OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks._)

I think I could best convey my impression of Miss ETHEL SIDGWICK'S

work by quoting the advertisement of a popular magazine which used to

proclaim that "these stories are different." All of Miss SIDGWICK'S

are this, though you might possibly be hard put to it to say exactly

how. It is chiefly an affair of style; there is about all of them

a certain dignity of utterance that combines with their humanity to

produce an effect wholly individual and rare. Take her latest example,

_A Lady of Leisure_ (SIDGWICK AND JACKSON). There is really very

little to arrest attention in the story itself; the characters are

persons whom you could meet every day, but in Miss SIDGWICK'S hands

they become creatures of extraordinary fascination. The result is a

novel by no means easy to criticise; partly because one is left with

the feeling (of course the most subtle compliment to any author) that

the characters have fashioned it themselves. Time and again one

seems to observe Miss SIDGWICK working towards some inevitable

_scene-a-faire_, when bounce! off go her people on an entirely

unexpected tack, which you must yet admit to be the very one they

quite obviously would follow. Never was a cast so incalculably alive.

Naturally for this reason its vagaries (they are almost all in love

and generally with the wrong person) would take too long to recount

in detail. I can only state my personal preference for the group that

consists of the heroine, _Violet Ashwin_, her father, the fashionable

physician, and her brainless but quite wonderful mother. I plump for

the _Ashwin_ household in short as a really brilliant contribution

to the homes in modern fiction. I don't say you will find their charm

easy of assimilation. The society of such clever and elusive folk as

_Violet_ and her father is bound to be hard going at first for

the general. But _Mrs. Ashwin_--oh, she is a joy, a marvel, an

exasperation! You will delight to read about her.

* * * * *

The first thing I have to say about _Initiation_ (HUTCHINSON) is that

it might have been written by Dr. CLIFFORD. The nice people in it

are all Roman Catholics, but a group of Huguenots or of Calvinistic

Methodists would have served the author's purpose equally well. For

ROBERT HUGH BENSON, the novelist, has (so to speak) told Monsignor

BENSON, the priest, to mind his own business, and leave him to

his, which is the telling of a story, and not the advocacy of any

particular form of religion. The second point to notice in the book is

that it divides its characters, and incidentally all characters, into

those who are initiated and those who are not. The initiated are those

who have learnt, chiefly by suffering, the lesson of life, which

is that it treats us as it likes. Because they have learnt it,

they trust, even when they do not understand, the purpose of the

life-giver; because they trust they do not kick against the pricks.

The young Catholic English gentleman, of whose initiation the story

tells, suffers prodigiously under two of the greatest misfortunes,

physical and mental, that a man may endure and live. And yet, when he

comes to die, you feel, and he knows, that they are not misfortunes,

but the opening up of the way of life. The chief cause of his mental

suffering, a young girl of eighteen or nineteen, is described (well on

in the book) as a practically insane egoist. She is, to my mind, the

weak spot in the story. Frankly I don't believe in her. A girl of her

age could not have been so selfishly cruel, and yet have taken in her

world as she did. I will own that she took me in at first; but that

was the author's fault. He ought not to have let me, as his reader,

think her charming and particularly sympathetic when he knew all the

time that she cared for no one but herself. I don't think that is

playing the game. All the I same, I like his book.

* * * * *

Having read Mr. REGINALD BLUNT'S book, _In Cheyne Walk and Thereabout_

(MILLS AND BOON), I am now prepared to pass an examination in the

history and the worthies (or unworthies) of Chelsea. I know that

DON SALTERO was no Spaniard, but an ardent collector of childish

curiosities who for a time kept a coffee-house and a smoking club of

which "the ornaments and apparatus" were eventually offered to CHARLES

LAMB. If I am asked about Dr. MESSENGER MONSEY I shall say that he

"tried hard, but with indifferent success, to popularise his own

method of extracting teeth by tying one end of a piece of catgut to

the offending molar and the other to a perforated bullet, putting the

latter with a full charge of powder into a revolver and then pulling

the trigger." Then again there is BARTHOLOMEW JOSEPH ALEXANDER DE

DOMINICETI, Lord DE CETE ET DE CORTESI, Knight of the Holy Boman

Empire and Noble of Venice in terra firma. How did he with his

resounding name come to be in Chelsea and there establish "baths,

fumigatory stoves and sweating chambers" for the relief of distressed

humanity? This question and a hundred others of a similar nature you

will find answered in Mr. BLUNT'S delightful book. Let Mr. BLUNT take

you by the hand and guide you through his beloved Chelsea. He is

the most urbane and the most agreeably gossiping companion. He will

re-introduce you to Sir THOMAS MORE, Sir HANS SLOANE; to NEILD, the

prison-reformer, and his son JOHN, the famous miser; to the CARLYLES

and their servant JESSIE HEDDLESTONE, and a host of others. And he

will remind you that Dr. JOHNSON endeavoured to manufacture Chelsea

china, and that his _chefs d'oeuvre_ always collapsed in the firing.

Take my advice and acquire Mr. BLUNT'S book.

* * * * *

I suspect that _Mr. Simpson_, who gives his name to the story

_Simpson_ (METHUEN), can hardly have shared my own exhausting

acquaintance with modern fiction, otherwise it is unlikely that he

would have behaved as he did. What happened was this. _Simpson_,

though on the wrong side of forty, well off and eminently lovable, was

unmarried. Finding a charming old house in the country, he conceives

the idea of renting it as a kind of bachelor residential club where he

and other congenial cronies can enjoy the life of ease untroubled

by any form of feminism. Well, that, to start with, one might fairly

describe as "asking for it." But when I add that the old house in

question was the property of a still young and charming widow you will

probably agree with me that poor _Simpson_ hadn't even a dog's chance

from the beginning. It is possible that this fore-dooming may a little

spoil your enjoyment of Miss ELINOR MORDAUNT'S otherwise pleasant

tale. Naturally, so far from women being banished from its pages,

they simply abound; and the tale of the progress of the bachelor club

resolves itself into a chronicle of proposals. There is however an

attractive variety about the love affairs, of which I liked best

that of the youngest couple. With two there is a note of tragedy;

and though the courtship of _Gilbert Strong_, a respectable country

lawyer, and the wild gipsy whom he marries may strike you as

fantastic, the end of their romance is well told with a fine

suggestion of inevitability. On the whole an agreeable and easy-going

tale, though without any unusual claim to distinction.

* * * * *

[Illustration: IT WAS AN AMBITIOUS YOUTH WHO, WHILE TRAVELLING ON

THE CONTINENT, WAS OFFERED THE CROWN OF ONE OF THE SMALLER STATES AND

REFUSED IT, SAYING, HE "DISLIKED THESE BLIND-ALLEY OCCUPATIONS."]

* * * * *

I quite realise that I have not the shadow of a case against Mr.

ALGERNON BLACKWOOD. He frankly calls his book _Ten Minute Stories_

(MURRAY), and that is exactly what they are. Nevertheless I did feel

a little aggrieved when each of them stopped with a jerk just as I

had become absorbed. One has a sense of having been cheated of one's

rights. That is why, though many of these sketches are as good as

they can be, I do not think that the book will be quite so popular

as others of his. But devout Blackwoodsmen will add it to their

collections and re-read the majority of its contents again and again,

as I propose to do. On second thoughts, indeed, I may say that perhaps

Mr. BLACKWOOD is not so unfair to his public as I have suggested,

for he is one of those writers who are not dead and done with after a

first perusal. He can pack a vast deal of food for thought even into

a ten-minute story. A good example of what I mean is to be found

in number fifteen of the collection, "Ancient Lights." Even a

scene-shifter at the Savoy Theatre would believe in fairies after one

reading of that. And if, after studying "If the Cap Fits," you lightly

steal a fellow-member's hat from your club, I shall regard you as a

very reckless dashing fellow. With the awful example of _Field-Martin_

before me, I would not do it for a fortune. I shall buy one of those

frightful plush hats which you see in shops but never out of them, and

I shall have my name in large letters on the inside band. And to the

hat-waiter's insidious "This is just as good, Sir," as he offers

me some sinister bowler or topper with a past, I shall reply with

gestures of disgust and threats to write to the committee.

* * * * *

"Detached 7-roomed horse wanted."--_The Norbury Weekly News._

Where is your one-stalled ox now?

* * * * *

Transcriber's Note:

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 146, March 4th 1914 · 第 41 / 42 题