Here, on this subject, is a curious passage from one of the ancients:--

‘Those who created the Latin language and those who spoke it well

do not give the word _humanitas_ the vulgar meaning which is

synonymous with the Greek word _philanthropia_, which means an

active kindness, a tender benevolence for all men. But they give

the word the meaning which the Greeks attach to _paideia_, which we

call education, knowledge of the fine arts. Those who show the most

taste and disposition for these studies are the most worthy to be

called _humanissimi_. For man alone among all living beings is able

to devote himself to cultivating a study which for that reason has

been called _humanitas_. Such is the meaning given to this by the

ancients, particularly by Varro and Cicero. Almost all their works

show examples, so I shall content myself with quoting one only. I

have chosen the opening of the first book of Varro “Concerning human

things”: “Praxiteles, qui propter artificium egregium nemini est paulum

modo humaniori ignotus (Praxiteles, whose excellent talent as an

artist has made him known to every man at all skilled in the arts)”.

Here _humanior_ does not bear the vulgar meaning of easy, tractable,

benevolent even though lacking in knowledge of letters. That meaning

would not express the author’s thought. It means an educated, a learned

man, one who is acquainted with Praxiteles through books and history.’

(Aulus Gellius, _Noctes Atticae_, Book XIII, XVI.)

The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs) · 第 17 / 29 题