The Bridle and the Horse (3:2b-3)

The man who does control his tongue is able to bridle the whole body

also (cf. 1:26), for the body goes with the tongue. In fact, nothing is

commoner than for one to make a rash statement and then feel compelled

to stand by it for the sake of imaginary consistency. Hort keenly

observes that the force of “also” after “the whole body” is that a man

who can bridle his tongue can bridle his whole body. The tongue is a

real Bucephalus, and it takes an Alexander to master him. It is really

wonderful how a spirited, impetuous horse can be subdued by bit and

bridle. The spirit does not go out of the horse, but his restless energy

is under control and guidance.

James does not mean that a man should be dumb and lifeless, without

ambition and power, but simply that his tongue, like all the rest of the

body, should be kept in control. This figure of bridling the tongue, as

already noted (1:26), is one of the most vivid figures in all languages.

David said: “I will take heed to my ways, that I sin not with my tongue:

I will keep my mouth with a bridle” (Psalm 39:1).

It is not merely that the tongue is so hard to put a bridle on but also

that the tongue has such an influence on the whole body, able thus to

lead the body by the bridle.[76] The horse has to follow his mouth, in

which the bridle is placed. The purpose of the bridle is that the horses

may obey us, and it is thoroughly successful, as a rule. “We turn about

their whole body also” along with the mouth. So we should place bridles

in our mouths for the deliberate purpose of controlling the tongue. It

will not happen by accident.

We are to repress the impulsive and petulant word. Thus we train our own

tongues and make it easier to subdue the other members of the body. One

member cannot be allowed to lead the whole body into sin. Pluck it out,

if it be the right eye or the right hand (Matt. 5:29). The members of

the body are all so related as to be affected by what the others

experience. “The eye cannot say to the hand, I have no need of thee” (1

Cor. 12:21). Without this bridle on the tongue there is no true

self-control. A tongue loose at both ends means a man whom everyone

shuns as a nuisance. If the bridle is good for the horse, it is far more

so for the man. The difference is that the man has to put the bridle

into his own mouth and in dual capacity as rider and horse master

himself, the most unmanageable of steeds.

A garrulous man is a bore at best, while a woman with a sharp tongue is

a terror to the community. Tell no secrets to a talkative man, and few

to anyone save your wife. A man who talks to hear himself talk will be

sure to tell what he ought not to say. The writer of Hebrews refuses to

go on with too many details about his heroes of faith, “for the time

will fail me if I tell” (Heb. 11:32), “time will leave me telling.” If

the audience held the bridle, the preacher might stop sooner. The

phonograph can be turned off at will, permitting only so much “canned”

talk at a time. And yet talk is one of the most delightful things in all

the world. But there can be too much of a good thing, if, forsooth, it

is good. There are few greater nuisances than the interrupter, who

breaks into a conversation with no regard for the courtesies of the

occasion. He is as bad as the man who monopolizes the conversation and

allows no one else to talk at all. He needs a stopper, not a bridle, in

his mouth.

Studies in the Epistle of James · 第 55 / 90 题