CHAPTER IX.

OSWALD OF BERNICIA.

When the cause of Christianity and, as connected with it, the hope of

eventually building in the new England a civilised and well-ordered

state seemed at its darkest, light arose from an island in the

Hebrides; it spread to a rough storm-beaten rock on the Northumbrian

coast; it illumined one of the noblest and loveliest pages in the

history of our nation, the reign of Oswald of Bernicia.

The conversion of the southern Picts to Christianity is believed to

have taken place more than two centuries before the date that we have

now reached. Near the close of the fourth century when the Roman empire

had already begun to crumble into ruin, St. Ninian, a Briton educated

at Rome, filled with veneration for the soldier-saint, Martin of Tours,

came to the region between the Roman Wall and the Grampians, preached

Christianity with much success to the Picts who dwelt in that country,

and built a monastic church dedicated to St. Martin, on one of the

promontories of Galloway which project south into the Irish sea. This

church, built of stone, and thereby differing from the humbler wooden

churches of the period, was called _Candida Casa_ (a name represented

in its modern successor Whithern), and it is said to have been still

in course of erection when Ninian heard of the death of the holy man

in whose name he dedicated his beautiful “white house”. Nearly two

centuries passed away. There was much intercourse of various kinds

between the dwellers in the Hebrides and their neighbours the Scots

of Ireland. The Dalriadic kingdom, Scottish (that is Erse) by race

and Christian by religious profession, was set up in Argyll and the

adjacent islands; but the Picts north of the Grampians whose relations

to Dalriada were generally hostile, remained obstinately heathen.

All this was changed by an event which took place about the year

563--the arrival of St. Columba from Ireland. Whatever accretions of

superstitious legend may have grown up around the name of this saint,

the historic importance of the great apostle of the Picts cannot be

denied, and can hardly be over-stated.

Born in Donegal, in the year 521, a scion of the princely clan of

the Hy Neill, descended from Irish kings both on his father’s and

his mother’s side, the young Irishman in his boyish days showed such

zeal in his attendance at church that his baptismal name of Colum

was changed to Colum-cille or Columba of the church. He was ordained

priest, but the bent of his religious temper like that of most of his

Irish contemporaries was all towards the monastic profession. During

his early middle life he was busily engaged in founding monasteries,

the first in point of date being that of Derry, and the most famous

that of Durrow in the diocese of Meath. But in his fortieth year,

561, he became entangled in one of the ever-recurring civil wars of

his distressful country. A great battle was fought at Cuildremhne,

in Connaught, near the boundary between that province and Ulster.

Columba’s kinsfolk, the northern Hy Neill, prevailed and the King of

Ireland, commanding the clans of the southern Hy Neill, was defeated.

Though his friends’ cause triumphed, the battle appears in some

unexplained manner to have injured Columba’s religious position in his

native country. He seems to have been excommunicated by some of his

brethren, possibly on account of his alleged responsibility for the

strife. At any rate he now resolved to quit his country and, perhaps as

a penance for his sins, to take up his abode in some place from which

he could not even see the shores of his beloved Ireland. Such a place,

after some wandering, he found in the then little known island of Hy,

famous to after ages under the name of Iona; where, as tradition tells,

he ascended a hill which still bears the name of Cul-ri-Erin (back

turned to Erin), and when he found that no line of the Irish coast,

however dimly seen, could thence be discerned on the horizon, amid all

the cluster of surrounding islands, he determined to make that little

spot his dwelling-place. Iona is separated from the much larger island

of Mull by a channel about one mile broad. It is only three miles long,

and from a mile to a mile and a half in breadth; yet in this little

space there is considerable variety of scenery; hills, the highest of

which attains to an elevation of 320 feet, “retired dells, long reaches

of sand on shores indented with quiet bays, little coves between bare

and striking rocks, and on the west wild barren cliffs and high rocky

islets opposed to the sweep of the Atlantic”.[61] As Bede says: “it is

not large but computed as containing five families according to English

reckoning”. (The word “families” is rendered “hides” in the English

_Chronicle_, and this is an important passage as showing what were

the average dimensions of a “hide of land” in early Saxon times.) The

ruins now visible on the island are those of a Benedictine abbey of the

thirteenth century. No traces remain of the buildings, probably wooden,

raised by St. Columba, but there are many interesting natural features

which may be recognised in the nearly contemporary life of the saint

written by the ninth abbot of Iona, Adamnan.

The objects which Columba set before himself after his migration to

Iona were political as well as religious. His kinsmen, the Scots of

Dalriada, were harassed and oppressed by the pagan Picts in the east of

the island, whose king, Brude, had in the year 560 inflicted a crushing

defeat on the Scottish king, Gabhran. Columba would fain convert the

Pictish conqueror to Christianity, and at the same time obtain more

generous treatment for his beaten countrymen; and by the magic of

his personality he achieved a striking success in both directions.

King Brude in 565 embraced Christianity, and relations of peace and

friendship were established between him and the man whom, in 574,

Columba succeeded in placing on the throne of Dalriada, Aidan, Prince

of Strathclyde. The thirty-four years of Columba’s life, after his

great migration, were spent in establishing monasteries in the land of

the northern Picts, in the Hebrides and in his native Ireland, to which

he paid several visits, and where the once excommunicated partisan was

now an honoured, almost worshipped guest. These Columban monasteries,

“the family of Iona” as they were called, were of a distinctly

different type from that of the monasteries of the Benedictine rule.

Like all the Irish monastic establishments they partook largely of the

tribal character. The tribe gave the land, contributed to the support

of the monks, had a right to receive, apparently without special

charge, their religious ministrations, and in certain circumstances

had also a right to nominate one of its members as abbot, though the

first claim upon this coveted office resided in the family of the

founder. It was thus that the first nine abbots of Iona were all

descended from the same family, the northern Hy Neill, from which St.

Columba himself had sprung. This tribal character of the monasteries

suited the genius of the Celtic populations, and was one reason of the

success of the missionaries in converting them to Christianity. It has

been truly said[62] that “these large monasteries, as in their external

aspect they appeared to be, were in reality Christian colonies into

which converts, after being tonsured, were brought under the name of

monks”.

The large part thus played by the monasteries in the work of conversion

impressed in its turn a peculiar character on the churches of Ireland

and Hebridean Scotland, rendering them more exclusively monastic

and less purely episcopal than the churches of Italy and Gaul. This

divergence resulted in part from the nature of things, and was due

to the differences of place and time in which the conversion of the

several countries was respectively effected. The Bishops of Lyons and

Vienne, of Toledo and Seville began their work while the Roman Empire

was still standing, were to some extent moulded by its form, shared the

prosperity and the influence of its great towns and were essentially

magnates of cities. Columba, his comrades and his pupils, came into a

much ruder and more primitive state of society. The rough tribal rulers

whom they converted had scarcely any cities worthy of the name. The new

missionaries planted their monasteries in such rural places as promised

them the supply of their simple wants, or even only safety from the

attacks of a midnight foe--often on an island in a lake or surrounded

by the ocean--and there, not so much by eloquent preaching as by mere

rightness and simplicity of living, succeeded in converting whole

populations to the religion of Christ. The conversions thus obtained

seem to have been for the most part more genuine and more durable than

those which were first effected in the large cities of the old Roman

world and from thence radiated outwards into the country.

It has seemed necessary to emphasise this distinction between the two

types of ecclesiastical organisation (the fourth century Gaulish and

the sixth century Irish Churches) because the difference reappears in

our own history. The Roman mission under Augustine and his successors,

and especially under Paulinus in Northumbria, seems to have gone on the

old urban and episcopal lines, while the far more successful mission

from Iona, with which we have now to deal, was monastic, many-centred

and rural. In the year 597, the very year of Augustine’s arrival

in England, St. Columba died. He is one of the most vividly seen

personalities of the early Middle Ages: a man of somewhat hot temper in

youth, softened and controlled in later life, with a stately beauty of

feature which seemed to correspond with his princely descent, and with

a kind of magnetic power of attracting to himself the devotion of his

followers, a lover of animals and beloved by them. One of his natural

gifts was an extraordinarily strong and resonant voice which, when he

sang the psalms of the church, could be heard distinctly for more than

a mile. A great open-air preacher, an organiser and a poet--he eagerly

championed the cause of his brother bards before an Irish synod--he

might, perhaps, not unfittingly, be called the John Wesley of the sixth

century.

In 615, about eighteen years after the death of Columba, when his

fellow-tribesman Fergna was ruling, fourth in the series of abbots, at

Iona, a party of refugees from the south crossed the little channel and

landed on the shore of the island, craving shelter and sanctuary. They

were some of the attendants of Ethelfrid, the late King of Bernicia,

who had been slain “when the river Idle ran foul with Anglian blood,”

and they brought, besides other noble youths, Oswald, that king’s

second son, and implored the brethren to protect him from the avenging

might of Edwin. There was no shadow of a claim for this young Anglian,

son of an obstinate pagan, on the hospitality of the Irish monks, but

the request was willingly granted. Oswald and the young nobles his

companions were kindly received, were soon baptised, and instructed

in the doctrines of Christianity, and growing up to manhood on the

sequestered Hebridean isle, probably looked forward to no other sort

of life than that which was led by the simple-hearted monks their

entertainers.

All this was changed, in 633, by the great and unlooked-for catastrophe

of Heathfield. The two Northumbrian kingdoms, united under the strong

rule of Ethelfrid and Edwin, fell once more apart. Osric, cousin of

Edwin, son of his uncle Elfric, ruled in Deira, and Eanfrid, eldest son

of Ethelfrid, in Bernicia. These two young princes, each of whom had

made profession of the Christian faith, both apostatised and returned

to paganism. Possibly the sordid calculations by which Coifi had

justified his renunciation of the faith of his fathers weighed with

them now in the opposite scale, and they felt themselves justified in

deserting the Christians’ God, who had abandoned their land to the

tender mercies of Penda and Cadwallon. But the triumph of paganism

was short. Osric, who with inadequate forces besieged Cadwallon while

holding the “municipium” of York, was killed and his whole army cut to

pieces by a sudden sally of the Welsh king. This happened in the summer

of the year which followed the battle of Heathfield, and, apparently

in the following autumn, Bernician Eanfrid, coming with twelve chosen

warriors to treat of peace with Cadwallon, was treacherously slain

by his orders. So full of gloomy memories was this year, 634, that

the monkish chroniclers, who afterwards drew up a scheme of Anglian

chronology, decided that it should not come into the number of the

years, and silently included it in the glorious reign of him who

succeeded the apostates.

This successor was Oswald, who came from Iona evidently determined to

play the part of a Christian hero-king, and who endured to his life’s

end steadfast in that decision. By one bold stroke he delivered his

nation, Bernicia, from the Cambrian ravagers. “When he arrived after

the death of his brother Eanfrid with a small army, and fortified by

the faith of Christ, the wicked general of the Britons with the immense

forces which, as he boasted, nothing could resist, was slain by him at

the place which is called in the English tongue Denisesburn,’ that is,

the stream of Denis.” So runs the first simple statement of Bede as to

this important encounter which for ever settled the question whether

the Celt or the Teuton was to be supreme in Northern Britain. From Bede

himself, as a kind of afterthought, and from Adamnan, the biographer of

St. Columba, we get some additional particulars which enable us to see

more clearly if not the strategic features of the battle at least what

was passing in the minds of the combatants. It seems that the battle

itself was fought not at “Denisesburn” but at Heavenfield, a little on

the north of the Roman wall, which probably was an important element

in the problem that the Anglian king, with his great inferiority of

forces, had to solve.[63] The great Roman work, striding across the

country in its uncompromising way, here traverses a high moorland which

separates the main stream of the Tyne from its northern affluent, and

in this portion of its career it is from 700 to 800 feet above the

level of the sea. Though none of its stones are here remaining, we can

yet trace the high mounds and deep fosses of its companion, the line of

fortification on the south, which is known by the name of the _vallum_.

Between these two lines, that of stone and that of earth, ran the

Roman road, still probably in Edwin’s day capable of being traversed,

notwithstanding 230 years of neglect. Along this road Cadwallon may

have marched, and by it he may have encamped for the night, while

somewhere, behind either wall or _vallum_, Oswald may have placed in

ambush his father’s veterans. He himself was in a mood of religious and

patriotic exaltation. On the day before the battle he had in his sleep

a vision of the blessed Columba, whom he had never seen with the eyes

of the flesh. The saint’s beautiful face shone with angelic brightness:

his figure rose majestic till it seemed to touch the clouds: he spread

his mantle over the Anglian camp. Addressing Oswald in the words which

Moses spake to Joshua he told him to be strong and of a good courage,

for the Lord would be with him. Let him march out on the following

night to battle: his foes should be all scattered in flight, and the

Welsh king should be delivered into his hands.

Awaking, Oswald assembled his council, told them his dream and received

the unanimous promise of the army that if they won the victory they

would make profession of the Christian faith. He then caused a large

wooden cross to be prepared and a hole to be dug, in which it was

firmly planted, he himself holding it erect with both hands while

his soldiers filled in the soil. When this was done he cried to the

host with a loud voice: “Let us all bend our knees and together call

upon God Almighty, the Living and the True, that He in His pity will

defend us from our proud and cruel foe: for He knoweth that this is a

just war that we have undertaken for the deliverance of our people”.

All obeyed his command and prayed to the God of the Christians. That

night, just before dawn, they moved out of camp, attacked the probably

unsuspecting Britons, and inflicted upon them a crushing defeat. Many

of the enemy must have perished on the wide moorland; some who probably

fled southwards with Cadwallon, their king, were whelmed in the deep

waters of the Tyne. Cadwallon himself met his death (how we know not)

on the banks of the little Rowley Burn, some five miles south of the

Tyne and ten miles from the field of battle. Such was the event which

ruined the British hopes of a reconquest of the island, which confirmed

the endangered work of Ethelfrid, ratified the victory of Chester, cut

off the Britons of the south from their kinsmen in Strathclyde, and

confined the former to that mountainous rectangle of territory which we

know as Wales. The son of the slain king, “Cadwallader the Blessed,”

perhaps strove for a time to maintain the high, almost imperial

pretensions of his father, but his long reign seems to have been on

the whole disastrous, and when he died a pilgrim at Rome in the year

681, the Welsh chronicler himself admits that “thenceforth the Britons

lost the crown of the kingdom and the Saxons gained it”.[64] The two

centuries which followed the battle of Heavenfield are the darkest and

dreariest in the history of Wales.

Returning in triumph, as Columba in vision had promised him, Oswald

proceeded to his father’s wooden palace at Bamburgh, and from thence,

apparently with little difficulty, extended his rule over all

Northumbria. In Bernicia he would, of course, as the son of Ethelfrid,

find many loyal hearts ready to greet him; and even Deira, now that

Edwin and his progeny were off the stage, had possibly a welcome for

the man who was not only the deliverer from British oppression, but

also on his mother’s side descended from the old line. For it will be

remembered that Acha, wife of Ethelfrid, was daughter of Aelle of Deira.

Thus, then, did Bamburgh, which is now a lonely village by the German

Ocean, become “the royal city,” the most strongly fortified abode of

the most powerful king in Britain,[65] the centre of a realm which

stretched from the Humber to the Firth of Forth, and apparently,

through the rest of the seventh century, the destined capital of

England, if England should ever attain to unity. The traveller who

now visits this dethroned queen of Northumbria will see much that,

however noble and picturesque, must be eliminated by an effort of the

imagination if he would picture to himself the Bamburgh of King Oswald.

The massive keep that “stands four-square to every wind that blows,”

dates from the reign of Henry II.; the great hall of the castle now

ingeniously restored by a modern architect, was originally of the time

of Edward I.; some of the still existing buildings were reared by a

benevolent ecclesiastic in the reign of George III.; but the natural

features of the place are unchangeable and unchanged, and in looking

upon them we know that we behold the same scenes that met the eye of

the conqueror of Cadwallon. Such is the rock itself, an upheaved mass

of basalt upon whose black sides the tooth of time seems to gnaw in

vain; such are the long sandy dunes which gather round its base; such

the Inner and Outer Farne Islands, fragments of basalt rising out

of the ocean at distances ranging from three to six miles from the

castle; such the far-off peninsula, which when the tide flows, becomes

Holy Island; such the long range of Cheviot on the western horizon,

snow-covered for many months of the year. Such, we might almost say,

is the fierce wind which, from one quarter or another, seems for

ever attacking the lonely fortress, and which assuredly battered the

“timbered” palace of Oswald as it now batters the time-worn fortress of

the Plantagenet.

Scarcely had Oswald seated himself on the Northumbrian throne when he

began to labour for the conversion of his new subjects to Christianity,

a Christianity, however, not altogether after the fashion which

Paulinus had taught to Edwin of Deira, but rather according to that

which he himself had learned of his friends, the monks of Iona. The

abbot Seghine paid him a visit, probably soon after his accession,

and heard from his own lips the marvellous story of his vision of

Columba and the victory of Heavenfield; and one of his monastic family

was despatched to teach the Northumbrians the religion of Christ.

This missionary was a man of narrow intellect and austere temper, who

soon returned to Iona with the unwelcome tidings that it was but lost

labour to try to teach a nation so barbarous and untamable. At the

council whereat this report was rendered sat a man, probably in early

middle life, the monk Aidan. “It seems to me, my brother,” said he,

“that thou hast been somewhat too hard on these poor unlearned folk,

and hast scarcely remembered the apostolic precept to give milk to

babes till such time as they may be able to understand and to keep

the more sublime commands of God.” The eyes of all in the council

were turned upon the speaker who had so opportunely spoken words of

wisdom. “Aidan shall be bishop,” “Aidan shall be ordained to preach

to the Northumbrians,” was the unanimous decision of the assembly. He

accordingly went southward, and for the next sixteen years (635–51) was

the great missionary bishop of Northumbria.

It must have seemed to Aidan when he visited the palace of the

king, his patron, as if it was a special act of Providence that had

fixed that palace where he found it. For here on the storm-beaten

Northumbrian coast, within six miles from the royal dwelling, lay

an island whereupon he could establish his monastery, and wherein

he could be out of the world yet within reach of the world like his

prototype Columba in Iona. This island which was given him by the king

for his possession, bore then and has borne intermittently ever since

the name of Lindisfarne; but even at this day for once that its legal

designation of Lindisfarne is mentioned, you shall hear it a thousand

times called by the endearing appellation of Holy Island, given to it

probably twelve centuries ago when it first received the imprint of

Aidan’s sandals. The island is but a small one, only about 1,000 acres

in extent, with three fair-sized farms, and a population of about 800

persons, chiefly engaged in fishing, and in winter often hard pressed

for subsistence. The beautiful ruins of the Benedictine abbey, the

parish church, the castle, built in the Commonwealth period, all belong

to ages long posterior to the time when it first became “Holy Island”;

but here, as at Bamburgh, the natural features of the landscape are

so unchanged that it requires but little effort of the imagination to

enable the beholder to travel backward through the centuries to see

Cuthbert praying among the sea-gulls, or Aidan slowly pacing the long

spit of sand which lay between him and the palace of the king. It will

be seen that it is spoken of as an island, and such for all practical

purposes it has ever been; for though on the north it stretches out a

long sandy arm to the mainland, and at dead low water travellers may

reach it from thence all-but dry shod, still their path, traversing

three miles of wet sand and leading them through the waste of waters on

either hand, seems to sever them from the mainland rather than to unite

them thereto, and the inhabitants are at this day islanders in heart

and feeling.

Here then dwelt the Celtic apostle of Northumbria, and from hence did

he diffuse that influence which accomplished the lasting conversion of

the northern Angles to Christianity. In this work he was powerfully

aided by King Oswald. In all the history of Christian Church and

state during eighteen centuries there are few fairer chapters than

that which deals with the intercourse between Oswald and Aidan. There

was evidently something in the character of the Celtic bishop which

won for him more than the veneration, the love, of the Anglian king.

Aidan was a man of absolute simplicity of character, intent on one

purpose alone, that of spreading the Christian faith in the kingdom of

Northumbria, utterly indifferent to wealth, and fame, and power, and

yet without that harshness and austerity which the men of one idea so

often display, and which made many of the noblest of medieval saints

unloveable. Herein, and in his genuine, not feigned, contempt of riches

we trace a certain resemblance between the saint of Lindisfarne and

the saint of Assisi. Bede describes the character of Aidan with an

enthusiasm all the more trustworthy, because he regretfully observes

that “his zeal for God was not according to knowledge, since he kept

the day of the Lord’s Pascha according to the manner of his race, that

is from the fourteenth day to the twentieth”. He says of him, however,

that “herein did he chiefly commend his doctrine to others in that he

taught none otherwise than as he lived among his friends”; words which

remind us of Chaucer’s often quoted description of the “Poure Persoun

of a Toun”:--

But Criste’s loore and his Apostles twelve

He taughte, but first he folwed it hymselve.

It was a strange, but, as Bede says, a most beautiful sight, when

the missionary who as yet had not fully mastered our English tongue

would preach to the people; when Oswald, whose boyhood passed at

Iona had made him master of the difficult Gaelic tongue, stood forth

as interpreter, and translated to his own grim warriors and to the

servants of his palace “the words of the heavenly life” as they fell

from the lips of Aidan. Occasionally, but not too often, for he

dreaded the fascinations of a court, Aidan would accept the royal

invitation and appear with one or two of his clergy in the great hall

at Bamburgh. Even then after a short and hurried repast he would go

forth speedily with his friends to read the Scriptures, to chant the

Psalter, or to pray. But the scene enacted at one such courtly festival

lingered for generations in the memory of men. It was Easter day (the

heterodox Easter, as it may be feared), and the king and the bishop

had just sat down to the mid-day meal. The bishop was on the point

of stretching forth his hand to bless the royal dainties which were

served in a splendid silver dish, when the king’s almoner abruptly

entered and told his master that a multitude of poor persons gathered

from all quarters had arrived, and were sitting in the streets and in

the courtyard of the palace, plaintively demanding alms from the king.

Thereupon Oswald at once ordered the victuals to be distributed among

the beggars, and the dish itself to be broken up into fragments, one of

which should be given to each of them. Aidan, who was himself a most

generous benefactor of the poor, was so delighted with the deed that he

clasped the king’s right hand and exclaimed, “May this hand never see

corruption!”

Devoted as Oswald was to the Christianisation of his people he was

no pious _roi fainéant_, but a strong and successful monarch who

made his power felt at least from the Firth of Forth to the Bristol

Channel. Bede tells us, perhaps with some unconscious exaggeration of

the glory of his native Northumbria, that “he received under his sway

all the nations and provinces of Britain, which are divided into four

languages, those of the Britons, the Picts, the Scots, and the Angles”.

As he evidently here uses “Angles” as equivalent to Angles and Saxons,

this sentence represents Oswald as accomplishing more than Egbert was

to achieve two centuries later, and as practically the lord of our

whole island. Consistently herewith he represents him as the sixth of

the Bretwaldas; and Adamnan, who at first calls him merely “regnator

Saxonicus,” says that after the victory of Heavenfield he was “ordained

by God emperor of the whole of Britain”. But all these statements must

be taken with considerable reservation. Oswald wielded evidently during

the seven years of his reign the predominant power in the island, but

we are not to think of him as interfering with any of the details of

administration in Wessex or East Anglia, still less in Wales or among

the Scots of Dalriada. With Wessex, indeed, we are expressly told that

he formed ties both of relationship and of religion. When Cynegils,

King of the West Saxons, who had been converted to Christianity by

the preaching of Birinus, was baptised, his godfather, the man who,

according to ecclesiastical phrase, “received him emerging from the

sacred laver,” was Oswald of Bernicia, who also became his son-in-law,

accepting from the old West Saxon king the hand of his daughter in

marriage.

From the character of our one chief authority, Bede’s _Ecclesiastical

History_, it naturally but unfortunately follows that we are left in

almost total ignorance of the political events in Oswald’s reign.

Gladly would we know, for instance, whether the fierce Mercian,

Penda, bowed his head even for a time under the yoke of Northumbrian

supremacy, but on this point we are left without information. There are

hints of earlier wars and fightings between the two states, but all

that we can certainly say is that on August 5, 642, Oswald and Penda

met in battle at a place called Maserfield,[66] and that though Penda’s

brother fell in the fight the Mercian king “was victorious by diabolic

art,” and Oswald lay dead on the battlefield. He died praying: when he

saw himself girt round by the Mercian host and knew that his death was

inevitable, he cried aloud: “Lord, have mercy on the souls of my army,”

and the remembrance of this prayer passed into a proverb: “‘Lord, pity

their souls,’ as Oswald said when he was falling to the ground”.

Oswald was in his thirty-eighth year when he died, the second

Northumbrian prince in the prime and vigour of his days, who had

fallen before the elderly barbarian, Penda. The brutal heathen had his

head and hands severed from the body and fixed on stakes; but before

long, at a turn of the wheel of fortune, these relics, now deemed to

be endowed with miraculous power, were carried to distant sites where

they met with more honourable treatment. The head was deposited in the

monastery at Holy Island, and in after years shared the migrations of

the relics of St. Cuthbert: the hand, “the uncorrupted hand” which

Aidan had blessed, was enshrined at Bamburgh: the body, by the order

of Oswald’s niece, Osthryd, now Queen of the Mercians, was reverently

laid in the monastery of Bardney in the centre of Lincolnshire. In

his lifetime Oswald had, with some display of force, extended his

dominion over this South-Humbrian land, mindful of which fact the

patriotic monks were loth to receive the body of their conqueror, but a

pillar of fire hovering at night over the coffin showed them that the

corpse to which they were refusing admittance would be a precious and

wonder-working relic, and turned their aversion into eagerness for its

possession. Numerous in fact were the miracles alleged to be wrought

by the dissevered fragments of the kingly body, and even by the dust

of the battlefield on which he had fallen. The day of his martyrdom,

August 5, was appropriated to the cult of Saint Oswald, and the fame of

the new saint and his wonder-working relics spread rapidly not only in

England but in Ireland and on the Continent.

The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest · 第 9 / 27 章