FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN PARENTS AND CHILDREN.

PARENTS and children furnish the first class of examples in which the

fondness of a close attachment by nature is elevated into a freer and

more comprehensive connection by intelligent sympathy; in which the

affection of instinct and custom is transformed into the loftier and

richer affection of friendship. This high and benign transformation

takes place in due season between all mothers and sons, all daughters

and fathers, who afford the requisite conditions for it; that is, in

all cases where they remain long enough together, and their

characters and manners are such as naturally command respect and love

from each other. Even when children are ignoble and unworthy, their

fathers and mothers may yearn over them with every strictly parental

affection; and even when parents are vicious and degraded, their

children may regard them with every strictly filial affection; but

friendship between them is generally impossible without the

co-existence, on both sides, of intrinsic worth, of those responsive

virtues which elicit esteem and dominate sympathy. The great reason

of the failure of a broad, glowing friendship between parents and

children a failure o deplorably common in our homes is the lack, in

heir characters, of that wealth, nobleness, sweetness, patience,

aspiration, which would irresistibly draw them to each other in

mutual honor, love, and joy. The only remedy for this unhappy failure

is the cure of its unhappier cause. Whatever makes characters deep,

rich, pure, and gentle in themselves, tends to make them pleasing to

each other.

It is absurd to suppose, that mean, hateful, and miserable souls will

love each other simply because they are connected by ties of

consanguinity, of interest, or of duty.

Whatever makes us suffer, especially whatever injures our finer

emotions, naturally tends to become repulsive to us, an object of

dislike gathering disagreeable associations. Even a mother, a son, a

father, a daughter, may become such an object, as is illustrated with

melancholy frequency. But when parents and children possess those

high qualities of soul which naturally give pleasure, create

affection, and evoke homage; and when they are not too early

separated, or too much distracted in alien pursuits, a firm and

ardent friendship must spring up between them. The mere parental and

filial relation will become subordinated, as a sober central thread

in a wide web of colored embroidery. The parental instinct and the

filial instinct, weaned from their organic directness, will grow more

complex and mental; and, parallel with this process, the gracious

guardians and the clinging dependants will gradually change into

companions and friends, still retaining, however, sacred vestiges and

memories of the original cords of their union. When we have allowed

proper abatement for the thousands of instances in which this

precious result is not reached, the general statement now made opens

to us a large class of beautiful friendships. In all ages there have

been myriads of mothers and sons, myriads of daughters and fathers,

who were models of devoted, happy friends. Before paying attention to

these, it will be profitable for us to notice the other cases.

Considered with reference to our subject, there are four classes of

parents and children. First, Those who are positive enemies, their

main relation being one of opposition, dislike, and pain. Undoubtedly

a chief reason for this unfortunate result is carelessness, failure

to understand and feel in advance the inestimable importance of a

right rule and fruition of the home. But a cause working more

strongly still arises from prominent vices of character, base and

wicked qualities of soul, which make harmony impossible, friction and

alienation inevitable. Disorder, fretfullness, antagonism, and

misery, pervading the house, compel its members to detest each other.

Then hatred occupies the place which should be occupied by

friendship. This is a melancholy and odious sight to see. It is a

horrible evil for its sufferers to endure. It is a terrible

misfortune and wretchedness to all concerned.

Secondly, There are parents and children who live in entire unconcern

and neglect of each other, in a mere routine of external connections

and associations. This absence of all deep personal sensibility,

either sympathetic or hostile, is not so frightful a calamity as the

rankling resentment of a rooted and conscious enmity; but it is a

lamentable misfortune. It is a sad loss, however little they may

think of it. Absorbed in other matters, giving all their affection to

business, fashion, ambition, dissipation, or to persons outside of

the home-circle, they overlook the thing most indispensable for

placid and permanent contentment; and are sure, sooner or later, to

rue their folly, in an experience of bitter disappointment.

Thirdly, there are those who, so far from cherishing hatred or

indifference, deeply love each other, and passionately long to enjoy

an intimate union in reciprocal confidence, esteem, and sympathy, but

are prevented by some unhappy impediment, some disastrous

misunderstanding or morbid pique. Many a parent yearns with

unspeakable fondness towards a disobedient and ungrateful child; the

heart breaking with agony for the reconciliation, the embrace, the

sweet communion fate withholds. Many a child profoundly desires to

fall at the feet of a cold, hard, careless parent, and with

supplicating tears win the notice, the affection, that would be so

priceless; and, sadder still, there is many an instance where both

parent and child are truly noble and affectionate, and would give the

world if they could break through the separating barrier, and lavish

their whole hearts on each other; but, in spite of these generous

qualities, their common desires and their bitter suffering, some

falsehood, some pride, some shyness, some suspicion, some chill,

intangible phantom, is set fatally between them. In every community

there are piteous tragedies of this sort, little dreamed of by those

outside, but which the bleeding hearts concerned in them feel as a

deadly drain, hastening them towards the grave.

Fourthly, Besides the parents and children who are open enemies, who

are utter indifferentists, or who, while loving each other, are kept

apart by some obstacle, there is another class, who, as free and

cordial friends, happily realize in their relation all that is to be

desired. In these examples there are ample wisdom, considerateness,

tender sympathy, and guardian strength, on the one side; ready

docility, attentiveness, obedience, reverence, and fondness, on the

other; with an exuberance of indescribable comfort and peace on both

sides. What a treasure, what an inestimable boon, what a divine

trust, what an inexhaustible delight, is such an affection between a

parent and a child! What a paradise any country would be, if such an

experience were welling up, a pure fountain of life, in every home

throughout its borders!

Few inquiries can have greater interest or importance than the

inquiry, why there is not more generally between parents and children

that warm, ingenuous, abiding affection which produces a full and

joyous friendship. A clear perception and statement of the

difficulties in the way of it may suggest the means of removing them.

And, in the outset, is it not obvious that the home affections

flourish so scantily because scanty attention is paid to the

cultivation of them? It is forever the fallacy and folly of man to

think least of that which lies nearest to him, and is the most

indissolubly bound up with his being as a cause of happiness or of

misery. He thinks most eagerly on those comparatively exceptional and

remote things, which, in consequence of their greatness or their

rarity, are the strangest and the most impressive to him. He ought to

pay the keenest heed to that which is the most important in its

influence on his life, not to that which is the most startling to his

fancy. Now, it is unquestionably true, that while there is nothing

which contributes so much to enrich or to impoverish us, to bless or

to curse us, as our domestic relations, there is scarcely any thing

which we take less pains to cultivate into all that it is capable of

becoming. In most instances, the life of the home is so close to us,

so identified with ourselves, accepted with such a matter of course

security, that we overlook the delicate conditions for preserving its

freshness and securing its increase. But, in every relation of

persons, there are two sets of conditions, corresponding with the two

sides, neither of which can be neglected with impunity. There are a

multitude of homes which are centres of irritation and wretchedness,

miniature hells to their occupants.

The first thing to be done is to turn thought to the subject, break

up the apathy of routine, secure an earnest appreciation of the facts

in the case, and then study the remedy.

One great obstacle to the desired friendships of parents and children

consists in the difficulty of a perfect sympathy between persons

marked by such differences of age, position, interest, and

experience. Those of the same years, passions, pleasures, duties,

will naturally sympathize the most easily. But in all these respects

the disparities of parent and child are equally numerous and

striking.

They look at things from opposed points of view; they judge of

subjects in the light respectively of experience and of inexperience.

This great and constant contrast must give rise to innumerable

discrepancies of opinion and of desire, provocative of disagreements,

if not of dislikes. Nature has, however, provided powerful

neutralizers for this obstacle to sympathy between those who are so

widely unlike, counteractives which forcibly tend to prevent

disagreements from breeding hostilities. These counteractives are the

profound instincts of parental fondness and filial reverence, the

first of which tends to make the parents enter into the spiritual

states of their children, and to look at things from their point of

view; and the second, to make the children, with docile duteousness,

adopt as their own the conclusions of their parents. These

counteractives ought to be carefully fostered, neither party

forgetting the differences between himself and the other, but

endeavoring to bridge those differences by the identifying powers of

imagination and sympathy. Another frequent destroyer or lessener of

the natural love of parents and children is the conflict between the

rightful authority of the former and the wilful impulses of the

latter.

Maturity, having accumulated knowledge and wisdom out of long

experience, and being set by God and nature in charge over the

headstrong instincts of ignorant or capricious youth, cannot avoid

the duty of frequently applying the curb to excessive desires, and

the spur to defective ones. A sense of chafing, an impulse to resent

and rebel, will naturally often arise. And, in every such collision

of passion and rule, there is a tendency to hostility. It is needless

to say how lamentably frequent are the examples in which this

tendency makes actual foes of those between whom the natural bonds of

love and reverence are of the most sacred character. It is evident

that parental authority is a divine trust which must be exercised

over childhood and youth. Only it should be exercised on principle,

not from caprice; for the good of the ruled, not for the

gratification of a despotic self-assertion in the ruler; with fond

gentleness, not with harshness or cruelty. And the authority of the

parent should be vindicated as far as possible by force of wisdom,

weight of character, power of persuasion; avoiding, as far as can

properly be done, every occasion of conflict, every need of a violent

issue. The child, on the other hand, ought to remember the rightful

authority of his parents, consider their greater experience, take for

granted their benignant intention, cultivate a grateful sense of

dependence and duty towards them, and foster the habit of prompt and

hearty submission to their wishes. It is a safe rule, in general, for

a boy or girl to respect and obey the father and mother, and not to

think, when they oppose the thoughtless spirit of self-indulgence,

that this parental opposition is unreasonable or unkind. To honor

one's parents is the first scriptural commandment with promise.

It is a habit which no one will ever regret. But, alas! how many a

man, how many a woman, has kneeled on the grave where father or

mother lay mouldering, and has lamented, with burning tears of shame

and sorrow, the disobedience, the disrespect, the unkindness, the

neglect, shown in earlier years! How have they longed to lift up the

faded forms from their coffins, to re-animate them, and to have them

again in their homes, that, by unwearied ministrations of tenderness,

they might atone for the upbraiding past! Let the man in the full

maturity of his age, hardened by long contact with the world, revisit

the scenes of his childhood. Let him stand by the old homestead where

fence and wall have fallen, and house and hearth gone to dust. What

presence hallows the place? Who so fills the air about him as to seem

just ready to break into palpable vision wherever he turns? It is his

mother. Overwhelmed by a flood of memories, inspired by an immortal

faith, not less than by an immortal affection, he drops on his knees,

and cries,

Mother! thou art mother still;

Only the body dies;

Such love as bound thy heart to mine,

Death only purifies.

The same moral is drawn by Sarah Tytler in her excellent book of

"Sweet Counsel" for girls, where she says, "I do not know that I ever

told my father I was once or twice very angry with him for refusing

me this or that request. My lips will never tell him now, and beg his

pardon, and assure him that I was not worthy of him then, but that I

know all at last; my hand will never clasp his hand, my lips never

kiss his lips again. But I do not break my heart; for I think he

knows all that I ever intended to tell him, and has forgiven me long

ago. I am persuaded,

"There must be wisdom with great death;

The dead shall look me through and through."

But perhaps the most fatal influence against the growth and

perpetuation of vivid friendships between parents and children is the

disenchanting effect of familiarity. A close and constant

intercourse, long continued, usually tends to make persons arid,

commonplace, uninteresting, to each other, takes away surprise, eager

expectation, and romance. There is nothing human beings so much like

as to be able strongly to impress and be impressed. This seems to

cease to be possible in a company who fancy they have struck every

string, sounded every secret, exhausted the possibilities, in each

other. A long subjection of the same persons to the same

circumstances produces a general spirit of sameness, a flagging

tedium, a want of varied attraction and stimulation. Let a stranger,

a foreign friend, any honored guest, come in, and how his presence

quickens every thing! Life shines with novel lustre, and throbs with

new energy. Every one puts his best foot forward, exerts his best

powers to interest. The fresh pleasure every one feels gives him a

fresh power of pleasing. But, ah it would be of no use, we think, to

make any effort in the dull old circle of our familiars, who can

produce no effect on us, and on whom we, in turn, can produce no

effect. And thus life in the home becomes monotonous, torpid, and

vacant. Worlds of love are every day destroyed by indifference and

repulse. If the same pains were taken to invigorate and perpetuate

the domestic affections as to secure the good-will of other persons

whom we admire or depend on, it could scarcely fail to give a

wonderful enrichment to the satisfactions of home.

This truth is especially applicable to the relation of parents and

children in our day. The old extreme of a severe exercise of parental

authority has passed away, and a new extreme of filial

insubordination and insolent self-assertion has taken its place. It

is altogether too frequent a thing now to see lads and lasses taking

their parents to task as inferiors, and demanding every service from

them. The thought of his child should be a constant delight to a

parent. When the ill-temper and ill-behavior of a child cause every

association with him in the heart of the parent to be disturbing and

painful, how can the result be otherwise than alienating and

depressing? Let there be two children in a family, one of whom is

invariably obedient, gentle, attentive, ingenuous; the other,

irritable, insubordinate, careless, secretive, and untruthful. The

former shall be idolized, while the latter is regarded with

condemnatory repugnance. The fact that a boy is your son, or that a

girl is your daughter, cannot wholly neutralize the repulsiveness of

their odious traits. When children uniformly respect and obey their

parents, and seek by every kind attention and praiseworthy effort to

please them, it is not in human nature that they should fail to be

unspeakably loved and caressed. Deferential treatment, patient

service, quick sympathy, expectant attention, an obvious desire to

please, are the most potent charms that mortals can wield. They show

that the parties are important to each other. They give life its

highest value. In their absence, all romantic color fades, and every

precious affection expires. The most effective intercourse that

vanity can establish with strangers offers nothing comparable to the

delicious quality of the experience which results when a parent and

child, of suitable character and age, are blessed with a complete

friendship. Every thought of it pours for them a sudden sunshine

through the sky, an exhilarating fragrance through the air.

Undoubtedly the affections are greatly hurt and repressed by being

regarded as obligations rather than as privileges. They must be wooed

forth by the gentlest lures. They will not come when carelessly

expected and demanded as a matter of course. The heart will be free.

It imperiously resents bonds and orders. The love of parent and child

is certainly even more a delight than it is a duty. They should be

friends, not so much because they are commanded to be such, but more

because they are mutually worthy, and because their peace of mind,

their contentment of heart, their improvement and happiness, depend

on their being such. What privilege can be imagined superior in

purity of joy and profit, to that of a young man who has for his

friend a wise and holy mother, whom he loves with enthusiasm and

confides in with an absolute devotion?

And if there be a human tear

From passion's dross refined and clear,

A tear so limpid and so meek

It would not stain an angel's cheek,

'Tis that which pious fathers shed

Upon a duteous daughter's head.

The Friendships of Women · 第 23 / 34 题