II

It must be evident, however, to any one acquainted with popular ideas

of God that if in a progressive world we thus are to maintain a vital

confidence in the spiritual nature of creative reality and so rejoice

in the guidance of the Spirit amid change, we must win through in our

thinking to a very much greater conception of God than that to which

popular Christianity has been accustomed. Few passages in Scripture

better deserve a preacher's attention than God's accusation against his

people in the 50th Psalm: "Thou thoughtest that I was altogether such a

one as thyself." The universal applicability of this charge is evident

to any one who knows the history of man's religious thought. If in the

beginning God did make man in his own image, man has been busy ever

since making God in his image, and the deplorable consequences are

everywhere to be seen. From idolaters, who bow down before wooden

images of the divine in human form, to ourselves, praying to a

magnified man throned somewhere in the skies, man has persistently run

God into his own mold. To be sure, this tendency of man to think of

God as altogether such a one as ourselves is nothing to be surprised

at. Even when we deal with our human fellows, we read ourselves into

our understandings of them. A contemporary observer tells us that

whenever a portrait of Gladstone appeared in French papers he was made

to look like a Frenchman, and that when he was represented in Japanese

papers his countenance had an unmistakably Japanese cast.

If this habitual tendency to read ourselves into other people is

evident even when we deal with human personalities, whom we can know

well, how can it be absent from man's thought of the eternal? A man

needs only to go out on a starry night with the revelations of modern

astronomy in his mind and to consider the one who made all this and

whose power sustains it, to see how utterly beyond our adequate

comprehension he must be. As men in old tales used to take diffused

superhumans, the genii, and by magic word bring them down into a

stoppered bottle where they could be held in manageable form, so man

has taken the vastness of God and run it into a human symbol.

This persistent anthropomorphism is revealed in our religious

ceremonies. Within Christianity itself are systems of priestcraft

where the individual believer has no glad, free access to his Father's

presence, but where his approach must be mediated by a priestly ritual,

his forgiveness assured by a priestly declaration, his salvation sealed

by a priestly sacrament. This idea that God must be approached by

stated ceremonies came directly from thinking of God in terms of a

human monarch. No common man could walk carelessly into the presence

of an old-time king. There were proprieties to be observed. There

were courtiers who knew the proper approach to royalty, through whom

the common folk would better send petitions up and from whom they would

better look for favour. So God was pictured as a human monarch with

his throne, his scepter, his ministering attendants. Here on earth the

priests were those courtiers who knew the effectual way of reaching

him, by whom we would best send up our prayers, through whom we would

best look for our salvation. Nordau is not exaggerating when he says:

"When we have studied the sacrificial rites, the incantations, prayers,

hymns, and ceremonies of religion, we have as complete a picture of the

relations between our ancestors and their chiefs as if we had seen them

with our own eyes." [2]

Our anthropomorphism, however, reaches its most dangerous form in our

inward imaginations of God's character. How the pot has called the

kettle black! Man has read his vanities into God, until he has

supposed that singing anthems to God's praise might flatter him as it

would flatter us. Man has read his cruelties into God, and what in

moments of vindictiveness and wrath we would like to do our enemies we

have supposed Eternal God would do to his. Man has read his religious

partisanship into God; he who holds Orion and the Pleiades in his

leash, the Almighty and Everlasting God, before whom in the beginning

the morning stars sang together, has been conceived as though he were a

Baptist or a Methodist, a Presbyterian or an Anglican. Man has read

his racial pride into God; nations have thought themselves his chosen

people above all his other children because they seemed so to

themselves. The centuries are sick with a god made in man's image, and

all the time the real God has been saying, "Thou thoughtest that I was

altogether such a one as thyself."

The unhappy prevalence of this mental idolatry is one of the chief

causes for the loss of religious faith among the younger generation.

They have grown up in our homes and churches with their imaginations

dwelling on a God made in man's image, and now through education they

have moved out into a universe so much too big for that little god of

theirs either to have made in the first place or to handle now that

they find it hard to believe in him. Astronomers tell us that there

are a hundred million luminous stars in our sky, and dark stars in

unknown multitudes; that these stars range from a million to ten

million miles in diameter; that some of them are so vast that were they

brought as close to us as our sun is they would fill the entire

horizon; and that these systems are scattered through the stellar

spaces at distances so incredible that, were some hardy discoverer to

seek our planet in the midst of them, it would be like looking for a

needle lost somewhere on the western prairies. The consequence is

inevitable: a vast progressive universe plus an inadequate God means

that in many minds faith in God goes to pieces.

Christianity and Progress · 第 44 / 52 题