Probably too there are certain physical and psychological laws, which

we do not at all understand, which account for the curious subjective

effects which certain people have at close quarters; there is something

hypnotic and mesmeric about the glance of certain eyes; and there is in

all probability a curious blending of mental currents in an assembly of

people, which is not a mere fancy, but a very real physical fact.

Personalities radiate very real and unmistakable influences, and

probably the undercurrent of thought which happens to be in one's mind

when one is with others has an effect, even if one says or does nothing

to indicate one's preoccupation. A certain amount of this comes from an

unconscious inference on the part of the recipients. We often augur,

without any very definite rational process, from the facial

expressions, gestures, movements, tones of others, what their frame of

mind is. But I believe that there is a great deal more than that. We

must all know that when we are with friends to whose moods and emotions

we are attuned, there takes place a singular degree of

thought-transference, quite apart from speech. I had once a great

friend with whom I was accustomed to spend much time tete-a-tete. We

used to travel together and spend long periods, day after day, in close

conjunction, often indeed sharing the same bedroom. It became a matter

at first of amusement and interest, but afterwards an accepted fact,

that we could often realise, even after a long silence, in what

direction the other's thought was travelling. "How did you guess I was

thinking of that?" would be asked. To which the reply was, "I did not

guess--I knew." On the other hand I have an old and familiar friend,

whom I know well and regard with great affection, but whose presence,

and particularly a certain fixity of glance, often, even now, causes me

a curious subjective disturbance which is not wholly pleasant, a sense

of some odd psychical control which is not entirely agreeable.

I have another friend who is the most delightful and easy company in

the world when we are, alone together; but he is a sensitive and

highly-strung creature, much affected by personal influences, and when

I meet him in the company of other people he is often almost

unrecognisable. His mind becomes critical, combative, acrid; he does

not say what he means, he is touched by a vague excitement, and there

passes over him an unnatural sort of brilliance, of a hard and futile

kind, which makes him sacrifice consideration and friendliness to the

instinctive desire to produce an effect and to score a point. I

sometimes actually detest him when he is one of a circle. I feel

inclined to say to him, "If only you could let your real self appear,

and drop this tiresome posturing and fencing, you would be as

delightful as you are to me when I am alone with you; but this hectic

tittering and feverish jocosity is not only not your real self, but it

gives others an impression of a totally unreal and not very agreeable

person." But, alas, this is just the sort of thing one cannot say to a

friend!

As one goes on in life, this terrible and disconcerting shyness of

youth disappears. We begin to realise, with a wholesome loss of vanity

and conceit, how very little people care or even notice how we are

dressed, how we look, what we say. We learn that other people are as

much preoccupied with their thoughts and fancies and reflections as we

are with our own. We realise that if we are anxious to produce an

agreeable impression, we do so far more by being interested and

sympathetic, than by attempting a brilliance which we cannot command.

We perceive that other people are not particularly interested in our

crude views, nor very grateful for the expression of them. We acquire

the power of combination and co-operation, in losing the desire for

splendour and domination. We see that people value ease and security,

more than they admire originality and fantastic contradiction. And so

we come to the blessed time when, instead of reflecting after a social

occasion whether we did ourselves justice, we begin to consider rather

the impression we have formed of other personalities.

I believe that we ought to have recourse to very homely remedies indeed

for combating shyness. It is of no use to try to console and distract

ourselves with lofty thoughts, and to try to keep eternity and the

hopes of man in mind. We so become only more self-conscious and

superior than ever. The fact remains that the shyness of youth causes

agonies both of anticipation and retrospect; if one really wishes to

get rid of it, the only way is to determine to get used somehow to

society, and not to endeavour to avoid it; and as a practical rule to

make up one's mind, if possible, to ask people questions, rather than

to meditate impressive answers. Asking other people questions about

things to which they are likely to know the answers is one of the

shortest cuts to popularity and esteem. It is wonderful to reflect how

much distress personal bashfulness causes people, how much they would

give to be rid of it, and yet how very little trouble they ever take to

acquiring any method of dealing with the difficulty. I see a good deal

of undergraduates, and am often aware that they are friendly and

responsive, but without any power of giving expression to it. I

sometimes see them suffering acutely from shyness before my eyes. But a

young man who can bring himself to ask a perfectly simple question

about some small matter of common interest is comparatively rare; and

yet it is generally the simplest way out of the difficulty.

IX

FEARS OF MIDDLE AGE

Now with all the tremors, reactions, glooms, shadows, and despairs of

youth--it is easy enough to forget them, but they were there--goes a

power of lifting and lighting up in a moment at a chord of music, a

glance, a word, the song of a bird, the scent of a flower, a flying

sunburst, which fills life up like a cup with bubbling and sparkling

liquor.

"My soul, be patient! Thou shalt find

A little matter mend all this!"

And that is the part of youth which we remember, till on looking back

it seems like a time of wandering with like-hearted comrades down some

sweet-scented avenue of golden sun and green shade. Our memory plays us

beautifully false--splendide mendax--till one wishes sometimes that old

and wise men, retelling the story of their life, could recall for the

comfort of youth some part of its languors and mischances, its bitter

jealousies, its intense and poignant sense of failure.

And then in a moment the door of life opens. One day I was an

irresponsible, pleasure-loving, fantastic youth, and a week later I

was, or it seemed to me that I was, a professional man with all the

cares of a pedagogue upon my back. It filled me at first, I remember,

with a gleeful amazement, to find myself in the desk, holding forth,

instead of on the form listening. It seemed delicious at first to have

the power of correcting and slashing exercises, and placing boys in

order, instead of being corrected and examined, and competing for a

place. It was a solemn game at the outset. Then came the other side of

the picture. One's pupils were troublesome, they did badly in

examinations, they failed unaccountably; and one had a glimpse too of

some of the tragedies of school life. Almost insensibly I became aware

that I had a task to perform, that my mistakes involved boys in

disaster, that I had the anxious care of other destinies; and thus,

almost before I knew it, came a new cloud on the horizon, the cloud of

anxiety. I could not help seeing that I had mismanaged this boy and

misdirected that; that one could not treat them as ingenuous and lively

playthings, but that what one said and did set a mark which perhaps

could not be effaced. Gradually other doubts and problems made

themselves felt. I had to administer a system of education in which I

did not wholly believe; I saw little by little that the rigid old

system of education was a machine which, if it made a highly

accomplished product out of the best material, wasted an enormous

amount of boyish interest and liveliness, and stultified the feebler

sort of mind. Then came the care of a boarding-house, close relations

with parents, a more real knowledge of the infinite levity of boy

nature. I became mixed up with the politics of the place, the chance of

more ambitious positions floated before me; the need for tact,

discretion, judiciousness, moderation, tolerance emphasized itself. I

am here outlining my own experience, but it is only one of many similar

experiences. I became a citizen without knowing it, and my place in the

world, my status, success, all became definite things which I had to

secure.

The cares, the fears, the anxieties of middle life lie for most men and

women in this region; if people are healthy and active, they generally

arrive at a considerable degree of equanimity; they do not anticipate

evil, and they take the problems of life cheerfully enough as they

come; but yet come they do, and too many men and women are tempted to

throw overboard scornfully and disdainfully the dreams of youth as a

luxury which they cannot afford to indulge, and to immerse themselves

in practical cares, month after month, with perhaps the hope of a

fairly careless and idle holiday at intervals. What I think tends to

counteract this for many people is love and marriage, the wonder and

amazement of having children of their own, and all the offices of

tenderness that grow up naturally beside their path. But this again

brings a whole host of fears and anxieties as well--arrangements, ways

and means, household cares, illnesses, the homely stuff of life, much

of it enjoyed, much of it cheerfully borne, and often very bravely and

gallantly endured. It is out of this simple material that life has to

be constructed. But there is a twofold danger in all this. There is a

danger of cynicism, the frame of mind in which a man comes to face

little worries as one might put up an umbrella in a shower--"Thou

know'st 'tis common!" Out of that grows up a rude dreariness, a

philosophy which has nothing dignified about it, but is merely a

recognition of the fact that life is a poor affair, and that one cannot

hope to have things to one's mind. Or there is a dull frame of mind

which implies a meek resignation, a sense of disappointment about life,

borne with a mournful patience, a sense of one's sphere having somehow

fallen short of one's deserts. This produces the grumpy paterfamilias

who drowses over a paper or grumbles over a pipe; such a man is

inimitably depicted by Mr. Wells in Marriage. That sort of ugly

disillusionment, that publicity of disappointment, that frank disregard

of all concerns except one's own, is one of the most hideous features

of middle-class life, and it is rather characteristically English. It

sometimes conceals a robust good sense and even kindliness; but it is a

base thing at best, and seems to be the shadow of commercial

prosperity. Yet it at least implies a certain sturdiness of character,

and a stubborn belief in one's own merits which is quite impervious to

the lessons of experience. On sensitive and imaginative people the

result of the professional struggle with life, the essence of which is

often social pretentiousness, is different. It ends in a mournful and

distracted kind of fatigue, a tired sort of padding along after life, a

timid bewilderment at conditions which one cannot alter, and which yet

have no dignity or seemliness.

What is there that is wrong with all this? The cause is easy enough to

analyse. It is the result of a system which develops conventional,

short-sighted, complicated households, averse to effort, fond of

pleasure, and with tastes which are expensive without being refined.

The only cure would seem to be that men and women should be born

different, with simple active generous natures; it is easy to say that!

But the worst of the situation is that the sordid banality and ugly

tragedy of their lot do not dawn on the people concerned. Greedy vanity

in the more robust, lack of moral courage and firmness in the more

sensitive, with a social organisation that aims at a surface dignity

and a cheap showiness, are the ingredients of this devil's cauldron.

The worst of it is that it has no fine elements at all. There is a

nobility about real tragedy which evokes a quality of passionate and

sincere emotion. There is something essentially exalted about a fierce

resistance, a desperate failure. But this abject, listless dreariness,

which can hardly be altered or expressed, this miserable floating down

the muddy current, where there is no sharp repentance or fiery

battling, nothing but a mean abandonment to a meaningless and

unintelligible destiny, seems to have in it no seed of recovery at all.

The dark shadow of professional anxiety is that it has no tragic

quality; it is like ploughing on day by day through endless mud-flats.

One does not feel, in the presence of sharp suffering or bitter loss,

that they ought not to exist. They are there, stern, implacable,

august; stately enemies, great combatants. There is a significance

about their very awfulness. One may fall before them, but they pass

like a great express train, roaring, flashing, things deliberately and

intently designed; but these dull failures which seem not the outgrowth

of anyone's fierce longing or wilful passion, but of everyone's

laziness and greediness and stupidity, how is one to face them? It is

the helpless death of the quagmire, not the death of the fight or the

mountain-top. Is there, we ask ourselves, anything in the mind of God

which corresponds to comfort-loving vulgarity, if so strong and yet so

stagnant a stream can overflow the world? The bourgeois ideal! One

would rather have tyranny or savagery than anything so gross and smug.

And yet we see high-spirited and ardent husbands drawn into this by

obstinate and vulgar-minded wives. We see fine-natured and sensitive

women engulfed in it by selfish and ambitious husbands. The tendency is

awfully and horribly strong, and it wins, not by open combat, but by

secret and dull persistence. And one sees too--I have seen it many

times--children of delicate and eager natures, who would have

flourished and expanded in more generous air, become conventional and

commonplace and petty, concerned about knowing the right people and

doing the right things, and making the same stupid and paltry show,

which deceives no one.

There is nothing for it but independence and simplicity and, perhaps

best of all, a love of beauty. William Morris asserted passionately

enough that art was the only cure for all this dreariness--the love of

beautiful sounds and sights and words; and I think that is true, if it

be further extended to a perception of the quality of beauty in the

conduct and relations of life. For those are the cheap and reasonable

pleasures of life, accessible to all; and if men and women cared for

work first and the decent simplicities of wholesome living, and could

further find their pleasure in art, in whatever form, then I believe

that many of these fears and anxieties, so maiming and impairing to all

that is fine in life, would vanish quietly out of being. The thing

seems both beautiful and possible, because one knows of households

where it is so, and where it grows up naturally and easily enough. I

know households of both kinds--where on the one hand the standard is

ambitious and mean, where the inmates calculate everything with a view

to success, or rather to producing an impression of success; and there

all talk and intercourse is an unreal thing, not the outflow of natural

interests and pleasant tastes, but a sham culture and a refinement that

is only pursued because it is the right sort of surface to present to

the world. One submits to it with boredom, one leaves it with relief.

They have got the right people together, they have shown that they can

command their attendance; it is all ceremony and waste.

And then I know households where one sees in the books, the pictures,

the glances, the gestures, the movements of the inmates, a sort of

grace and delicacy which comes of really caring about things that are

beautiful and fine. Sincere things are simply said, humour bubbles up

and breaks in laughter; one feels that light is thrown on a hundred

topics and facts and personalities. The whole of life then becomes a

garden teeming with strange and wonderful secrets, and influences that

flash and radiate, passing on into some mysterious and fragrant gloom.

Everything there seems charged with significance and charm; there are

no pretences--there are preferences, prejudices if you will; but there

is tolerance and sympathy, and a desire to see the point of view of

others. The effect of such an atmosphere is to set one wondering how

one has contrived to miss the sense of so much that is beautiful and

interesting in life, and sends one away longing to perceive more, and

determined if possible to interpret life more truly and more graciously.

X

FEARS OF AGE

And then age creeps on; and that brings fears of its own, and fears

that are all the more intolerable because they are not definite fears

at all, merely a loss of nervous vigour, which attaches itself to the

most trivial detail and magnifies it into an insuperable difficulty. A

friend of mine who was growing old once confided to me that foreign

travel, which used to be such a delight to him, was now getting

burdensome. "It is all right when I have once started," he said, "but

for days before I am the prey of all kinds of apprehensions." "What

sort of apprehensions?" I said. He laughed, and replied, "Well, it is

almost too absurd to mention, but I find myself oppressed with anxiety

for weeks beforehand as to whether, when we get to Calais, we shall

find places in the train." And I remember, too, how a woman friend of

mine once told me that she called at the house of an elderly couple in

London, people of rank and wealth. Their daughter met her in the

drawing-room and said, "I am glad you are come--you may be able to

cheer my mother up. We are going down to-morrow to our place in the

country; the servants and the luggage went this morning, and my mother

and father are to drive down this afternoon--my mother is very low

about it." "What is the matter?" said my friend. The daughter replied,

"She is afraid that they will not get there in time!" "In time for

what?" said my friend, thinking that there was some important

engagement. "In time for tea!" said the daughter gravely.

It is all very well to laugh at such fears, but they are not natural

fears at all, they just indicate a low vitality; they are the symptoms

and not the causes of a disease. It is the frame of mind of the

sluggard in the Bible who says, "There is a lion in the way." Younger

people are apt to be irritated by what seems a wilful creating of

apprehensions. They ought rather to be patient and reassuring, and

compassionate to the weakness of nerve for which it stands.

With such fears as these may be classed all the unreal but none the

less distressing fears about health which beset people all their lives,

in some cases; it is extremely annoying to healthy people to find a man

reduced to depression and silence at the possibility of taking cold, or

at the fear of having eaten something unwholesome. I remember an

elderly gentleman who had lived a vigorous and unselfish life, and was

indeed a man of force and character, whose activity was entirely

suspended in later years by his fear of catching cold or of over-tiring

himself. He was a country clergyman, and used to spend the whole of

Sunday between his services, in solitary seclusion, "resting," and

retire to bed the moment the evening service was over; moreover his

dread of taking cold was such that he invariably wore a hat in the

winter months to go from the drawing-room to the dining-room for

dinner, even if there were guests in his house. He used to jest about

it, and say that it no doubt must look curious; but he added that he

had found it a wise precaution, and that we had no idea how disabling

his colds were. Even a very healthy friend of my own standing has told

me that if he ever lies awake at night he is apt to exaggerate the

smallest and most trifling sense of discomfort into the symptom of some

dangerous disease. Let me quote the well-known case of Hans Andersen,

whose imagination was morbidly strong. He found one morning when he

awoke that he had a small pimple under his left eyebrow. He reflected

with distress upon the circumstance, and soon came to the rueful

conclusion that the pimple would probably increase in size, and deprive

him of the sight of his left eye. A friend calling upon him in the

course of the morning found him writing, in a mood of solemn

resignation, with one hand over the eye in question, "practising," as

he said, "how to read and write with the only eye that would soon be

left him."

One's first impulse is to treat these self-inflicted sufferings as

ridiculous and almost idiotic. But they are quite apt to beset people

of effectiveness and ability. To call them irrational does not cure

them, because they lie deeper than any rational process, and are in

fact the superficial symptoms of some deep-seated weakness of nerve,

while their very absurdity, and the fact that the mind cannot throw

them off, only proves how strong they are. They are in fact signs of

some profound uneasiness of mind; and the rational brain of such

people, casting about for some reason to explain the fear with which

they are haunted, fixes on some detail which is not worthy of serious

notice. It is of course a species of local insanity and monomania, but

it does not imply any general obscuration of faculties at all. Some of

the most intellectual people are most at the mercy of such trials, and

indeed they are rather characteristic of men and women whose brain is

apt to work at high pressure. One recollects in the life of Shelley,

how he used to be haunted by these insupportable fears. He was at one

time persuaded that he had contracted leprosy, and he used to

disconcert his acquaintances by examining solicitously their wrists and

necks to see if he could detect symptoms of the same disease.

There is very little doubt that as medical knowledge progresses we

shall know more about the cause of such hallucinations. To call them

unreal is mere stupidity. Sensible people who suffer from them are

often perfectly well aware of their unreality, and are profoundly

humiliated by them. They are some disease or weakness of the

imaginative faculty; and a friend of mine who suffered from such things

told me that it was extraordinary to him to perceive the incredible

ingenuity with which his brain under such circumstances used to find

confirmation for his fears from all sorts of trivial incidents which at

other times passed quite unnoticed. It is generally quite useless to

think of removing the fear by combating the particular fancy; the

affected centre, whatever it is, only turns feverishly to some other

similar anxiety. Occupation of a quiet kind, exercise, rest, are the

best medicine.

Where No Fear Was: A Book About Fear · 第 3 / 10 段