CHAPTER XXIV.

DEPREDATIONS AT THE MOUTH OF SPRUCE CREEK--MURDER OF LEVI HICKS--

SCALPING OF HIS CHILD.

We have already mentioned the Hicks family in a preceding chapter, and

incidentally mentioned their captivity for a number of years among the

Indians. We have made the most unremitting exertions, yet we have

failed to ascertain any thing like a satisfactory account of this

remarkable family. The name of Gersham Hicks figures in Miner's

"History of Wyoming" as an Indian guide, while in the Archives he is

noticed as an Indian interpreter, previous to the war of the

Revolution. Where they were taken, or when released, is not positively

known. One thing, however, is quite certain: that is, that they made

themselves masters of both the habits and language of many of the

Indians.

Mrs. Fee thinks they came to Water Street immediately after their

release from captivity, and settled there. During their captivity they

imbibed the Indian habit to such a degree that they wore the Indian

costume, even to the colored eagle-feathers and little trinkets which

savages seem to take so much delight in. Gersham and Moses were

unmarried, but Levi, the elder, brought with him a half-breed as his

wife, by whom he had a number of children. They all settled at Water

Street, and commenced the occupation of farming. Subsequently, Levi

rented from the Bebaults the tub-mill at or near the mouth of Spruce

Creek.

[Illustration: TUNNEL ON THE PENNSYLVANIA CENTRAL ROAD AT THE MOUTH OF

SPRUCE CREEK.]

When the Indian troubles commenced in the spring of 1778, he was

repeatedly urged to go either to Lytle's or Lowry's Fort, and let the

mill stand until the alarm had subsided. Hicks, however, obstinately

refused, declaring that he was safe. It is thus apparent that he relied

upon his intimate knowledge of the Indian character and language for

safety, in case any of the marauders should find their way to what he

looked upon as a sort of an out-of-the-way place,--a fatal case of

misplaced confidence, notwithstanding it was asserted that the fall

previous a party had attacked his cabin, and that, on his addressing

them in their own language, they had desisted.

On the 12th of May, 1778, Hicks started his mill in the morning, as was

his usual custom, and then repaired to breakfast. While in the house he

procured a needle and thread, returned to the mill, replenished the

hopper, and then seated himself near the door and commenced mending a

moccasin. He had been occupied at this but a minute or two before he

heard a rustling in the bushes some ten or fifteen yards in front of

him. The idea of there being Indians in the vicinity never entered his

head; nobody had seen or heard of any in the settlement. Consequently,

in direct violation of an established custom, he walked forward to

ascertain the cause of the commotion in the bushes, leaving his rifle

leaning against the mill. He advanced but one or two steps before he

was shot through the heart.

His wife, who was in the house at the time, hearing the report, ran to

the door, and in an instant comprehended how matters stood. She opened

the back door, ran down the river to a fording, crossed over, and, with

all the speed she could command, hastened over the mountain to Lytle's

Fort. Near Alexandria she met a man on horseback, who, noticing her

distracted condition, demanded what the matter was. She explained as

best she could, when the man turned back and rode rapidly toward the

fort to apprise the people of what had occurred. It was then that the

woman fairly recovered her senses, and, on looking around for the first

time, she noticed her little son, about ten years old, who had followed

her. The sight of him reminded her of her family of children at home,

at the mercy of the savages, and all the mother's devotion was aroused

within her. She picked up her boy, and, exhausted as she was, hastened

toward the fort with him.

As it subsequently appeared, one of the children of Mrs. Hicks,--a girl

between three and four years of age,--directly after her escape, went

out to see her father, just while the savages were in the act of

scalping him. She was too young to comprehend the act clearly, but,

seeing the blood about his head, she commenced crying, and screamed,

"My pappy! my pappy! what are you doing to my poor pappy?"

One of the Indians drew his tomahawk from his belt and knocked the

child down, after which he scalped it; and, without venturing to the

house, the savages departed. Mrs. Hicks reached the fort, and the news

of the murder soon spread over the country, but the usual delays

occurred in getting up a scout to follow the marauders. Some declared

their unwillingness to go unless there was a large force, as the

depredators might only be some stragglers belonging to a large party;

others, that their rifles were out of order; and others again pleaded

sickness. In this way the day slipped around, and in the mean time the

savages got far beyond their reach, even in case the scout could have

been induced to follow them.

Next morning, however, a party mustered courage and went over to the

mill, where they found Hicks scalped on the spot where he fell, and his

rifle gone.

The inside of the house presented one of the saddest spectacles ever

witnessed in the annals of savage atrocities. Two of the children were

lying upon the floor crying, and the infant in the cradle, for the want

of nourishment had apparently cried until its crying had subsided into

the most pitiful moanings; while the little girl that had been scalped

sat crouched in a corner, gibbering like an idiot, her face and head

covered with dry clotted blood!

Of course, considering the start the Indians had, it was deemed useless

to follow them; so they buried Hicks near the mill, and removed the

family to the fort.

It may seem a little singular, nevertheless it is true, that the child,

in spite of its fractured skull and the loss of its scalp, actually

recovered, and lived for a number of years after the outrage, although

its wounds were never dressed by a physician. It was feeble-minded,

however, owing to the fracture.

As no other family resided near the mill, no person could be induced to

take it after Hicks was murdered, and it stood idle for years.

The murder of Hicks created the usual amount of alarm, but no

depredations followed in the immediate neighborhood for some time after

his death.

History of the Early Settlement of the Juniata Valley Embracing an Account of the Early Pioneers, and the Trials and Privations Incident to the Settlement of the Valley, Predatory Incursions, Massacres, and Abductions by the Indians During the French and Indian Wars, and the War of the Revolution, &c. · 第 24 / 34 章