VI

We have said that when science has given us all its facts we still need

a spiritual interpretation of the facts; that when science has put all

its energies into our hands we still need spiritual mastery over their

use. Let us say in conclusion that, when science has given us all its

power, we still need another kind of power which it is not the business

of science to supply. Long ago somebody who knew the inner meaning of

religion wrote:

"The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.

He maketh me to lie down in green pastures;

He leadeth me beside still waters.

He restoreth my soul."

That last phrase sums up one of the deepest needs of human life. We

are in constant want of spiritual repair; we are lost without a fresh

influx of inward power; we desperately need to have our souls restored.

A young British soldier once came in from the trenches where his

aggressive powers had been in full employ and, having heard one of the

finest concert companies that London could send out, he wrote in a

letter to his family: "I have just come down from the trenches, and

have been listening to one of the best concerts I ever attended. It

makes one feel that perhaps there is a good God after all." The two

aspects of life which that soldier discovered in himself all men

possess. One takes us to life's trenches; the other throws us back on

some revelation of grace and beauty that we may be sure of God. With

one we seek aggressively to master life; with the other we seek

receptively to be inspired. Every normal man needs these two kinds of

influence: one to send him informed and alert to his tasks, the other

to float his soul off its sandbars on the rising tide of spiritual

reassurance and power. Every normal man needs two attitudes: one when

he goes into action determined to do his work and to do it well, and

the other when he subdues his spirit to receptivity and with the

Psalmist cries,

"My soul, wait thou in silence for God only;

For my expectation is from him."

When science has given us all the power it can, we still need another

kind of power which science cannot give.

Whatever else the scientific control of life may have accomplished, it

has not saved mankind from the old and devastating problems of trouble

and sin. So far as individual experience of these is concerned, there

is little discernable difference between two thousand years before

Christ and two thousand years afterward. Still disasters fall upon our

lives, sometimes as swift in their assault as wild beasts leaping from

an unsuspected ambush. Still troubles come, long drawn out and

wearying, like the monotonous dripping of water with which old

torturers used to drive their victims mad. Still sins bring shame to

the conscience and tragic consequence to the life, and tiresome work,

losing the buoyancy of its first inspiration, drags itself out into

purposeless effort and bores us with its futility. Folk now, as much

as ever in all history, need to have their souls restored. The

scientific control of life, however, is not adequate for that.

Electricity and subways and motor cars do not restore the soul; and to

know that there are millions upon millions of solar systems, like our

own, scattered through space does not restore the soul; and to delve in

the sea or to fly in the air or to fling our words through the ether

does not restore the soul. The need of religion is perennial and would

be though our scientific control over life were extended infinitely

beyond our present hope, for the innermost ministry of religion to

human life is the restoration of the soul.

In this fact lies the failure of that type of naturalism which

endeavours to keep religion as a subjective experience and denies the

reality of an objective God. If we are not already familiar with this

attempted substitution we soon shall be, for our young people are being

taught it in many a classroom now. One of the basic principles of this

new teaching is belief in the spiritual life but, when one inquires

where the spiritual life is, he discovers that it is altogether within

ourselves--there is no original, creative and abiding Spiritual Life

from whom we come, by whom we are sustained, in whom we live. Rather,

as flowers reveal in their fragrance a beauty which is not in the earth

where they grow nor in the roots on which they depend, so our spiritual

life is the mysterious refinement of the material out of which we are

constructed, and it has nothing to correspond with it in the source

from which we sprang. Nevertheless, the new naturalism exalts this

spiritual life within us, calls it our crown and glory, bids us

cultivate and diffuse it, says about it nearly everything a Christian

says except that it is a revelation of eternal reality. Moreover, it

is difficult to differentiate from this outspoken group of professed

naturalists another group of humanists who do retain the idea of God,

but merely as the sum total of man's idealistic life. "God," says one

exponent, "is the farthest outreach of our human ideals." That is to

say, our spiritual lives created God, not God our spiritual lives.

God, as one enthusiastic devotee of this new cult has put it, is a sort

of Uncle Sam, the pooling of the idealistic imaginations of multitudes.

Of course he does not exist, yet in a sense he is real; he is the

projection of our loyalties, affections, hopes.

It should go without saying that this idea of God has about as much

intellectual validity as belief in Santa Claus and is even more

sentimental, in that it is a deliberate attempt to disguise in pleasant

and familiar terms a fundamentally materialistic interpretation of

reality. The vital failure of this spiritualized naturalism, however,

lies in the inability of its Uncle Sam to meet the deepest needs on

account of which men at their best have been religious. This deified

projection of our ideals we made up ourselves and so we cannot really

pray to him; he does not objectively exist and so has no unifying

meaning which puts purposefulness into creation and hope ahead of it;

he does not care for any one or anything and so we may not trust him;

and neither in sin can he forgive, cleanse, restore, empower, nor in

sorrow comfort and sustain. A god who functions so poorly is not much

of a god. Once more, therefore, one wonders why in a generation when,

not less, but more, because of all our scientific mastery the souls of

men are starved and tired, the Church is not captured by a new sense of

mission. It is precisely in a day when the active and pugnacious

energies of men are most involved in the conquest of the world that the

spirit becomes most worn for lack of sustenance. To be assured of the

nearness and reality and availability of the spiritual world is a

matter of life and death to multitudes of folk to-day. There could

hardly be a more alluring time in which to make the Holy Spirit real to

the world. For the supreme moral asset in any man's life is not his

aggressiveness nor his pugnacity, but his capacity to be inspired--to

be inspired by great books, great music, by love and friendship; to be

inspired by great faiths, great hopes, great ideals; to be inspired

supremely by the Spirit of God. For so we are lifted until the things

we tried to see and could not we now can see because of the altitude at

which we stand, and the things we tried to do and could not we now can

do because of the fellowship in which we live. To one asserting the

adequacy of the scientific control of life, therefore, the Christian's

third answer is clear: man's deepest need is spiritual power, and

spiritual power comes out of the soul's deep fellowships with the

living God.

Such, then, is the abiding need of religion in a scientific age. To be

scientifically minded is one of the supreme achievements of mankind.

To love truth, as science loves it, to seek truth tirelessly, as

science seeks it, to reveal the latent resources of the universe in

hope that men will use them for good and not for evil, as science does,

is one of the chief glories of our race. When, however, we have taken

everything that science gives, it is not enough for life. When we have

facts, we still need a spiritual interpretation of facts; when we have

all the scientific forces that we can get our hands upon, we still need

spiritual mastery over their use; and, beyond all the power that

science gives, we need that inward power which comes from spiritual

fellowships alone. Religion is indispensable. To build human life

upon another basis is to erect civilization upon sand, where the rain

descends and the floods come and the winds blow and beat upon the house

and it falls and great is the fall thereof.

[1] Andrew D. White: A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology

in Christendom, Vol. II, p. 16.

[2] Quoted in the Hibbert Journal, Vol. III, January 1905, p. 296.

[3] Psalm 19:1.

[4] Ernst Haeckel: The Wonders of Life, p. 413.

[5] Arthur Schopenhauer: Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, Zweiter

Band, Kapital 46, Von der Nichtigkeit und dem Leiden des Lebens, p. 669.

Christianity and Progress · 第 25 / 52 题