AGAIN AT THE MARTELLO TOWER

Now that regattas are over and oysters have come in again, our little

port has returned to its normal or W. W. Jacobs demeanour. The bathers

on the sand-spit have struck their tents. The Salvation Army band is

practising its winter repertory. When our blue-eyed boatman rowed us over

to the Martello tower again the other day, he almost looked as though

he expected little more than his legal fare. Selina, who has the gift

of management, suggested that Patty should try it on with him, on the

ground, first, that women always do these things better than men, and,

second, that Patty was blue-eyes’ favourite. I acquiesced, and Patty

borrowed half-a-crown of me, so as to be prepared when the time came.

Meanwhile Selina began to read us extracts from Professor Henri Bergson

on “Laughter.” Selina is a serious person without, so far as I have ever

discovered, a grain of humour in her composition. These are just the

people who read theories of laughter. It is a mystery to them, and they

desire to have it explained. “A laughable expression of the face,” began

Selina, “is one that will make us think of something rigid and, so to

speak, coagulated, in the wonted mobility of the face. What we shall see

will be an ingrained twitching or a fixed grimace. One would say that

the person’s whole moral life has crystallized into this particular cast

of features.”

“I wonder whether Mr. George Robey’s whole moral life has,” dropped

Patty, innocently.

“And who, pray,” said Selina, with her heavy eyebrows making semi-circles

of indignant surprise, “is Mr. George Robey?”

I sat silent. I had just brought my niece back from a short but

variegated stay in town. I knew, but I would not tell.

“Why, Selina, dear,” answered Patty, “you are the very image of him with

your eyebrows rounded like that. He is always glaring at the audience

that way.”

“_Will_ you, Patty,” said Selina, now thoroughly roused, “be good enough

to tell me who he _is_?”

“Well, he’s an actor, who makes the very faces your Bergson describes.

Uncle took me to see him in a” (catching my warning eye)—“in a sort of

historical play. He was Louis XV., at Versailles, you know.”

“H’m,” said Selina, “it’s rather a doubtful period; and the very best

historical plays do make such a hash of history. Was it in blank verse?

Blank verse will do much to mitigate the worst period.”

“N-no,” answered Patty, “I don’t think it was in blank verse. I didn’t

notice; did you, Uncle?”

I tried to prevaricate. “Well, you never know about blank verse on the

stage nowadays, nearly all the actors turn it into prose. Mr. Robey may

have been speaking blank verse, as though it were prose. The best artists

cannot escape the fashion of the moment, you know.”

“But what did he do?” insisted Selina, “What was the action of the play?”

Patty considered. “I don’t remember his doing anything, Selina, dear, but

chuck the ladies of the Court under the chin. Oh, yes, and he made eyes

at them affectionately.”

“A pretty sort of historical play, on my word!” exclaimed Selina.

“Oh, it wasn’t _all_ historical, Selina, dear,” said Patty, sweetly. “A

lot of it was thoroughly modern, and Mr. Robey wore a frock coat, and

such a funny little bowler hat, and another time he was a street musician

in Venice with a stuffed monkey pinned to his coat-tails.”

Selina looked at me. There was a silent pause that would have made

anybody else feel uncomfortable, but I was equal to the occasion. I

snatched Selina’s book out of her hand, and said, cheerfully, “You see,

Selina, it’s all explained here. Wonderful fellow, Bergson. ‘Something

mechanical encrusted upon the living,’ that’s the secret of the comic.

Depend upon it, he had seen George Robey and the stuffed monkey. And if

Bergson, who’s a tremendous swell, member of the institute, and all that,

why not Patty and I?”

“And where,” asked Selina, with a rueful glance at the Bergson book,

as though she began to distrust theories of the comic, “where was this

precious performance?”

“At the Alhambra,” answered Patty, simply.

“The Alhambra! I remember Chateaubriand once visited it,” said Selina,

who is nothing if not literary, “but I didn’t know it was the haunt of

philosophers.”

I looked as though it was, but Patty tactlessly broke in, “Oh, I wish

you two wouldn’t talk about philosophers. Can’t one laugh at Mr. Robey

without having him explained by Bergson? Anyhow, I don’t believe he can

explain Mr. Nelson Keys.”

“Another of your historical actors?” inquired Selina with some bitterness.

“Yes, Selina, dear, and much more historical than Mr. Robey. He played

Beau Brummell and they were all there, Fox and Sheridan and the Prince of

Wales, you know, all out of your favourite Creevey, and they said ‘egad’

and ‘la’ and ‘monstrous fine,’ and bowed and congee’d like anything—oh,

it was awfully historical.”

Selina, a great reader of memoirs, was a little mollified. “Come,” she

said, “this is better—though the Regency is another dangerous period. I’m

glad, however, that Londoners seem to be looking to the theatre for a

little historical instruction.”

“Yes, Selina,” I said, feeling that it would be dangerous to let Patty

speak just at that moment, “and there is a certain type of contemporary

play, called _revue_, which recognizes that demand and seldom, if

ever, fails to cater for it. In _revues_ I have renewed acquaintance

with the heroes of classical antiquity, with prominent crusaders, with

Queen Elizabeth, with the Grand Monarque—a whole course of history, in

fact. Let Bergson explain that, if he can. And, what is more wonderful

still, our _revue_ artists, whose talent is usually devoted to provoking

laughter, seem willingly to forgo it for the honour of appearing as an

historical personage. Mr. Robey and Mr. Keys, I should tell you, are

both professional laughter-provokers, indeed are the heads of their

profession, yet one is content to posture as Louis Quinze and the other

as Beau Brummell without any real chance of being funny. So the past ever

exerts its prestige over us. So the muse of history still weaves her

spell.”

“Which was the muse of history, Patty, dear?” said Selina, whose

equanimity was now happily restored.

“Oh, bother, I forget,” said Patty, “and, anyhow, I don’t think she has

as much to do with _revues_ as uncle pretends. Give me the real muse of

_revue_ who inspired Mr. Keys with his German waiter and his Spanish

mandolinist and his Japanese juggler and——”

“This,” I said, to put an end to Patty’s indiscreet prattle, “must be the

muse of geography.”

Patty gave me no change out of my half-crown. The boatman said he didn’t

happen to have any. So much for Selina’s management!

Pastiche and prejudice · 第 42 / 60 题