DWARFS.

We can scarcely believe that the ancients gave any credence to the

fabulous accounts of dwarfish nations, or could be persuaded of the

existence of those pigmies spoken of by Aristotle and other writers, who,

in all probability, described as such a species of diminutive monkeys.

Athenaeus mentions a race of dwarfs who were in perpetual war with cranes,

who harnessed partridges to their chariots, and were obliged to cut down

corn with felling-axes, like forest trees. Pliny asserts that their

constant enemy, the crane, drove them out of Thracia, but that they still

were to be met with in Ethiopia, near the source of the Nile, and above

the rise of the Ganges, where they were named _Spithania_, their stature

not exceeding three palms. Nicephorus Calixtus, in his Ecclesiastical

History, mentions an Egyptian who was not longer than a partridge, and

who, at the age of twenty-five, displayed considerable mental endowment.

Strabo, however, judiciously observed that these stories arose from the

circumstance of the small size of every animal in intemperate regions.

Various modern travellers have recorded the most absurd stories of

diminutive men, as well as of gigantic nations; but to most of them we may

apply the words of Congreve--

Fernandez Mendez Pinto was but a type of thee,

Thou liar of the first magnitude.

It is nevertheless true, that man exhibits differences of stature in

various climes. The Laplanders and Samoides in Europe, the Ostiacks and

Tungooses in Asia, the Greenlanders and Esquimaux in America--all the

natives indeed of high northern latitudes are remarkably short, measuring

little more than four feet; and Niels Sara, the Laplander mentioned by Von

Buch in his Travels, and who measured five feet eight inches, may be

considered as a gigantic exception. It had been reported by travellers,

that a nation of white dwarfs, called _Quimos_ or _Kimos_, existed in the

interior of Madagascar; but Flacourt has positively denied the fact,

although Commerson, the naturalist of Bougainville, and De Modave, confirm

the former statement. It has also been remarked by various travellers,

that dwarfs are not uncommon amongst robust and manly races, instanced in

Poland and Lithuania. Sigismund de Herbestein made the same observation in

Samogitia, the population of which was of a high stature.

It is by no means evident that climate or any external agency invariably

produces this effect; for, in the very regions inhabited by the stunted

Hottentot, the shortest race in Africa, since the Bosjernan tribe scarcely

ever exceed four feet, we find the strong and tall Kaffer. Amongst these

it is also to be remarked, that there exists a singular difference between

the sexes. Langsdorf thus expresses himself on the subject: "The Kaffer

women were mostly of low stature, very strong-limbed, and particularly

muscular in the leg: the men, on the contrary, were the finest figures I

ever beheld; they were tall, robust, and muscular. A young man of about

twenty, of six feet ten inches high, was one of the finest figures that

perhaps was ever created. He was a perfect Hercules; and a cast from his

body would not have disgraced the pedestal of the deity in the Farnese

Palace." He further adds, "There is, perhaps, no nation on earth, taken

collectively, that can produce so fine a race of men as the Kaffers: they

are tall, stout, muscular, well-made, elegant figures. They are exempt,

indeed, from many of those causes that in more civilized societies

contribute to impede the growth of the body. Their diet is simple, their

exercise of a salutary nature; their body is neither cramped nor

encumbered by clothing; the air they breathe is pure; their rest is not

disturbed by violent love, nor their minds ruffled by jealousy; they are

free from those licentious appetites which proceed frequently more from a

depraved imagination than a real natural want. Their frame is neither

shaken nor enervated by the use of intoxicating liquor; they eat when

hungry, and sleep when nature demands it. With such a kind of life,

languor and melancholy have nothing to do. The countenance of a Kaffer is

always cheerful, and the whole of his demeanour bespeaks content and peace

of mind."

Are diminutive races more productive than those of stronger formation? The

brute creation has been taken as an example in support of this opinion;

large animals producing one or two young ones, while the smaller species

are singularly prolific. The lioness seldom brings forth more than two or

four whelps, the cat will have a litter of eight or ten kittens; the

pullulation of insects is incredible. But is not this circumstance an

illustration of the wisdom of Providence? If the larger species were as

abundant as the lesser races, where could they find sustenance in regions

where the produce is, under the influence of the seasons, occasionally

abundant or scarce? In the ocean, this is not the case; the myriads of its

creatures suffice to support each other, and we therefore meet in the

deep, the largest of animals in numerous shoals, while the small fry are

generated in marvellous abundance.

That the facility of obtaining food and the nature of the nutritious

substances that animals may find, influence their stature, is evident. In

sandy and arid plains poor in pasture, we find horses and cattle of a

stunted breed: the herds of Flanders widely differ from those of Wales and

of the Ukraine, and the Scotch and Welsh cattle cannot be compared to

those of Holstein. At the same time, it must be observed, that in regard

to dwarfs, although it frequently does occur that they are labouring under

a hereditary lowness of stature, this is not invariably the case. In these

instances dwarfs may be considered as morbid phenomena. Thus Bebe, the

dwarf of Stanislaus of Poland, who was thirty-three French inches high,

was weak, of delicate health, became deformed as he grew up, and died at

the age of twenty-three; his parents were of the usual stature: whereas

the Polish nobleman Borwlaski was well-made, active, intelligent: he

measured twenty-eight inches; he had a brother of thirty-four inches, and

a sister of twenty-one. Stoeberin, of Nuerenberg, was nearly three feet high

at twenty, well-proportioned, and possessing a cultivated mind: his

parents, brothers, and sisters, were all dwarfs. Such natural dwarfs have

been known to evince brilliant qualities. Uladislas, king of Poland,

surnamed _Cubitalis_ from his only measuring a cubit in height, was

renowned for his warlike exploits; and we find a dwarf of the name of

Kasan, a khan of Tartary, boldly leading their enterprising bands. These

individuals sprung from dwarfish parents; whereas the dwarfs we generally

meet with are deformities of nature; their head is voluminous, their

intellectual faculties obtuse, they are mostly childish in their ideas and

pursuits, and are rarely able to propagate their race.

Held in contempt by the people, dwarfs naturally become peevish and

irritable; and the diminutive names given to them to match their apparent

natural imperfection tend constantly to increase their irritability. Thus

the Latins called them _Homunciones_, the Italians _Piccoluomini_, the

Flemings _Mennekin_,--whence, no doubt, our term _Mannikin_ given to

little men, and _Minikin_ applied to small pins. A very curious case of a

dwarf born from parents of the usual stature was exhibited in Paris in

1819: her name was Anne Souvray; she was born in the Vosges, and was only

thirty-three inches in height. She was at that period seventy-three years

of age; was gay, animated, good-humoured, and danced with tolerable grace

with her sister Barbe, seventy-five years of age, and taller than her by

two inches. In 1762, King Stanislaus wanted to marry her to his Bebe; the

bridegroom, however, did not live to contract so desirable a match; but,

faithful to her lover, she ever afterwards called herself _Madame Bebe_.

Jeffrey Hudson, the dwarf of King Charles, must also have been of a very

diminutive stature, since we find that he was served up in a pie to the

royal table, and jumped out when the crust was raised. It appears that

introducing live pies in those days were not an uncommon frolic; hence

there may be some truth in the old song of

Four-and-twenty black-birds bak'd in a pye,

When the pye was open'd the birds began to sing,

Was not that a dainty dish to lay before a king?