Where Winter sits upon his throne of snow,

РОССІЙСКАЯ АНТОЛОГІЯ.

SPECIMENS

OF

_THE RUSSIAN POETS_:

TRANSLATED BY

JOHN BOWRING, F.L.S.

_Вамъ, вамъ плетутъ Хариты

Безамертные вѣнцы!

Я вами здѣсь вкушаю

Восторги Піеридъ,

И въ радости взываю:

О Музы! я Піитъ!_

БАТЮШКОВЪ

WITH PRELIMINARY REMARKS AND

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.

SECOND EDITION, WITH ADDITIONS.

London:

PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR:

SOLD BY R. HUNTER, ST. PAUL’S CHURCHYARD;

AND A. CONSTABLE AND CO., EDINBURGH.

1821.

[Illustration: ALBRE FLAMMAN printer’s mark.]

PRINTED BY R. AND A. TAYLOR,

SHOE-LANE, LONDON.

ADVERTISEMENT

TO

THE SECOND EDITION.

The first edition of this work was published without any strong

expectations that it would excite attention. It has been received with

singular indulgence, nay with flattering encouragement, and I trust

it will be followed, at no distant period, by Specimens of the Poetry

of other nations, which is as yet a stranger to our literature and

language.

The objects of this publication have been in a great degree answered.

Many of the Poets of Russia, whom I have ventured to introduce to my

countrymen, have met with a cordial welcome, and their claims have

been cheerfully admitted by the mighty arbiters of fame. For myself

I own, that my hopes of the future progress of that vast empire in

civilization and virtue and liberty have been greatly flattered,

greatly increased by the observations which this little volume has

served to elicit.

It must not, however, be forgotten, that this is a representation of

nothing but the unformed and infant poetical literature of Russia.

That literature had its birth but yesterday, and certainly its present

strength and beauty give fair hope for to-morrow. In it are elements

of improvement, and buds and blossoms of future expectation. They

are scattered over “half a world,” and in due time will ripen, to

encourage, to console, and to stimulate myriads and millions. It will

then be an interesting task, to compare the maturer charms of Sclavonic

song, with these its earliest gems.

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

INTRODUCTION vii

Derzhavin 1

Batiushkov 45

Lomonosov 65

Zhukovsky 71

Karamsin 103

Dmitriev 117

Krĭlov 129

Khemnitzer 135

Bobrov 145

Bogdanovich 163

Davĭdov 175

Kostrov 179

Neledinsky Meletzky 183

National Songs 192

Biographical and Critical Notices 203

INTRODUCTION.

Few subjects can be more complacent to the philanthropist than to trace

the forward march of mind; peculiarly complacent where its progress is

neither slow nor doubtful; where the stream of light spreads widening

more and more over the whole surface of society; and more delightful

yet, where the first rays of twilight break out of the thick darkness

of long and dreary barbarism, and the day advances with sure and steady

steps. Such were the circumstances under which Russia presented itself

to my contemplation. It had emerged, as it were instantaneously, from

a night of ignorance, to occupy a situation in the world of intellect,

not contemptible, even when compared with that of southern nations;

but singularly striking as contrasted with the almost universal

ignorance which pervaded the immense empire of the Tzars, before Peter

the Great, the Russian Colossus, as one of their poets calls him, gave

it the first impulse towards civilization[1]. The foundation is now

laid, on which the proud edifice of civilization will be raised. The

moral _vis inertiæ_ is in action: and the immense political influence

which Russia has acquired, and seems likely to maintain, will be less

appalling, at all events, to the moralist, if not to the statesman,

than if wholly unaccompanied by a spirit of literature; while, on the

other hand, it is consolatory to remember, that every instance which

Russia affords of the advance of knowledge, is a pledge that the

blessings of freedom and good government, which follow in the train of

intellectual distinction, cannot be for ever shut out.

Lomonosov[2] is the father of Russian poetry. It did not advance from

step to step through various gradations of improvement, but received

from his extraordinary genius an elevation and a purity which are

singularly opposed to the barbarous compositions which preceded him.

He did more than any other writer to fix the standard of language, and

wielded a then uncouth and unformed idiom with singular address and

power. A natural sense of harmony and beauty, made sublimer by early

contemplation of the prophetic and the poetical compositions of the

Old Testament, did more for his own fame, and for the future literary

reputation of his country, than could have resulted from the closest

acquaintance with the great names of Greece or Rome. His style is

singularly vigorous, and his works are distinguished throughout for

their bold and impressive character. They have been collected into six

volumes; and his name, as well as that of his rival Sumarokov, has

already found its way, with some particulars of his life and writings,

into our biographical dictionaries[3].

Sumarokov, whose productions are very voluminous, and were once

considered models of grace, beauty, and harmony, has been much

neglected of late years. His dramatic compositions are, for the most

part, gross and indecent; his contemptuous jealousy of Lomonosov,

though so greatly his superior, is often most ridiculously intruding

itself; but in one point of view, at least, he is entitled to

respect and gratitude. He is the eldest of the Russian fabulists;

the introducer of a species of composition, in which Russian poetry

possesses treasures more varied and more valuable than that of any

other nation. It is no mean praise to say, and it may be said truly,

that Russia can produce more than one rival of the delightful La

Fontaine. Of the dramatic writings of Sumarokov, the best is the

tragedy _Demitrĭj Samosvanelz_, or The False Demetrius[4], which has

been translated into English.

Von Visin, who seems to have made Moliere his model, improved greatly

upon Sumarokov. His two most celebrated comedies are _Nedorosl_, The

Spoilt Youth, and _Brigadir_, The Brigadier[5].

Kheraskov holds a high rank among the lyric poets of Russia. He

died a few years ago. He was curator of the Moscow University. He

published a collection of his poems, which he entitled _Bakhariana,

ili Neisviëstnĭj_; Bachariana, or The Unknown; but his great work is

_Rossiada, ili Rasrushchenie Kasanij_; The Russiad, or The Destruction

of Kasan.

But of all the poets of Russia, Derzhavin is in my conception entitled

to the very first place. His compositions breathe a high and sublime

spirit; they are full of inspiration. His versification is sonorous,

original, characteristic; his subjects generally such as allowed him

to give full scope to his ardent imagination and lofty conceptions.

Of modern poets, he most resembles Klopstock: his _Oda Bog_, Ode on

God, with the exception of some of the wonderful passages of the

Old Testament, “written with a pen of fire,” and glowing with the

brightness of heaven, passages of which Derzhavin has frequently

availed himself, is one of the most impressive and sublime addresses

I am acquainted with, on a subject so pre-eminently impressive and

sublime. The first poem which excited the public attention to him was

his _Felitza_.

Bogdanovich has obtained the title of the Russian Anacreon. His

_Dushenka_ (Psyche) is a graceful and lovely poem. I mean at some

future time to give some extracts from this poem, with specimens of

the Russian epics, and longer poetical compositions, which I hope to

collect into one volume. He has also written several dramatic pieces.

Bobrov was well acquainted with the literature of the South of Europe,

and has transfused many of its beauties into his native tongue. Our

English writers especially have given great assistance to his honest

plagiarism. His _Khersonida_, an oriental epic poem, is not so good as

_Lalla Rookh_, but it is very good notwithstanding.

Kapnist has written on a variety of subjects--odes, songs, romances and

translations.

The name of Kostrov closes the list of the most eminent among the

deceased poets of Russia. He died, not long ago, in the meridian of his

days. He had made an admirable translation of Homer, and was engaged in

a version of Ossian, which he left unfinished: the conclusion has since

been added by Gnœdich.

Of all the living writers of Russia, or rather of all the writers

Russia ever produced, the most successful and the most popular is

Karamsin. Derzhavin called him long ago “the nightingale of poetry,”

but it is not to his poetry alone that he owes his fame. Standing on

the summit of modern literature in Russia, he has been loaded with

honours and distinctions, which, however, have not served to check his

wonted urbanity, or to chill his natural goodness of heart. When a

young writer, he was fond of imitating Sterne[6]; a very bad model, it

may be added, since the peculiarities which characterize him are only

tolerable because they are original. Karamsin’s style was then usually

abrupt and unnatural, and its sentimentality wearisome and affected.

But he has outlived his errors, and established his reputation on

their subjection. His great undertaking, the _Rossijskaje Istorije_

(History of Russia), is, without comparison, the first and best

literary work which has been produced in the country it celebrates. It

was received with loud eulogiums throughout the Russian empire; it has

been translated into several European languages; and will probably long

maintain a pre-eminent rank among Russian classics, and become one of

the standard authorities of history[7].

The peculiar excellence of the Russian fabulists has been mentioned.

Sumarokov and Khemnitzer, Dmitriev and Krĭlov, are the most

distinguished among them. Dmitriev, who is still living at Moscow, has

published a great number of fables and ballads, besides translations

from the Latin and other languages. His style is easy, harmonious, and

energetic: some of his compositions have a sublimer character; his

religious poetry is dignified and solemn; his elegies are tender and

affecting.

Krĭlov holds an office in the Imperial library at Petersburg. He is

well known to the _bons vivans_ of the English club. His heavy and

unwieldy appearance is singularly contrasted with the shrewdness and

the grace of his writings. He stings like a wasp, and flies laughingly

away, but always leaves his sting behind him. He has published one

volume of fables, remarkable for their spirit and originality. He now

employs himself in translating Herodotus, having, at an advanced period

of life, first entered on the study of the languages of ancient Greece

and Rome.

Zhukovskij has printed some poetical translations of distinguished

merit from the German, French and English. Among these, his version

of Gray’s elegy is entitled to particular praise. For the sake of

comparison I give the epitaph.

Sdœs’ pepel iunoshi besvremenno sokrĭli;

Chto slava, shchastie, ne snal on v mirœ sem!

No Musĭ ot nego litza ne otvratili,

I melankholii pechat’ bĭla na nem.

On krotok serdtzem bĭl, chuvstvitelen dushoiu

Chuvstvitel’nĭm Tvoretz nagradu polozhil!

Daril neshchastnĭkh on--chœm tolko mog--slesoiu!

V nagradu ot Tvortza on druga poluchil!

Prokhozhii, udalis’! vo grobœ son svjeshchennĭi!

Sud’ba pochivshikh v nem pokrĭta grosnoimgloi

Nadezha robkaje zhivit ikh pepel tlœnnĭi!

Kto snaet, kto nas zhdet sa grobovoi doskoi!

This piece is one among very many translations from the English. The

following verse from Goldsmith’s Edwin and Angelina will be perhaps

recognised from its cadence alone.

Voidikh v moi dom--sabot tam chuzhdĭ

Nœt blaga v suetœ!

Nam malĭje denĭ sdœs’ nuzhdĭ!

Na malĭi mig i nœ!

His _Liudmilla_ (an imitation of Leonora) is deemed more beautiful

and forcible than the original itself. He has written on a variety of

subjects, and is now engaged as a companion to the Grand Dukes.

I believe Batiushkov is now in Italy. He has published translations

from Tibullus and other classics. His most celebrated composition is

his Address to his Penates, which will be found in the present volume.

As it introduces in a very agreeable manner the most eminent of the

Russian poets, and contains some allusion to Russian manners, it will

not, I hope, be without interest to the English reader.

There are many other names which the narrow limits of this volume will

not allow to be introduced at length. Mersljekov’s translations from

the Greek and Latin classics: those of Gnœdich, Knjezhnin, Milonov,

Volkov and Bunina from different sources: Rodsjenkai from Addison, and

many others, have produced an admirable effect upon the taste of the

nation, and given noble examples for the imitation of Russian bards.

I can scarcely hope to satisfy those who are masters of Russian

literature. I have not always satisfied myself; for, far from any

feelings of self-complacency, to do full justice to some of the poets

of Russia has been beyond the compass of my powers. In the instance of

Bogdanovich, especially, the charm I have felt, I have not been able to

convey.

No one can be more alive than I am to the extreme difficulty of

communicating to a foreign version the peculiar characters of the

original. The grace, the harmony, the happy arrangement, the striking

adaptation of words to ideas; every thing, in fact, except the

primary and naked thought, requires for its perfect communication

a genius equal to its first conception: and, in truth, there are

but few instances of enduring and deserved reputation dependent

only on successful poetical translations, unaided by the merits of

distinguished original works.

One thing, however, is certain; I have intended no wrong,--I hope I

have done no wrong, to the names and to the works I now introduce to

my countrymen; I mean only to be an honest, conscientious interpreter.

Many of the charms of their compositions have probably escaped me:

their faults, I am afraid, are but too faithfully rendered; I have

discovered many, but I dared not meddle with them.

The measure of the original has been generally preserved. This adhesion

to one of the distinguishing characters of poetical composition has

been made of late quite a point of conscience in Germany (a country

which possesses a greater number of excellent and faithful translations

than all the united world besides); and as far as the genius of the

language will admit, I hope it will become so in England[8]. It would

have been well if our early translators had been more honest and

correct in this particular--their aberrations have given a sort of

sanction to the wanderings of others. The future poets of Russia have

excellent precursors to study, especially as regards the fidelity of

their early versions.

A few words on the peculiarities of the Russian language will not,

perhaps, be misplaced[9].

The mother-tongue of nearly forty millions of human beings, and which

in the course of thirteen centuries has undergone no radical change, is

indeed entitled to some attention. All Russian grammarians claim for

it an antiquity at least equal to that of the city of Novogorod. The

oldest written documents that exist are two treaties with the Greek

emperors, made by Oleg, A.D. 912, and Igor, A.D. 943. Christianity,

introduced into Russia at the beginning of the eleventh century by

Vladimir the Great, brought with it many words of Greek origin. The

Tartars added considerably to the vocabulary during the two centuries

of their domination. The intercourse which Peter the Great established

with foreign nations, increased it still more; and of late years a

great number of words have been amalgamated with it from the French,

German, and English. It is now one of the richest, if not the richest,

of all the European languages, and contains a multitude of words which

can only be expressed by compounds and redundant definitions in any

northern tongues. Schlözer calculates, that of the five hundred roots

on which the modern Russ is raised, three-fourths of the number are

derived from Greek, Latin, and German. Many are of Sans-crit origin, of

which Adelung published a list in 1811[10].

Printing was introduced into Russia about the middle of the sixteenth

century. The oldest printed book which has been discovered is a

Sclavonic Psalter, bearing the date Kiev, 1551; two years after, a

press was established in Moscow. The Sclavonic alphabet, said to have

been introduced by Cyrillus in the ninth century, consists of forty-two

letters. The modern Russ has only thirty-five: those unknown to the

English are as follows:

Letters. Sounds and Orthography adopted.

Ж[11] zh.

Ф ph.

Х[12] kh (guttural).

Ц tz.

Ч ch (as in chance).

Ш sh.

Щ[13] shtsh, or shch.

Ы[14] ĭ (dull i).

Ъ[15] terminal.

Ь[16] ditto.

Ѣ[17] œ.

Ю[18] iu.

Я je.

Besides these, there are several letters which seem almost identical as

to sound.

Е and Э[19] for e.

И -- І[20] -- i.

С -- З[21] -- s.

Of the above,

Щ appears a compound of Ш and Ч.

Ю -------------------- І -- У.

Я -------------------- І -- Е.

Ѳ (_theta_) and Ѵ (_upsilon_) form a part of the Russian alphabet,

but are seldom used. _h_[22], _c_[23], _x_[24], _f_[25], _w_[26], are

wanting altogether.

The Russian language may be adapted to almost every species of

versification. It is flexible, harmonious, full of rhythmus, rich in

compounds, and possesses all the elements of poetry. From the following

examples in different measures, some idea may be formed of its natural

music.

ADONICS OF FIVE SYLLABLES.

Ti dusha moje

Krasna dævitza,

Moje prezhnjeje

Poliu bovnitza[27].

TROCHAICS OF SEVEN AND EIGHT SYLLABLES.

Stónet sísoi gólu bóchik

Stónet ón i dén’ i nóch’;

Égo mílen’kói druzhéchik,

Otletœ’l daléko próch’[28].

_Derzhavin._

IAMBICS OF SIX AND SEVEN SYLLABLES.

Sakónĭ ó suzhdáiut,

Predmét moéi liubví:

No któ, o sérdtze! mózhet,

Protiv’it’sjé tebǽ[29].

_Karamsin._

DACTYLICS OF SEVEN AND EIGHT SYLLABLES.

Svǽri rabótĭ ne snaíut,

Ptítzĭ zhivút bes trudá;

Liúdi ne svǽri ne ptítzĭ,

Liúdi rabótoi zhiv`út[30].

_Karamsin._

ALEXANDRINES.

Bozhéstvennĭí metáll! krasjéshchíi ístukánov,

Zhivótvorjéshchajé dushá pustĭ´kh karmánov[31].

_Von Visin._

HEXAMETERS AND PENTAMETERS.

Tám, tam sætóvat’ mnæ vés’væk moi! górestnii mráchnii

Kázhdĭi medlénnii den’, kázhduíus úzhasom nóch’[32].

Rimes are either masculine or feminine; the former have the accent on

the last syllable, the latter on the penultimate:

Masculine. Feminine.

iskál lobóiu

stál krasóiu

tzár póru

tvár góru[33]

The productions of the Russian press are no index to the national

cultivation. The great majority of that extensive empire are yet little

removed from the uncivilized and brutish state in which they were

left by the Ruriks and the Vladimirs of other times. Unfortunately,

society has few gradations; and there is no influence so unfriendly

to improvement, no state of things so hopeless, as that produced by a

domestic slavery built upon the habits of ages. In Russia, the next

step from absolute dependence is nobility; at least, the intermediate

classes are very inconsiderable. The strength, the intelligence, the

public and the private virtue, of our middling ranks, which serve so

admirably to cement the social edifice, are there wanting. All sympathy

is partial and exclusive. In _this_ country, the spirit of information,

wherever elicited, rapidly spreads over and glows in every link of

the electrical chain of society. It mounts aspiringly, if it have its

origin among the less privileged orders; and it descends through all

the beautiful gradations of rank, when it has its birth in the higher

circles: it is diffusive--it is all-enlightening. But in Russia,

however bright the flame, it is pent up, it cannot spread. The noble

associates with the noble: the slave herds with the slave; but man has

no communion with man. No spot is there, whether sacred to science or

to virtue, in which the “rich and poor” may “meet together,” equalized

though but for a moment, as if the common Father were indeed “the

Maker of all;” and assuredly the Russian nation can make no striking

progress in civilization till the terrible barriers which so completely

separate the different ranks are destroyed. The million, uninstructed

and unambitious, will, it is to be feared, be long held in the fetters

of vassalage. The personal interests of the ruling few are too clearly,

too fatally opposed to the melioration of the subject many, to allow

any thing to be hoped for from these Lords of the soil. There are, it

must be confessed, active minds, generous energies, at work; but where

is their influence seen? To lead such an immense nation through the

different stages of improvement, to rational and permanent liberty,

were indeed an object worthy of the most aspiring, the most glorious

ambition. It were an achievement not to be hailed by the blast of

trumpet, nor the roar of artillery; (the world, recovering from its

drunken infatuation, is well nigh weary of the unholy triumphs which

have been thus celebrated;) it were an achievement which would hand

down the name of him who should effect it to future ages, linked with

the gratitude, the virtue, the happiness, of successive and long

enduring generations.

I must not, however, be misunderstood. The language of despondency, as

to the progressive improvement and ultimate civilization of Russia,

would be unwarrantable and insincere. If, in the vassalage which

depresses and degrades the most numerous class in that country, we

look in vain for any redeeming circumstance, to create or to encourage

the expectation of a speedy and considerable change; still there

is little fear of active opposition to the progress of truth and

knowledge, among the immense majority of the people; that is, among the

hereditary slaves. They are an inert, unintellectual mass, who, though

they will not probably make sufficient advances, under the present

system, to bring about any very perceptible improvement themselves,

will certainly be little disposed to take any measures in support of

an arbitrary system, or to offer any resistance to those changes whose

benign effects they would so speedily feel. But, as far as _they_ are

concerned, improvement must follow, rather than lead to, any important

melioration. A middle class, as yet neither numerous nor powerful, is

withal growing up in Russia; by and by, they will form the link between

the oppressor and the oppressed. The pride of the first will be brought

down; the ambition of the last will be excited. Bosoms will begin to

glow with hope and ardor, which are now frozen beneath the wintry touch

of bondage; and Russia, full as she is of the materials out of which

great minds are formed, may yet perhaps take her stand in intellectual

eminence among the nations of Europe, at no distant period.

* * * * *

For the interesting notices at the close of this volume I am indebted

to my illustrious friend Von Adelung. Thus to thank him is the least

return I can make.

J. B.

* * * * *

I bore you from the regions of the north,

Where ye first blossom’d, flowers of poetry!

Now light your smiles and pour your incense forth

Beneath our Albion’s more benignant sky.

I cull’d your garlands ’neath the polar star,

From the vast fields of everlasting snow,

Adventurous I transplant your beauties far:--

Still breathe in fragrance, still in beauty glow.

Within _our_ temple many a holy wreath,

Hallowed by genius and by time, is hung:

At our old altar many a bard has sung,

Whose music vibrates from the realms of death.

I may not link your lowlier names with theirs--

The giants of past ages:--but to bring

To our Parnassus one delightful thing,

Would gild my hopes and answer all my prayers.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] So an anonymous Russian poet:

Russia and Russia’s strength lay hid in dreary night;

God said “Let Peter be!” and then they burst to light.

[2] or Broken Nose.

[3] Under the engravings of Lomonosov an eulogium is sometimes found,

of which the following is a translation:

Where Winter sits upon his throne of snow,

Thus spoke the bright Parnassian Deity:

“Another Pindar is created now,

The king of bards, the lord of music, he.”

And Russia’s bosom heaved with holy glow--

“My Lomonosov! Pindar lives in thee!”

[4] The history of this extraordinary man may be found at length in

Coxe’s Travels, ii. 366-393.

[5] I do not feel myself qualified to give an opinion on the present

state of the Russian Stage: but the translations represented there

from the French and German drama are of acknowledged merit; and many

original pieces have been of late produced, of which their literary men

speak with great delight and even enthusiasm. Ozerov is, I imagine, the

most eminent of their tragic poets.

[6] Especially in his _Puteshestvennik_ (or Traveller).

[7] The German translation is faithful, but heavy and ill-written. The

French, tolerably written, perhaps, but miserably incorrect; Karamsin

told me he had discovered two hundred errors in the first volume

alone. The Italian is a rendering from the French. As a proof of the

estimation in which Karamsin is held, I may mention that I learned at

Petersburg, that several thousand copies of this voluminous work were

distributed in a few weeks; and it was said, the author received fifty

thousand rubles for the copy-right of the second edition.

[8] The merits of Shakespeare were never fully recognised till he was

clad in garments something like his own. There is generally no idea in

this country of the sublime and imposing character of the writings of

Klopstock, for they have never been presented to us in any thing like

their original form. If any one wish to study the freezing effect of

a translation made in conformity to what are called the prejudices,

or the habits of a people, let him read the Hamlet of Moratin; a man

confessedly of extraordinary talent; an original dramatic writer

of most distinguished success; and who has preserved a general

faithfulness to the sense of his author, even in this translation: let

him compare this, or any of the plays of Le Tourneur, or the choicest

passages of Ducis, with ten lines taken at random from Voss, or

Schlegel, and the argument will be fully understood.

[9] It is a remarkable fact, that the first Russian Grammar ever

published was published in England. It was entitled H. W. Ludolfi

_Grammatica Russica, quæ continet et manuductionem quandam ad

Grammaticam Sclavonicam_. Oxon. 1696.

[10] _Rapports entre les Langues Russe et Sans-crite._

[11] I have adopted _zh_ to convey the sound of this letter, though it

is sometimes rendered by j; it is nearly equivalent to the French _j_,

as in _jardin_, _jaune_; or to s and z in the English words, measure,

vision, azure.

[12] A strong guttural; the Greek χ.

[13] This is the letter which disfigures Russian words so much when

written in Roman characters. “I defend,” which has but seven letters

in the original, is thus conveyed by fourteen--_sashchishchaju_;

and much more awkwardly in the German system of orthography by

twenty--_saschtschischtschaju_. Its exact sound may be produced

by connecting together the two last syllables of the words

establi_sht-ch_urch.

[14] The _shibboleth_ of the Russian alphabet. It is hardly ever well

pronounced by foreigners. It is a deep, indistinct articulation,

something like _i_ in _bill_.

[15] A mere expletive; and yet so common that Schlözer says, to abandon

it would diminish the trouble and expense of writing and printing five

_per cent._ It occurs, on an average, fifty times among a thousand

letters. It can only be used as the termination of a syllable or a word.

[16] This letter, which is also a terminal, gives to the consonant that

precedes it the sound which the French call _mouillé_, as in _ai_ll_e_,

_a_gn_eau_; like _gn_ or _gl_ in Italian; in Spanish the _ñ_ or _ll_. I

have adopted an apostrophe ’ when it is introduced.

[17] The close _e_ of the French.

[18] The English _u_, as in union, universe, always pronounced _iu_.

[19] Is of modern introduction, and is used principally in the

beginning of words of foreign origin, as Edinburgh, Etymology.

[20] The first of these is used before a consonant, the latter before a

vowel.

[21] С is the sharp s or ss, as in lass: З the soft single s, as

usually pronounced in the middle of words; _e.g._ muse.

[22] H, where it occurs in foreign words, is rendered by Г, _g_.

[23] C, is in fact an expletive in all languages.

[24] X, is always written ks, _v. g._ Aleksandr (Alexander).

[25] F, is conveyed usually by the Ф (ph), sometimes by the В (v).

[26] The Germans use their W for the Russian В, which latter is in

fact the English _v_. This letter might in English, as in Russian,

conveniently stand in the alphabet next to B. It is a second B, a

letter which in all times has been constantly confounded with it. In

Spanish the two letters are used almost indifferently.

[27]

Thou my sweet spirit,

Beautiful maiden!

Thou my fair empress,

Queen of my bosom!

[28]

Deeply sighs the little wood-dove,

Deeply sighs he day and night;

His beloved heart-companion

Far away has wing’d her flight.

[29]

But law’s imposing fetters

My burning love restrain:

Yet who, O heart! could ever

O’er thee a victory gain?

[30]

Beasts of the field never labour,

Birds of the forest repose;

Man, neither one nor the other,

Man is appointed to toil.

[31]

Thou godlike metal gold! that mov’st the very statues,

And to an empty purse canst give a living spirit.

[32]

There, there do I wear out life’s pilgrimage, sorrowing and dreary,

While the day in its misery rolls, and the terrible night.

[33] The best Russian Grammar I have met with is Tappe’s

_Theoretisch-praktische Russische Sprachlehre_. I have availed myself

of it for many of the preceding observations.

_RUSSIAN ANTHOLOGY._

DERZHAVIN.

GOD[1].

O Thou eternal One! whose presence bright

All space doth occupy, all motion guide;

Unchanged through time’s all-devastating flight;

Thou only God! There is no God beside!

Being above all beings! Three in One!

Whom none can comprehend and none explore;

Who fill’st existence with _Thyself_ alone:

Embracing all,--supporting,--ruling o’er,--

Being whom we call GOD--and know no more[2]!

In its sublime research, philosophy

May measure out the ocean-deep--may count

The sands or the sun’s rays--but, God! for Thee

There is no weight nor measure:--none can mount

Up to Thy mysteries; Reason’s brightest spark,

Though kindled by Thy light, in vain would try

To trace Thy counsels, infinite and dark:

And thought is lost ere thought can soar so high,

Even like past moments in eternity.

Thou from primeval nothingness didst call

First chaos, then existence;--Lord! on Thee

Eternity had its foundation:--all

Sprung forth from Thee:--of light, joy, harmony,

Sole origin:--all life, all beauty Thine.

Thy word created all, and doth create;

Thy splendor fills all space with rays divine.

Thou art, and wert, and shalt be! Glorious! Great!

Light-giving, life-sustaining Potentate!

Thy chains the unmeasured universe surround:

Upheld by Thee, by Thee inspired with breath!

Thou the beginning with the end hast bound,

And beautifully mingled life and death!

As sparks mount upwards from the fiery blaze,

So suns are born, so worlds spring forth from Thee;

And as the spangles in the sunny rays

Shine round the silver snow, the pageantry

Of heaven’s bright army glitters in Thy praise[3].

A million torches lighted by Thy hand

Wander unwearied through the blue abyss:

They own Thy power, accomplish Thy command;

All gay with life, all eloquent with bliss.

What shall we call them? Piles of crystal light--

A glorious company of golden streams--

Lamps of celestial ether burning bright--

Suns lighting systems with their joyous beams?

But Thou to these art as the noon to night.

Yes! as a drop of water in the sea,

All this magnificence in Thee is lost:--

What are ten thousand worlds compared to Thee?

And what am _I_ then? Heaven’s unnumber’d host,

Though multiplied by myriads, and array’d

In all the glory of sublimest thought;

Is but an atom in the balance weigh’d

Against Thy greatness; is a cypher brought

Against infinity! What am I then? Nought!

Nought! But the effluence of Thy light divine,

Pervading worlds, hath reach’d my bosom too;

Yes! in my spirit doth Thy spirit shine

As shines the sun-beam in a drop of dew.

Nought! but I live, and on hope’s pinions fly

Eager towards Thy presence; for in Thee

I live, and breathe, and dwell; aspiring high,

Even to the throne of Thy divinity.

I am, O God! and surely _Thou_ must be!

Thou art! directing, guiding all, Thou art!

Direct my understanding then to Thee;

Control my spirit, guide my wandering heart:

Though but an atom midst immensity,

Still I am something, fashion’d by Thy hand!

I hold a middle rank ’twixt heaven and earth,

On the last verge of mortal being stand,

Close to the realms where angels have their birth,

Just on the boundaries of the spirit-land!

The chain of being is complete in me;

In me is matter’s last gradation lost,

And the next step is spirit--Deity!

I can command the lightning, and am dust!

A monarch, and a slave; a worm, a god!

Whence came I here, and how? so marvellously

Constructed and conceived? unknown! this clod

Lives surely through some higher energy;

For from itself alone it could not be!

Creator, yes! Thy wisdom and Thy word

Created _me_! Thou source of life and good!

Thou spirit of my spirit, and my Lord!

Thy light, Thy love, in their bright plenitude

Fill’d me with an immortal soul, to spring

Over the abyss of death, and bade it wear

The garments of eternal day, and wing

Its heavenly flight beyond this little sphere,

Even to its source--to Thee--its Author there.

O thoughts ineffable! O visions blest!

Though worthless our conceptions all of Thee,

Yet shall Thy shadowed image fill our breast,

And waft its homage to Thy Deity.

God! thus alone my lowly thoughts can soar;

Thus seek Thy presence--Being wise and good!

Midst Thy vast works admire, obey, adore;

And when the tongue is eloquent no more,

The soul shall speak in tears of gratitude.

ON THE DEATH OF MESHCHERSKY.

Ah! that funereal toll! loud tongue of time!

What woes are centred in that frightful sound!

It calls! it calls me with a voice sublime,

To the lone chambers of the burial ground.

My life’s first footsteps are midst yawning graves;

A pale, teeth-clattering spectre passes nigh;

A scythe of lightning that pale spectre waves,

Mows down man’s days like grass, and hurries by.

Nought his untired rapacity can cloy:

Monarchs and slaves are all the earth-worm’s food;

And the wild-raging elements destroy

Even the recording tomb. Vicissitude

Devours the pride of glory; as the sea

Insatiate drinks the waters, so our days

And years are lost in deep eternity;

Cities and empires vandal death decays.

We tremble on the borders of the abyss,

And giddy totter headlong from on high;

For death with life our common portion is,

And man is only born that he may die.

Death knows no sympathy; he tramples on

All tenderness--extinguishes the stars--

Tears from the firmament the glowing sun,

And blots out worlds in his gigantic wars.

But mortal man forgets mortality!

His dreams crowd ages into life’s short day;--

While, like a midnight robber stealing by,

Death plunders time by hour and hour away.

When least we fear, then is the traitor nigh;

Where most secure we seem, he loves to come:

Less swift than he, the bolts of thunder fly,

Less sure than he, the lightning strikes the dome.

Thou son of luxury! child of dance and song,

O whither, whither is thy spirit fled?

On life’s dull sea thy bark delayed not long,

But sought the silent haven of the dead.

Here is thy dust! Thy spirit is not here!

_Where_ is it? There. _Where_ there? ’tis all unknown:

We weep and sigh--alas! we know not _where_!

For man is doubt and darkness’ eldest son.

Where love and joy and health and worldly good,

And all life’s pleasures in their splendor glow;

He dries the nerves up, he congeals the blood,

And shakes the very soul with mighty woe.

The songs of joy are funeral cries become--

And luxury’s board is cover’d with a pall--

The chamber of the banquet is a tomb:

Death, the pale autocrat, he rules o’er all.

He rules o’er all--and him must kings obey,

Whose will no counsel knows and no control;

The proud and gilded great ones are his prey,

Who stand like pillars in a tyrant’s hall.

Beauty and beauty’s charms are nought to him,

Man’s intellect is crush’d by his decrees;

Man’s brightest light his dreadful frown can dim--

He whets his scythe with trophies such as these.

Death makes all nature tremble! What are we?

To-morrow dust, though almost gods to-day!

A mixture strange of pride and poverty:

Now basking in hope’s fair and gladdening ray;

To-morrow--what is man to-morrow? Nought!

How swiftly rolls the never-tarrying stream,

Hour after hour to gloomy chaos brought;

While ages dawn and vanish like a dream!

Even like an infant’s sweet imagining,

My early, lovely spring-tide hurried on:

Beauty just smiled and sported--then took wing;

Joy laugh’d a moment and then joy was gone.

Now less susceptible of bliss, less blest,

Wiser and worldlier, panting for a name;

With a vain thirst of honour, pain’d, opprest,

I labour wearied up the hill of fame.

But manhood too and manhood’s care will pass,

And glory’s struggles be ere long forgot;

For fame, like wealth, has busy wings, alas!

And joy’s and sorrow’s sound will move us not.

Begone, ye vain pursuits, ye dreams of bliss,

Changing and false, no longer flatter me!

I stand upon the sepulchre’s abyss,

In the dark portal of eternity.

To-day, my friend! _may_ bring our final doom;

If not to-day, to-morrow surely _will_:

Why look we sadly on Meshchersky’s tomb?

Here he was happy--he is happy still!

Life was not given for ages to endure,

But virtue on death’s bosom finds her rest;

And know--a spirit order’d well and pure,

May make life’s sorrows and life’s changes blest.

THE WATERFALL.

Lo! like a glorious pile of diamonds bright,

Built on the steadfast cliffs, the waterfall

Pours forth its gems of pearl and silver light:

They sink, they rise, and sparkling cover all

With infinite refulgence; while its song,

Sublime as thunder, rolls the woods along--

Rolls through the woods--they send its accents back,

Whose last vibration in the desert dies:

Its radiance glances o’er the watery track,

Till the soft wave, as wrapt in slumber, lies

Beneath the forest-shade; then sweetly flows

A milky stream, all silent, as it goes.

Its foam is scattered on the margent bound,

Skirting the darksome grove. But list! the hum

Of industry, the rattling hammer’s sound,

Files whizzing, creaking sluices, echoed come

On the fast-travelling breeze! O no! no voice

Is heard around, but thy majestic noise!

When the mad storm-wind tears the oak asunder,

In thee its shivered fragments find their tomb;

When rocks are riven by the bolt of thunder,

As sands they sink into thy mighty womb:

The ice that would imprison thy proud tide,

Like bits of broken glass is scattered wide.

The fierce wolf prowls around thee--there he stands

Listening--not fearful, for he nothing fears:

His red eyes burn like fury-kindled brands,

Like bristles o’er him his course fur he rears;

Howling, thy dreadful roar he oft repeats,

And, more ferocious, hastes to bloodier feats.

The wild stag hears thy falling waters’ sound,

And tremblingly flies forward--o’er her back

She bends her stately horns--the noiseless ground

Her hurried feet impress not--and her track

Is lost amidst the tumult of the breeze,

And the leaves falling from the rustling trees.

The wild horse thee approaches in his turn:

He changes not his proudly rapid stride;

His mane stands up erect--his nostrils burn--

He snorts--he pricks his ears--and starts aside;

Then rushing madly forward to thy steep,

He dashes down into thy torrents deep.

Beneath the cedar, in abstraction sunk,

Close to thine awful pile of majesty,

On yonder old and mouldering moss-bound trunk,

That hangs upon the cliff’s rude edge, I see

An old man, on whose forehead winter’s snow

Is scattered, and his hand supports his brow.

The lance, the sword, the ample shield beneath

Lie at his feet obscured by spreading rust;

His casque is circled by an ivy wreath--

Those arms were once his country’s pride and trust:

And yet upon his golden breast-plate plays

The gentle brightness of the sunset rays.

He sits, and muses on the rapid stream,

While deep thoughts struggling from his bosom rise:

“Emblem of man! here brightly pictured seem

The world’s gay scenery and its pageantries,

Which, as delusive as thy shining wave,

Glow for the proud, the coward and the slave.

So is our little stream of life poured out,

In the wild turbulence of passion: so,

Midst glory’s glance and victory’s thunder-shout,

The joys of life in hurried exile go--

Till hope’s fair smile and beauty’s ray of light

Are shrouded in the griefs and storms of night.

Day after day prepares the funeral shroud;

The world is gray with age:--the striking hour

Is but an echo of death’s summons loud--

The jarring of the dark grave’s prison door:

Into its deep abyss--devouring all--

Kings and the friends of kings alike must fall.

Aye! they must fall! see that unconquered one

Midst Rome’s high senate--hark! his deeds they tell:

He stretch’d his hand to seize the proffered crown;

His mantle veiled his countenance--he fell.

Where are the schemes, the hopes that dazzled him?

Those eyes, aspiring to a throne, are dim[4].

Aye! they must fall! another hero see,

From triumph’s golden chariot fortune flings:

The proudest son of magnanimity,

Who scorned the purple robe:--ev’n he whom kings

Looked to with reverence: he in prison dies,

Heaven’s light extinguished in his vacant eyes[5].

Aye! they must fall! as I have fallen--I,

Whom late with flowery wreaths the cities crown’d;

And dazzling phantoms played so smilingly

Midst laurels, olive-branches waving round;

’Tis past--’tis past--for in the battle now

My hand no lightnings at the foe can throw.

My strength abandons me; the tempest’s roar

Hath in its fury borne my lance away:

My spirit rises proudly as before,

But triumph hides her false and treacherous ray.”

He spake--he slumbered, wearied and opprest;

And Morpheus o’er him waved his wings of rest.

A wintry darkness visited the world,

Borne on the raven-pinions of the night;

Nothing is heard but thy loud torrents, hurled

Down in their fierceness from the o’erhanging height;

They dash in fury ’gainst the echoing rock,

Even with an Alpine avalanche’s shock.

The desert is as gloomy as the grave;

The mountains seem all wrapt in solemn sleep;

The clouds are rolling by, like wave on wave,

In silent majesty across heaven’s deep.

But see, the pale-faced melancholy moon

Looks tremblingly from her exalted throne:

She look’d out tremblingly, and soon withdrew

Her terror-stricken horns: the old man lay

Sleeping in sweet tranquillity: she knew

Her mighty foe--she knew, and slunk away:

She dared not look on that old man, for he

Was the world’s glory and her enemy[6].

He slumber’d; glorious were his hero-dreams!

And wondrous visions floated round his eye:

While near, the sleeping bolt of thunder seems

To wait from him its awful destiny.

Ten thousand warriors armed around him stand,

And silently attend his high command.

His finger points! the loud artillery’s fire

Follows! a sudden trembling shakes the ground;

Army on army, in their proud attire,

Cover the vales, the hills, the plains around;

They rise like mountains o’er the distant sea,

When from the sunny ray the vapours flee.

His footsteps now imprint the dewy grass;

There early morning opens on his view,

Amidst the dust, th’ innumerable mass

Of enemies: he looks their squadrons through,

And reads the secrets of their vast array,

Even as an eagle soaring o’er his prey.

Then like a Magus in his dark retreat

He calls his spirits round him; gathering those

And scattering these, with prudence infinite,

Thro’ valleys, plains, and mountains; then he throws

O’er all a mantle of omnipotence,

While the storm bursts with furious vehemence.

The eagle’s daring, and the crescent’s pride,

There, by the ebony and the amber sea[7],

He humbles; and, by the evening’s golden side[8],

Subdues the golden fleece and Kolkhidi.

A thousand trophies of victorious war

Redeem the losses of the snowy tzar[9]:

Like the vermilion ray on morning’s wings,

His triumphs o’er admiring nations beam:

Emperors and empires, heroes, kingdoms, kings,

Unite to praise, unite to honour him,

And raise above his glory-circled head

A laurelled, time-enduring pyramid.

His name, his deeds through hurrying years appear

Bright as the sun-beams on the mountain’s brow,

Dazzling the world with splendor: waving there

Garlands of radiance-giving laurels glow;

Their rays shall animate the future fight,

And fill the brave one’s breast with hope and light.

Envy, disarmed before his piercing glance,

Bends down her head to earth, and hurries by;

Crawls trembling to her vile retreat askance--

She cannot bear the lightnings of his eye.

Go, envy, to thy dark and deep abyss!

What deeds, what fame can be compared to his?

He slumbers midst these images; but now

He hears the howling dogs--the trembling trees;

The vulture’s cries, the screech-owl’s voice of woe,

And the fierce raging of the turbulent breeze;

The wild beasts’ roaring from their distant lair,

And shadowy spirits fill the troubled air.

The oaks are shivered by the maddened storm;

Armies of ravens flap their funeral wings;

The stony mountain shakes its giant form,

And bursts, with terrible re-echoings:

From rock to rock ’tis vibrated around,

And thunders thunder back the thundering sound[10].

A winged woman, clad in sable weeds,

Her long hair scattered by the winds, was there,

Like one with dreadful, deathful news that speeds:

She waved a scythe-like weapon in the air,

And held a golden trump; she called “Arise,”

And her loud voice was echoed through the skies.

See on her casque the frowning eagle rest,

Grasping the fearful thunderbolt: he bears

His country’s shield upon his noble breast.

The old man waked; he shed a shower of tears;

He sighed, and bent his venerable head,

Uttering--“Some hero surely must be dead.

Happy if always combating for right

When combating with glory: happy he

Whose sword knew mercy in the bloodiest fight,

His shield an Ægis for an enemy.

Centuries to come shall celebrate his fame,

And ‘Friend of Man’ shall be his noblest name.

Dear let his memory be, and proud his grave,

And this his epitaph!--‘He lived, he fought

For truth and wisdom: foremost of the brave,

Him glory’s idle glances dazzled not;

’Twas his ambition, generous and great,

A life to life’s great end to consecrate!’

O glory! glory! mighty one on earth!

How justly imaged in this waterfall!

So wild and furious in thy sparkling birth,

Dashing thy torrents down, and dazzling all,

While hurrying thus sublimely from thy height,

Majestic, thundering, beautiful and bright.

How many a wondering eye is turned to thee,

In admiration lost;--short-sighted men!

Thy furious wave gives no fertility;

Thy waters, rolling fiercely through the plain,

Bring nought but devastation and distress,

And leave the flowery vale a wilderness.

O fairer, lovelier is the modest rill,

Watering with steps serene the field, the grove;

Its gentle voice as sweet and soft and still

As shepherd’s pipe, or song of youthful love.

It has no _thundering_ torrent, but it flows

Unwearied, scattering blessings as it goes.

To the wild mountain let the wanderer come,

And, resting on the turf, look round and see,

With sadden’d eye, the green and grassy tomb,

And hear its monitory language: he--

He sleeps below, not famed in war alone;

The great, the good, the generous-minded one.

O be immortal, warlike hero! Thou

Hast done thy duty--all thy duty here.”

So said the old man crowned with locks of snow:

He looked to heaven, then stood in silence there,--

In silence, but the echoes caught the sound,

And filled the listening scenery around.

Who glances there along the mountain’s side,

Just like the moon upon the darkest wave?

What shadow flits across the midnight tide,

Gleaming as if from heaven? The pitchy grave

Is brighter than that gloomy brow, ’tis clad

In deep and desolate abstraction sad!

Specimens of the Russian poets, vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 1 / 7 段