Let us read another line--

"_And now he will raise the mischief with them; that his anger burns

like hell_."

That is true. The bible says of God--"My anger burns to the lowest

hell." And that is all that the defendant says. Every word of it is

in the bible. He simply does not believe it--and for that reason is a

"blasphemer."

I say to you now, gentlemen,--and I shall argue to the Court,--that

there is not in what I have read a solitary blasphemous word--not a word

that has not been said in hundreds of pulpits in the Christian world.

Theodore Parker, a Unitarian, speaking of this bible-God, said: "Vishnu

with a necklace of skulls, Vishnu with bracelets of living, hissing

serpents, is a figure of Love and Mercy compared to the God of the Old

Testament." That, we might call "blasphemy," but not what I have read.

Trial of C. B. Reynolds For Blasphemy, at Morristown, N. J., May 1887: Defence · 第 9 / 12 题