CHAPTER II

THE SOIL

The soil is the greatest of our natural resources. We may almost say

that it is greater than all the others combined, for from it comes all

of our food; a large part of it directly as plants which grow in the

soil and which we eat in the form of roots, leaves, grains, berries,

fruits, and nuts; and a part of it indirectly as animals, which have

received their food supply from the plants.

But this is not all. The soil supplies almost every known need. We build

our homes from the trees of the forest; combined with the iron that

comes from the soil they furnish our fuel, our ships, our cars, our

furniture, and countless other things. Our clothing is made from the

cotton or flax which grows from the soil, the wool from the sheep that

feed on the pastures, or from the silk-worms that feed on leaves.

So it is to the earth that we turn for every need, and Mother Nature

supplies it. But it is of the soil as it gives us our food supply that

we shall speak in this chapter, and we must first learn the nature of

the soil, and the process of its making, in order to understand the need

of extraordinary care in its management, and also how to use it so that

it will not wear out, or become exhausted, but will increase in value

for years and even centuries, as it will if properly cared for.

The earth's surface is constantly being renewed. Although the great

formative movements occurred ages ago, yet earthquakes, volcanic action,

wind, frost and water are working continual changes. Hills and mountains

have been thrown up, and nature has gone to work at once to shave down

the mountains and fill up the valleys. The whole earth is as carefully

adjusted and balanced as the wheels of a watch, but these adjustments

take place in long periods of time. In a lifetime, or even a century,

the changes of the earth's surface seem few and small, but they are none

the less sure.

The soil or humus, that is, the upper layer of the earth's crust which

is used in farming, has an average depth of about four feet, and has

been formed by decay, first and most important of all by rock decay

which is constantly going on under the surface of the earth and in

exposed places everywhere, and is caused by the action of air and water.

This process is very slow. In places where the rock is already partly

ground up, or, disintegrated, as we sometimes say, it is more rapid, but

the average growth of the soil from beneath by rock decay is scarcely

more than a foot in ten thousand years.

Some waste of this upper layer is constantly taking place from above,

caused by wind and floods, and considerable additions are made to it by

the decay of animal and vegetable matter, but in order to keep the soil

at its best, the average soil waste should not amount to more than an

inch every thousand years.

When this humus is once exhausted there is no way to repair the damage

but to wait for the slow rock-decay. In the river valleys there is no

immediate danger of exhausting the entire body of the soil, but on the

hills and in the higher regions the soil-depth is very much less than

four feet, and the danger of waste much more serious. There are parts of

the earth that were once almost as fertile as ours where great cities

once stood, but where now nothing is left but the bare rock.

So we know that the end is sure, even for the life of man upon earth,

unless we learn to conserve our soil.

The value of our farm crops can not be overestimated. In food value they

are the life of the nation; in money value, our greatest national

wealth. For the year 1909 the total value of farm products was the

amazing sum of $8,760,000,000. It may give some idea of this vast amount

to say that if we could have it in the form of twenty-dollar gold

pieces, stacked in one pile, the column would reach seven hundred miles

high. If they were laid flat, edge to edge, they would extend from

Alaska to the Panama Canal, with enough left over to reach from New York

to San Francisco. If the money could be distributed, it would give us

all, every man, woman and child in the United States, one hundred

dollars apiece. The corn crop was worth $1,720,000,000; the cotton

$850,000,000; wheat comes third with a value of $725,000,000; then come

hay, oats, and other crops in vast amounts worth hundreds of millions of

dollars. The cotton alone was worth more than the world's output of gold

and silver combined. The corn would pay for the Panama Canal, for fifty

battleships, and for the irrigation projects in the West, with a hundred

million dollars left over.

And this is all new wealth. If we build a house, we have gained the

house, but the trees of which we build it are gone. The same thing is

true of every article we manufacture. Something is taken from our store

in the making. But after we have taken these wonderful crops from our

farms the land is still there, and the soil is just as ready to produce

a good crop the next year, and the next, and the next, if we treat it

properly.

This matter of soil conservation is of the greatest importance to every

one of us. If you are to own a farm, or rent a farm, or till a garden,

or plant an orchard ten years from now, it will make a great difference

to you whether the man who owns it from now until then knows how to care

for it so as to make it produce well, or whether, by neglect, he allows

it to become poorer each year. It will make a far greater difference if

twenty years elapse.

It makes a difference to the farmer whether he gets twelve bushels of

wheat to the acre, or whether he gets twenty, for the cost of producing

the smaller amount is just as great as the cost of producing the larger,

and the extra bushels are all profit. It makes a difference whether a

garden furnishes all the fruit and vegetables needed by the family, or

whether it does not even pay for cultivation, and the food must be

bought at high prices. It makes even more difference to the dweller in

the city, who must buy all that he eats, whether food is abundant or

not. If food is abundant, prices are low, but when the yield is small

the demand is so great that prices become high.

Not only the men, but the women and children as well, are affected by

these food values, because it is from the extra money left over after

the actual cost of living is taken out that the clothing, the

house-furnishings, books, pictures, music, travel and all the pleasures

of life must come.

Great as are our harvests, we are not raising much more than enough for

our present needs. Each year we are using more of our food at home, and

have less to export to other countries. In a few years more the public

lands will all be taken, and there will be comparatively little more

land than we now cultivate to supply a population that will be many

times as great as at present.

Men who watch the great movements of the world tell us that the time is

coming before many years when there will not be food enough to supply

all our people, when we shall be buying food from other countries

instead of selling to them, when we shall have famine instead of plenty

unless we realize the danger and at once set about to make the most of

every acre of our land.

James J. Hill, the great railroad builder of the Northwest, and one of

the best informed men of the country on food production and the increase

of population, is doing a great work in pointing out these dangers to

the people on every possible occasion.

Watching the great food-producing region of the country, he has noted

that each year the yield per acre is growing less, and the population

steadily more. He tells us that when our first census was taken only

four per cent. of the people lived in cities, that fifty years ago

one-third of the people lived in cities, and two-thirds in the country,

that is, two-thirds of the people were furnishing food to the remainder.

Now conditions are almost exactly reversed. Only one-third remain in the

country, and must supply the food, not only for themselves, but for all

the two-thirds who are not food producers, so that the food supply is

lagging far behind the demand. The price of corn has advanced from

twenty-five cents to sixty-five cents a bushel in ten years, and this in

turn raises the price of live stock. And so all along the line. Prices

are growing higher all the time because not enough food is being

produced to supply the demand.

So we can see that it is absolutely necessary that the soil be properly

cared for if we are to continue to increase and prosper, for as

Secretary Wilson has said, "Upon the fertility of the soil depends the

whole business of agriculture."

The soil is exhausted in two ways: (1) By erosion, or the carrying away

of the entire soil itself. (2) By so using the soil that one or more of

its principal elements are worn out. We shall consider this form of soil

exhaustion first, because it more directly concerns the work of every

farmer.

By a fertile soil is meant one that has an abundance of plant food in

the proper proportions. The soil contains all the elements that are

needed to support life, but they are in an inorganic form, that is, they

are lifeless. Plants alone can take these inorganic substances from the

soil, and change them into starch, sugar, fats, and protein. All

animals, including man, must get these substances through plants, or

through other animals that have already absorbed them from plants.

The soil contains ten elements that are absorbed or assimilated by

plants. These are: (1) lime, (2) magnesia, (3) iron, (4) sulphur, all of

which are found in most plants in very small proportions, and are

present in most soils in quantities far beyond the needs of crops for

ages to come; (5) carbon, which is obtained by plants through their

leaves directly from the air and the sunshine; (6) hydrogen and (7)

oxygen, which are taken from the water in the soil and carried to the

leaves, where they also help to take the carbon from the atmosphere.

With none of these elements, then, does the farmer need to concern

himself in regions where the water supply is abundant, as they are, and

will continue to be, plentifully supplied by nature. But the other

three, (8) nitrogen, (9) potassium, and (10) phosphorus, are needed by

plants in large quantities, and are taken from the soil far more rapidly

than nature can replace them.

All these elements are necessary to plant life, but some plants require

a large amount of one element, others a small proportion of that, but a

large amount of some of the others. No two varieties of plants require

exactly the same proportions, so it is easy to see that the plant that

takes out of the soil any one element makes the soil less capable each

year of producing a good crop of the same kind.

In the early days of farming in this country, it was the custom to grow

a single crop, which had been found to give good results, year after

year in the same field. In Virginia and other near-by states nearly all

the best land was given every year to the cultivation of tobacco, which

exhausts the soil rapidly. In the states farther north other crops were

planted in the same way. As a result, some of the most fertile soil in

Virginia, the Carolinas, Massachusetts, and other eastern states has

been so exhausted that it is no longer worth cultivating. Everywhere

throughout the New England states are to be found these worn-out farms,

and, while they were never so fertile as the lands of the Mississippi

Valley, each one was rich enough to support a family in comfort, with

something left to sell; but because they were required to produce the

same crops, and so take the same element from the soil, year after year,

they have become so lacking in one of the essential elements that they

are unfit for cultivation, and have been abandoned.

It is wisdom and good business policy for farmers to study carefully

this question of plant food and to learn what each crop is taking from

the soil, so that it may be replaced. It has been found by long and

careful experiments, that when land has been "single cropped," as this

abuse of the land is called, for a long time, the soil has been almost

entirely deprived of its nitrogen. As you know, nitrogen is one of the

elements of the air, so that there is a never-ending supply, but most

plants are unable to take it from the air, and until the last few years

the task of replacing nitrogen in the soil was considered impossible.

Recent discoveries, however, have shown that there are two ways in which

it may be done. By means of electricity, nitrogen may be directly

combined with the other elements of the soil. The other method is

nature's own plan, and so is easier and cheaper. It has been found that

while most plants exhaust the nitrogen from the soil, one class of

plants, the legumes, of which beans, peas, clover, and alfalfa are the

best known, have the power of drawing large stores of nitrogen from the

air, and, by means of bacteria attached to their roots, restoring it to

the ground.

So farmers have learned that if they plant corn one year, it is wiser

not to plant corn in the same field the next year, but to sow wheat,

which requires less nitrogen, and the following year to sow clover, so

that the nitrogen which the corn and wheat have taken from the soil, may

be put back into it. If the land be naturally fertile, and has been well

cared for, the soil is then ready to produce a good crop of corn again.

If the soil has become worn-out and the farmer is trying to improve its

general condition, he can gain better results by keeping the field in

clover a second year, when a profitable crop of clover seed may be had

from the land. This system of changing each year, and alternating cereal

crops, which take the nitrogen from the soil, with leguminous plants,

which restore it to the soil again, is called "rotation of crops," and

if regularly followed will preserve a proper balance of nitrogen in the

soil.

In some parts of the West there is a lack of decaying vegetable matter

in the soil, because the few plants which naturally grow there have

small roots, and leave little vegetable material behind when they decay.

For this condition one of the best crops to employ in rotation is

sugar-beets, because they strike many small roots deep into the earth.

As these decay, each leaves behind a tiny load of vegetable mold deep in

the earth, and also makes the soil more porous. As the principal

elements of the soil needed by sugar-beets are carbon and oxygen, which

are absorbed from the air and sunshine, and as the beets can be sold at

a good profit, it is an excellent crop to employ in rotation. In the

United States records in various states show that where sugar-beets are

used in rotation, the wheat and corn yield is increased from two to four

times, and in Germany they are largely used to restore the fertility of

the land, even if the sugar-beets themselves are sold at a loss.

It is most important that farmers should understand the principle of

rotation of crops, because nothing is taken from the soil so quickly or

in such large quantities as nitrogen, and nothing is so easily put back;

while, if it is not so replaced, the land becomes worthless.

A comparison of the results of single cropping and the rotation of crops

has been clearly shown at the Experiment Station of the Agricultural

College of the State of Minnesota, where for ten years they have planted

corn on one plot of ground. For the first five years it averaged a

little more than twenty bushels per acre, and for the last five years,

eleven bushels.

On another plot, where corn was planted in rotation, the average yield

was more than forty-eight bushels, the difference in average in the two

plots being thirty-two bushels, or twice the value of the entire average

yield on the exhausted ground. The corn grown at the end of the ten

years was only about three feet high, the ears were small, and the

grains light in weight. But it cost just as much to cultivate the land

that produced it as it did to cultivate the land that produced

forty-eight bushels.

Of the other two elements, potassium is found abundantly in most soils.

It is also found in a readily soluble form in various parts of the

United States and is sold at a very low price. But even if these

deposits were exhausted we could still use the rocks which are very rich

in potassium, and are very abundant, in a pulverized form, or potash

could be manufactured from them.

The only remaining element of the soil is phosphorus. This element was

discovered in 1607, the year of the first English settlement at

Jamestown and was first noticed because of its property of giving off

light from itself. The name which was given it means light-bearer. It

was at first thought to be the source of all power, to heal all

diseases, and to turn the common minerals into gold. Although we have

long ago learned that these ideas are absurd, yet we have also learned

that its real value to man is far greater than was even dreamed of then.

It is the most important element in every living thing, for no cell,

however small, in either animal or vegetable organisms can grow or even

live without phosphorus. It is found in the green of the leaves, and

helps to make the starch. It enters largely into the grain and seeds of

plants, and is necessary for their germination, or sprouting, as well as

their growth. Three-fourths of all the phosphorus in a crop of cereals

is in the grains, giving them size and weight. It will thus be seen how

necessary it is that the soil which feeds our plants, which in turn

become the food of animals and of man, should contain a sufficient

amount of phosphorus.

Phosphorus is taken from the soil in large quantities by every kind of

crop. In parts of Wisconsin which have been farmed a little more than

fifty years without fertilizing, it is found that about one-third of the

phosphorus has been taken out of the soil, which would mean that in one

hundred and fifty years, or a hundred years from now, the soil would be

incapable of producing any living thing, and long before that time the

crops would not pay for the labor of producing them. Almost every acre

of land that has been farmed for ten years without fertilization is

deficient in phosphorus, that is, so much has been used that the soil

can no longer produce at its former rate.

It may be asked, if this be true, why the soil of America, which before

it was cultivated had borne rich forests and fields of waving grass, has

not become exhausted long ago. We must remember that nature always

adjusts itself; that, in the wild state, all plants decay where they

grow, and the same elements are returned again to the soil. But when the

entire product of vast areas is removed year after year, the soil has

nothing except the slow rock-decay with which to renew itself.

In tropical regions it is not necessary to feed domestic animals at any

season of the year, but in those countries where the natural food can be

found only during a part of the year, the need of artificial feeding is

seen at once, and it becomes a part of the regular expense of farming.

It would be considered the height of folly for a man to allow his

valuable animals to starve to death because of the expense of feeding

them, but few people recognize the fact, which is also true, that it is

equally bad business policy to allow the valuable crops of wheat, oats,

and corn to starve for want of plant food.

The phosphates (that is, phosphorus) are the only large items of

expense, and in a large measure this may be lessened by raising live

stock, for which high prices can be obtained either as meat or dairy

products, and returning the manure, which contains a large amount of

phosphate, to the soil. If all the waste animal products could be

returned to the land, Professor Van Hise says, three-fourths of the

phosphorus would be replaced. All animal products are rich in

phosphates. The packing houses manufacture large quantities from the

bones and blood of animals.

The garbage of cities, when reduced to powder, yields large returns in

phosphorus. It is said that if the sewage of cities, which in this

country is often turned into rivers and streams, polluting them and

causing disease, was reduced to commercial fertilizer, it would supply

the equivalent of from six to nine pounds of rock phosphate per year for

every acre of cultivated land in the United States. And this valuable

product is now totally lost, and worse than lost, since it menaces the

life and health of great numbers of our people.

There still remain to be considered the rock phosphates, the form in

which phosphorus is found in separate deposits. The only large deposits

that have been used are in Florida, South Carolina, and Tennessee, and

from them about two and a quarter million tons were mined in 1907.

Unfortunately, however, there is no law that prevents its export from

this country, and almost half of this found its way to Europe, where it

is eagerly sought at high prices.

Within a short time valuable phosphate beds, more extensive than any

before known to exist in this country, have been discovered in Utah,

Wyoming, and Idaho. Professor Van Hise, who is one of the highest

authorities on the subject, says of these deposits that with the

exception of our coal and iron lands, they are our most precious mineral

possession; that every ounce should be saved for the time which is

coming when the population will have outgrown the capacity of the land,

and means of increasing its fertility in order to prevent famine will be

sought from every possible source.

The other great waste of the soil is by erosion, or the wearing away of

the soil by stream-flow. We can all see this in a small way by wandering

along the shore of any swift-running stream and noticing how the banks

are worn away, and what deep gullies and ravines are cut into them by

the water running down from the fields above. Another way in which we

can observe the effect of this waste is by noticing the muddy yellow

color of streams during floods and after heavy rains, and comparing it

with the clear blue of the same stream at ordinary times.

When we realize that this muddy color always means that the water is

filled with soil, all that it will hold in solution, that it is carrying

away the top soil, which is best for agriculture, and, finally, that

every little streamlet and creek, as well as the mightiest river, is

carrying this rich soil-deposit downward toward the sea in its flow, we

begin to see how great a factor erosion is in the wasting of the land.

The Missouri River, which drains a large area of wheat and corn land, is

notable as a muddy, yellow river at almost all seasons. Do you

understand what that means? It means that this great productive region

is growing poorer each year, and that as the population increases, and

the need of great harvests increases, the land is becoming less able to

produce them. The Mississippi River is said to tear down from its banks

more soil each year than is to be dredged from the Panama Canal. At the

mouth of the river is a delta many miles in extent, formed wholly of

land that has been carried down the river. The soil in lower Mississippi

and Louisiana is almost black, and is in many places seventy feet in

depth, and it has all been left there by the river, which took it from

the higher lands.

It is estimated that our rivers carry out to sea one billion tons of our

richest soil each year. The ancient Egyptians worshiped the Nile because

each year the spring floods left behind the rich soil deposits that

fertilized their fields and gave them an abundant harvest. Entire fields

and even whole farms along the upper stretches of the Mississippi and

Missouri have been carried away, not the top soil only, but the land

itself, by the swift current of the springtime floods as they cut a new

channel for the river.

Canaan, the "land of promise" of the Bible, was once an abundant region,

"flowing with milk and honey" in the language of Moses, with its grapes,

its vast forests of cedar, fir, and oak, its treasures of wheat,

olive-oil, and other rich agricultural products. Now all are gone. The

entire country seen by the traveler in the Holy Land to-day is one of

the most desolate regions on the globe, where the few inhabitants are

scarcely able to obtain a scanty living.

We wonder what has brought about this change, and we have not far to

seek in answer to our questioning. The preservation of the forests means

the preservation of the soil, and the destruction of the forests means

the destruction of the soil. This is the universal law. First the

forests were cut down and the hillsides left bare. Then the streams wore

great ravines down the unprotected hillsides. Steadily the work of

destruction by erosion has gone on, until time beyond our possibility to

comprehend must pass before the land can be made productive again. The

hills and valleys of China have been devastated in the same way, and

many of the older regions of the earth that were once the sites of great

cities and extensive commerce are now marked only by the ruins of the

civilization that has passed away. They have almost ceased to support

life.

In the days of Rome's greatness, Sicily was known as "the granary of

Rome" because from this little island came the grains to supply her vast

armies. 12,000,000 bushels of grain was the tribute that Rome claimed of

Sicily each year, and yet Sicily had enough left to make her rich. She

built splendid cities and became great. But the same story of

destruction is to be read in the history of Sicily. Now the entire

island does not raise a million and a half bushels of wheat altogether.

The soil is barren. The cities have nearly all fallen into ruin. The

people are scattered. Thousands have come to America, seeking a poor

living at the lowest wages because at home there was no chance to earn

even the little they require. They allowed the soil to become exhausted

by lack of fertilization and by erosion and it long ago ceased to

support the people. All the rest followed naturally.

In many parts of our own country this same danger is coming on us. It is

only the beginning, but the end is as sure for us as for those far-off

Eastern countries.

Millions of acres have already been destroyed in the East and South. The

Appalachian mountain system lies not far from the coast, and the rivers

on the eastern slopes are short and swift. It is necessary, then, to

exercise the greatest care of the forests in order to prevent the floods

in this region from carrying away the lands in their swift rush to the

sea. North Carolina was one of the richest states in the Union in

natural resources a hundred years ago. Now it is low on the list in

agricultural products. The forests on its mountain tops were valuable

for their lumber, their turpentine, pitch, and other products, and great

lumber companies have almost denuded the hillsides, regardless of the

fate of the lands they cut over. The people of the state are powerless

to prevent this except by buying all of these lands and replanting the

forests. They have been pleading with Congress for power to stop the

destruction of their forests and the wasting of their lands, but so far

have received no assistance and meanwhile the land grows poorer each

year. The same conditions are to be found in many other states that now

rank high agriculturally, but in North Carolina we are beginning to see

results.

In order to understand exactly how the damage is done to the land, let

us suppose a case which has actually occurred in hundreds of places. A

farmer owned a farm on the mountain side. Much of it was good wheat

land, but the top was covered with forests. At last he decided to cut

and sell the timber, and use the land for raising more wheat. He did

so, but now there was no spreading foliage to check the dash of the

heavy rains as they fell to the ground. As they sank below the surface

there were no masses of tangled roots to hold the moisture in the soil

and to carry it up into the air again through the trees.

As the water penetrated deeper, the soil became softened, and was

carried away down the hillside. It was only a muddy little stream, but

it took away some of the richest soil from the fields, and the next

year's crop was not quite so good. Every rain that fell carried more of

the fertile soil down the hillside, and the next year the farmer

wondered that the yield was still less. After a few years he ceased to

sow the field because it had never paid for its cultivation, and was

constantly growing poorer. But it was too late then to repair the damage

that had been done. There were no seeds of forest trees left in the

ground and the farmer did not plant them, so the ground lay idle and

desolate. The rain wore deep gullies down the hillside, which, as they

grew larger, became more of a menace to the lands below them. The

streams soon grew large enough to take the top-soil from the fields

lower down, and in a few years more the whole farm had grown so

unproductive that the farmer, tired of the struggle, left the farm and

went to the city to make a living.

In the meantime the land in the valley below had been growing more

fertile, for each year the spring floods had left a rich soil deposit

behind them. The farmer down there had been innocently stealing the land

above him, but not all of it, for much had been carried out to sea.

It is not possible to prevent this entirely, but much of the loss might

have been avoided by leaving the hilltops, which are never well fitted

for cultivation, covered with forests. In this way the soil-wash from

above is prevented and the streams run gently and with only a small

amount of muddy deposit, forming proper drainage for the soil.

The preserving of the forests on the great mountain ranges of the

country, where nature has placed them, will mean in the one matter of

soil-wash, fruitful lands and bountiful harvests, instead of barren,

wasted lands, desolated by floods and seamed by great ravines, carrying

desolation to the lands below them.

But in many cases the trees are already cut away. Here replanting

becomes necessary and should be done in every case where soil-wash is

beginning on the mountain tops. It is almost equally desirable to plant

small shrubs and bushes as an undergrowth, so that the roots may form a

thick mat below the ground to hold the water in the soil, and permit it

to filter through slowly.

In Massachusetts, the tracks of the Boston and Albany Railroad are

depressed so that trains may pass below the level of the highways. In

order to protect the banks from erosion, the sloping sides of this

roadway have been planted with trailing rose-bushes and other vines

which have thickly matted roots. These serve a double purpose in

preventing landslides and washouts on the tracks, and in adding greatly

to the attractiveness of the scenery along the railway.

The poorest land of a farm is always found on the hilltops, because even

with the greatest care there is always considerable waste of the

top-soil. This land, then, should never be used for field crops. It

should constitute the woodland, or if this is not possible, the

pasture-land of the farm, for the grass roots protect the soil and

prevent it from washing away, and the profits on the hay are at least as

great as any other crop which could be grown on hill land.

But when erosion has been checked and the top-soil preserved, when the

soil is thoroughly fertilized, and a proper rotation of crops

established, there are still other lessons to be learned in order to

make our country as productive as it might be, as it will _need_ to be

to support the population that we shall have by the end of the century.

As a nation we undertake to farm too much land and do it carelessly.

The invention of labor-saving machinery has made it possible to farm

hundreds and even thousands of acres together with little physical

labor. This has made farmers heedless of small amounts of land wasted.

A man often only expects to make a comfortable living on one hundred and

sixty acres of land, while in Europe he would expect to grow rich on two

or three acres. It is often said that a French family would live off of

an American farmer's neglected fence-corners. In France, in England, in

Holland and Belgium every bit of land is tended and made useful. We have

the best natural soil in the world, the most fertile river valleys,

watered by abundant rains. The fertility of our lands is the envy of the

civilized world, and has drawn thousands to our shores in the hope of

finding comfort and plenty, and yet the total value of our farm products

was only eleven dollars and thirty-eight cents per cultivated acre

according to the last census, while in the little island of Jersey, just

off the English coast, the average annual value of products is over two

hundred and fifty dollars per acre.

Germany has been cultivated nearly eighteen hundred years, the soil is

not naturally so productive nor the climate so favorable as ours, but

the wheat yield there averages more than twice as much as in this

country.

When the most fertile land in the world produces so much less than

poorer lands elsewhere it plainly shows that we are robbing the soil in

order to get the largest cash returns in the shortest possible time and

with the least possible labor.

The American farmer needs to cultivate a much smaller amount of land

thoroughly, to have a soil analysis made of his land in order to know

what crops are best suited to it and what elements are lacking to make

it produce the best. In Illinois more than half a million acres had

become unfit for cultivation. Analysis showed that the soil was too

acid. By mixing limestone dust with the soil the trouble was corrected

and the land reclaimed.

Often it is only necessary to find the cause of some deficiency, or

lack, in the soil, and the remedy will be found to be simple and cheap,

while the result of its use will be to double the crop. Nothing else so

quickly and easily responds to proper treatment, no other resource is so

easily conserved. All the soil needs is proper treatment.

Every bit of waste land should be cultivated for either use or beauty,

or both. If all the lanes and neglected places could be planted with

fruit and nut trees, berry vines, and bushes, herbs or flowers which

need little cultivation after they are planted, our food, in variety and

quantity, would be greatly increased. "The hedge-rows of Old England"

are famous for their beauty and the air of comfort and prosperity they

give. They take the place of the weeds that grow by the country

roadsides in America and which constitute one of the greatest nuisances

of the farmer.

Another thing that should be considered is the marketing of farm

products. Near a city or near a canning factory the soil can be most

profitably used for the raising of vegetables, for which the cost of

cultivation is great, but which yield far larger profits than farm

crops.

Within the last few years a new system of farming has been developed in

the West, which is of great interest to all of us, both because it is

opening up for production a large part of our country that has seemed

valueless, and because the lessons that have been learned there are of

the greatest advantage in every part of the country.

West of the one-hundredth meridian, which crosses North and South

Dakota, the western part of Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, and

including the states west of them, lies a vast region that used to be

known as the "great American desert." It comprises almost half of the

United States. Here the noble forests of the eastern states and the

prairie grasses of the plains were replaced by sage-brush and cactus.

The soil was light in color and weight, and the rainfall very scanty.

It seemed impossible that it could ever be fitted for agriculture. But

there were a few great rivers, rich mining districts, and excellent

grazing lands. These attracted settlers, and to them some cultivation of

the soil became almost a necessity. The waste waters of the rivers were

used for irrigation and the land when watered was found to produce

remarkably fine fruits and agricultural products. Yet there were

hundreds of thousands of acres that could not be irrigated for lack of

water, and the problem of finding a use for these barren, semi-arid

lands remained unsolved for many years.

But here and there in different states and under varying conditions,

after many experiments and failures, men began without water to grow

successful crops on these semi-arid lands, where the rainfall was

scarcely more than ten inches per year. Others following this method

found success, and it began to seem possible that all this territory

might some day become a great farming region.

By comparing the methods employed in different states, the few general

laws have been worked out which must be applied in order to farm

successfully in this region, though the details differ with local

differences in altitude, climate, soil, and rainfall. Here farming is

being reduced to a science. In other parts of the country a man sows his

seed and nature cares for it, and gives him his harvest; but here he

must wring from nature all that he gets, so it is only the man who farms

according to fixed laws who can hope to succeed.

This system is usually called "dry farming," though "scientific farming"

would perhaps be a better name, for the same principles that are

absolutely necessary here will greatly increase the yield anywhere. The

most important principle is to conserve every particle of moisture in

the soil. It is necessary to go deep into the soil to find the

underlying moisture. The seed-bed is made very deep. Plowing is from

sixteen to nineteen inches deep, while in well-watered regions it is

only about six inches. This deep seed-bed is thoroughly cultivated to

make the soil porous, the soil being reduced to a fine powder. After

sowing the seed, the ground is packed as solidly as possible. This is

done by especially designed machines. The surface of the soil is kept

broken all the time to prevent the escape of the moisture. This rule

applies equally to all soils in dry weather, and will often save a crop

of corn in any part of the country during a drought.

These are simple rules, but the practice of them is opening up the great

semi-arid regions, not of the United States only, but of the whole

earth. Western Canada, a large part of Australia, the Kalahari Desert of

Africa, and many parts of Asia, which are all semi-arid, will in time

become productive instead of barren.

It must be remarked that the grains of the East could not

withstand the severe winters in a large part of the Northwest, so

the Department of Agriculture sent men all over the world to find

drought-and-cold-resisting grains. They found a hard winter wheat, the

most nutritious in existence, which is now growing all the way from the

Dakotas to the Pacific Ocean, producing crops far above the yield of the

eastern states. 50,000,000 bushels of this wheat was raised in 1907.

The soil is the natural disintegrated rock, rich in the mineral

elements, but lacking in decayed vegetable matter. The crops soon

exhaust the nitrogen, and as clover and the common alfalfas can not grow

there, the problem of finding legumes has been the most serious one

facing this new region; but in Siberia the Agricultural Department has

recently found a new clover and three varieties of alfalfa that will

stand the cold, and Secretary Wilson believes that these will solve the

problem.

Every acre brought under cultivation adds to the world's food supply.

Can we even dream of what it will mean when 200,000,000 acres are added

to the farm lands of this continent? It means prosperity for the farmers

themselves, homes for those who are now crowded in cities, work for the

idle, and food for the hungry. It means wealth and happiness for

thousands now living and millions yet to come.

REFERENCES

Lands. Report National Conservation Commission.

Soil Wastage. Chamberlain. Report White House Conference of Governors.

Conservation of Soils. Van Hise. (Same.)

Commercial Fertilizers. Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin, 44.[A]

[Footnote A: Department of Agriculture bulletins are free unless a price

is indicated, and may be obtained by application to The Department of

Agriculture. Washington, D. C. Postage is free in the United States.

These bulletins contain the latest scientific information and result of

research work by the government.]

The Liming of Soils. Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin, 57.

Renovation of Worn-out Soils. Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin, 245.

Soil Fertility. Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin, 257.

Management of Soils to Conserve Moisture. Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin,

266.

Fertilizers for Cotton Soils. Bureau of Soils Bulletin, 62.

Work of the Bureau of Soils. Bureau of Soils Bulletin.

Exhaustion and Abandonment of Soils. Bureau of Soils Bulletin. Whitney,

5c.

Phosphorus. Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin.

The Present Status of the Nitrogen Problem. Yearbook Dept. of

Agriculture Reprint, 411.

The Search for Leguminous Forage Crops. Yearbook Dept. of Agriculture

Reprint, 478.

Leguminous Crops. Yearbook Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin, 278.

Progress in Legume Inoculation. Yearbook Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin,

315.

A Grain for Semi-arid Lands. Yearbook Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin,

139.

The Sugar-Beet. Yearbook Dept. of Agriculture Bulletin, 52.

Dry-Land Problems in the Great Plains Area. Yearbook Dept. of

Agriculture Reprint, 461.

Reports of Dry Farming Congress.

The Natural Wealth of the Land. J. J. Hill, Report Governor's

Conference.

National Wealth and the Farm. J. J. Hill.

Checking the Waste: A Study in Conservation · 第 2 / 14 章