it unreasonable to expect that what has happened in the Philippine

Islands might, by proper education and suggestion, happen elsewhere

in the world? Certainly the interest in athletic contests is no

slight and transient interest. At the time of a great war we know

that news of the games is fully as much demanded as news of the

war. Already in the United States, without special stimulation, the

number of young men engaged in athletic training is estimated as

equal to the number in the standing army. And in England, belief

in the efficacy of athletics as a means of promoting hardihood

and readiness to face stern hazards has found expression in the

phrase that England’s battles have been won on the football fields

of Rugby and of Eton. With the further promotion of international

contests the influence of competitive sports is likely to increase

rather than lessen. Within national boundaries emulation is sure

to stimulate extensively such games as will bring forth the best

representative athletes that the country can produce. In one of

the high-spirited European nations, which made a poor showing at

the last Olympic meet, thousands of young men began training for

the next meet, under a director imported from the nation that had

made the highest records.

Training for athletic contests is quite as likely to enure young

men to physical hardship and fatigue, is quite as conducive to

the development of bodily vigor, the attainment of alertness and

skill and the practice of self-restraint, as is army life with its

traditional associations and easy license. It may be urged, however,

that an essential element is lacking in all this discussion--the

sobering possibility that in war the supreme surrender of life itself

may be required. Death for one’s country is indeed glorious. But the

argument that being killed is desirable has little to commend it.

When the strongest and sturdiest are constantly chosen to be fed to

the engines of annihilation, the race is more likely to lose greater

values than it gains from the spectacle of self-sacrifice, however

perfect that may be. Are there not advantages in the conditions of

great athletic rivalries that may compensate for war’s most austere

demand? The race of hardy men, to secure which the militarists urge

war, is much more likely to result from the honoring and preserving

of vigorous men in their vigor than it is from the systematic

selection of such men to be destroyed in their youth.

There are other aspects of international games which strongly commend

them as an alternative to the pursuit of military discipline.

The high standards of honor and fairness in sport; its unfailing

revelation of excellence without distinctions of class, wealth,

race or color; the ease with which it becomes an expression of

the natural feelings of patriotism; the respect which victory and

pluckily borne defeat inspire in competitors and spectators alike;

the extension of acquaintance and understanding which follows from

friendly and magnanimous rivalry among strong men who come together

from the ends of the earth--each of these admirable features of

athletic contests between nations might be enlarged upon. But, as

intimated before, these moral considerations must be left without

further mention, as being irrelevant to the physiological processes

with which we are dealing.

We are concerned with the question of exercising the fighting

instinct and thus assuring the physical welfare of the race. The

race must degenerate, the militarists say, if this instinct is not

allowed to express itself in war. This declaration we are in a

position to deny, for the evidence is perfectly clean-cut that the

aggressive instincts, which through æons of racial experience have

naturally and spontaneously developed vigor and resourcefulness in

the body, are invited by elemental emotions, and that through these

emotions energies are released which are highly useful to great

physical effort. No stupid routine of drill, or any other deadening

procedure, will call these energizing mechanisms into activity. War

and the preparations for war nowadays have become too machine-like

to serve as the best means of preserving and disciplining these

forces. The exhilarating swing and tug and quick thrust of the big

limb muscles have largely vanished. Pressing an electric contact or

bending the trigger finger is a movement altogether too trifling.

If, then, natural feelings must be expressed, if the fighting

functions of the body must be exercised, how much better that these

satisfactions be found in natural rather than in artificial actions,

how much more reasonable that men should struggle for victory in

the ancient ways, one against another, body and spirit, as in the

great games.

REFERENCES

[Footnote 225: See Angell: The Great Illusion, New York and London,

1913, pp. 159-164.]

[Footnote 226: McDougall: Introduction to Social Psychology, London,

1908, p. 61.]

[Footnote 227: James: Memories and Studies, New York, 1911, p. 287.]

[Footnote 228: See Perry: The Moral Economy, New York, 1909, p.

32; and Drake: Problems of Conduct, Boston, 1914, p. 317.]

[Footnote 229: Worcester: The Philippines, Past and Present, New

York, 1914, ii, pp. 515, 578.]

A LIST OF PUBLISHED RESEARCHES FROM THE PHYSIOLOGICAL

LABORATORY IN HARVARD UNIVERSITY, ON WHICH THE PRESENT

ACCOUNT IS BASED.

1. The Influence of Emotional States on the Functions of the

Alimentary Canal. By W. B. Cannon. American Journal of the Medical

Sciences, 1909, cxxxvii, pp. 480-487.

2. Emotional Stimulation of Adrenal Secretion. By W. B. Cannon and

D. de la Paz. American Journal of Physiology, 1911, xxviii, pp.

64-70.

3. The Effects of Asphyxia, Hyperpnœa, and Sensory Stimulation on

Adrenal Secretion. By W. B. Cannon and R. G. Hoskins. _Ibid._,

1911, xxix, pp. 274-279.

4. Emotional Glycosuria. By W. B. Cannon, A. T. Shohl and W. S.

Wright. _Ibid._, 1911, xxix, pp. 280-287.

5. A Consideration of Some Biological Tests for Epinephrin. By R.

G. Hoskins. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,

1911, iii, pp. 93-99.

6. The Sthenic Effect of Epinephrin upon Intestine. By R. G. Hoskins.

American Journal of Physiology, 1912, xxix, pp. 363-366.

7. An Explanation of Hunger. By W. B. Cannon and A. L. Washburn.

_Ibid._, 1912, xxix, pp. 441-454.

8. A New Colorimetric Method for the Determination of Epinephrin.

By O. Folin, W. B. Cannon and W. Denis. Journal of Biological

Chemistry, 1913, xiii, pp. 477-483.

9. The Depressor Effect of Adrenalin on Arterial Pressure. By W.

B. Cannon and Henry Lyman. American Journal of Physiology, 1913,

xxxi, pp. 376-398.

10. The Effect of Adrenal Secretion on Muscular Fatigue. By W. B.

Cannon and L. B. Nice. _Ibid._, 1913, xxxii, pp. 44-60.

11. Fatigue as Affected by Changes of Arterial Pressure. By C. M.

Gruber. _Ibid._, 1913, xxxii, pp. 222-229.

12. The Threshold Stimulus as Affected by Fatigue and Subsequent

Rest. By C. M. Gruber. _Ibid._, 1913, xxxii, pp. 438-449.

13. The Fatigue Threshold as Affected by Adrenalin and by Increased

Arterial Pressure. By C. M. Gruber. _Ibid._, 1914, xxxiii, pp.

335-355.

14. The Emergency Function of the Adrenal Medulla in Pain and the

Major Emotions. By W. B. Cannon. _Ibid._, 1914, xxxiii, pp. 356-372.

15. The Relation of Adrenalin to Curare and Fatigue in Normal and

Denervated Muscles. By C. M. Gruber. _Ibid._, 1914, xxxiv, pp.

89-96.

16. The Graphic Method of Recording Coagulation. By W. B. Cannon

and W. L. Mendenhall. _Ibid._, 1914, xxxiv, pp. 225-231.

17. The Hastening or Retarding of Coagulation by Adrenalin

Injections. By W. B. Cannon and Horace Gray. _Ibid._, 1914, xxxiv,

pp. 232-242.

18. The Hastening of Coagulation by Stimulating the Splanchnic

Nerves. By W. B. Cannon and W. L. Mendenhall. _Ibid._, 1914, xxxiv,

pp. 243-250.

19. The Hastening of Coagulation in Pain and Emotional Excitement.

By W. B. Cannon and W. L. Mendenhall. _Ibid._, 1914, xxxiv, pp.

251-261.

20. The Interrelations of Emotions as Suggested by Recent

Physiological Researches. By W. B. Cannon. American Journal of

Psychology, 1914, xxv, pp. 256-282.

INDEX

Adrenal extract: effect of, on muscular contraction, 82.

Adrenal glands: nerve supply of, 37;

stimulated in emotion, 52-59, 62-63;

stimulated in pain, 59-62, 63;

in relation to blood sugar, 77;

removal of, causes muscular weakness, 81;

secretion of, improves contraction of fatigued muscle, 92;

variations in adrenin content of, 171;

latent period of, when splanchnics stimulated, 188;

amount of secretion from, when splanchnics stimulated, 198;

fatigue of, 199;

stimulated by asphyxia, 206-208.

Adrenin: secreted by adrenal glands, 36;

action of, identical with sympathetic impulses, 37, 64;

secretion of, by splanchnic stimulation, 41-43;

secreted in emotional excitement, 44, 52-59;

method of testing for, in blood, 47-50;

secreted in emotion, 52-59, 62-63;

disappearance of, from blood, 58;

secreted in pain, 59-62, 63;

effects of, when injected into body, 64-65;

effect of, on distribution of blood in the body, 107;

quickly restores fatigued muscle to normal irritability, 119-123;

specific in its restorative action, 124-128;

as an antidote to muscular metabolites, 129;

restores fatigued denervated muscle to normal irritability,

130;

point of action of, in muscle, 128-133;

antagonistic to curare, 132;

induces rapid coagulation of blood, 136, 147 ff.;

not the direct cause of rapid coagulation, 156-158;

fails to shorten coagulation time in absence of intestines and

liver, 157-158;

variable amount of, in adrenal glands, 171;

emergency functions of, 185 ff.;

utility of, in bettering the contraction of fatigued muscle,

194-195;

not a check to use of sugar in the body, 197, 199;

amount of, secreted when splanchnics stimulated, 198;

a condition for increase of blood sugar, 199;

stimulates the heart, 191, 201;

dilates the bronchioles, 204;

secretion of, increased in asphyxia, 206-208.

Amyl nitrite: effect of, on contraction of fatigued muscle, 126.

Anger: associated with action, 188;

energizing influence of, 216.

Antagonisms: autonomic, 34;

in relation to emotions, 38;

between cranial and sympathetic divisions, 268-270;

between sacral and sympathetic divisions, 270-272.

Appetite: compared with hunger, 233, 235;

operation of, after section of vagus and splanchnic nerves,

240.

Arterial blood pressure: increased in excitement, 95;

artificial methods of increasing, 97;

influence of different heights of, on fatigue, 97-102;

influence of increase of, on fatigue, 97-102;

influence of decrease of, on fatigue, 102-104;

the “critical region” in decreasing, 104;

explanation of effects on fatigued muscle, of varying, 104-106;

value of increased, in pain and emotion, 106.

Arteries: innervation of, 26.

Asphyxia: increases adrenal secretion, 206-208;

increases sugar in blood, 209.

Athletes: glycosuria of, after games, 75.

Autonomic nervous system: three divisions of, 25;

arrangement of sympathetic division of, 26-29;

arrangement of cranial and sacral divisions of, 29-30;

general functions of cranial division of, 30-32;

general functions of sacral division of, 32-34;

antagonism between sympathetic and cranial-sacral divisions

of, 34-36;

identity of action of sympathetic division of, and adrenal

secretion, 36-38;

antagonisms between emotions expressed in, 268-272.

Behavior: biological explanation of, 2.

Bile: flow of, inhibited by excitement, 13.

Bladder: innervation of, 27, 32;

effects of emotions on, 33.

Blood: method of obtaining, for test for adrenin, 45-46;

method of testing, for adrenin, 47-50;

sugar in, 66, 73-74;

distribution of, as affected by adrenin, pain and excitement,

107-108, 200;

functions of, 135;

rapid coagulation of, by adrenin, 136 ff.;

drawing of, for testing coagulation time, 140-142;

treatment of, in testing coagulation time, 142-145;

faster coagulation of, after subcutaneous injections of adrenin,

147-150,

and after intravenous injections, 150-156;

oscillations in the rate of coagulation of, 155;

rapid coagulation of, not due directly to adrenin, 156-158;

rapid coagulation of, not caused by adrenin in absence of liver

and intestines, 157-158,

and not caused by increase of blood sugar, 159, 170;

coagulation of, hastened by splanchnic stimulation, 162-167,

but not in absence of adrenal glands, 167-171;

possible delay of coagulation of, after stimulation of hepatic

nerves, 170;

coagulation of, hastened by “painful” stimulation, 172-177;

coagulation of, hastened in light anesthesia, 174-177;

rapid coagulation of, after excitement, stopped by severing

splanchnic nerves, 180-182;

utility of increased sugar in, 188-193;

distribution of, in pain and excitement, favorable to muscular

effort, 201;

sugar in, increased by asphyxia, 209;

utility of rapid coagulation of, 211.

Bronchioles: dilated by adrenin, 204.

Bulimia: explanation of, 262.

Coagulation, see Blood.

Coagulometer: graphic, 138-147.

Combat: relation of emotion and endurance in, 225-226;

nature of ancient, 294.

Constipation: as result of worry and anxiety, 271.

Cortex, cerebral: insensitiveness of, 242.

Cranial autonomic division: functions of, to conserve bodily

resources, 30-32, 268;

activities of, suppressed by activities of sympathetic division,

268-272.

Curare: action of, antagonized by adrenin, 132.

Dances: relation of excitement and endurance in, 222-224.

Danger: stimulating effect of, 230.

Dervishes: exhibitions of endurance by, 224.

Digestion: interruption of, by strong emotion, 9-12, 13-18,

268-269.

Emotions: surface signs of, 3;

favorable to digestive secretions, 4-8;

unfavorable to digestive secretions, 9-13;

persistence of effects of, on digestive secretions, 12;

effects of, on gastric and intestinal contractions, 13-18;

in relation to sympathetic division, 36;

in relation to adrenal secretion, 44, 52-59, 62-63;

increase of blood sugar in, 66, 73;

glycosuria in, 70-76;

influence of, on distribution of blood in body, 108;

faster coagulation of blood in, 177-182,

but stopped by cutting splanchnics, 180-182;

value of forced respiration in, 203;

value of bronchiolar dilation in, 204;

relation to action, 215;

displayed in a “pattern” response, 218, 282;

in relation to exhibitions of power and endurance, 215, 229;

antagonisms between cranial and sympathetic, 268-270,

and between sacral and sympathetic, 270-272;

similarity of visceral changes in strong, 275-279;

dependence of, on cerebral cortex, 282-283.

Endurance: feats of, related to great emotion, 217-218;

in the excitements of mania and dancing, 222-224;

stimulated by music, 228.

Esophagus: contractions of, associated with hunger sensation,

259-260.

Fatigue: of muscle, 84;

muscular, lessened by splanchnic stimulation, 89-93;

as affected by increase of arterial pressure, 97-102;

irritability of muscle in, increased by splanchnic stimulation,

101;

explanation of effects of varied arterial pressure on, 104-106;

lessens neuro-muscular irritability, 114-117, 120;

effect of, on curarized muscle, 132;

utility of adrenin in lessening effects of, 194, 195;

of adrenal glands, 199;

cessation of hunger contractions in, 262.

Fear: anticipatory character of, 186-187;

associated with action, 188;

explanation of paralyzing effect of, 189;

energizing influence of, 216;

relation to rage, 275;

bodily changes in, like those in rage, 276-277;

importance of, as a fighting emotion, 286.

“Fesselungsdiabetes,” 69.

Fever: absence of hunger in, 242, 263.

Fighting emotions: bodily changes in, like those in competitive

sports, 219-221, 296;

anger and fear as, 285;

importance of, 286;

satisfactions for, in competitive sports, 301.

Food: effect of sight and smell of, on gastric secretion, 6.

Football: glycosuria in players of, 75;

relation of excitement and power in, 219-221.

Frenzy: endurance in, 223, 224.

Ganglia: autonomic, 23.

Gastric glands: turgescence of, not the cause of hunger sensation,

249-250.

Gastric juice: psychic secretion of, 5-8, 11;

importance of, for intestinal digestion, 7;

flow of, inhibited by excitement, 9-12,

and by pain, 19.

Generative organs: innervation of, 32, 33;

effects of strong emotions on activities in, 271.

Glycosuria: in pain, 69-70;

in emotion, 70-76;

after football, 75, 221;

after examinations, 76;

dependence of, on adrenal glands, 77.

Heart: innervation of, 26, 31;

use of sugar by, 191;

stimulated by adrenin, 191, 201.

Hunger: compared with appetite, 233, 235;

description of, 234-236;

theories of, 237;

as a general sensation, 237;

disappearance of, as time passes, 238-239;

when stomach full, 239;

may be absent in bodily need, 242-243;

temporarily abolished by indigestible materials, 243;

quick onset and periodicity of, 244-245;

reference of, to stomach region, 245-247;

not due to emptiness of stomach, 248;

not due to hydrochloric acid in empty stomach, 248;

not due to turgid gastric glands, 249-250;

as the result of contractions, 251-253;

inhibited by swallowing, 254;

method of recording gastric contractions in, 255-256;

associated with gastric contractions, 256-259,

and with esophageal contractions, 259-260;

function of, 263-264, 272-275.

Hydrochloric acid: not the cause of hunger sensation, 248.

Intestine: contractions of, inhibited by excitement, 16;

innervation of, 27, 31;

use of, as test for adrenin in blood, 47-50;

contracts when empty, 251-253;

contractions of, may originate hunger sensations, 263.

Instincts: relation of, to emotions, 187, 188.

Irritability: increased in fatigued muscle by splanchnic

stimulation, 101;

neuro-muscular, lessened by fatigue, 114-117, 120;

when lowered, restored slowly by rest, 119;

when lowered, restored quickly by adrenin, 119-123, 195.

“Jumpers”: exhibition of endurance by, 223.

Mania: endurance in, 222.

Martial virtues: claims for, by militarists, 287;

importance of preserving, 290-291;

preserved in competitive sports, 297-299.

Metabolites: influence of, on muscular contraction, 104;

action of, opposed by adrenin, 129;

increase adrenal secretion, 206-208.

Militarists: emphasis of, on strength of fighting instincts,

286-288;

claims of, as to values of war, 287;

support for claims of, 287.

Muscle: weakness of, after removal of adrenal glands, 81;

improved contraction of, after injection of adrenal extract,

82;

fatigue of, 84;

method of recording fatigue of, 85-86;

fatigue of, lessened by splanchnic stimulation, 89-93;

contraction of, when fatigued, improved by increased arterial

pressure, 97-102;

irritability of, when fatigued, increased by splanchnic

stimulation, 101;

contraction of, when fatigued, lessened by decreased arterial

pressure, 102-104;

explanation of effects of varied arterial pressure on fatigued,

104-106;

irritability of, decreased in fatigue, 114-117, 120;

decreased irritability of, slowly restored by rest, 117-118,

and quickly restored by adrenin, 119-123;

contraction of fatigued denervated, increased by adrenin, 130;

point of action of adrenin in, 128-133;

use of, in struggle, 189;

energy of, from carbonaceous material, 190-193;

disappearance of glycogen from, 190;

increased efficiency of, with increase of blood sugar, 192-193;

utility of adrenin in lessening fatigue of, 194-195;

efficiency of, increased by distribution of blood in pain and

excitement, 201.

Music: stimulating influence of, 227;

influence of martial, 228.

Neurones, autonomic: extensive distribution of sympathetic, 26;

arrangement of sympathetic for diffuse action, 28;

restricted distribution of cranial and sacral, 29;

arrangement for specific action, 30.

Olympic games: as physical substitutes for warfare, 297-298.

Operations: in light anesthesia hasten coagulation of blood,

174-177.

“Ordeal of rice,” 9.

Pain: disturbing effect of, on digestion, 18-19;

as occasion for adrenal secretion, 59-62, 63;

glycosuria in, 69-70;

influence of, on distribution of blood in body, 108;

hastens coagulation of blood, 172-177;

reflex nature of responses in, 185-187;

associated with action, 189;

stimulating and depressive effects of, 189.

Pancreatic juice: flow of, inhibited by excitement, 13.

Philippine Islands: substitution of sports for warfare in, 297.

Power: the feeling of, 229.

Psychic secretion: of gastric juice, 5-8, 11;

of saliva, 6;

dependent on cranial autonomic innervation, 31.

Psychic “tone”: of gastro-intestinal muscles, 13.

Racing: relation of excitement and power in, 221.

Rage: relation of, to fear, 275;

transformation of other emotions into, 276;

bodily changes in, like those in fear, 276-277;

importance of, as a fighting emotion, 286.

Reflexes: “purposive” character of, 185-186.

“Reservoirs of power,” 216.

Respiration: utility of increased, in pain and excitement, 202;

value of forced, in lessening distress, 203.

Rest: restores irritability lessened by fatigue, 117-118.

Sacral autonomic division: functions of, in mechanisms for

emptying, 32-34;

activities of, suppressed by activities of sympathetic division,

270-272.

Saliva: psychic secretion of, 6;

importance of, for taste, 6;

flow of, inhibited by excitement, 9.

Salivary glands: innervation of, by cranial autonomic, 31.

“Second wind”: explanation of, 210.

Sex: instinct of, suppressed by fear and anger, 271.

“Sham feeding,” 5.

Splanchnic nerves: stimulation of, causes adrenal secretion,

41-43;

method of stimulating, 87-88;

stimulation of, improves contraction of fatigued muscle, 89;

stimulation of, hastens coagulation of blood, 162-167,

but not in absence of adrenal glands, 167-171;

severance of, stops rapid coagulation following excitement,

180-182;

eating after severance of, 240.

Sports: relation of excitement and power in, 219-221, 296;

as physical substitutes for warfare, 297-301;

moral values of, 300.

Stomach: psychic tonus of, 13;

contractions of, inhibited by excitement, 14-15, 17,

and by pain, 19;

innervated by sympathetic neurones, 27,

and by cranial autonomic, 31;

reference of hunger sensation to, 245-247;

emptiness of, not the cause of hunger, 248;

contractions of, when empty, 251-253;

method of recording contractions of, 255-256;

contractions of, when empty, associated with hunger sensations,

256-259;

function of contractions of empty, 263-264.

Strength: feats of, related to great emotion, 217-218, 229.

Sugar: in blood, 66, 73;

in urine, 69-76;

relation of adrenal glands to, in blood, 77;

increase of, in blood, does not hasten clotting, 159, 170;

utility of, when increased in blood, 188-193;

a source of muscular energy, 191-193;

a means of increasing muscular efficiency, 192-193;

use of, in body, not checked by adrenin, 197-199.

Swallowing: inhibits hunger sensation, 254.

Sweating: value of, in emotion and pain, 203.

“Sympathetic” autonomic division: extensive distribution of

neurones of, 26;

arranged for diffuse action, 28;

antagonistic to cranial and sacral divisions, 34-36;

active in pain and strong emotion, 36;

emotions expressed in, opposed to those expressed in cranial

and sacral divisions, 268-272;

dominance of, temporary, 273.

Threshold stimulus: as measure of irritability, 111;

method of determining, 111-114;

increased in fatigue, 114-117, 120;

when increased, slowly restored by rest, 117-118,

and quickly restored by adrenin, 119-123.

Trial by battle: feats of endurance in, 226.

Vagus nerves: severance of, does not abolish appetite, 240-241,

and does not abolish hunger contractions of the stomach, 261.

Viscera: similar changes in, in various strong emotions, 275-279;

changes in, not distinctive for emotions, 280-281.

Vomiting: in consequence of pain, 19.

Warfare: as an expression of strong emotions, 286;

physical and moral values claimed for, 287;

barbarities of, and opposition to, 289-290;

moral substitutes for, 292-293;

physical substitutes for, 293-297;

contrast between ancient and modern, 294-295.

Witnesses: stimulating influence of, 227.

Work: effect of, on neuro-muscular irritability, 117;

done with use of carbonaceous material, 190-193.

Transcriber's Notes

The following changes have been made to the text as printed.

1. Illustrations and end-of-page footnotes (marked with an asterisk)

have been located in appropriate paragraph breaks. References,

marked with numbered indices, have been re-indexed and are listed

at the end of each chapter as in the book.

2. Obvious typographical errors have been corrected.

3. Where a word is used repeatedly in the same way, spelling and

hyphenation have been made consistent, preferring the form most

often used in the printed work, or failing that the more usual form

in general use at the time of publication. No typographical change

has been made within direct quotes from other works.

4. Page 25: "or thoradico-lumbar division" has been changed to "or

thoracico-lumbar division".

5. Page 58: The name "Emden" in "Emden and v. Furth" has been

changed to "Embden" in agreement with Footnote 1 on Page 65. (Gustav

Embden, 1874-1933.)

6. Page 62: The Greek letter Β (Beta) has been substituted for

Latin B at the start of "Β-tetrahydronaphthylamine".

Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage · 第 15 / 15 章