W. C. H.

Chelsea.

"_Quod fuit esse_" (Vol. vii., p. 235.).--Allow me to suggest the

following meaning of the epitaph in Lavenham churchyard, which is the

subject of A. B. R.'s Query. The word _est_ has evidently been omitted

in the third line: with this restored, the lines will read as a couple

of hexameters:

"Quod fuit esse, quod est; quod non fuit esse, quod esse;

Esse quod (est), non esse; quod est, non est, erit, esse."

And the literal meaning, will be: "What was existence, is that which

lies here; that which was not existence, is that which is existence; to

be what is now, is not to be; that which is now, is not existence, but

will be hereafter."

This, perhaps, is as enigmatical as the original: but the following

lines will render the meaning plainer, though it is difficult to

preserve the brevity of the Latin in an English version:

All that I really was lies here in dust;

That which was death before is life, I trust.

To be what _is_, is not, I ween, to _be_;

_Is_ not, but _will be_ in eternity.

Notes and Queries, Number 179, April 2, 1853. A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 100 / 158 题