CHAPTER XXXIV

THE LATER REIGN OF WILLIAM III, AND THE REGENCY OF

QUEEN EMMA, 1872-1898

The death of Thorbecke was the signal for a growing cleavage between the

old _doctrinaire_ school of liberals, who adhered to the principles of

1848, and the advanced liberalism of many of the younger progressive

type. To Gerrit de Vries was entrusted the duty of forming a ministry,

and he had the assistance of the former first minister, F. van de Putte.

His position was weakened by the opposition of the Catholic party, who

became alienated from the liberals, partly on the religious education

question, but more especially because their former allies refused to

protest against the Italian occupation of Rome. The election of 1873 did

not improve matters, for it left the divided liberals to face an

opposition of equal strength, whenever the conservatives,

anti-revolutionaries and Catholics acted together. This same year saw

the first phase of the war with the piratical state of Achin. An

expedition of 3600 men under General Köhler was sent out against the

defiant sultan in April, 1873, but suffered disaster, the General

himself dying of disease. A second stronger expedition under General van

Swieten was then dispatched, which was successful; and the sultan was

deposed in January, 1874. This involved heavy charges on the treasury;

and the ministry, after suffering two reverses in the Second Chamber,

resigned (June, 1874), being succeeded by a Heemskerk coalition

ministry.

Heemskerk in his former premiership had shown himself to be a clever

tactician, and for three years he managed to maintain himself in office

against the combined opposition of the advanced liberals, the

anti-revolutionaries and the Catholics. Groen van Prinsterer died in

May, 1876; and with his death the hitherto aristocratic and exclusive

party, which he had so long led, became transformed. Under its new

leader, Abraham Kuyper, it became democratised, and, by combining its

support of the religious principle in education with that of progressive

reform, was able to exercise a far wider influence in the political

sphere. Kuyper, for many years a Calvinist pastor, undertook in 1872 the

editorship of the anti-revolutionary paper, _De Standdard_. In 1874 he

was elected member for Gouda, but resigned in order to give his whole

time to journalism in the interest of the political principles to which

he now devoted his great abilities.

The Heemskerk ministry had the support of no party, but by the

opportunist skill of its chief it continued in office for three years;

no party was prepared to take its place, and "the government of the king

must be carried on." The measures that were passed in this time were

useful rather than important. An attempt to deal with primary

instruction led to the downfall of the ministry. The elections of 1877

strengthened the liberals; and, an amendment to the speech from the

throne being carried, Heemskerk resigned. His place was taken by Joannes

Kappeyne, leader of the progressive liberals. A new department of State

was now created, that of Waterways and Commerce, whose duties in a

country like Holland, covered with a net-work of dykes and canals, was

of great importance. A measure which denied State support to the

"private" schools was bitterly resisted by the anti-revolutionaries and

the Catholics, whose union in defence of religious education was from

this time forward to become closer. The outlay in connection with the

costly Achin war, which had broken out afresh, led to a considerable

deficit in the budget. In consequence of this a proposal for the

construction of some new canals was rejected by a majority of one. The

financial difficulties, which had necessitated the imposing of unpopular

taxes, had once more led to divisions in the liberal ranks; and

Kappeyne, finding that the king would not support his proposals for a

revision of the Fundamental Law, saw no course open to him but

resignation.

In these circumstances the king decided to ask an anti-revolutionary,

Count van Lynden van Sandenburg, to form a "Ministry of Affairs,"

composed of moderate men of various parties. Van Lynden had a difficult

task, but with the strong support of the king his policy of conciliation

carried him safely through four disquieting and anxious years. The

revolt of the Boers in the Transvaal against British rule caused great

excitement in Holland, and aroused much sympathy. Van Lynden was careful

to avoid any steps which might give umbrage to England, and he was

successful in his efforts. The Achin trouble was, however, still a

cause of much embarrassment. Worst of all was the series of bereavements

which at this time befell the House of Orange-Nassau. In 1877 Queen

Sophie died, affectionately remembered for her interest in art and

science, and her exemplary life. The king's brother, Henry, for thirty

years Stadholder of Luxemburg, died childless early in 1879; and shortly

afterwards in June the Prince of Orange, who had never married, passed

away suddenly at Paris. The two sons of William III's uncle Frederick

predeceased their father, whose death took place in 1881. Alexander, the

younger son of the king, was sickly and feeble-minded; and with his

decease in 1884, the male line of the House of Orange-Nassau became

extinct. Foreseeing such a possibility in January, 1879, the already

aged king took in second wedlock the youthful Princess Emma of

Waldeck-Pyrmont. Great was the joy of the Dutch people, when, on August

31, 1880, she gave birth to a princess, Wilhelmina, who became from this

time forth the hope of a dynasty, whose history for three centuries had

been bound up with that of the nation.

The Van Lynden administration, having steered its way through many

parliamentary crises for four years, was at last beaten upon a proposal

to enlarge the franchise, and resigned (February 26, 1883). To Heemskerk

was confided the formation of a coalition ministry of a neutral

character; and this experienced statesman became for the third time

first minister of the crown. The dissensions in the liberal party

converted the Second Chamber into a meeting-place of hostile factions;

and Heemskerk was better fitted than any other politician to be the head

of a government which, having no majority to support it, had to rely

upon tactful management and expediency. The rise of a socialist party

under the enthusiastic leadership of a former Lutheran pastor, Domela

Nieuwenhuis, added to the perplexities of the position. It soon became

evident that a revision of the Fundamental Law and an extension of the

franchise, which the king no longer opposed, was inevitable. Meanwhile

the death of Prince Alexander and the king's growing infirmities made it

necessary to provide, by a bill passed on August 2,1884, that Queen Emma

should become regent during her daughter's minority.

Everything conspired to beset the path of the Heemskerk ministry with

hindrances to administrative or legislative action. The bad state of the

finances (chiefly owing to the calls for the Achin war) the subdivision

of all parties into groups, the socialist agitation and the weak

health of the king, created something like a parliamentary deadlock. A

revision of the constitution became more and more pressing as the only

remedy, though no party was keenly in its favour. Certain proposals for

revision were made by the government (March, 1885), but the

anti-revolutionaries, the Catholics and the conservatives were united in

opposition, unless concessions were made in the matter of religious

education. Such concessions as were finally offered were rejected

(April, 1886), and Heemskerk offered his resignation. Baron Mackay

(anti-revolutionary) declining office, a dissolution followed. The

result of the elections, however, was inconclusive, the liberals of all

shades having a bare majority of four; but there was no change of

ministry. A more conciliatory spirit fortunately prevailed under stress

of circumstances in the new Chamber; and at last, after many debates,

the law revising the constitution was passed through both Chambers, and

approved by the king (November 30, 1887). It was a compromise measure,

and no violent changes were made. The First Chamber was to consist of 50

members, appointed by the Provincial Councils; the Second Chamber of 100

members, chosen by an electorate of male persons of not less than 25

years of age with a residential qualification and possessing "signs of

fitness and social well-being"--a vague phrase requiring future

definition. The number of electors was increased from (in round numbers)

100,000 to 350,000, but universal male suffrage, the demand of the

socialists and more advanced liberals, was not conceded.

The elections of 1888 were fought on the question of religious education

in the primary schools. The two "Christian" parties, the Calvinist

anti-revolutionaries under the leadership of Dr Kuyper, and the

Catholics, who had found a leader of eloquence and power in Dr

Schaepman, a Catholic priest, coalesced in a common programme for a

revision of Kappeyne's Education Act of 1878. The coalition obtained a

majority, 27 anti-revolutionaries and 25 Catholics being returned as

against 46 liberals of various groups. For the first time a socialist,

Domela Nieuwenhuis, was elected. The conservative party was reduced to

one member. In the First Chamber the liberals still commanded a

majority. In April, 1888, Baron Mackay, an anti-revolutionary of

moderate views, became first minister. The coalition made the revision

of the Education Act of 1878 their first business; and they obtained the

support of some liberals who were anxious to see the school question

out of the way. The so-called "Mackay Law" was passed in 1889. It

provided that "private" schools should receive State support on

condition that they conformed to the official regulations; that the

number of scholars should be not less than twenty-five; and that they

should be under the management of some body, religious or otherwise,

recognised by the State. This settlement was a compromise, but it

offered the solution of an acute controversy and was found to work

satisfactorily.

The death of King William on November 23, 1890, was much mourned by his

people. He was a man of strong and somewhat narrow views, but during his

reign of 41 years his sincere love for his country was never in doubt,

nor did he lose popularity by his anti-liberal attitude on many

occasions, for it was known to arise from honest conviction; and it was

amidst general regret that the last male representative of the House of

Orange-Nassau was laid in his grave.

A proposal by the Catholic minister Borgesius for the introduction of

universal personal military service was displeasing however to many of

his own party, and it was defeated with the help of Catholic dissidents.

An election followed, and the liberals regained a majority. A new

government was formed of a moderate progressive character, the premier

being Cornelis van Tienhoven. It was a ministry of talents, Tak van

Poortvliet (interior) and N.G. Pierson (finance) being men of marked

ability. Pierson had more success than any of his predecessors in

bringing to an end the recurring deficits in the annual balance sheet.

He imposed an income tax on all incomes above 650 florins derived from

salaries or commerce. All other sources of income were capitalised

(funds, investments, farming, etc.); and a tax was placed on all capital

above 13,000 florins. Various duties and customs were lowered, to the

advantage of trade. There was, however, a growing demand for a still

further extension of the franchise, and for an official interpretation

of that puzzling qualification of the Revision of 1889--"signs of

fitness and social well-being." Tak van Poortvliet brought in a measure

which would practically have introduced universal male suffrage, for he

interpreted the words as including all who could write and did not

receive doles from charity. This proposal, brought forward in 1893,

again split up the liberal party. The moderates under the leadership of

Samuel van Houten vigorously opposed such an increase of the electorate;

and they had the support of the more conservative anti-revolutionaries

and a large part of the Catholics. The more democratic followers of

Kuyper and Schaepman and the progressive radicals ranged themselves on

the side of Tak van Poortvliet. All parties were thus broken up into

hostile groups. The election of 1894 was contested no longer on party

lines, but between Takkians and anti-Takkians. The result was adverse to

Tak, his following only mustering 46 votes against 54 for their

opponents.

A new administration therefore came into office (May, 1894) under the

presidency of Jonkheer Johan Roëll with Van Houten as minister of the

interior. On Van Houten's shoulders fell the task of preparing a new

electoral law. His proposals were finally approved in 1896. Before this

took place the minister of finance, Spenger van Eyk, had succeeded in

relieving the treasury by the conversion of the public debt from a 3-1/2

to a 3 per cent, security. The Van Houten reform of the franchise was

very complicated, as there were six different categories of persons

entitled to exercise the suffrage: (1) payers of at least one guilder in

direct taxation; (2) householders or lodgers paying a certain minimum

rent and having a residential qualification; (3) proprietors or hirers

of vessels of 24 tons at least; (4) earners of a certain specified wage

or salary; (5) investors of 100 guilders in the public funds or of 50

guilders in a savings bank; (6) persons holding certain educational

diplomas. This very wide and comprehensive franchise raised the number

of electors to about 700,000.

The election of 1897, after first promising a victory to the more

conservative groups, ended by giving a small majority to the liberals,

the progressive section winning a number of seats, and the socialists

increasing their representation in the Chamber. A liberal-concentration

cabinet took the place of the Roell-Van Houten ministry, its leading

members being Pierson (finance) and Goeman-Borgesius (interior). For a

right understanding of the parliamentary situation at this time and

during the years that follow, a brief account of the groups and sections

of groups into which political parties in Holland were divided, must

here interrupt the narrative of events.

It has already been told that the deaths of Thorbecke and Groen

van Prinsterer led to a breaking up of the old parties and the

formation of new groups. The Education Act of 1878 brought about an

alliance of the two parties, who made the question of religious

education in the primary schools the first article of their political

programme--the anti-revolutionaries led by the ex-Calvinist pastor

Dr Abraham Kuyper and the Catholics by Dr Schaepman, a Catholic

priest. Kuyper and Schaepman were alike able journalists, and used

the press with conspicuous success for the propagation of their

views, both being advocates of social reform on democratic lines. The

anti-revolutionaries, however, did not, as a body, follow the lead of

Kuyper. An aristocratic section, whose principles were those of Groen

van Prinsterer, "orthodox" and "conservative," under the appellation of

"Historical Christians," were opposed to the democratic ideas of Kuyper,

and were by tradition anti-Catholic. Their leader was Jonkheer Savornin

Lohman. For some years there was a separate Frisian group of "Historical

Christians," but these finally amalgamated with the larger body. The

liberals meanwhile had split up into three groups: (1) the Old

Independent _(vrij)_ Liberals; (2) the Liberal Progressive Union

_(Unie van vooruitstrevende Liberalen)_; (3) Liberal-Democrats

_(vrijzinnig-democratischen Bond)_. The socialist party was a

development of the _Algemeene Nederlandsche Werklieden Verbond_ founded

in 1871. Ten years later, by the activities of the fiery agitator,

Domela Nieuwenhuis, the Social-Democratic Bond was formed; and the

socialists became a political party. The loss of Nieuwenhuis' seat in

1891 had the effect of making him abandon constitutional methods for a

revolutionary and anti-religious crusade. The result of this was a split

in the socialist party and the formation, under the leadership of

Troelstra, Van Kol and Van der Goes, of the "Social-Democratic Workmen's

Party," which aimed at promoting the welfare of the proletariat on

socialistic lines, but by parliamentary means. The followers of Domela

Nieuwenhuis, whose openly avowed principles were "the destruction of

actual social conditions by all means legal and illegal," were after

1894 known as "the Socialist Bond." This anarchical party, who took as

their motto "neither God nor master," rapidly decreased in number; their

leader, discouraged by his lack of success in 1898, withdrew finally

from the political arena; and the Socialist Bond was dissolved. This

gave an accession of strength to the "Social-Democratic Workmen's

Party," which has since the beginning of the present century gradually

acquired an increasing hold upon the electorate.

* * * * *

History of Holland · 第 34 / 35 章