BUILDING THE PANAMA CANAL

In foreign affairs the most important action Roosevelt took during the

second administration was in regard to the building of the Panama

Canal. His action is still termed “unconstitutional” by many people,

and a bill is now under discussion to compensate Colombia for the

alleged damages she sustained through the secession of the State of

Panama, and the building of the canal without her consent.

Roosevelt’s defense, and the defense of his eminent Secretary of State,

John Hay, was, to put it bluntly, “We got the canal.”

During the four centuries that had passed since Balboa crossed the

Isthmus, statesmen had talked of connecting the Atlantic and Pacific

oceans by an Isthmus canal. It had been talked about in Washington for

a half-century, but nothing had come of it.

Shortly after Roosevelt became President, an agreement was reached with

the French Panama Company, and the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty was signed,

by which the United States acquired possession, so far as Europe was

concerned, which warranted her undertaking the task.

The logical location for the canal was the line already begun by the

French company in Panama. Panama belonged to Colombia. Colombia had

promised friendly co-operation. Her delegate to the Pan-American

Congress in Mexico had joined in the unanimous vote which requested

the United States to proceed with building the canal.

Both Colombia and the Isthmus had been places of frequent revolutions

and outbreaks. Many times United States warships had been forced to

patrol the Isthmus, at times at the urgent request of the Colombian

government. Through another revolution Colombia had come under the

dictatorship of Marquin, its former vice-president. Marquin, although

he had consented to the Hay-Herran Treaty, by which Colombia had agreed

to the building of the canal, now made use of his power as a dictator

to break his promise. He summoned a congress especially to break the

canal treaty. This congress, which Roosevelt describes as “a congress

of mere puppets,” carried out Marquin’s wishes. The treaty was rejected.

The President, through Secretary Hay, had warned Colombia that

grave consequences might follow her rejection of the treaty. He had

information that the entire population of Panama felt that it was of

vital concern to their prosperity that the canal be immediately built;

newspaper correspondents predicted a revolution on the Isthmus.

On November 8, 1903, the revolution occurred. The Colombian troops

stationed on the Isthmus joined in the revolution, and there was no

bloodshed, except the life of an unfortunate Chinaman.

Roosevelt immediately recognized the Republic of Panama and the other

principal nations did likewise. A canal treaty was at once negotiated

with the new republic, and, after considerable debate in the Senate,

the treaty was ratified by that body and the work on the canal began.

Roosevelt’s case against Colombia was that, so long as the United

States was considering the alternative route through Nicaragua,

Colombia eagerly pressed this country to build a canal across the

Isthmus. When the United States was committed to this latter course,

Colombia, under her usurper, refused to fulfil the agreement, with the

hope of securing the rights and property of the French Panama Company,

so as to secure the $40,000,000 the United States had authorized as

payment to this company. John Hay thus defended Roosevelt’s course:

“The action of the President in the Panama matter is not only in the

strictest accordance with the principles of justice and equity, and in

line with the best precedents of our public policy, but it was the only

course he could have taken in compliance with our treaty rights and

obligations.”

In November, 1906, the President’s interest in the work on the

canal led him to go in person to Panama. This act caused a storm of

disapproval in certain quarters, similar to that which President

Wilson met when he decided to attend the peace conference at Paris.

Roosevelt’s critics pointed out that no President had ever gone beyond

the bounds of his country. Roosevelt went and let his critics howl.

Here, in one thing at least, Wilson and Roosevelt were in agreement,

namely, that where the President of this country sets foot that place

is within the sphere of the United States.

"Great-Heart": The Life Story of Theodore Roosevelt · 第 91 / 121 题