IMPALEMENT BY REQUEST.

_Athenaeum_, August, 19, 1865. _Notice to Correspondents._

"R. W.--If you will consult the opening chapter of the Budget of Paradoxes,

you will see that the author presents only works in his own library at a

given date; and this for a purpose explained. For ourselves we have

carefully avoided allowing any writers to present themselves in our columns

on the ground that the Budget has passed them over. We gather that Mr. De

Morgan contemplates additions at a future time, perhaps in a separate and

augmented work; if so, those who complain that others of no greater claims

than themselves have been ridiculed may find themselves where they wish to

be. We have done what we can for you by forwarding your letter to Mr. De

Morgan."

The author of "An Essay on the Constitution of the Earth," published in

1844, demanded of the _Athenaeum_, as an _act of fairness_, that a letter

from him should be published, proving that he had as much right to be

"impaled" as Capt. Drayson. He holds, on speculative grounds, what the

other claims to have proved by measurement, namely, that the earth is

growing; and he believes that in time--a good long time, not _our_

time--the earth and other planets may grow into suns, with systems of their

own.

This gentleman sent me a copy of his work, after the commencement of my

Budget; but I have no recollection of having received it, and I cannot find

it on the (nursery? {134} quarantine?) shelves on which I keep my

unestablished discoveries. Had I known of this work in time, (see the

Introduction) I should of course, have impaled it (heraldically) with the

other work; but the two are very different. Capt. Drayson professes to

prove his point by results of observation; and I think he does not succeed.

The author before me only speculates; and a speculator can get any

conclusion into his premises, if he will only build or hire them of shape

and size to suit. It reminds me of a statement I heard years ago, that a

score of persons, or near it, were to dine inside the skull of one of the

aboriginal animals, dear little creatures! Whereat I wondered vastly,

nothing doubting; facts being stubborn and not easy drove, as Mrs. Gamp

said. But I soon learned that the skull was not a real one, but

artificially constructed by the methods--methods which have had striking

verifications, too--which enable zoologists to go the whole hog by help of

a toe or a bit of tail. This took off the edge of the wonder: a hundred

people can dine inside an inference, if you draw it large enough. The

method might happen to fail for once: for instance, the toe-bone might have

been abnormalized by therian or saurian malady; and the possibility of such

failure, even when of small probability, is of great alleviation. The

author before me is, apparently, the sole fabricator of his own premises.

With vital force in the earth and continual creation on the part of the

original Creator, he expands our bit of a residence as desired. But, as the

Newtoness of Cookery observed, First catch your hare. When this is done,

when you _have_ a growing earth, you shall dress it with all manner of

proximate causes, and serve it up with a growing Moon for sauce, a growing

Sun, if it please you, at the other end, and growing planets for

side-dishes. Hoping this amount of impalement will be satisfactory, I go on

to something else. {135}

A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume II · 第 52 / 123 题