PREFACE TO THE EMPEROR CHARLES V.

Most Invincible Emperor, Caesar Augustus, Most Clement Lord: Inasmuch as

Your Imperial Majesty has summoned a Diet of the Empire here at Augsburg

to deliberate concerning measures against the Turk, that most atrocious,

hereditary, and ancient enemy of the Christian name and religion, in

what way, namely, effectually to withstand his furor and assaults

by strong and lasting military provision; and then also concerning

dissensions in the matter of our holy religion and Christian Faith, that

in this matter of religion the opinions and judgments of the parties

might be heard in each other's presence; and considered and weighed

among ourselves in mutual charity, leniency, and kindness, in order

that, after the removal and correction of such things as have been

treated and understood in a different manner in the writings on either

side, these matters may be settled and brought back to one simple truth

and Christian concord, that for the future one pure and true religion

may be embraced and maintained by us, that as we all are under one

Christ and do battle under Him, so we may be able also to live in unity

and concord in the one Christian Church.

And inasmuch as we, the undersigned Elector and Princes, with others

joined with us, have been called to the aforesaid Diet the same as the

other Electors, Princes, and Estates, in obedient compliance with the

Imperial mandate, we have promptly come to Augsburg, and--what we do not

mean to say as boasting--we were among the first to be here.

Accordingly, since even here at Augsburg at the very beginning of the

Diet, Your Imperial Majesty caused to be proposed to the Electors,

Princes, and other Estates of the Empire, amongst other things, that the

several Estates of the Empire, on the strength of the Imperial edict,

should set forth and submit their opinions and judgments in the German

and the Latin language, and since on the ensuing Wednesday, answer was

given to Your Imperial Majesty, after due deliberation, that we would

submit the Articles of our Confession for our side on next Wednesday,

therefore, in obedience to Your Imperial Majesty's wishes, we offer,

in this matter of religion, the Confession of our preachers and of

ourselves, showing what manner of doctrine from the Holy Scriptures and

the pure Word of God has been up to this time set forth in our lands,

dukedoms, dominions, and cities, and taught in our churches.

And if the other Electors, Princes, and Estates of the Empire will,

according to the said Imperial proposition, present similar writings,

to wit, in Latin and German, giving their opinions in this matter of

religion, we, with the Princes and friends aforesaid, here before Your

Imperial Majesty, our most clement Lord are prepared to confer amicably

concerning all possible ways and means, in order that we may come

together, as far as this may be honorably done, and, the matter between

us on both sides being peacefully discussed without offensive strife,

the dissension, by God's help, may be done away and brought back to

one true accordant religion; for as we all are under one Christ and do

battle under Him, we ought to confess the one Christ, after the tenor

of Your Imperial Majesty's edict, and everything ought to be conducted

according to the truth of God; and this it is what, with most fervent

prayers, we entreat of God.

However, as regards the rest of the Electors, Princes, and Estates,

who constitute the other part, if no progress should be made, nor some

result be attained by this treatment of the cause of religion after the

manner in which Your Imperial Majesty has wisely held that it should be

dealt with and treated namely, by such mutual presentation of writings

and calm conferring together among ourselves, we at least leave with

you a clear testimony, that we here in no wise are holding back from

anything that could bring about Christian concord,--such as could be

effected with God and a good conscience,--as also Your Imperial Majesty

and, next, the other Electors and Estates of the Empire, and all who

are moved by sincere love and zeal for religion, and who will give an

impartial hearing to this matter, will graciously deign to take

notice and to understand this from this Confession of ours and of our

associates.

Your Imperial Majesty also, not only once but often, graciously

signified to the Electors Princes, and Estates of the Empire, and at the

Diet of Spires held A. D. 1526, according to the form of Your Imperial

instruction and commission given and prescribed, caused it to be stated

and publicly proclaimed that Your Majesty, in dealing with this matter

of religion, for certain reasons which were alleged in Your Majesty's

name, was not willing to decide and could not determine anything, but

that Your Majesty would diligently use Your Majesty's office with the

Roman Pontiff for the convening of a General Council. The same matter

was thus publicly set forth at greater length a year ago at the last

Diet which met at Spires. There Your Imperial Majesty, through His

Highness Ferdinand, King of Bohemia and Hungary, our friend and clement

Lord, as well as through the Orator and Imperial Commissioners caused

this, among other things, to be submitted: that Your Imperial Majesty

had taken notice of; and pondered, the resolution of Your Majesty's

Representative in the Empire, and of the President and Imperial

Counselors, and the Legates from other Estates convened at Ratisbon,

concerning the calling of a Council, and that your Imperial Majesty also

judged it to be expedient to convene a Council; and that Your Imperial

Majesty did not doubt the Roman Pontiff could be induced to hold

a General Council, because the matters to be adjusted between Your

Imperial Majesty and the Roman Pontiff were nearing agreement and

Christian reconciliation; therefore Your Imperial Majesty himself

signified that he would endeavor to secure the said Chief Pontiff's

consent for convening, together with your Imperial Majesty such General

Council, to be published as soon as possible by letters that were to be

sent out.

If the outcome, therefore, should be such that the differences between

us and the other parties in the matter of religion should not be

amicably and in charity settled, then here, before Your Imperial Majesty

we make the offer in all obedience, in addition to what we have already

done, that we will all appear and defend our cause in such a general,

free Christian Council, for the convening of which there has always been

accordant action and agreement of votes in all the Imperial Diets held

during Your Majesty's reign, on the part of the Electors, Princes, and

other Estates of the Empire. To the assembly of this General Council,

and at the same time to Your Imperial Majesty, we have, even before

this, in due manner and form of law, addressed ourselves and made appeal

in this matter, by far the greatest and gravest. To this appeal, both to

Your Imperial Majesty and to a Council, we still adhere; neither do we

intend nor would it be possible for us, to relinquish it by this or

any other document, unless the matter between us and the other side,

according to the tenor of the latest Imperial citation should be

amicably and charitably settled, allayed, and brought to Christian

concord; and regarding this we even here solemnly and publicly testify.

Article I: Of God.

Our Churches, with common consent, do teach that the decree of the

Council of Nicaea concerning the Unity of the Divine Essence and

concerning the Three Persons, is true and to be believed without any

doubting; that is to say, there is one Divine Essence which is called

and which is God: eternal, without body, without parts, of infinite

power, wisdom, and goodness, the Maker and Preserver of all things,

visible and invisible; and yet there are three Persons, of the same

essence and power, who also are coeternal, the Father the Son, and the

Holy Ghost. And the term "person" they use as the Fathers have used it,

to signify, not a part or quality in another, but that which subsists of

itself.

They condemn all heresies which have sprung up against this article,

as the Manichaeans, who assumed two principles, one Good and the other

Evil--also the Valentinians, Arians, Eunomians, Mohammedans, and all

such. They condemn also the Samosatenes, old and new, who, contending

that there is but one Person, sophistically and impiously argue that

the Word and the Holy Ghost are not distinct Persons, but that "Word"

signifies a spoken word, and "Spirit" signifies motion created in

things.

Article II: Of Original Sin.

Also they teach that since the fall of Adam all men begotten in the

natural way are born with sin, that is, without the fear of God, without

trust in God, and with concupiscence; and that this disease, or vice

of origin, is truly sin, even now condemning and bringing eternal death

upon those not born again through Baptism and the Holy Ghost.

They Condemn the Pelagians and others who deny that original depravity

is sin, and who, to obscure the glory of Christ's merit and benefits,

argue that man can be justified before God by his own strength and

reason.

Article III: Of the Son of God.

Also they teach that the Word, that is, the Son of God, did assume the

human nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin Mary, so that there

are two natures, the divine and the human, inseparably enjoined in one

Person, one Christ, true God and true man, who was born of the Virgin

Mary, truly suffered, was crucified, dead, and buried, that He might

reconcile the Father unto us, and be a sacrifice, not only for original

guilt, but also for all actual sins of men.

He also descended into hell, and truly rose again the third day;

afterward He ascended into heaven that He might sit on the right hand of

the Father, and forever reign and have dominion over all creatures, and

sanctify them that believe in Him, by sending the Holy Ghost into their

hearts, to rule, comfort, and quicken them, and to defend them against

the devil and the power of sin.

The same Christ shall openly come again to judge the quick and the dead,

etc., according to the Apostles' Creed.

Article IV: Of Justification.

Also they teach that men cannot be justified before God by their own

strength, merits, or works, but are freely justified for Christ's sake,

through faith, when they believe that they are received into favor, and

that their sins are forgiven for Christ's sake, who, by His death, has

made satisfaction for our sins. This faith God imputes for righteousness

in His sight. Rom. 3 and 4.

Article V: Of the Ministry.

That we may obtain this faith, the Ministry of Teaching the Gospel and

administering the Sacraments was instituted. For through the Word and

Sacraments, as through instruments, the Holy Ghost is given, who works

faith; where and when it pleases God, in them that hear the Gospel, to

wit, that God, not for our own merits, but for Christ's sake, justifies

those who believe that they are received into grace for Christ's sake.

They condemn the Anabaptists and others who think that the Holy Ghost

comes to men without the external Word, through their own preparations

and works.

Article VI: Of New Obedience.

Also they teach that this faith is bound to bring forth good fruits, and

that it is necessary to do good works commanded by God, because of God's

will, but that we should not rely on those works to merit justification

before God. For remission of sins and justification is apprehended by

faith, as also the voice of Christ attests: When ye shall have done all

these things, say: We are unprofitable servants. Luke 17, 10. The same

is also taught by the Fathers. For Ambrose says: It is ordained of God

that he who believes in Christ is saved, freely receiving remission of

sins, without works, by faith alone.

Article VII: Of the Church.

Also they teach that one holy Church is to continue forever. The Church

is the congregation of saints, in which the Gospel is rightly taught and

the Sacraments are rightly administered.

And to the true unity of the Church it is enough to agree concerning the

doctrine of the Gospel and the administration of the Sacraments. Nor

is it necessary that human traditions, that is, rites or ceremonies,

instituted by men, should be everywhere alike. As Paul says: One faith,

one Baptism, one God and Father of all, etc. Eph. 4, 5. 6.

Article VIII: What the Church Is.

Although the Church properly is the congregation of saints and true

believers, nevertheless, since in this life many hypocrites and

evil persons are mingled therewith, it is lawful to use Sacraments

administered by evil men, according to the saying of Christ: The

Scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat, etc. Matt. 23, 2. Both

the Sacraments and Word are effectual by reason of the institution and

commandment of Christ, notwithstanding they be administered by evil men.

They condemn the Donatists, and such like, who denied it to be lawful to

use the ministry of evil men in the Church, and who thought the ministry

of evil men to be unprofitable and of none effect.

Article IX: Of Baptism.

Of Baptism they teach that it is necessary to salvation, and that

through Baptism is offered the grace of God, and that children are to

be baptized who, being offered to God through Baptism are received into

God's grace.

They condemn the Anabaptists, who reject the baptism of children, and

say that children are saved without Baptism.

Article X: Of the Lord's Supper.

Of the Supper of the Lord they teach that the Body and Blood of Christ

are truly present, and are distributed to those who eat the Supper of

the Lord; and they reject those that teach otherwise.

Article XI: Of Confession.

Of Confession they teach that Private Absolution ought to be retained in

the churches, although in confession an enumeration of all sins is

not necessary. For it is impossible according to the Psalm: Who can

understand his errors? Ps. 19, 12.

Article XII: Of Repentance.

Of Repentance they teach that for those who have fallen after Baptism

there is remission of sins whenever they are converted and that the

Church ought to impart absolution to those thus returning to repentance.

Now, repentance consists properly of these two parts: One is contrition,

that is, terrors smiting the conscience through the knowledge of sin;

the other is faith, which is born of the Gospel, or of absolution,

and believes that for Christ's sake, sins are forgiven, comforts the

conscience, and delivers it from terrors. Then good works are bound to

follow, which are the fruits of repentance.

They condemn the Anabaptists, who deny that those once justified can

lose the Holy Ghost. Also those who contend that some may attain to such

perfection in this life that they cannot sin.

The Novatians also are condemned, who would not absolve such as had

fallen after Baptism, though they returned to repentance.

They also are rejected who do not teach that remission of sins comes

through faith but command us to merit grace through satisfactions of our

own.

Article XIII: Of the Use of the Sacraments.

Of the Use of the Sacraments they teach that the Sacraments were

ordained, not only to be marks of profession among men, but rather to be

signs and testimonies of the will of God toward us, instituted to awaken

and confirm faith in those who use them. Wherefore we must so use the

Sacraments that faith be added to believe the promises which are offered

and set forth through the Sacraments.

They therefore condemn those who teach that the Sacraments justify

by the outward act, and who do not teach that, in the use of the

Sacraments, faith which believes that sins are forgiven, is required.

Article XIV: Of Ecclesiastical Order.

Of Ecclesiastical Order they teach that no one should publicly teach in

the Church or administer the Sacraments unless he be regularly called.

Article XV: Of Ecclesiastical Usages.

Of Usages in the Church they teach that those ought to be observed which

may be observed without sin, and which are profitable unto tranquillity

and good order in the Church, as particular holy-days, festivals, and

the like.

Nevertheless, concerning such things men are admonished that consciences

are not to be burdened, as though such observance was necessary to

salvation.

They are admonished also that human traditions instituted to propitiate

God, to merit grace, and to make satisfaction for sins, are opposed

to the Gospel and the doctrine of faith. Wherefore vows and traditions

concerning meats and days, etc., instituted to merit grace and to make

satisfaction for sins, are useless and contrary to the Gospel.

Article XVI: Of Civil Affairs.

Of Civil Affairs they teach that lawful civil ordinances are good works

of God, and that it is right for Christians to bear civil office, to sit

as judges, to judge matters by the Imperial and other existing laws, to

award just punishments, to engage in just wars, to serve as soldiers,

to make legal contracts, to hold property, to make oath when required by

the magistrates, to marry a wife, to be given in marriage.

They condemn the Anabaptists who forbid these civil offices to

Christians.

They condemn also those who do not place evangelical perfection in the

fear of God and in faith, but in forsaking civil offices, for the Gospel

teaches an eternal righteousness of the heart. Meanwhile, it does not

destroy the State or the family, but very much requires that they be

preserved as ordinances of God, and that charity be practiced in such

ordinances. Therefore, Christians are necessarily bound to obey their

own magistrates and laws save only when commanded to sin; for then they

ought to obey God rather than men. Acts 5, 29.

Article XVII: Of Christ's Return to Judgment.

Also they teach that at the Consummation of the World Christ will appear

for judgment and will raise up all the dead; He will give to the godly

and elect eternal life and everlasting joys, but ungodly men and the

devils He will condemn to be tormented without end.

They condemn the Anabaptists, who think that there will be an end to the

punishments of condemned men and devils.

They condemn also others who are now spreading certain Jewish opinions,

that before the resurrection of the dead the godly shall take possession

of the kingdom of the world, the ungodly being everywhere suppressed.

Article XVIII: Of Free Will.

Of Free Will they teach that man's will has some liberty to choose

civil righteousness, and to work things subject to reason. But it has

no power, without the Holy Ghost, to work the righteousness of God, that

is, spiritual righteousness; since the natural man receiveth not the

things of the Spirit of God, 1 Cor. 2,14; but this righteousness is

wrought in the heart when the Holy Ghost is received through the

Word. These things are said in as many words by Augustine in his

Hypognosticon, Book III: We grant that all men have a free will, free,

inasmuch as it has the judgment of reason; not that it is thereby

capable, without God, either to begin, or, at least, to complete aught

in things pertaining to God, but only in works of this life, whether

good or evil. "Good" I call those works which spring from the good in

nature, such as, willing to labor in the field, to eat and drink, to

have a friend, to clothe oneself, to build a house, to marry a wife, to

raise cattle, to learn divers useful arts, or whatsoever good pertains

to this life. For all of these things are not without dependence on the

providence of God; yea, of Him and through Him they are and have their

being. "Evil" I call such works as willing to worship an idol, to commit

murder, etc.

They condemn the Pelagians and others, who teach that without the Holy

Ghost, by the power of nature alone, we are able to love God above all

things; also to do the commandments of God as touching "the substance

of the act." For, although nature is able in a manner to do the outward

work, (for it is able to keep the hands from theft and murder,) yet it

cannot produce the inward motions, such as the fear of God, trust in

God, chastity, patience, etc.

Article XIX: Of the Cause of Sin.

Of the Cause of Sin they teach that, although God does create and

preserve nature, yet the cause of sin is the will of the wicked, that

is, of the devil and ungodly men; which will, unaided of God, turns

itself from God, as Christ says John 8, 44: When he speaketh a lie, he

speaketh of his own.

Article XX: Of Good Works.

Our teachers are falsely accused of forbidding good Works. For their

published writings on the Ten Commandments, and others of like import,

bear witness that they have taught to good purpose concerning all

estates and duties of life, as to what estates of life and what works

in every calling be pleasing to God. Concerning these things preachers

heretofore taught but little, and urged only childish and needless

works, as particular holy-days, particular fasts, brotherhoods,

pilgrimages, services in honor of saints, the use of rosaries,

monasticism, and such like. Since our adversaries have been admonished

of these things, they are now unlearning them, and do not preach these

unprofitable works as heretofore. Besides, they begin to mention faith,

of which there was heretofore marvelous silence. They teach that we are

justified not by works only, but they conjoin faith and works, and

say that we are justified by faith and works. This doctrine is more

tolerable than the former one, and can afford more consolation than

their old doctrine.

Forasmuch, therefore, as the doctrine concerning faith, which ought to

be the chief one in the Church, has lain so long unknown, as all

must needs grant that there was the deepest silence in their sermons

concerning the righteousness of faith, while only the doctrine of works

was treated in the churches, our teachers have instructed the churches

concerning faith as follows:--

First, that our works cannot reconcile God or merit forgiveness of sins,

grace, and justification, but that we obtain this only by faith when we

believe that we are received into favor for Christs sake, who alone has

been set forth the Mediator and Propitiation, 1 Tim. 2, 6, in order that

the Father may be reconciled through Him. Whoever, therefore, trusts

that by works he merits grace, despises the merit and grace of Christ,

and seeks a way to God without Christ, by human strength, although

Christ has said of Himself: I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. John

14, 6.

This doctrine concerning faith is everywhere treated by Paul, Eph. 2, 8:

By grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves; it is

the gift of God, not of works, etc.

And lest any one should craftily say that a new interpretation of

Paul has been devised by us, this entire matter is supported by the

testimonies of the Fathers. For Augustine, in many volumes, defends

grace and the righteousness of faith, over against the merits of works.

And Ambrose, in his De Vocatione Gentium, and elsewhere, teaches to like

effect. For in his De Vocatione Gentium he says as follows: Redemption

by the blood of Christ would become of little value, neither would

the preeminence of man's works be superseded by the mercy of God, if

justification, which is wrought through grace, were due to the merits

going before, so as to be, not the free gift of a donor, but the reward

due to the laborer.

But, although this doctrine is despised by the inexperienced,

nevertheless God-fearing and anxious consciences find by experience that

it brings the greatest consolation, because consciences cannot be set

at rest through any works, but only by faith, when they take the sure

ground that for Christ's sake they have a reconciled God. As Paul

teaches Rom. 5, 1: Being justified by faith, we have peace with God.

This whole doctrine is to be referred to that conflict of the terrified

conscience, neither can it be understood apart from that conflict.

Therefore inexperienced and profane men judge ill concerning this

matter, who dream that Christian righteousness is nothing but civil and

philosophical righteousness.

Heretofore consciences were plagued with the doctrine of works, they did

not hear the consolation from the Gospel. Some persons were driven by

conscience into the desert, into monasteries hoping there to merit grace

by a monastic life. Some also devised other works whereby to merit grace

and make satisfaction for sins. Hence there was very great need to treat

of, and renew, this doctrine of faith in Christ, to the end that anxious

consciences should not be without consolation but that they might know

that grace and forgiveness of sins and justification are apprehended by

faith in Christ.

Men are also admonished that here the term "faith" does not signify

merely the knowledge of the history, such as is in the ungodly and in

the devil, but signifies a faith which believes, not merely the

history, but also the effect of the history--namely, this Article: the

forgiveness of sins, to wit, that we have grace, righteousness, and

forgiveness of sins through Christ.

Now he that knows that he has a Father gracious to him through Christ,

truly knows God; he knows also that God cares for him, and calls upon

God; in a word, he is not without God, as the heathen. For devils and

the ungodly are not able to believe this Article: the forgiveness of

sins. Hence, they hate God as an enemy, call not upon Him, and expect no

good from Him. Augustine also admonishes his readers concerning the word

"faith," and teaches that the term "faith" is accepted in the Scriptures

not for knowledge such as is in the ungodly but for confidence which

consoles and encourages the terrified mind.

Furthermore, it is taught on our part that it is necessary to do good

works, not that we should trust to merit grace by them, but because

it is the will of God. It is only by faith that forgiveness of sins is

apprehended, and that, for nothing. And because through faith the Holy

Ghost is received, hearts are renewed and endowed with new affections,

so as to be able to bring forth good works. For Ambrose says: Faith is

the mother of a good will and right doing. For man's powers without the

Holy Ghost are full of ungodly affections, and are too weak to do works

which are good in God's sight. Besides, they are in the power of the

devil who impels men to divers sins, to ungodly opinions, to open

crimes. This we may see in the philosophers, who, although they

endeavored to live an honest life could not succeed, but were defiled

with many open crimes. Such is the feebleness of man when he is without

faith and without the Holy Ghost, and governs himself only by human

strength.

Hence it may be readily seen that this doctrine is not to be charged

with prohibiting good works, but rather the more to be commended,

because it shows how we are enabled to do good works. For without faith

human nature can in no wise do the works of the First or of the Second

Commandment. Without faith it does not call upon God, nor expect

anything from God, nor bear the cross, but seeks, and trusts in, man's

help. And thus, when there is no faith and trust in God all manner of

lusts and human devices rule in the heart. Wherefore Christ said, John

16,6: Without Me ye can do nothing; and the Church sings:

Lacking Thy divine favor,

There is nothing found in man,

Naught in him is harmless.

Article XXI: Of the Worship of the Saints.

Of the Worship of Saints they teach that the memory of saints may be set

before us, that we may follow their faith and good works, according to

our calling, as the Emperor may follow the example of David in making

war to drive away the Turk from his country; For both are kings. But the

Scripture teaches not the invocation of saints or to ask help of saints,

since it sets before us the one Christ as the Mediator, Propitiation,

High Priest, and Intercessor. He is to be prayed to, and has promised

that He will hear our prayer; and this worship He approves above all, to

wit, that in all afflictions He be called upon, 1 John 2, 1: If any man

sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, etc.

This is about the Sum of our Doctrine, in which, as can be seen, there

is nothing that varies from the Scriptures, or from the Church Catholic,

or from the Church of Rome as known from its writers. This being the

case, they judge harshly who insist that our teachers be regarded as

heretics. There is, however, disagreement on certain Abuses, which have

crept into the Church without rightful authority. And even in these, if

there were some difference, there should be proper lenity on the part

of bishops to bear with us by reason of the Confession which we have

now reviewed; because even the Canons are not so severe as to demand

the same rites everywhere, neither, at any time, have the rites of all

churches been the same; although, among us, in large part, the ancient

rites are diligently observed. For it is a false and malicious charge

that all the ceremonies, all the things instituted of old, are abolished

in our churches. But it has been a common complaint that some abuses

were connected with the ordinary rites. These, inasmuch as they could

not be approved with a good conscience, have been to some extent

corrected.

The Augsburg Confession The confession of faith, which was submitted to His Imperial Majesty Charles V at the diet of Augsburg in the year 1530 · 第 3 / 5 题