In the cities, these birds make choice of a particular chimney for their

roosting place, where, early in spring, before they have begun building,

both sexes resort in multitudes, from an hour or more before sunset,

until long after dark. Before entering the aperture, they fly round and

over it many times, but finally go in one at a time, until hurried by

the lateness of the hour, several drop in together. They cling to the

wall with their claws, supporting themselves also by their sharp tail,

until the dawn, when, with a roaring sound, the whole pass out almost

at once. Whilst at St Francisville in Louisiana, I took the trouble of

counting how many entered one chimney before dark. I sat at a window not

far from the spot, and reckoned upwards of a thousand, having missed a

considerable number. The place at that time contained about a hundred

houses, and no doubt existed in my mind that the greater number of these

birds were on their way southward, and had merely stopped there for the

night.

Immediately after my arrival at Louisville, in the State of Kentucky, I

became acquainted with the hospitable and amiable Major WILLIAM CROGHAN

and his family. While talking one day about birds, he asked me if I had

seen the trees in which the Swallows were supposed to spend the winter,

but which they only entered, he said, for the purpose of roosting.

Answering in the affirmative, I was informed that on my way back to

town, there was a tree remarkable on account of the immense numbers

that resorted to it, and the place in which it stood was described to

me. I found it to be a sycamore, nearly destitute of branches, sixty or

seventy feet high, between seven and eight feet in diameter at the base,

and about five for the distance of forty feet up, where the stump of a

broken hollowed branch, about two feet in diameter, made out from the

main stem. This was the place at which the Swallows entered. On closely

examining the tree, I found it hard, but hollow to near the roots. It

was now about four o'clock after noon, in the month of July. Swallows

were flying over Jeffersonville, Louisville, and the woods around,

but there were none near the tree. I proceeded home, and shortly after

returned on foot. The sun was going down behind the Silver Hills; the

evening was beautiful; thousands of Swallows were flying closely above

me, and three or four at a time were pitching into the hole, like bees

hurrying into their hive. I remained, my head leaning on the tree,

listening to the roaring noise made within by the birds as they settled

and arranged themselves, until it was quite dark, when I left the place,

although I was convinced that many more had to enter. I did not pretend

to count them, for the number was too great, and the birds rushed to

the entrance so thick as to baffle the attempt. I had scarcely returned

to Louisville, when a violent thunder-storm passed suddenly over the

town, and its appearance made me think that the hurry of the Swallows to

enter the tree was caused by their anxiety to avoid it. I thought of the

Swallows almost the whole night, so anxious had I become to ascertain

their number, before the time of their departure should arrive.

Next morning I rose early enough to reach the place long before the

least appearance of daylight, and placed my head against the tree. All

was silent within. I remained in that posture probably twenty minutes,

when suddenly I thought the great tree was giving way, and coming down

upon me. Instinctively I sprung from it, but when I looked up to it

again, what was my astonishment to see it standing as firm as ever. The

Swallows were now pouring out in a black continued stream. I ran back

to my post, and listened in amazement to the noise within, which I could

compare to nothing else than the sound of a large wheel revolving under

a powerful stream. It was yet dusky, so that I could hardly see the

hour on my watch, but I estimated the time which they took in getting

out at more than thirty minutes. After their departure, no noise was

heard within, and they dispersed in every direction with the quickness

of thought.

I immediately formed the project of examining the interior of the tree,

which, as my kind friend, Major CROGHAN, had told me, proved the most

remarkable I had ever met with. This I did, in company with a hunting

associate. We went provided with a strong line and a rope, the first

of which we, after several trials, succeeded in throwing across the

broken branch. Fastening the rope to the line we drew it up, and pulled

it over until it reached the ground again. Provided with the longest

cane we could find, I mounted the tree by the rope, without accident,

and at length seated myself at ease on the broken branch; but my labour

was fruitless, for I could see nothing through the hole, and the cane,

which was about fifteen feet long, touched nothing on the sides of the

tree within that could give any information. I came down fatigued and

disappointed.

The next day I hired a man, who cut a hole at the base of the tree. The

shell was only eight or nine inches thick, and the axe soon brought

the inside to view, disclosing a matted mass of exuviæ, with rotten

feathers reduced to a kind of mould, in which, however, I could perceive

fragments of insects and quills. I had a passage cleared, or rather

bored through this mass, for nearly six feet. This operation took up a

good deal of time, and knowing by experience that if the birds should

notice the hole below, they would abandon the tree, I had it carefully

closed. The Swallows came as usual that night, and I did not disturb

them for several days. At last, provided with a dark lantern, I went

with my companion about nine in the evening, determined to have a full

view of the interior of the tree. The hole was opened with caution. I

scrambled up the sides of the mass of exuviæ, and my friend followed.

All was perfectly silent. Slowly and gradually I brought the light

of the lantern to bear on the sides of the hole above us, when we saw

the Swallows clinging side by side, covering the whole surface of the

excavation. In no instance did I see one above another. Satisfied with

the sight, I closed the lantern. We then caught and killed with as much

care as possible more than a hundred, stowing them away in our pockets

and bosoms, and slid down into the open air. We observed that, while

on this visit, not a bird had dropped its dung upon us. Closing the

entrance, we marched towards Louisville perfectly elated. On examining

the birds which we had procured, a hundred and fifteen in number, we

found only six females. Eighty-seven were adult males; of the remaining

twenty-two the sex could not be ascertained, and I had no doubt that

they were young of that year's first brood, the flesh and quill-feathers

being tender and soft.

Let us now make a rough calculation of the number that clung to the

tree. The space beginning at the pile of feathers and moulded exuviæ,

and ending at the entrance of the hole above, might be fully 25 feet in

height, with a breadth of 15 feet, supposing the tree to be 5 feet in

diameter at an average. There would thus be 375 feet square of surface.

Each square foot, allowing a bird to cover a space of 3 inches by 1½,

which is more than enough, judging from the manner in which they were

packed, would contain 32 birds. The number of Swallows, therefore, that

roosted in this single tree was 9000.

I watched the motions of the Swallows, and when the young birds that

had been reared in the chimneys of Louisville, Jeffersonville, and the

houses of the neighbourhood, or the trees suited for the purpose, had

left their native recesses, I visited the tree on the 2d day of August.

I concluded that the numbers resorting to it had not increased; but I

found many more females and young than males, among upwards of fifty,

which were caught and opened. Day after day I watched the tree. On the

13th of August, not more than two or three hundred came there to roost.

On the 18th of the same month, not one did I see near it, and only a few

scattered individuals were passing, as if moving southward. In September

I entered the tree at night, but not a bird was in it. Once more I

went to it in February, when the weather was very cold; and perfectly

satisfied that all these Swallows had left our country, I finally closed

the entrance, and left off visiting it.

May arrived, bringing with its vernal warmth the wanderers of the air,

and I saw their number daily augmenting, as they resorted to the tree

to roost. About the beginning of June, I took it in my head to close

the aperture above, with a bundle of straw, which with a string I could

draw off whenever I might chuse. The result was curious enough; the

birds as usual came to the tree towards night; they assembled, passed

and repassed, with apparent discomfort, until I perceived many flying

off to a great distance, on which I removed the straw, when many entered

the hole, and continued to do so until I could no longer see them from

the ground.

I left Louisville, having removed my residence to Henderson, and did

not see the tree until five years after, when I still found the Swallows

resorting to it. The pieces of wood with which I had closed the entrance

had rotted, or had been carried off, and the hole was again completely

filled with exuviæ and mould. During a severe storm, their ancient

tenement at length gave way, and came to the ground.

General WILLIAM CLARK assured me that he saw this species on the whole

of his route to the Pacific, and there can be no doubt that in those

wilds it still breeds in trees or rocky caverns.

Its food consists entirely of insects, the pellets composed of the

indigestible parts of which it disgorges. It is, furnished with glands

which supply the unctuous matter with which it fastens its nest.

This species does not appear to extend its migrations farther east than

the British provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. It is unknown

in Newfoundland and Labrador; nor was it until the 29th of May that I

saw some at Eastport in Maine, where a few breed.

HIRUNDO PELASGIA, _Linn._ Syst. Nat. vol. i. p. 345.—_Lath._

Ind. Ornith. vol. ii. p. 581.

CYPSELUS PELASGIUS, _Ch. Bonaparte_, Synops. of Birds of the

United States, p. 63.

CHIMNEY SWALLOW, HIRUNDO PELASGIA, _Wils._ Amer. Ornith, vol. v.

p. 48. pl. 39. fig. 1.—_Nuttall_, Manual, p. 609.

Adult Male. Plate CLVIII. Fig. 1.

Bill extremely short, very broad at the base, with a very wide rictus,

compressed towards the tip; upper mandible bent towards the end, the

sides convex, the sharp edges inflected and having an indistinct sinus

near the tip; lower mandible nearly straight; gap line slightly arched.

Nostrils basal, approximate, oblong. Head large and depressed, neck

short, body slender. Feet extremely short and weak; tarsus rounded,

destitute of scutella; toes extremely short, the three anterior nearly

equal, each with only two joints, hind toe puny, with a much smaller

claw; claws strong, shortish, compressed, arched, very acute.

Plumage short, compact, rather blended, slightly glossed; wings extremely

elongated, falciform, quills narrow with excessively strong shafts, the

first longest. Tail of ten feathers, very short, slightly rounded, the

shaft of extraordinary strength, and projecting beyond the webs in the

form of a stiff prickle.

Bill black. Iris black. Feet dusky, with black claws. The general

colour is brownish-black, lighter on the rump, and with slight greenish

reflections on the head and back; the throat greyish-white, gradually

shaded into the greyish-brown colour of the under parts, which have a

peculiar grey and greenish lustre; the space from the eye to the bill

black; a greyish-white line over the eye.

Length 4¾ inches, extent of wings 12; bill along the back 2/12, along

the edge 7/12; tarsus 5/12.

Adult Female. Plate CLVIII. Fig. 2.

The Female is similar to the male.

Two views of the nest are also given in the plate.

THE CARDINAL GROSBEAK.

_FRINGILLA CARDINALIS_, BONAP.

PLATE CLIX. MALE AND FEMALE.

In richness of plumage, elegance of motion, and strength of song, this

species surpasses all its kindred in the United States. It is known by

the names of Red Bird, Virginia Nightingale, Cardinal Bird, and that at

the head of the present article. It is very abundant in all our Southern

States, as well as in the peninsula of the Floridas. In the western

country a great number are found as far up on the Ohio as the city of

Cincinnati, and they extend to considerable distances into Indiana,

Illinois and Missouri. They are found in the maritime districts of

Pennsylvania and New Jersey, where they breed, and where a few remain

the whole year; some are also seen in the State of New York, and now

and then a straggler proceeds into Massachusetts; but farther eastward

this species has never been observed.

This fine songster relishes the interior of the forest, and the heart of

the deepest cane-brakes or retired swamps, as well as the neighbourhood

of cities. It is constantly found in our fields, orchards and gardens;

nay, it often enters the very streets of our southern towns and villages

to breed; and it is rare that one goes into a planter's yard without

observing the Red Bird skipping about the trees or on the turf beneath

them. Go where it may, it is always welcome, and every where a favourite,

so rich is its song, and so brilliant its plumage.

The Cardinal Bird breeds in the Floridas. In the beginning of March I

found them already paired in that country, and on the 8th of February

near General HERNANDEZ'S. In the neighbourhood of Charleston, as well

as in Louisiana, they are nearly a month later, and much the same lapse

of time takes place again before they form a nest in the State of New

Jersey or in that of Kentucky.

The nest is placed, apparently without much consideration, in some low

briar, bush, or tree, often near the fence, the middle of a field, or

the interior of a thicket, not far from a cooling stream, to which they

are fond of resorting, for the purpose of drinking and bathing. Sometimes

you find it placed close to the planter's house or in his garden, a few

yards from that of the Mocking Bird or the Thrasher. It is composed of

dry leaves and twigs, together with a large proportion of dry grass and

slips of grape-vines, and is finished within with bent-grass, wrought in

a circular form. The eggs are from four to six, of a dull white colour,

marked all over with touches of olive-brown.

In the Southern Districts they now and then raise three broods in the

season, but in the Middle States seldom more than one. The young on

leaving the nest, frequently follow their parents on the ground for

several days, after which they disperse and seek for food apart. During

the pairing season, the males are so pugnacious, that although they breed

near birds of other species, they never allow one of their own to nestle

in their vicinity. One male may be seen following another from bush to

bush, emitting a shrill note of anger, and diving towards the fugitive

antagonist whenever an opportunity offers, until the latter has escaped

quite beyond his jurisdiction, when the conqueror, elated, returns to

his grounds, ascends his favourite tree, and pours out his song in full

exultation.

Those which migrate to the eastward begin to move about the commencement

of March, usually in the company of the Towhe Bunting and other Sparrows,

hopping and passing from bush to bush during the whole day, announcing to

the traveller and husbandman the approach of a more genial season, and

resting at night in the secluded swamps. The males precede the females

about ten days.

Towards autumn they frequently ascend to the tops of tall trees in search

of grapes and berries, being as fond of succulent or pulpy fruits as they

are of the seeds of corn and grasses. On the least appearance of danger

they at once glide into the interior of the nearest thickets. During the

summer heats they frequently resort to sandy roads to dust themselves,

carelessly suffering people to approach them until within a few yards,

when they only remove to the nearest bushes, until the intruders pass.

They are easily raised when taken from the nest, and breed when kept

in aviaries. My friend Dr SAMUEL WILSON of Charleston, has had them

breeding with him, having placed straw-baskets for the purpose, in which

the female deposited her eggs, without improving the nest any more than

by placing in it a few grass blades, perhaps pilfered from some of her

neighbours. The purity of its colouring is soon lost when it is kept in

confinement, where it is gentle, easily fed on corn or hemp-seed, and

it sings when placed in a cage for several months in the year.

During winter the Cardinal Grosbeak frequently shews itself in the

farm-yard, among Turtle-Doves, Jays, Mocking-Birds, and various species

of Sparrows, picking up its food from the store daily supplied to

the poultry. It now and then seeks refuge at night in the lee of some

hay-stack, or throws itself with many other birds among the thickest

branches of the nearest evergreen tree.

The flight of this species is strong and rapid, although seldom continued

to any great distance. It is performed by glidings and jerks of the tail.

When the bird is alighted it also frequently juts its tail with grace.

Like all birds of the genus it hops, but does not walk.

Its song is at first loud and clear, resembling the finest sounds

produced by the flageolet, and gradually descends into more marked and

continued cadences, until it dies away in the air around. During the

love-season the song is emitted with increased emphasis by this proud

musician, who, as if aware of his powers, swells his throat, spreads

his rosy tail, droops his wings, and leans alternately to the right and

left, as if on the eve of expiring with delight at the delicious sounds

of his own voice. Again and again are those melodies repeated, the bird

resting only at intervals to breathe. They may be heard from long before

the sun gilds the eastern horizon, to the period when the blazing orb

pours down its noonday floods of heat and light, driving the birds to

the coverts to seek repose for a while. Nature again invigorated, the

musician recommences his song, when, as if he had never strained his

throat before, he makes the whole neighbourhood resound, nor ceases

until the shades of evening close around him. Day after day the song of

the Red Bird beguiles the weariness of his mate as she assiduously warms

her eggs; and at times she also assists with the modesty of her gentler

sex. Few individuals of our own race refuse their homage of admiration

to the sweet songster. How pleasing is it, when, by a clouded sky, the

woods are rendered so dark, that were it not for an occasional glimpse

of clearer light falling between the trees, you might imagine night at

hand, while you are yet far distant from your home—how pleasing to have

your ear suddenly saluted by the well known notes of this favourite bird,

assuring you of peace around, and of the full hour that still remains

for you to pursue your walk in security! How often have I enjoyed this

pleasure, and how often, in due humbleness of hope, do I trust that I

may enjoy it again!

I have represented a pair of these beautiful birds on a branch of the

Wild Olive.

FRINGILLA CARDINALIS, _Ch. Bonaparte_, Synops. of Birds of

the United States, p. 113.

CARDINAL GROSBEAK, LOXIA CARDINALIS, _Wils._ Amer. Ornith.

vol. ii. p. 38. pl. 2. fig. 1. Male; fig. 2. Female.—_Nuttall_,

Manual, p. 519.

Adult Male. Plate CLIX. Fig. 1.

Bill short, very robust, conical, acute, deeper than broad at the base;

upper mandible with its dorsal outline a little convex, the sides rounded,

the edges sharp and inflected, the tip slightly declinate; lower mandible

broader than the upper, with its dorsal line straight, the back broad,

the sides rounded, the edges inflected; the gap-line deflected at the

base. Nostrils basal, roundish, concealed by the feathers. Head large,

neck short, body robust. Legs of moderate length, rather strong; tarsus

compressed, anteriorly covered with a few scutella, posteriorly sharp;

toes scutellate above, free, the lateral ones nearly equal; claws slender,

arched, compressed, acute, that of the hind toe considerably larger.

Plumage soft and blended, slightly glossed. Wings of moderate length,

broad, much rounded, the fourth quill longest; primaries rather broad,

rounded, from the second to the sixth slightly cut out on the outer web,

secondaries rather narrow and rounded. Tail long, straight, rounded.

Feathers of the crown long, pointed, and erectile.

Bill of a tint approaching to coral-red. Iris dark hazel. Feet pale umber.

The whole upper parts of a deep dusky-red, excepting the head which is

vermillion. The anterior part of the forehead, the lores, and the upper

anterior part of the neck, black. The under parts are vermillion, which

is brightest anteriorly. Inner webs of the quills light brown, their

shafts and those of the tail-feathers blackish-brown.

Length 8¼ inches, extent of wings 11½; bill along the back 7/12, along

the edge ¾; tarsus 1½/12.

Adult Female. Plate CLIX. Fig. 2.

The female has a crest as well as the male, which it resembles in the

texture of its plumage, but the tail is proportionally shorter. The

general colour of the upper parts is dull greyish-brown slightly tinged

with olive; the longer crest-feathers are streaked with dull red, the

wings, coverts, and outer edges of the quills, are of the same tint;

the edge of the wings and the lower coverts are pale vermillion, and

the inner edges of the quills are of the same tint, but paler. The

parts surrounding the base of the bill, which are black in the male,

are blackish-grey, and the lower parts in general are pale greyish-brown.

Length 7½ inches.

THE WILD ALMOND.

PRUNUS CAROLINIANA, _Willd._ Sp. Pl. vol. ii. p. 987. _Pursh_,

Fl. Amer. Sept. vol. i. p. 330.—ICOSANDRIA MONOGYNIA, _Linn._

ROSACEÆ, _Juss._

Flowers in racemes; leaves evergreen, oblong-lanceolate, mucronate,

serrate, without glands at the base. The Wild Almond is altogether a

southern tree. Its height now and then is as much as twenty-five feet,

the stem in that case being a foot or more in diameter. The usual rounded

form of its top, and the persistence of its foliage, together with its

white flowers, and dark coloured fruits, render it a very agreeable

object. Many are planted around the plantation grounds or the gardens of

our southern cities, on account of their beautiful appearance. The fruits

are greedily devoured by many species of birds, but are unpalatable to

man. I have not observed it to the east of Virginia, nor farther west

than the town of Memphis on the Mississippi. The wood is seldom applied

to any useful purpose.

THE CAROLINA TITMOUSE.

_PARUS CAROLINENSIS._

PLATE CLX. MALE AND FEMALE.

It was not until some time after my drawing of this small southern

species of Titmouse had been engraved and distributed among my patrons,

that I discovered the difference as to size and habits between it and

the one which inhabits the Middle and Northern States, and which has

been so well described by WILSON, NUTTALL and SWAINSON. Indeed, I never

was struck with the difference of size until I reached Eastport in the

State of Maine, early in May 1833, when one morning my friend Lieutenant

GREEN of the United States army entered my room and shewed me a Titmouse

which he had just procured. The large size of his bird, compared with

those met with in the south, instantly struck me.

On my return from Labrador, I immediately proceeded to Charleston in

South Carolina, with a view of once more visiting the western portions

of the Floridas and the whole coast of the Gulf of Mexico. In the course

of conversation with my friend, the Reverend JOHN BACHMAN, I mentioned

my ideas on the subject of Titmice, when he immediately told me that he

had for some time been of the same mind. We both went to the woods, and

procured some specimens. I wrote to several persons of my acquaintance

in Massachusetts, Maine, and Maryland, and before a month had elapsed,

I received an abundant supply of the Northern species, preserved in

spirits, from my friend JOHN BETHUNE of Boston, Lieutenant GREEN, and

Colonel THEODORE ANDERSON of Baltimore. We examined and compared many

individuals of both species, and satisfied ourselves that they were

indeed specifically distinct.

Ornithological biography, Vol. 2 (of 5) · 第 32 / 55 段