Sir Walter Scott says, in the "Lay of the Last Minstrel,"--

She drew the splinter from the wound,

And with a charm she stanch'd the blood.

The strength of imagination in effecting wonderful cures has been observed

in all ages; and Avicenna declares, "that he prefers confidence before

art, precepts, and all remedies whatsoever." Our learned Burton says,

"that this strong imagination or conceit is _Astrum Hominis_, and the

rudder of this our ship, which reason should steer, but overborne by

phantasie, cannot manage, and so suffers itself and the whole vessel of

ours to be overruled and often overturned."

Nothing could be more absurd than the notions regarding some of these

supposed cures: a ring made of the hinge of a coffin had the power of

relieving cramps; which were also mitigated by having a rusty old sword

hung up by the bedside. Nails driven in an oak-tree prevented the

toothache. A halter that had served in hanging a criminal was an

infallible remedy for a headache, when tied round the head; this affection

was equally cured by the moss growing on a human skull, dried and

pulverized, and taken as a cephalic snuff. A dead man's hand could dispel

tumours of the glands by stroking the parts nine times, but the hand of a

man who had been cut down from the gallows was the most efficacious. To

cure warts, one had nothing to do but to steal a piece of beef from the

butcher, with which the warts were to be rubbed; then inter it in any

filth, and as it rotted, the warts would wither and fall.

The chips of a gallows on which several persons had been hanged, when worn

in a bag round the neck, would cure the ague. A stone with a hole in it,

suspended at the head of the bed, would effectually stop the nightmare;

hence it was called a _hag-stone_, as it prevents the troublesome witches

from sitting upon the sleeper's stomach. The same amulet tied to the key

of a stable-door, deterred witches from riding horses over the country.

Rickety children were cured by being drawn through a cleft tree, which was

afterwards bound up, and as the split wood united, the child acquired

strength. Creeping through a perforated stone to cure various disorders

was a Druidical rite, still practised in the East. In the parish of Marden

there is a stone with a hole in it, fourteen inches in diameter, through

which children are drawn for the rickets; and, in the North, infants are

made to pass through a hole cut in a _groaning_ cheese the day of their

christening.

Second sight, which, as an hereditary faculty, was deemed a malady, was

cured in the Isle of Man, according to Mr. Aubrey's account, by baptizing

a child upon the first sight of its head. This ceremony exempts the

succeeding generation from the troublesome gift.

It is a melancholy reflection that, at various periods, impostors have

impiously called in Scriptural aid to promote their sordid or ambitious

views. Chiromancers have quoted the Bible in support of their doctrines

and adduced the following lines of Job,--"He sealeth up the hand of every

man, that all men may know his works:" while, in the like manner, the Holy

Inquisition of Spain and Portugal justified their atrocities on the score

of the parable of the marriage of the king's son, in the 22nd of St.

Matthew.

Unlawful cures, as they were called, being thus anathematized, lawful

remedies were resorted to, and the patient was first ordered to pray with

due devotion before he took his physic; or, as Burton observes, not one

without the other, but both together; for, as he adds, to pray alone, and

reject ordinary means, is to do like him in Aesop, that, when his cart was

stalled, lay flat on his back, and cried out "Help, Hercules!" However,

Hyperius maintains that no physicians can hope for success unless "with a

true faith they call upon God and teach their patients to do the like."

Comineus, when he addressed the Christian princes after the overthrow of

Charles of Burgundy, bade them "first pray with all submission and

penitency, confess their sins, and then take physic."

Another question of importance that led to much controversy was, whether

it were lawful to seek the aid of the saints; the learned Burton's remarks

on this controverted point are so curious that they are worth relating.

"They (the papists) have a proper saint for almost every peculiar

infirmity: for poisons, gout, agues, Petronella; St. Romanus, for such as

are possessed; St. Vitus for madmen, &c.; and as, of old, Pliny reckons up

gods for all diseases. All affections of the mind were heretofore

accounted gods: Love and Sorrow, Virtue, Honour, Liberty, Contumely,

Impudency, had their temples; Tempests, Seasons, _Crepitus Ventris_, _Dea

Vacuna_, _Dea Cloacina_. Varro reckons up thirty thousand gods; Lucian

makes Podagra, the gout, a goddess, and assigns her priests and ministers.

'Tis the same devil still, called heretofore, Apollo, Mars, Venus, &c.;

the same Jupiter, and those bad angels, are now worshipped and adored by

the name of St. Sebastian, St. Barbara, &c.; and our Lady succeeds Venus

in many offices; and God often winks at these impostures, because they

forsake his word, and betake themselves to the devil, as they do, that

seek after holy water, crosses," &c.

Amidst this violent denunciation against popery and devilment, evil

spirits and saints, it is somewhat singular to find a spirit of anomalous

perversity which justifies suicide to rid ourselves of disease and

suffering; and these very sanctimonious censors quote ancient and modern

authorities to sanction a practice which every Christian must condemn. Let

us pursue the disquisition of our learned bookworm Burton:--"Another doubt

is made by philosophers, whether it be lawful for a man in such extremity

of pain and grief to make away himself, and how those men that do so are

to be censured. The Platonists approve of it, that it is lawful in such

cases upon a necessity. Plotinus (_L. de Beatitud._) and Socrates himself

defend it (_in Plato's Phaedon_): _If any man labour of an incurable

disease, he may despatch himself, if it be to his good_. Epictetus and

Seneca say, _Quamcunque veram esse viam ad libertatem_;--any way is

allowable that leads to liberty. _Let us give God thanks no man is

compelled to live against his will. Quid ad hominem claustra, carcer,

custodia? liberum ostium habet._ Death is always ready at hand: _Vides

illum precipitem locum, illud flumen?_ There is liberty at hand. _Effugia

cervitutis et doloris sunt_, as that Laconian lad cast himself headlong,

_Non serviam, aiebat puer_; to be freed of misery. Wherefore hath our

mother earth brought out poisons (saith Pliny) in so great a quantity, but

that men in distress might make away themselves? which kings of old had

ever in readiness, _ad incerta fortunae venenum sub custode promptum_. Many

worthy men and women, _quorum memoria celebratur in ecclesia_, sayeth

Leminctius, killed themselves to save their chastity and honour, when Rome

was taken. Jerome vindicates the same, and Ambrose commendeth Pelagia for

so doing. Eusebius admired a Roman matron for the same fact, to save

herself from the lust of Maxentius the tyrant. Adelhelmus, the Abbot of

Malmesbury, calls them, _beatas virgines quae sic, &c._ Sir Thomas More, in

his Utopia, commends voluntary death if one be _sibi aut aliis molestus;

especially if to live be a torment to him_, let him free himself with his

own hand from this tedious life, or from a prison, or suffer himself to be

freed by others." However, be it said in justice to our worthy Burton, he

condemns this practice as "a false and pagan position, founded in prophane

stoical paradoxes and wicked examples;" and although he denounces most

fulminating anathemas on papists, he concludes by saying, "we ought not to

be rash and rigorous in our censures, as some are; Charity will judge and

hope best; God be merciful unto us all!"

But why should we marvel at the credulity and superstition of our

forefathers, when we daily observe equal absurdities? Fanaticism and

bigotry will ever strive to speculate on human weakness, and endeavour to

surround with impenetrable mists every rebel to their power who gropes for

the shrine of reason and of truth. Johanna Southcote had her votaries, and

Prince Hohenlohe is still considered by many a pious person, as a

vicarious instrument of divine mercy. No miraculous recovery recorded in

the dark ages can surpass the tenebral absurdity of the following relation

of one of his cures:

Miss O'Connor was a nun in a convent near Chelmsford, and in December

1820, being about thirty years old, was suddenly attacked by a violent

pain in the right hand, which extended with much swelling and inflammation

up the arm. The whole limb became red, swollen, extremely painful, and

entirely useless. Every remedy, both topical and directed to the system,

was tried in vain for a year and a half. There was no suppuration, nor any

formation of pus; but the malady continued obdurate, and yielded to no

application. The resources of the flesh having manifestly failed, Mrs.

Gerard, the worthy superior, very properly betook herself to those of the

spirit. She made a request through a friend to Prince Hohenlohe to assist

the patient in this her extreme case; when the following precious

document, which it would be impious to translate into heretical English,

was received:

"_Pour la Religeuse Novice d'Angleterre._

"Le trois du mois de Mai, a huit heures, je dirai, conformement a

votre demande, pour votre guerison, mes prieres. Joignez-y a la meme

heure, apres avoir confesse et communie, les votres, avec cette

ferveur angelique et cette confiance pleniere que nous devons a notre

Redempteur J. C.: excitez au fond de votre coeur les vertus divines

d'un vrai repentir, d'un amour Chretien, d'une croyance sans bornes

d'etre exauce, et d'une resolution inebranlable de mener une vie

exemplaire, afin de vous maintenir en etat de grace. Agreez

l'assurance de ma consideration.

"PRINCE ALEXANDRE HOHENLOHE.

"Bamberg, Mars 16, 1822."

It is to be regretted that this letter, which was no doubt a circular to

his proselytes, with necessary blanks to be filled up _pro re nata_, as

the doctors have it, was not drawn out in better French. Howbeit, on the

appointed day, asserts Dr. Baddely (the lady's unsuccessful medical

attendant), Miss O'Connor went through the religious process prescribed by

her princely physician. Mass being said, Miss O. not finding the immediate

relief she expected from her faith, or faithfully expected, exclaimed

somewhat impatiently, not having the fear of Job before her eyes, "Thy

will be done, O Lord, since thou hast not thought me worthy of this cure;"

when behold! _immediately_ after she felt an extraordinary sensation

throughout the whole arm to the end of the fingers. The pain _instantly_

left her, the swelling gradually subsided, and Dr. B., who no doubt was

the pet physician of the nuns, declares that the hand shortly resumed its

natural size and shape.

Now, Miss O'Connor was most likely a young lady from Ireland, where this

miraculous cure was re-echoed in every chapel. The protestants were

naturally offended by a report which seemed to impugn the sanctity of the

reformed religion, and they thought it incumbent on them, for the welfare

of church and state, to get up a miracle of their own which would cast

Prince H., Nun O., and Dr. B. in the shade. The following statement was

therefore published and certified upon oath by sundry most respectable and

most worthy Orangemen:

"I pledge you the word and honour of an Orangeman that the following

facts, sworn to by all present, occurred yesterday evening. A party of

gentlemen dined with me, and after dinner a vase, containing some orange

lilies, was placed upon the table by my directions. We drank several

toasts; but on the glorious and immortal memory being given, an _unblown

lily_, which the party had remarked, _expanded its leaves and bloomed

before us_ in all its splendour!" How appropriate are the lines of Otway

when applied to the propagators of such absurdities, who dare to call upon

our faith to give credence to their impostures.

You want to lead

My reason blindfold like a hamper'd lion

Check'd of its noble vigour; then, when baited

Down to obedient tameness, make it crouch

And show strange tricks, which you call signs of faith:

So silly souls are gull'd, and you get money.

A curious anecdote is related of Lord Chief Justice Holt. When a young

man, he happened, with some of his merry companions, to run up a score at

a country inn, which they were not able to pay. In this dilemma they

appealed to Holt, to get them out of the scrape. Our young lawyer had

observed that the inn-keeper's daughter looked very ill, and, passing

himself for a medical student, asked her father what ailed her, when he

was informed that she suffered from an ague. Holt immediately gathered

various plants, mixed them up with great ceremony, and after rolling them

up in parchment, scrawled upon the ball some cabalistic characters. The

amulet, thus prepared, he suspended round the neck of the young woman,

and, strange to say, the ague did not return. After this cure the doctor

offered to pay the bill, to which the grateful landlord would not consent,

allowing Holt and his party to leave the house.

Many years after, when on the bench, a woman was brought before him,

accused of witchcraft--the very last person tried upon such a charge. Her

only defence was, that she possessed a ball invariably efficacious in the

cure of agues. The charm was produced, handed to the judge, who recognised

the identical ball which he had prepared in his youthful frolics.

Not only did these victims of superstition firmly believe that evil

spirits had the power of inflicting disease, and afterwards salve the

mischief, but they were also invested with the privilege of killing and

subsequently restoring to life. The story related of the truly learned

Agrippa, who was falsely represented as a necromancer, is curious.

Agrippa had occasion one time to be absent for a few days from his

residence in Louvain. During his absence he intrusted his wife with the

key of his museum, but with an earnest injunction that no one on any

account should be allowed to enter it; Agrippa happened at that time to

have a boarder in his house, a young fellow of insatiable curiosity, who

constantly importuned his hostess, till at length he obtained from her the

forbidden key. The first thing that attracted his attention was a book of

spells and incantations. He spread the volume before him, and, thinking no

harm, began to read aloud. He had not long continued this occupation, when

a knock was heard at the door of the chamber. The youth took no notice,

but continued reading. Presently there followed a second and a louder

knock, which somewhat alarmed the reader. The space of a minute having

elapsed, and no answer been made, the door opened and a demon entered.

"For what purpose am I called?" said the unwelcome visitor in a stern

voice: "What is it you demand to have done?" The youth was seized with the

greatest alarm and struck speechless. The demon then rushed upon him,

seized him by the throat, and strangled him, indignant no doubt in having

been interrupted in some more interesting pursuit to no purpose.

At the expected time Agrippa came home, and to his great surprise found a

number of devils capering about, and playing strange antics on the roof of

his house. By his art he caused them to desist from their gambols, of

which he demanded the cause. The chief of them then related to him what he

had done, how he had been disturbed and insulted, and how he had thought

proper to revenge himself. Agrippa became much alarmed at the probable

consequences of this unfortunate adventure, and he ordered the demon,

without loss of time, to reanimate his victim, and walk about the streets

with him, that the public might behold him alive. The infernal spirit

reluctantly obeyed, and went forth with the student in the marketplace and

promenades. This excursion over, however, he maliciously allowed his

companion to fall down, when life once more flitted from his body. For a

time it was thought that the student had been killed by a sudden attack of

illness; but, presently, the marks of strangulation became evident, and

the truth came out. Agrippa was thus suddenly obliged to quit the town,

and seek refuge in a distant state.

It was further related of this supposed wizard, that he was always

accompanied by a familiar spirit in the shape of a black dog; and that

when he lay on his deathbed he was earnestly exhorted to repent of his

sins. Struck with remorse, he took hold of the dog, and removed from his

neck a collar studded with cabalistic nails, exclaiming, "Begone, wretched

animal, that has been the cause of my perdition!" and lo! the dog

immediately ran away, and, plunging into the river Soane, disappeared. It

is to be regretted that historians do not relate whether the water hissed

or not when the canine devil took his last leap.

It merits notice, that the mystic and medicinal celebrity of various

substances have to this hour survived the traditions of their

superstitious origin; coral, for instance, which was considered as

possessed of the power of keeping off evil spirits, and rendering effete

the malefices of the evil eye, was constantly worn as an amulet; and

Paracelsus informs us that it should be worn round the necks of infants,

as an admirable preservative against fits, sorcery, charms, and poisons.

We still find necklaces of this substance suspended by fond mothers and

nurses round the necks of infants. In the West Indies these chaplets are

worn by the negroes as a magic protection against Obiism, and they even

affirm that the colour of the coral is affected by the state of health of

the wearer, and becomes paler when he is ill.

The irrational belief in the mysterious powers of certain remedies went so

far in former days, that when they were applied to the weapon that had

inflicted an injury, their indirect sympathetic action was considered as

effectual as if they had been used to heal the wound. The sympathetic

powder of Sir Kenelm Digby, which was nothing else but pulverized green

vitriol, was eulogized in a discourse pronounced by its inventor, at

Montpellier, in 1658. Our James I. purchased this wonderful discovery from

Sir Kenelm, who pretended that he had obtained it from a Carmelite friar,

who had learned it in America and Persia. This superstitious practice is

alluded to by Walter Scott, in the "Lay of the Last Minstrel:"

But she has ta'en the broken lance,

And wash'd it from the clotted gore,

And salved the splinter o'er and o'er.

Dryden has also illustrated this absurdity in his "Enchanted Island,"

where Ariel says,

Anoint the sword which pierced him, with this

Weapon-salve, and wrap it close from air

Till I have time to visit it again.

Sir Kenelm's sympathetic powder was applied in the same manner; the weapon

being covered with ointment and dressed three times a day. But it was not

mentioned that at the same time the wound was to be brought together, and

bound up with clean linen bandages for seven days. This wonderful cure was

then simply the process of what surgeons call healing by first intention,

which means uniting the lips of the wound without suppuration. Dr. Paris

apprehends that this secret was suggested to the worthy knight by the

cures operated by the rust of the spear of Telephus, which, according to

Homer, healed the injuries it had occasioned; and this rust was most

probably verdigris.

To this day the Irish peasantry, and even many of the superior classes,

firmly believe in the malevolent and destructive effect of the evil eye,

when cast upon man or beast. Hence the absurd custom that prevails,

especially in the western provinces, of adding "God bless it," to any

expression of admiration; and if perchance a Sassenagh traveller exclaimed

"What a sweet child!" or, "What a fine cow!" without the adjunctive

benediction, he would be suspected of malefice, and the priest forthwith

summoned to save the devoted victim of sorcery. In Scotland dairy-maids

drive cattle with a switch of the mountain ash, or roan-tree, considered

as held sacred since the days of Druidism; and in some districts the sheep

and lambs are made to pass through a hoop of its wood on the first day of

May.

The toad was also considered to be possessed of marvellous qualities for

the cure of various maladies, more especially the stone that was supposed

to be occasionally found in the reptile's head, and which was called

_Crapaudina_. Lupton, in his seventh book of "Notable Things," thus

instructs us how to obtain it. "You shall knowe whether the tode stone be

the ryght and perfect stone or not. Holde the stone before a tode, so that

he may see it; and if it be a ryght and true stone, the tode will leape

towarde it and make as though he would snatch it, he envies so much that

man should have this stone." This famous toadstone is simply one of the

fossil teeth of various fishes, and is chiefly formed of phosphate of

lime. Its high polish and convexity has often induced lapidaries to have

it set in rings and other jewels, to which marvellous powers were

attached.

Pulverized toads were not only employed in medicine with supposed

advantage, but were also considered a slow but certain poison. Solander

relates, that a Roman woman, desirous of poisoning her husband gave him

this substance; but instead of attaining her criminal desire, it cured him

of a dropsy that had long perplexed him. Boccaccio relates the story of

Pasquino and Simona, two young lovers, who, wandering in a garden,

plucked some sage-leaves, with which Pasquino rubbed his teeth and gums.

In a few minutes he fell ill and expired. Simona accused of being his

assassin, was brought before a magistrate, who ordered an immediate

investigation of the matter, when, on proceeding to the garden, Simona,

after relating the particulars of the case, took some leaves from the same

plant and used them in a similar manner. In a few minutes the lovers were

reunited in death; when it was discovered that a large toad was under the

root of the plant to which it had communicated its deadly venom.

Regarding unlawful cures, have we not seen vaccination, when first

introduced, condemned from the very pulpit as an impious interference in a

disease which seemed to have been assigned to mankind by the Creator as an

inevitable doom? Did not these desperate bigots even pronounce that we

were not warranted to seek in the brute creation a human remedy or

preservative? What is still more worthy of remark, is the coincidence of a

similar idea in India, where the greatest obstacle vaccination encountered

arose from a belief that the natural smallpox was a dispensation of a

malicious deity, called _Mah-ry-Umma_, or rather that the disease was an

incarnation of the goddess herself into the person who was affected by it:

the fear of irritating her, and of exposing themselves to her resentment,

necessarily rendered the natives averse to vaccination, until it was

impressed upon their easy belief, that _Mah-ry-Umma_ had altered her mind,

and chosen this new and milder mode of manifesting her visits to her

votaries.

Could there ever have existed a more superstitious belief than that which

vested in the regal touch a healing power? Yet from Edward the Confessor

to the accession of the House of Hanover, it was generally thought in

these realms that our kings could cure scrofula with their anointed

fingers!

Dr. Paris's truly philosophic remarks on this subject, in his valuable

work, entitled Pharmacologia, are worthy of quotation:--"Credulity,

although it is nearly allied to superstition, yet differs from it widely.

Credulity is an unbounded belief in what is possible, although destitute

of proof, and perhaps of probability; but superstition is a belief in what

is wholly repugnant to the laws of the physical and moral world. Credulity

is a far greater source of error than superstition; for the latter must be

always more limited in its influence, and can exist only, to any

considerable extent, in the most ignorant portions of society; whereas

the former diffuses itself through the minds of all classes, by which the

rank and dignity of science are degraded, its valuable labours confounded

with the vain pretensions of empiricism, and ignorance is enabled to claim

for itself the prescriptive right of delivering oracles, amidst all the

triumph of truth and the progress of philosophy. Credulity has been justly

defined _belief without reason_, while scepticism, its opposite, is

_reason without belief_, and the natural and invariable consequence of

credulity; for it may be observed that men who believe without reason are

succeeded by others whom no reasoning can convince."

Curiosities of Medical Experience · 第 86 / 214 题