INFLUENCE OF IMAGINATION.

Innumerable are the diseases that arise from our busy fancy. We are all

subject to the tyrannic sway of imagination's empire. Under this mighty

influence man displays energies which lead him boldly to dare danger and

complicated sufferings, or he is reduced to the most degraded state of

miserable despondency. These diseases are the more fearful, since they

rarely yield to physical aid, and it is seldom that moral influence is

sufficiently persuasive to combat their inveteracy. It is idle to tell the

timid hypochondriac that he is not ill; the mere circumstance of his

believing himself sick, constitutes a serious disorder. His constant

apprehensions derange his functions until an organic affection arises. The

patient who fancies that he labours under an affection of the heart

disturbs the circulation, which is ever influenced by our moral emotions,

till at last this disturbance occasions the very malady which he dreaded.

These aberrations of the mind arise from various causes,--mental emotions,

constitution, climate, diet, hereditary disposition, education. Tertullian

called philosophy and medicine twin sisters; both may become powerful

agents in controlling our imagination.

The ancients have variously endeavoured to determine the seat of this

faculty. Aristotle placed it in the heart, which, from the sense of its

oppression observed in acute moral sufferings he considered the origin of

our nerves, or sensorium. Avicenus and other philosophers located

imagination in the anterior portion of the brain, which he called the

_prow_; memory in the posterior part, which he denominated the _poop_, and

judgment in the centre of the organ, or what mariners would term

_mid-ship_. The notions of Gall and Spurzheim had long since been

anticipated by philosophers and physicians, both in regard to the division

of the cerebral organ, and the external appearance of the cranium, which

denoted their preponderancy. That temperature exercises a powerful

influence over our mental faculties is evident. In warm climates we find a

greater exaltation of the mind, more enthusiasm and vivid emotion, than in

northern latitudes. The East is the land of fancy, illustrated by their

wondrous tales of fiction, and their vivid and fantastic imagery,

displayed in the chimeras and the arabesques of their palaces and temples.

In these regions all the passions are uncontrollable and wild. Love is

characterized by furious or dark jealousy, according to the rank and

power of the lover; and ambition is signalized by bloodthirsty and

promiscuous barbarity. No opposition can be brooked: man is either a

ferocious tyrant, or an abject slave; subjection alone preventing the

oppressed from being as sanguinary as the oppressor. Government is

despotism, and religion fatality and fanaticism. In northern climes, on

the contrary, every thing is cold and calculating. The almighty passion of

love may prevail; but its demonstrations are morose, concentrated,

although not less ferocious than under a southern sky. In the one country,

man seeks the dark shelter of the forest, and the solitude of the

mountain, to ponder over his grievances, or soliloquise on his sufferings;

in the other he courts the roseate bower and the orange grove, to lull him

into a soft repose which may calm his feelings by temporary oblivion, to

be roused again to action by the stimulus of opium, tobacco, and a burning

sun. The ancients were so fully convinced of this influence of the

amorphous constitution, that Lucianus tells us that the Abderites (a

people so remarkable for their stupidity and sluggishness that _Abderitica

mens_ was proverbial), having witnessed the performance of one of

Euripides's plays under the fierce solar rays, became fired with such

enthusiasm, that they ran about the streets in a wild phrensy, repeating

aloud his sublime verses, until the coolness of the evening restored them

to reason and to their native torpor. So predominant are these feelings,

which owe their character to climate, that they regulate our ideas of a

future state, as well as our conduct on earth. The paradise of the

Mohammedan is a blessed region of everlasting pleasure and sensual

enjoyments; beauteous houris await the soul, which is to luxuriate in

corporeal voluptuousness; and the purple wine, forbidden to the living, is

to flow in delectable streams, to delight the dead, who may, in the

seventh paradise inhabit a land where rivers of wine, and milk, and honey,

are ever flowing; where evergreen trees bend under luxurious fruits, whose

very pips are transformed into lovely maidens, so sweet--to use their own

metaphorical language--that the ocean would lose its bitterness if they

did but condescend to spit in its briny waters; and all these enjoyments

are secured to the true believer by hosts of guardian angels, who have

seventy thousand mouths, and seventy thousand tongues, to praise God

seventy thousand times each day in seventy thousand languages: and such is

their horror of earthly heat, that in the other world one of the greatest

rewards is the delight of being able to sleep under the cool shade of a

tree each leaf of which is of such an expanse that a man might travel

fifty thousand years under its benign protection. How different is the

paradise of Odin! There, it is true, the soul of the departed dwells in

magnificent palaces; but what are his enjoyments compared to those of the

sensual Asiatic! Instead of soft music, the din of war is constantly to

resound in his ear, while he luxuriates in drinking strong beer and

hydromel, poured by the fair Valknas, the houris of the Vahalla paradise,

into the skulls of his enemies. Their God is called the god of crows; and

two of these sable familiars, _Hugin_, who represents the mind, and

_Nunnin_, or memory, are constantly perched upon his shoulders, until they

take flight to seek information for their master.

To this day it is said that the Tartars fancy, that, in their future abode

of bliss, their reward will be a sort of Platonic affection, and a

perpetual and undisturbed state of meditation; in short, a celestial _far

niente_. So convinced were the ancients of this effect of peculiar

temperature, that the morose Heraclitus maintained that the power of the

mind arose from a _dry splendour_; that all things were created by solar

heat; and when ill himself, he sought health by endeavouring to dispel

watery accumulations by the heat of a dunghill. Ptolemy and Posidonius

assert, that southern climes engender genius and wit, and are better

calculated for the study of things divine; and Plato, Hippocrates, and

Galen, on the same principle, affirm that stupidity and forgetfulness are

produced by cold and humidity. The celebrated Descartes, in his younger

days, states that he felt his enthusiasm moderated by the damps and cold

of Holland; and that he ever experienced more facility in pursuing his

philosophic studies in winter than in summer. Poets, on the contrary,

court the glowing rays of an inspiring sun, and their Phoebus and their

Apollo is the conductor and the inspirer of the Muses:

Cynthius aurem vellit et admonuit.

That the energies of our intellectual faculties are under the influence of

our food, is a fact long since observed. The stupidity of the athletae, who

lived upon coarse bread (coliphium) and underdone meat, was proverbial;

even Hercules laboured under the imputation of a mind somewhat obtuse. Our

genius, our energies are all affected by our mode of living. The rule of

_Sanis omnia sana_, of Celsus, is applicable to very few individuals; and

all our faculties may be rendered more keen or less vivid by temperance or

excesses. As the nature of our _ingesta_ influences the functions of our

digestive organs, so do these organs in their turn influence our moral

powers when our physical energies are elevated or depressed. Our courage,

our strength of mind, our religious and our moral train of thinking, are

under the control of diet. Fasting has ever been considered as

predisposing to meditation and ascetic contemplation. Tertullian tells us,

that we should approach the altars fasting, or having eaten nothing but

dry substances. All the religious ceremonies of the Egyptians were

preceded by abstinence, and their sacrificators were allowed neither

animal food nor wine. Indeed, the Egyptian priesthood were remarkable for

their abstinence and self-denial, fearful, according to Plutarch, that

"the body should not sit light upon the soul." Similar precautions were

observed with animals, and the ox apis was not allowed to drink the waters

of the Nile, as they were considered of a gross and fattening nature; even

upon festive days they observed a similar moderation. It was customary, on

the 9th day of the month Thoth, for every one to eat fried fish at their

doors--the priests only conformed to the custom by burning theirs at the

appointed time. In general they abstained from most sorts of pulse,

especially beans and lentils, onions, garlic, leeks, mutton, pork; and on

certain days of purification, even salt was forbidden. Many of their fasts

lasted from seven to forty-two days, during which time they abstained

entirely from animal food, from herbs and vegetables, and the indulgence

of any passion. Similar privations were observed by all those who attended

the mysteries of Juno and Ceres. In Holy Writ we find that it was after

abstinence that Divine inspiration illumined the elect. The angel appeared

unto Daniel after he had been three weeks without tasting flesh, or wine,

or "pleasant bread." In the Acts, x., we find that the vision appeared to

Peter, "when he had become hungry and would have eaten." Moses fasted

forty days on Mount Sinai. We find in Jonah, that even cattle were

frequently subject to this mortification, when he proclaimed in Nineveh

that neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, should taste any thing; "let

them not feed nor drink water." Congius Ripensis tells us, that the same

restriction was imposed by the Lacedaemonians on their Helots and all

domestic animals. Fasting was considered by the early Christians as an

essential rite. St. Anthony prescribed to his disciples one meal of dry

bread, salt and water, in the day without any food on Wednesdays and

Fridays. In the monastery of Mocham, in Egypt, a monk of the name of Jonas

was beatified for having lived until the age of eighty-five, working hard

in the garden, and without any other food than raw herbs and grass steeped

in vinegar; this abstemious cenobite added to his claims to canonization

by always sleeping in his chair. St. Hilarius only ate fifteen figs and

six ounces of barley bread _per diem_. St. Julian Sabus retired to a

cavern, where he only luxuriated once in the week on millet-bread, with

salt and water; and St. Macarius resolved to outdo him by restraining his

sustenance to a few cabbage-leaves every Sunday. Not only did these

gastric martyrs attribute their holy visions to abstinence, but they

considered it as the source of their longevity. Thus, St. Anthony lived to

the age of one hundred and five; St. Paphinus to ninety on dry bread; and

St. Paul the Hermit thrived for one hundred and fifty-nine years upon

dates. It is not derogatory to their supposed divine mission to say that

all these men were as enthusiastic as the fakirs of the east.

So acceptable to the Deity was starvation considered, that at various

periods it was enforced by penal laws. Charlemagne denounces the

punishment of death on all those who transgressed in this respect; and, by

an old Polish edict, any sinner who ate on a fast-day was sentenced to

have all his teeth drawn. However, monkish ingenuity endeavoured to elude

these severe enactments, by interpreting the letter instead of the spirit;

and we find, in the regulations of a German monastery, the following

accommodation, "_Liquidum non frangit jejunium_," by which, on days of

penance, the monks only took rich soups and succulent broth. In latter

days, being permitted to eat fish in Lent, they saw no reason why fowl

should not be included, on the authority of Genesis, that the waters

brought forth every winged fowl after his kind. This relaxation in

culinary discipline called forth loud indignation from many prelates. St.

Ambrosius attributes the profligacy of the monks to these excesses; and

Tertullian considers the fall of the Israelites as the punishment of their

neglect in this respect. Our Shakspeare illustrates this belief in the

influence of fasting as preparatory to inspiration.

Last night the very gods shew'd me a vision--

I _fast_ and pray'd for their intelligence.

Not satisfied with this mystification in food, we find some austere monks

endeavouring to reduce carnal appetites by other means, such as by

blood-letting, _monialem minuere_; and claustral flesh was brought down by

phlebotomy and purging at regular periods. To this day we find that

well-behaved Turks, during the Ramasan, make it a godly point never to

swallow their saliva.

This digression on fasting was somewhat necessary, to show how much our

diet tends to modify our being. It is well known that troops will display

more activity and courage when fasting than after a meal; and an ingenious

physician of our day is perfectly correct when he attributes a daring

spirit or a pusillanimous feeling to the influence of our stomach.

Intellectual weakness, frequently brought on by excesses, has proved a

rich source to empiricism; hence the belief in mystic and supernatural

agencies, and the power of certain nostrums. Coloured fountain water and

bread pills have made the fortune of various quacks, when imaginary cures

have relieved imaginary diseases. In our days, numerous have been the

recoveries attributed to Hohenloe's prayers. Trusting to mystic numbers,

three, five, seven, or nine pills have produced effects, when other

numbers less fortunate would have failed. To this hour mankind, even in

enlightened nations, are fettered by these absurd trammels. Credulity, and

superstition her twin sister, have in all ages been the source whence

priestcraft, and quackery have derived their wealth. Next to these rich

mines we may rank fashion. The adoption of any particular medicine by

princes and nobles will endow it with as great a power as that which was

supposed to be vested in regal hands in the cure of scrofula, hence called

_king's evil_; and we have too many instances of such cures having been

effected by a monarch's touch to doubt the fact. The history of the potato

is a strong illustration of the influence of authority: for more than two

centuries the use of this invaluable plant was vehemently opposed; at

last, Louis XV. wore a bunch of its flowers in the midst of his courtiers,

and the consumption of the root became universal in France. The warm bath,

so highly valued by the Romans, once fell into disrepute, because the

Emperor Augustus had been cured by a cold one, which for a time was

invariably resorted to. Thus Horace exclaims,

----Caput ac stomachum supponere fontibus audent

Clusinis, Gabiosque petunt et frigida rura.

Unfortunately, the means which had relieved Augustus killed his nephew

Marcellus; and the _Laconicum_ and the _Tepidarium_ were again crowded

with the "fashion."

Persecution and its prohibitions have also been most powerful in working

upon our imagination. Rare and forbidden fruits will always be considered

more desirable than those we can easily obtain. The history of tobacco is

a striking instance of this influence of difficulty upon the mind of man.

Pope Urban VIII. prohibited its use in any shape, under the penalty of

excommunication. It was afterwards forbidden in Russia, under the pain of

having the offender's nose cut off. In some cantons of Switzerland the

prohibition was introduced in the decalogue, next to the commandment

against adultery. Amurath IV. ordered all persons taken in _flagranti

delicto_ smoking tobacco, to be impaled, on the principle that its use

checked the progress of population. The denunciation of our James I. may

be considered as a masterpiece of the imaginary horrors attributed to this

obnoxious weed. "It is," he says, "a custome loathsome to the eye,

hatefull to the nose, harmefull to the braine, dangerous to the lungs, and

in the black stinking fume thereof neerest resembling the horrible Stygian

smoake of the pit that is bottomlesse." During the reign of this monarch

such a restriction might have been necessary, unless the consumption of

tobacco enriched the exchequer: for it appears that some _amateurs_

consumed no less than L500 per annum in smoke. Surely we should reap some

flourishing revenue from fashion and credulity, when we find our

government awarding L5000 to a _certain_ Johanna Stephens for her

discovery of _certain_ medicines for the cure of _calculi_! The same

imaginary hope induced many a credulous creature to minister to the

necessities of another Johanna, for _certain_ expectations. Alas! how this

indefinite _sense_ exhibits the infinite folly of poor humanity!

A morbid imagination, although frequently the source of much misery, will

prove in many cases the fountain-head of many noble qualities; its

exaltation constitutes genius, which is, in fact, a natural disposition of

individual organization sometimes bordering upon insanity. "_Non est

magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae_," says Seneca; and Montaigne

observes, "De quoi se fait la plus subtile folie que de la plus subtile

sagesse? il n'y a qu'un demi-tour a passer de l'une a l'autre." Aristotle

asserts that all the great men of his time were melancholy and

hypochondriac. The ancient and eastern nations entertained a singular idea

regarding men of innate genius, and possessed of more than common

attributes; they fancied that they were the first-born, and the offsprings

of illicit love: Zoroaster, Confucius, Mahomet, Vishnou, were born of

virgins; and Theseus, Hercules, Castor and Pollux, and Romulus, were all

illegitimate.

So prone is a lively imagination to a derangement of the intellectual

harmony, that the greatest care should be taken during the youthful

development to resort to a sound and proper exercise. The constant

tendency to wild and supernatural visions, the disregard of every daily

and vulgar matter of fact consideration, soaring in regions of fiction,

should engage our incessant vigilance, such a state of mind, as

Abercrombie justly observes, "tends in a most material manner to prevent

the due exercise of those nobler powers which are directed towards the

cultivation both of science and of virtue," and Foster has thus

beautifully illustrated this subject in his essays.

"The influence of this habit of dwelling on the beautiful fallacious forms

of imagination, will accompany the mind into the most serious speculations

or rather musings, on the real world, and what is to be done in it and

expected; as the image which the eye acquires from looking at any dazzling

object, still appears before it wherever it turns. The vulgar materials,

that constitute the actual economy of the world, will rise up to its sight

in fictitious forms, which it cannot disenchant into plain reality, nor

will ever suspect to be deceptive. It cannot go about with sober, rational

inspection and ascertain the nature and value of all things around it--in

that paradise it walks delighted, till some imperious circumstance of real

life call it thence, and gladly escapes thither again when the avocation

is past. If a tenth part of the felicities that have been enjoyed, the

great actions that have been performed, the beneficial institutions that

have been established, and the beautiful objects that have been seen in

that happy region, could have been imported into this terrestial

place!--what a delightful thing the world would have been to awake each

morning to see such a world once more!"

Of the miseries the hypochondriacs experience the following extract of a

letter to a physician will afford a specimen: "My poor body is a burning

furnace, my nerves red-hot coals, my blood is boiling oil; all sleep has

fled, and I am suffering martyrdom. I am in agony when I lie on my back; I

cannot lie on either side; and I endure excruciating torture when I seek

relief by lying on my stomach; and, to add to my misery, I can neither

sit, stand, nor walk." The fancies of hypochondriacs are frequently of the

most extraordinary nature: one patient imagines that he is in such a state

of obesity as to prevent his passing through the door of his chamber or

his house; another impressed with the idea that he is made of glass, will

not sit down for fear of cracking; a third seems convinced that his head

is empty; and an intelligent American, holding a high judicial seat in our

West Indian colonies, could not divest himself of the occasional

conviction of his being transformed into a turtle.

The most melancholy record of the miseries of hypochondriacism is to be

found in the diary of Dr. Walderstein of Gottingen. He was a man much

deformed in person, and his mind seemed as distorted as his body. Although

of deep learning and research, and convinced of the absurdity of his

impressions, yet he was unable to resist their baneful influence. "My

misfortune," says the doctor, "is, that I never exist in this world, but

rather in possible combinations created by my imagination to my

conscience. They occupy a large portion of my time, and my reason has not

the power to banish them. My malady, in fact, is the faculty of extracting

poison from every circumstance in life; so much so that I often felt the

most wretched being because I had not been able to sneeze three times

together. One night when I was in bed I felt a sudden fear of fire, and

gradually became as much oppressed by imaginary heat as though my room

were in flames. While in this situation, a fire-bell in the neighbourhood

sounded, and added to my intense sufferings. I do not blush at what might

be called my superstition any more than I should blush in acknowledging

that my senses inform me that the earth does not move. My error forms the

_body_ of my judgment, and I thank God that he has given it a _soul_

capable of correcting it. When I have been perfectly free from pain, as is

not unfrequently the case when I am in bed, my sense of this happiness has

brought tears of gratitude in my eyes. I once dreamt," adds Walderstein,

"that I was condemned to be burnt alive. I was very calm, and reasoned

coolly during the execution of my sentence. 'Now,' I said to myself, 'I am

burning, but not yet burnt; and by-and-by I shall be reduced to a cinder.'

This was all I thought, and I did nothing but think. When, upon awaking, I

reflected upon my dream, I was by no means pleased with it, for I was

afraid I should become _all thought and no feeling_." It is strange that

this fear of thought, assuming a corporeal form in deep affliction, had

occurred to our poet Rowe, when he exclaims in the Fair Penitent, "_Turn

not to thought my brain_." "What is very distressing," continues the

unfortunate narrator, "is, that when I am ill I can think nothing, feel

nothing, without bringing it home to myself. It seems to me that the whole

world is a mere machine, expressly formed to make me feel my sufferings in

every possible manner." What a fearful avowal from a reflecting and

intelligent man! Does it not illustrate Rousseau's definition of

reason--_the knowledge of our folly_.

Dr. Rush mentions a man who imagined that he had a Caffre in his stomach

who had got into it at the Cape of Good Hope, and tormented him ever

since. Pinel relates the case of an unfortunate man who believed that he

had been guillotined, but his innocence having been made complete after

his execution, his judges decided that his head should be restored to him,

but the person intrusted with this operation had made a mistake, and put

on a wrong head. Dr. Conolly knew a man who really believed that he had

been hanged, but had been brought to life by galvanism, but he maintained

that this operation had not restored the whole of his vitality.

Jacobi relates the case of a man confined in the lunatic asylum at

Wurtzburg, in other respects rational, of quiet, discreet habits, so that

he was employed in the domestic business of the house, but who laboured

under the impression that there was a person concealed in his stomach,

with whom he held frequent conversations. He often perceived the absurdity

of this idea, and grieved in acknowledging and reflecting that he was

under the influence of so groundless a persuasion, but he never could get

rid of it. "It was very curious to observe," adds our intelligent author,

"how, when he had but an instant before cried what nonsense!--is it not

intolerable to be thus deluded? and while the tears which accompanied

these exclamations were yet in his eyes, he again began to talk,

apparently with entire conviction about the person in his belly who told

him that he was to marry a great princess. An attempt was made to cure

him, by putting a large blister on his abdomen, and the instant that it

was dressed, moving from behind him a dressed-up figure, as if just

extracted from his body. The experiment so far succeeded that the patient

believed in the performance, and his joy was at first boundless in the

full persuasion that he was cured; but some morbid feeling about the

bowels, which he had associated with the insane impression, still

continuing, or being again experienced, he took up the idea that another

person similar to the first was still left within him, and under that

persuasion he still continues to labour."

A nobleman of the court of Louis XIV., fancied himself a dog, and would

invariably put his head out of window to bark aloud. Don Calmet relates

the case of some nuns in a convent in Germany, who imagined that they were

transformed into cats, and wandered about the building loudly mewing and

spitting at and scratching each other.

One of the strangest aberrations of a disordered state of mind was

exhibited by some impudent fellows who fancied themselves virtuous and

modest females. Esquirol relates the case of a young man of 26 years of

age, handsome and of a good figure, who had been in the habit of

occasionally putting on woman's attire to perform female parts in private

theatricals, and who had actually fancied himself a woman. In his

paryoxysms he would put off his male clothes, and equip himself like a

nymph,--the greater part of his day was spent before his looking-glass,

decorating his person and dressing his hair--he was incurable!

Curiosities of Medical Experience · 第 110 / 214 题