TO W. E. HENLEY

The essays here mentioned on Benjamin Franklin and William Penn were

projects long cherished but in the end abandoned: _The Forest State_

came to maturity three years later as _Prince Otto_.

_608 Bush Street, San Francisco, Cal., February 1880._

MY DEAR HENLEY,--Before my work or anything I sit down to answer your

long and kind letter.

I am well, cheerful, busy, hopeful; I cannot be knocked down; I do not

mind about the _Emigrant_. I never thought it a masterpiece. It was

written to sell, and I believe it will sell; and if it does not, the

next will. You need not be uneasy about my work; I am only beginning to

see my true method.

(1) As to _Studies_. There are two more already gone to Stephen.

_Yoshida Torajiro_, which I think temperate and adequate; and _Thoreau_,

which will want a really Balzacian effort over the proofs. But I want

_Benjamin Franklin and the Art of Virtue_ to follow; and perhaps also

_William Penn_, but this last may be perhaps delayed for another

volume--I think not, though. The _Studies_ will be an intelligent

volume, and in their latter numbers more like what I mean to be my

style, or I mean what my style means to be, for I am passive. (2) The

Essays. Good news indeed. I think _Ordered South_ must be thrown in. It

always swells the volume, and it will never find a more appropriate

place. It was May 1874, Macmillan, I believe. (3) Plays. I did not

understand you meant to try the draft. I shall make you a full scenario

as soon as the _Emigrant_ is done. (4) _Emigrant._ He shall be sent off

next week. (5) Stories. You need not be alarmed that I am going to

imitate Meredith. You know I was a story-teller ingrain; did not that

reassure you? The _Vendetta_, which falls next to be finished, is not

entirely pleasant. But it has points. _The Forest State_ or _The

Greenwood State: A Romance_, is another pair of shoes. It is my old

Semiramis, our half-seen Duke and Duchess, which suddenly sprang into

sunshine clearness as a story the other day. The kind, happy

_denouement_ is unfortunately absolutely undramatic, which will be our

only trouble in quarrying out the play. I mean we shall quarry from it.

_Characters_--Otto Frederick John, hereditary Prince of Gruenwald; Amelia

Seraphina, Princess; Conrad, Baron Gondremarck, Prime Minister;

Cancellarius Greisengesang; Killian Gottesacker, Steward of the River

Farm; Ottilie, his daughter; the Countess von Rosen. Seven in all. A

brave story, I swear; and a brave play too, if we can find the trick to

make the end. The play, I fear, will have to end darkly, and that spoils

the quality as I now see it of a kind of crockery, eighteenth century,

high-life-below-stairs life, breaking up like ice in spring before the

nature and the certain modicum of manhood of my poor, clever,

feather-headed Prince, whom I love already. I see Seraphina too.

Gondremarck is not quite so clear. The Countess von Rosen, I have; I'll

never tell you who she is; it's a secret; but I have known the countess;

well, I will tell you; it's my old Russian friend, Madame Zassetsky.

Certain scenes are, in conception, the best I have ever made, except for

_Hester Noble_. Those at the end, Von Rosen and the Princess, the Prince

and Princess, and the Princess and Gondremarck, as I now see them from

here, should be nuts, Henley, nuts. It irks me not to go to them

straight. But the _Emigrant_ stops the way; then a reassured scenario

for _Hester_; then the _Vendetta_; then two (or three) essays--_Benjamin

Franklin_, _Thoughts on Literature as an Art_, _Dialogue on Character

and Destiny between two Puppets_, _The Human Compromise_; and then, at

length--come to me, my Prince. O Lord, it's going to be courtly! And

there is not an ugly person nor an ugly scene in it. The _Slate_ both

Fanny and I have damned utterly; it is too morbid, ugly, and unkind;

better starvation.

The Works of Robert Louis Stevenson - Swanston Edition, Vol. 23 · 第 391 / 567 题