DE BECOURT.

I have come in the way of a work, entitled _The Grave of Human

Philosophies_ (1827), translated from the French of R. de Becourt[441] by

A. Dalmas. It supports, but I suspect not very accurately, the views of the

old Hindu books. {278} That the sun is only 450 miles from us, and only 40

miles in diameter, may be passed over; my affair is with the state of mind

into which persons of M. Becourt's temperament are brought by a fancy. He

fully grants, as certain, four millions of years as the duration of the

Hindu race, and 1956 as that of the universe. It must be admitted he is not

wholly wrong in saying that our errors about the universe proceed from our

ignorance of its origin, antiquity, organization, laws, and final

destination. Living in an age of light, he "avails himself of that

opportunity" to remove this veil of darkness, etc. The system of the

Brahmins is the only true one: he adds that it has never before been

attempted, as it could not be obtained except by him. The author requests

us first, to lay aside prejudice; next, to read all he says in the order in

which he says it: we may then pronounce judgment upon a work which begins

by taking the Brahmins for granted. All the paradoxers make the same

requests. They do not see that compliance would bring thousands of systems

before the world every year: we have scores as it is. How is a poor candid

inquirer to choose. Fortunately, the mind has its grand jury as well as its

little one: and it will not put a book upon its trial without a _prima

facie_ case in its favor. And with most of those who really search for

themselves, that case is never made out without evidence of knowledge,

standing out clear and strong, in the book to be examined.

A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume II · 第 97 / 123 题