[1] Resolutions of the Legislature of South Carolina, December 16,
1835. See also Resolutions of the Legislature of North Carolina,
December 19, 1835; of Georgia, December 22, 1835; of Alabama, January
7, 1836; and of Virginia, February 16, 1836. Massachusetts Senate
Documents, Sess. 1836, No. 56.
[2] “Ahi serva Italia, … bordello!”--_Purgatorio_, Canto VI. 76-78.
[3] Civil Code of the State of Louisiana, Art. 35.
[4] Statutes at Large of South Carolina, Vol. VII. p. 397, Act No. 670,
sec. 1.
[5] Sketch of the Laws relating to Slavery in the several States, pp.
22, 23.
[6] Genesis, ix. 25-27.
[7] Dryden, Absalom and Achitophel, Part I. 301, 302.
[8] Encyclopædia Metropolitana, First Division, Pure Sciences, Vol. I.
p. 32 (ed. 1829, 4to): Preliminary Treatise on Method, Sect. 2, _Dark
Ages_.
[9] By the Rev. Thomas Thompson, Vicar of Reculver, in Kent, and
printed at Canterbury in 1772. Boswell’s defence of the Slave-Trade
was kindred in character. (Life of Johnson, ed. Croker, London, 1848,
Vol. VII. pp. 23, 24, Sept. 23, 1777.) Nothing can be more melancholy
than the effort of Capitein the African, who, surrendering to the Dutch
influences about him, made himself the apologist of Slavery, in a Latin
Dissertation, translated into Dutch, and reprinted four times, entitled
“_Dissertatio politico-theologica de Servitute Libertati Christianæ non
contraria_, quam sub Præside J. Van den Honert publicæ Disquisitioni
subjicit J. E. J. Capitein, Afer, in 4to, Lugduni Batavorum, 1742.” In
our own country, the Rev. John Beck, of Georgia, dared to preach and
print, in 1801, two sermons entitled “The Doctrine of Perpetual Bondage
reconcilable with the Infinite Justice of God, a Truth plainly asserted
in the Jewish and Christian Scripture.” Good men must join in the
thanks expressed to Colonel Humphreys by the philanthropist Grégoire,
for his exposure of this baseness in his Valedictory Discourse before
the Cincinnati of Connecticut. Grégoire, De la Littérature des Nègres,
p. 232.
[10] Epistle to Philemon, 10-19.
[11] See Parliamentary Papers, 1852, Vol. XXXI.; 1852-53, Vol. LXII.;
1854-55, Vol. XXXVI.; 1856, Vol. LVII.; 1857, Vol. XL.; 1862, Vol.
LVII. Also, Davy’s West Indies, pp. 65, 200, 245, 277, 412.
[12] Speech at Opening of Assembly, Oct. 30. 1838; Parliamentary
Papers, Sess. 1839, Vol. XXXV., No. 107, p. 151.
[13] Despatch from Gov. Higginson to Earl Grey, April 5, 1849:
Parliamentary Papers, Sess. 1849, Vol. XXXIV. [No. 1126], p. 219.
[14] Hansard, Parliamentary Debates, 3d Ser. Vol. XLV. col. 4, Feb. 5,
1839.
[15] Speech on American Taxation, April 19, 1774: Works (London, 1801),
Vol. II. p. 413.
[16] Of Goodness, and Goodness of Nature.
[17] Exodus, xxxiii. 18,19.
[18] Marston, History of Antonio and Mellida, Act III. Sc. 1.
[19] Hansard, Parliamentary History, XXX. 659, April 11, 1793.
[20] Cowper, Sonnet to Wilberforce.
[21] De Bow’s Statistical View, pp. 94, 95.
[22] “Our Southern islands, for I call them ours.” Speech of Mr.
Butler, of South Carolina, March 20, 1854: Congressional Globe, 33d
Cong. 1st Sess., Vol. XXVIII. p. 690.
[23] Inferno, tr. Brooksbank, Canto III. 37-39.
[24] Case of Passmore Williamson, pp. 3-5, 9-11, 15, 73, 157-163.
[25] Notes on Party Principles: Life of Wilberforce by his Sons, Vol.
II., Appendix, p. 456.
[26] Case of Passmore Williamson. See, _ante_, p. 52.
[27] Hon. Henry J. Gardner.
[28] “Tu vero, si quid in te artis est, ita compone domum meam, ut,
quicquid agam, ab omnibus perspici possit.”--A saying of the tribune
M. Livius Drusus, preserved by Velleius Paterculus, _Historiæ Romanæ_,
Lib. II. c. 14.
[29] Of this Professor Agassiz is a brilliant instance.
[30] Madison’s Debates, July 5, 1787, p. 1024, note.
[31] Ibid., July 6, p. 1040.
[32] Ibid.
[33] Madison’s Debates, July 6, 1787, p. 1042.
[34] Ibid., p. 1043.
[35] Ibid., July 14, pp. 1096-1098.
[36] Madison’s Debates, August 8, 1787, pp. 1266, 1267.
[37] Madison’s Debates, July 6, 1787, p. 1044.
[38] Madison’s Debates, June 13, 1787, pp. 855, 856.
[39] Ibid., August 13, p. 1307.
[40] Ibid., July 6, p. 1041.
[41] Ibid., p. 1043.
[42] Elliot’s Debates, June 14, 1788, Vol. II. p. 283, ed. 1828.
[43] Journals of the House of Commons, Vol. IX. p. 509. May’s Law of
Parliament, p. 407, ed. 1851.
[44] May’s Law of Parliament, pp. 415, 418.
[45] Ibid., p. 425.
[46] Hon. George P. Marsh.
[47] Webster’s Works, Vol. VI. pp. 406, 409.
[48] Wheaton, Elements of International Law (ed. Lawrence, 1863), note,
pp. 334, 335, Part II. Ch. 4.
[49] Exec. Doc., 34th Cong. 1st Sess., 1855-56, No. 1, p. 9.
[50] Ibid., p. 30.
[51] Commentaries on the Constitution, § 1838.
[52] Foster et al. _v._ Neilson, 2 Peters, 314
[53] Ware _v._ Hylton et al., 3 Dallas, 284.
[54] Ibid., 261.
[55] 1 United States Statutes at Large, 578.
[56] Annals of Congress, 5th Cong., 1797-1799, col. 2120.
[57] Ibid., col. 2123.
[58] Ibid., col. 2126.
[59] Executive Documents, 29th Cong. 1st Sess., No. 2, p. 11.
[60] 9 United States Statutes at Large, pp. 109, 110.
[61] Executive Documents, 33d Cong. 1st Sess., 1853-54, No. 108, pp.
40, 42.
[62] United States Statutes at Large, Vol. XI. p. 720. Wheaton,
Elements of International Law (ed. Lawrence, 1863), note, p. 335, Part
II. Ch. 4.
[63] This illustration, deemed necessary to expose the hateful violence
to a beautiful region for the sake of Slavery, was denounced by Mr.
Cass, in the Senate, while Mr. Sumner was absent, as “an unpatriotic
metaphor”, and the critical Senator added: “I believe that hundreds of
thousands of copies of that production which contains this passage, and
many others equally objectionable, were sent through the country during
the last Presidential election.”--Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 3d
Sess., p. 90, December 11, 1856.
[64] Florus, Epitome Rerum Romanarum, Lib. IV. cap. 2, § 4. Five
years later the fury of the propagandists broke forth in the war here
foretold.
[65] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, p. 107,
February 28, 1856.
[66] Hildreth, History of the United States, Vol. VI. p. 713.
[67] Referring to this provision of the Missouri Bill, Mr. Niles
italicizes “_forever_,” thus showing his construction of the
word.--Niles’s Weekly Register, March 11, 1820.
[68] This letter, which the _Columbian Centinel_, of Boston, April 1,
1820, properly styles “tell-tale,” was addressed to the Editor of the
Charleston _City Gazette_, under date of March 2, 1820.
[69] Act to organize the Territories of Nebraska and Kansas, Sec. 14:
Statutes at Large, Vol. X. p. 283.
[70] Senator of Missouri at Washington from 1843 to 1855, and for
several sessions President _pro tempore_ of the Senate.
[71] Message relative to Affairs in the Territory of Kansas, January
24, 1856: Executive Documents, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., No. 28, p. 4.
[72] Hon. S. C. Pomeroy, afterwards for many years Senator of Kansas at
Washington.
[73] Hon. Wilson Shannon.
[74] Burke, Speech in the Impeachment of Warren Hastings, February 16,
1788: Works (London, 1822), Vol. XIII. p. 202.
[75] Horatio Greenough, the earliest of our sculptors, and also
excellent with his pen.
[76] Cicero, Oratio in Catilinam I. 12.
[77] This review Mr. Sumner was disabled from making, as will appear in
the sequel.
[78] Statutes of the Territory of Kansas, passed at the First Session
of the Legislative Assembly, 1855, and the Act of Congress organizing
said Territory, and other Acts of Congress having immediate relation
thereto, Shawnee M. L. School, 1855, Chap. 151, pp. 715-717. Mr.
Sumner’s copy of this curious volume, which once belonged to Mr.
Seward, is lettered on the back, “Laws of Kansas; Territorial
Legislature, _alias_ The Ruffians’ Legislature.”
[79] This story is told of Sir James Marriott, the Admiralty Judge.
(Basil Montagu’s Essays: _Barrister_.) Something similar may be traced
to Lord Mansfield, not usually pedantic or technical, in the Debate
on the Right of Parliament to tax America, Feb. 10, 1766. (Hansard,
Parliamentary History, XVI. 176.)
[80] Mr. Crampton, the British Minister at Washington, was dismissed.
Lawrence’s Wheaton (ed. 1863), p. 438, note. See also Executive
Documents, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., No. 107.
[81] Statutes at Large, Vol. I. p. 424.
[82] Ibid., Vol. II. p. 443.
[83] Mr. Douglas’s Report on the Affairs of Kansas: Senate Reports,
34th Cong. 1st Sess., No. 34, p. 29.
[84]
“_Emigravit_ is the inscription on the tombstone where he lies.”
This is the verse of Longfellow on the artist Albert Dürer, buried at
Nuremberg.
[85] Livy, XXXVII. 46. See, also, Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman
Antiquities, art. COLONIA.
[86] Massachusetts Special Laws, Vol. X. p. 282.
[87] Hon. John Carter Brown, of Providence, R. I.
[88] Hon. John M. S. Williams, of Cambridge, afterwards an earnest
member of the Republican party, and for some time Chairman of its
Republican State Committee, in Massachusetts.
[89] Hon. A. A. Lawrence, of Boston.
[90] Hon. Reuben A. Chapman, of Springfield, afterward Chief Justice of
the Supreme Court of Massachusetts.
[91] Mr. Evans, of South Carolina, here interrupted Mr. Sumner to say
that he did not know of any such address. Mr. Sumner replied, that “it
was in a speech or letter of one of the gentlemen enlisted in obtaining
emigrants in South Carolina.”--Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st
Sess., Appendix, p. 538.
[92] Mr. Douglas was born in Vermont.
[93] Mr. Butler, of South Carolina, in his two days’ speech reviewing
and denouncing Mr. Sumner, while the latter was suffering at home, said
of this passage: “The best part of his late speech is a periphrasis
of Demosthenes, almost a servile imitation of the apostrophe of
Demosthenes. I never saw such a remarkable resemblance.… I do not say
it is a plagiarism; but it is a remarkable imitation, as far as one man
incapable of comprehending the true spirit of Demosthenes could imitate
him.”--Speech in the Senate, June 12th and 13th, 1856: Congressional
Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, p. 634.
[94] At this point, Mr. Sumner, having spoken three hours, yielded for
a motion to adjourn. On the next day, May 20th, he concluded.
[95] Hansard, Parliamentary History, XVIII. 33, 34.
[96] Speech in the Senate, March 6, 1856: Congressional Globe, 34th
Cong. 1st Sess., p. 587.
[97] For an abstract of this bill, see Congressional Globe, 34th Cong.
1st Sess., p. 693, March 20, 1856. Printed by the Senate at the time,
but, as it was never passed, will not be found in the Statutes.
[98] Ovid, Metamorphoses, Book I, 545-547.
[99] Journal of Congress, Vol. IX. p. 153.
[100] This was the ratio at the cession of Florida. At the cession of
Louisiana it was 33,000.
[101] Memorial of the People of the Territory of Florida for Admission
into the Union: Executive Documents, 27th Cong. 2d Sess., Vol. IV. No.
206, p. 3.
[102] Message relative to Affairs in the Territory of Kansas, Jan. 24,
1856: Executive Documents, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Vol. VII. No. 28, p. 6.
[103] Congressional Globe, 24th Cong. 1st Sess., p. 140, Jan. 26, 1836.
[104] Ibid., Appendix, p. 307, April 1, 1836.
[105] Congressional Globe, 24th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, p. 331,
April 1, 1836.
[106] Ibid., p. 308.
[107] Senate Journal, 24th Cong. 1st Sess., p. 262, April 1, 1836.
[108] Ibid., pp. 437, 439. Act of July 2, 1836: Statutes at Large, Vol.
V. p. 113.
[109] Reports of Committees, 24th Cong. 1st Sess., Vol. II. No. 380, p.
18.
[110] Act of June 15th, 1836: Statutes at Large, Vol. V. p. 50.
[111] Senate Documents, 24th Cong. 2d Sess., Vol. I. No. 36, p. 2.
[112] Senate Journal, 24th Cong. 2d Sess., p. 72. Act of 26th January,
1837: Statutes at Large, Vol. V. p. 144.
[113] Senate Documents, 24th Cong. 2d Sess., Vol. I. No. 36, p. 5.
[114] Congressional Globe, 24th Cong. 2d Sess., pp. 60, 61.
[115] Debates in Congress, Vol. XIII. Part I. col. 233, 24th Cong. 2d
Sess. This debate is not reported in the Congressional Globe.
[116] Ibid., col. 209.
[117] Ibid., col. 208.
[118] Ibid., col. 300.
[119] Ibid.
[120] Debates in Congress, Vol. XIII. Part I. col. 215, 24th Cong. 2d
Sess.
[121] Dépêche Circulaire, Laybach, 12 Mai, 1821: Martens, Nouveau
Recueil de Traités, Tom. V. p. 644.
[122] Speech of Mr. Corbin, June 7, 1788: Elliot’s Debates, Vol. II. p.
104.
[123] 1 Virginia Cases, 70, 71, Kamper _v._ Hawkins.
[124] The Federalist, No. 40.
[125] Debates in Congress, Vol. XIII. Part I. col. 313, 24th Cong. 2d
Sess.
[126] An examination of the _Globe_ shows, that, besides a regular
speech, the Senator intervened, often irregularly and impatiently, no
less than thirty-five times.
[127] Hon. James H. Lane, afterwards Senator of Kansas at Washington.
[128] Speech on Memorial of the Legislature of Kansas, April 7, 1856:
Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., p. 826.
[129] Art. I. § 6.
[130] The close of the Rebellion witnessed the fulfilment of this
prophecy.
[131] Lowell, The Present Crisis.
[132] This was the case of Mrs. Douglas, which at the time caused
sensation.
[133] Æneid, tr. Dryden, VI. 853 [1177].
[134] “_Il gran rifiuto._” Dante, Inferno, III. 60.
[135] Deuteronomy, xxvii. 17.
[136] Ibid., xxviii. 16-19.
[137] Ezekiel, xiv. 8.
[138] American Archives, 4th Series, Vol. I. col. 446.
[139] _Ante_, Vol. III. p. 368.
[140] _Ante_, Vol. III. pp. 368-423.
[141] The second day of the delivery.
[142] The short-hand reporter of the Senate.
[143] House Journal, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., pp. 1199-1221, July 14, 15,
1856.
[144] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, pp. 831-833,
July 14, 1856.
[145] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., pp. 1304-1306, May 27,
1856.
[146] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, p. 626, June
12, 1856.
[147] New York Independent, February 5, 1857. See also New York Herald,
January 31, and February 2, 1857; New York Times, January 30, 1857. The
effect of this on the House is described by correspondents at the time.
[148] January 29, 1857, p. 502, 34th Cong. 3d Sess.
[149] _Ante_, Vol. III. pp. 368-423.
[150] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, p. 629, June
12, 1856.
[151] Ibid., p. 626.
[152] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, p. 625, June
12, 1856.
[153] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 1st Sess., Appendix, p. 633, June
13, 1856.
[154] Congressional Globe, 34th Cong. 3d Sess., Appendix, p. 356,
February 26, 1857.
[155] Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Vol. LV. pp. 417-421,
December 25, 1856.
[156] This letter was addressed to Hon. H. Wilson.