INTRODUCTION.

The _conte_ is a form of fiction in which the French have always

delighted and in which they have always excelled, from the days of the

_jongleurs_ and the _trouvères_, past the periods of La Fontaine and

Voltaire, down to the present. The _conte_ is a tale, something more

than a sketch, it may be, and something less than a short story. In

verse it is at times but a mere rhymed anecdote, or it may attain almost

to the direct swiftness of a ballad. The _Canterbury Tales_ are

_contes_, most of them, if not all; and so are some of the _Tales of a

Wayside Inn_. The free-and-easy tales of Prior were written in imitation

of the French _conte en vers_; and that, likewise, was the model of more

than one of the lively narrative poems of Mr. Austin Dobson.

No one has succeeded more abundantly in the _conte en vers_ than M.

Coppée. Where was there ever anything better of its kind than _L'Enfant

de la Balle?_--that gentle portrait of the Infant Phenomenon, framed in

a chain of occasional gibes at the sordid ways of theatrical managers

and at their hostility towards poetic plays. Where is there anything of

a more simple pathos than _L'Épave?_--that story of a sailor's son whom

the widowed mother strives vainly to keep from the cruel waves that

killed his father. (It is worthy of a parenthesis that although the ship

M. Coppée loves best is that which sails the blue shield of the City of

Paris, he knows the sea also, and he depicts sailors with affectionate

fidelity.) But whether at the sea-side by chance, or more often in the

streets of the city, the poet seeks out for the subject of his story

some incident of daily occurrence made significant by his

interpretation; he chooses some character common-place enough, but made

firmer by conflict with evil and by victory over self. Those whom he

puts into his poems are still the humble, the forgotten, the neglected,

the unknown; and it is the feelings and the struggles of these that he

tells us, with no maudlin sentimentality, and with no dead set at our

sensibilities. The sub-title Mrs. Stowe gave to _Uncle Tom's Cabin_

would serve to cover most of M. Coppée's _contes_ either in prose or

verse; they are nearly all pictures of _life among the lowly_. But there

is no forcing of the note in his painting of poverty and labor; there is

no harsh juxtaposition of the blacks and the whites. The tone is always

manly and wholesome.

_La Marchande de Journaux_ and the other little masterpieces of

story-telling in verse are unfortunately untranslatable, as are all

poems but a lyric or two, now and then, by a happy accident. A

translated poem is a boiled strawberry, as some one once put it

brutally. But the tales which M. Coppée has written in prose--a true

poet's prose, nervous, vigorous, flexible, and firm--these can be

Englished by taking thought and time and pains, without which a

translation is always a betrayal. Ten of these tales have been rendered

into English by Mr. Learned; and the ten chosen for translation are

among the best of the two score and more of M. Coppée's _contes en

prose_. These ten tales are fairly representative of his range and

variety. Compare, for example, the passion in "The Foster Sister," pure,

burning and fatal, with the Black Forest _naïveté_ of "The Sabots of

Little Wolff." Contrast the touching pathos of "The Substitute,"

poignant in his magnificent self-sacrifice, by which the man who has

conquered his shameful past goes back willingly to the horrible life he

has fled from that he may save from a like degradation and from an

inevitable moral decay the one friend he has in the world, all unworthy

as this friend is--contrast this with the story of the gigantic deeds

"My Friend Meurtrier" boasts about unceasingly, not knowing that he has

been discovered in his little round of daily domestic duties, making the

coffee of his good old mother and taking her poodle out for a walk.

Among these ten there are tales of all sorts, from the tragic adventure

of "An Accident" to the pendent portraits of the "Two Clowns," cutting

in its sarcasm, but not bitter--from "The Captain's Vices," which

suggests at once George Eliot's _Silas Marner_ and Mr. Austin Dobson's

_Tale of Polypheme_, to the sombre revery of the poet "At Table," a

sudden and searching light cast on the labor and misery which underlies

the luxury of our complex modern existence. Like "At Table," "A Dramatic

Funeral" is a picture more than it is a story; it is a marvellous

reproduction of the factitious emotion of the good-natured stage folk,

who are prone to overact even their own griefs and joys. "A Dramatic

Funeral" seems to me always as though it might be a painting of M. Jean

Beraud, that most Parisian of artists, just as certain stories of M. Guy

de Maupassant inevitably suggest the bold freedom of M. Forain's

sketches in black-and-white.

An ardent admirer of the author of the stories in _The Odd Number_ has

protested to me that M. Coppée is not an etcher like M. de Maupassant,

but rather a painter in water-colors. And why not? Thus might we call M.

Alphonse Daudet an artist in pastels, so adroitly does he suggest the

very bloom of color. No doubt M. Coppée's _contes_ have not the

sharpness of M. de Maupassant's, nor the brilliancy of M. Daudet's--but

what of it? They have qualities of their own; they have sympathy,

poetry, and a power of suggesting pictures not exceeded, I think, by

those of either M. de Maupassant or M. Daudet. M. Coppée's street views

in Paris, his interiors, his impressionist sketches of life under the

shadows of Notre Dame, are convincingly successful. They are intensely

to be enjoyed by those of us who take the same keen delight in the

varied phases of life in New York. They are not, to my mind, really

rivalled either by those of M. de Maupassant, who is a Norman by birth

and a nomad by choice, or by those of M. Daudet, who is a native of

Provence, although now for thirty years a resident of Paris. M. Coppée

is a Parisian from his youth up, and even in prose he is a poet; perhaps

this is why his pictures of Paris are unsurpassable in their felicity

and in their verity.

It may be fancy, but I seem to see also a finer morality in M. Coppée's

work than in M. de Maupassant's or in M. Daudet's or in that of almost

any other of the Parisian story-tellers of to-day. In his tales we

breathe a purer moral atmosphere, more wholesome and more bracing. It is

not that M. Coppée probably thinks of ethics rather than æsthetics; in

this respect his attitude is undoubtedly that of the others; there is no

sermon in his song--or at least none for those who will not seek it for

themselves; there is never a hint of a preachment. But for all that I

have found in his work a trace of the tonic morality which inheres in

Molière, for example, also a Parisian by birth, and also in Rabelais,

despite his disguising grossness. This finer morality comes possibly

from a wider and a deeper survey of the universe; and it is as different

as possible from the morality which is externally applied and which

always punishes the villain in the fifth act.

It is of good augury for our own letters that the best French fiction of

to-day is getting itself translated in the United States, and that the

liking for it is growing apace. Fiction is more consciously an art in

France than anywhere else--perhaps partly because the French are now

foremost in nearly all forms of artistic endeavor. In the short story

especially, in the tale, in the _conte_, their supremacy is

incontestable; and their skill is shown and their æsthetic instinct

exemplified partly in the sense of form, in the constructive method,

which underlies the best short stories, however trifling these may

appear to be, and partly in the rigorous suppression of non-essentials,

due in a measure, it may be, to the example of Mérimee. That is an

example we in America may study to advantage; and from the men who are

writing fiction in France we may gain much. From the British fiction of

this last quarter of the nineteenth century little can be learned by any

one--less by us Americans in whom the English tradition is still

dominant. When we look to France for an exemplar we may find a model of

value, but when we copy an Englishman we are but echoing our own faults.

"The truth is," said Mr. Lowell in his memorable essay _On a Certain

Condescension in Foreigners_--"the truth is that we are worth nothing

except so far as we have disinfected ourselves of Anglicism."

Ten Tales · 第 16 / 46 题