Conclusion.
The allusion in the foregoing page is to a very long letter which the
Horseherd wrote to my husband, dated September 10, 1897, eighteen months
after his first letter. This was followed three days later by a short
note, saying that the long letter was not written for publication, and
that it was the Horseherd’s express wish that it should not be printed. In
this note he mentions that he was perfectly well, and that he had been so
successful in his trade, that he no longer sat with an oil lamp by an iron
stove, but was “every inch a gentleman,” as he expressed it. The
_Pferdebürla_ was brought out early in 1899, and my husband sent a copy to
the only address he had,—“Pferdebürla, Post-Office, Pittsburgh,”—with the
following letter:—
“
(Translation.) 7 Norham Gardens, Feb. 10 /99.
Dear far-off Friend:
“You see I have kept my promise, and after many delays the book is ready.
How are you? whether you are sitting by your iron and oil light, or have
become a great and rich man. Well, all that is only external, the great
thing, the Self, remains unchanged. I am growing old—past seventy-five—and
have still so much to do, and am now printing a big book, the _Six Systems
of Indian Philosophy_. That would please you, for those old fellows saw
deeper than our philosophers, though they don’t talk so much about it. Now
write and tell me how it is with you, and whether you are pleased or not
with your and my book. But make haste, for who knows how long it may last.
It is strange how well one can know those whom one has never seen,”
With all good wishes,
F. Max Müller.
”
The book and letter were returned as unclaimed after three months. But on
September 29, 1899, the Horseherd wrote again, giving his real name, Fritz
Menzel, and the address Monangahela Hotel, Pittsburgh. This letter I have
been unable to find. On October 17, 1899, I wrote by my husband’s desire.
“DEAR SIR: My husband, who is seriously ill, wishes me to send you this
letter from him, written last February and returned late in April, and to
say, as he has now received your letter of September 29, with your real
name and address, he is sending you the copy of his book, _Das
Pferdebürla_, which was also returned to him.”
After a few months both letter and book came back unclaimed, and from that
time nothing more has been heard from the Horseherd. The book bears the
inscription:—
“To the Pferdebürla, with greetings from his Pardner.”
A few words must be said about the translation. In August, 1898, a
translation of the first article on Celsus, made by Mr. O. A. Fechter of
North Yakima, Washington, U.S.A., was sent to my husband by an old friend,
Mrs. Bartlett, wife of the Rev. H. M. Bartlett, rector of the church in
the same place. He liked it and returned it at once, begging that the
other articles, which had appeared in the _Deutsche Rundschau_, though not
yet published as a book, might be translated. For more than two years
nothing was heard from North Yakima, though I wrote more than once during
my husband’s illness, so anxious was he to see the translation carried
out. At length, just before Christmas, 1901, I wrote once more and
registered the letter, which was safely delivered, and I then heard that
my friend had not only written repeatedly, but that the whole finished
translation had been sent, nearly two years before, and that she was
astonished at hearing nothing further. Some fault in the post-office had
caused the long silence on both sides. A rough copy of the translation had
been kept, and was sent over after it had been clearly written out.
I cannot sufficiently express my gratitude to the Rev. J. Estlin
Carpenter, who has revised the whole work in the most thorough manner,
devoting to it much of his very valuable time.
GEORGINA MAX MÜLLER
FOOTNOTES
1 The Greek term “logos” was rendered _Geschichte_ in the German
title.
2 The word _Pferdebürla_ is apparently a Silesian equivalent for
_Pferdebursche_, and is represented in this volume by the term
“horseherd,” after the analogy of cowherd, swineherd, or shepherd.
The termination _bürla_ is probably a local corruption of the
diminutive _bürschel_ or _bürschlein_.
3 “What difference does it make,” he would ask, “whether it was
written by the son of Zebedee, or some other John, if only it
reveals to us the Son of God?” (letter from the Vicar of St.
Giles’s, Oxford, _Life and Letters_, II, Chap. xxxvi.).
4 See the letters between Max Müller and Dr. G. J. Romanes, _Life and
Letters_, II, Chap. xxxi.
_ 5 Ueber die Wahre Geschichte des Celsus._
_ 6 Contra Celsum_, I, 8.
_ 7 Contra Celsum_, I, 63.
8 Luke v. 8.
9 1 Tim. i. 15.
10 Tit. iii. 3.
11 Miss Swanwick’s translation.
12 κόσμος νοητός, ἀόρατος.
13 κόσμος ἰδεῶν.
14 ἰδέα τῶν ἰδεῶν.
15 παραδεἰγματα.
16 Philo, vol. I, p. 106.
17 τιθήνη.
_ 18 De Ebriet._, VIII, 1, 361 f.
19 υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ.
20 μονογενής.
21 πρωτόγονος.
22 σοφία = θεοῦ λόγος.
23 πρεσβύτερος υἱὸς.
24 νεώτερος υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ.
25 δυνάμεις.
26 M. M., _Theosophy and Psychological Religion_, p. 406.
27 Lücke, _Commentary on the Gospel of John_.
28 M. M., _Theosophy and Psychological Religion_, p. 383.
29 M. M., _Theosophy_, p. 404.
30 See the _Deutsche Rundschau_, 1895, XXXIII, p. 47.
31 μονογενής υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ.
32 Ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγέιετο.
33 λόγος τῆς ζοῆς.
34 The original was, however, in German.
_ 35 Deutsche Rundschau_, 1895, LXXXII, 409 ff., “The Parliament of
Religions in Chicago,” by F. Max Müller.
36 See Prof. Dr. Paul Flechsig, _Neue Untersuchungen über die
Markbildung in den menschlichen Gehirnlappen_, p. 67.
37 These pronouns, referring of course to England and the Continent,
were reversed in the original.
_ 38 Academy_, January 2, 1897, p. 12.
_ 39 Ascent of Man_, p. 187.
_ 40 Origin of Species_, 5th ed., 1869, p. 255.
_ 41 Descent of Man_, 1871, Vol. I, p. 36.
_ 42 Ascent of Man_, 1894, p. 9.
43 Vol. XVIII, p. 464.
44 Lloyd Morgan, _Animal Life and Intelligence_, p. 350.
45 H. Drummond, _Ascent of Man_, 1894, p. 169.
46 See _Science of Thought_, p. 405.
47 See the author’s preface to his English translation (second edition)
of Kant’s _Critic of Pure Reason_, p. xxviii, to which we now add
the prophetic words of Shelley, in his _Prometheus Unbound_ (II,
4):—
“He gave man speech, and speech created thought,
Which is the measure of the Universe.”
_ 48 Ascent of Man_, 1894, p. 200.
_ 49 Science of Language_, 1891, p. 499.
50 Cf. _Biographies of Words_, by M. M., 1888.
51 This must of course be understood of authoritative or canonical
Scripture.—ed. J. E. C.