THE HAUGHTINESS OF THE ENGLISH (1367).

SOURCE.--Froissart's _Chronicle_ (Hafod Press, 1803), iii. 209.

I, the author of this history, was at Bordeaux when the Prince of

Wales marched to Spain, and witnessed the great haughtiness of the

English, who are affable to no other nation than their own; nor could

any of the gentlemen of Gascony or Aquitaine, though they had ruined

themselves by their wars, obtain office or appointment in their own

country; for the English said they were neither on a level with them

nor worthy of their society, which made the Gascons very indignant,

as they showed the first opportunity that presented itself. It was

on account of the harshness of the Prince's manners that the Count

d'Armagnac and the Lord d'Albreth, with other knights and squires,

turned to the French interest. King Philip of France, and the good

John his son, had lost Gascony by their overbearing pride; and in like

manner did the Prince. But King Charles, of happy memory, regained them

by good humour, liberality, and humility. In this manner the Gascons

love to be governed....

Such are the Gascons; they are very unsteady, but they love the English

in preference to the French, for the war against France is the most

profitable; and this is the cause of their preference.

"TIME-HONOURED LANCASTER" (MAY-JUNE, 1376).

SOURCE.--Harleian MSS. (British Museum), 247, fol. 173; and

6217, fols. 3-4.[40]

... There arose this question amongst them [the Commons] which of the

knights should be their speaker, for they had fully resolved to deny

the King's request until certain abuses were corrected.... Careful they

were, as is said, about their speaker for they doubted certain of the

King's secretarys who they thought would have disclosed their drifts,

for they were captious and in great and especial favour with the King.

In this space God moved the spirit of a knight of their company

called Peter de la Mare, pouring into him wisdom, and boldness to the

conceit of his mind, and with all such constancy that he neither feared

the threats of his enemies nor the subtleties of such as envied his

preferment, &c. Peter, trusting in God, and standing together with his

fellows before the nobles (whereof the chief was John Duke of Lancaster

whose doings were ever contrary, for, as it is thought, he wanted the

grace of God, &c.), he began thus:

"Lords and nobles, by whose faith and diligence the realm is governed,

it is well known to your wisdoms, how with like vexations the Commons

have been often oppressed, now paying fifteenths, otherwhiles ninths

and tenths, to the King's use, which they would take in good part,

if the King or his realm took any commodity, thereby, nor would they

grieve at it if it had been bestowed in the King's wars, although

scarcely prosperous; but it is evident neither the King nor the realm

do have any profit thereby. And because it cannot be known how such

great expences should arise, the commonalty require an account of such

as received the same to the King's use, neither is it credible that the

King should want such an infinity of treasure if they were faithful

that served him."

When he had thus said, they having not wherewith to answer, the judges

held their peace.

The night following the Duke [of Lancaster] consulted with his private

men how he might put off that that redounded to his infamy and manifest

dishonour. After divers men's opinions diversely told, he, liking of

none of their ways, is reported to have said: "What," saith he, "do

these base and ignoble knights attempt? Do they think they be kings or

princes of this land? Or else whence is this haughtiness and pride? I

think they know not what power I am of. I will therefore early in the

morning appear unto them so glorious and will show such power among

them and with such vigour I will terrify them, that neither they nor

their like shall dare henceforth to provoke me to wrath." Boasting in

this sort and vainly assuring himself, one of his gentlemen is said to

have given him this answer: "My lord," saith he, "it is not unknown

to your honour what helps these knights, not of the common sort, as

you affirm, but mighty in arms and valiant, have to undershore them;

for they have the favour and love of the lords, and especially of the

Lord Prince Edward, your brother, who giveth them his council and aid

effectually. The Londoners also, all and everyone, and common people

be so well affected towards them that they will not suffer them to

be overlaid with reproachful language, or to be molested with the

least injury in the world. Yea, and the knights themselves abused in

any reproachful manner, shall be enforced to attempt all extremities

against your person and your friends, which, haply, otherwise they

would never do." With this admonition the duke's guilty conscience was

very much troubled. He was afraid indeed that it would so come to pass,

as the gentleman had said unto him, and that so his honour should ever

more distained.[41] Whereas he knew that if mention were openly made of

his wicked acts he could not satisfy the people by any purgation, nor

for trouble of mind and guiltiness of conscience durst, though he were

willing thereto, wage battle against his enviers....

O unfortunate duke and miserable, O that destroyest with thy treason

and lack of sense and reason, whom thou guidest to battle, and whom in

peace thou shouldst guide through examples of good works, thou leadest

them through bye ways and bringest them to destruction, for thou

whereas either God, or, that I may so say, Nature, the mother of all

things hath given thee a soul and discretion, than the which nothing is

more excellent, so dost abject and abase thyself, that a man may think

you to differ nothing from a brute beast. Behold, O most miserable man,

thinkest thyself to flourish, which accountest thyself happy, in what

sort thy own miseries do overbear thee, thy lusts do torment thee; to

whom that which thou hast is not sufficient, and yet fearest lest it

will not long continue thine.

The sting of conscience for thy lewd acts prick and vex thee but would

God and the fear of laws and judgment terrify thee as it doth others,

truly then thou wouldst even against thy will, amend that is amiss.

The Duke therefore, as afore is touched, punished with the most

sharp pricks of his conscience and terrified with the answers of his

councillors, laid aside all vigour and stoutness of stomach, and the

next day came into the assembly of the knights, and, contrary to all

expectations, showed himself so favourable and so mild that he drew

them all into admiration. They knew how proud Moab was ii or iii days

before, although they regarded not his arrogancy; and they said,

is not this the change of the right hand of the highest? The Duke,

counterfeiting modesty, deceitfully seemed to comfort them, saying he

knew well the desire of the knights to be zealous, and to tender the

state of the realm and therefore, whatsoever they thought good to be

corrected they should speak, and he would put thereto the wished remedy.

FOOTNOTES:

[40] The first leaf of this English translation of part of the Harleian

MS. 3634, which is the _Chronicon Angliæ_, 1308-1388, written by a

contemporary monk of St. Albans, possibly Walsingham, has at some time

been separated from the main part of the manuscript, and is now in

Harleian MS. 247, while the rest is in Harleian MS. 6217, fol. 3, of

which begins: "The night following, the Duke consulted," etc.

[41] Soiled, stained.

LAMENT FOR THE BLACK PRINCE.

SOURCE.--_Chronicon Angliæ_, 1328-1388 (Rolls Series), 91.

Who being dead, the whole hope of the English perished; for while he

lived they feared no inroad of any enemy, even as when he was present,

they feared no warlike encounter. For never when he was present were

any foul deeds done, nor did any soldiers turn renegade; and, as it

was said of the great Alexander, he attacked no people that he did not

conquer, he besieged no city that he did not take. Let these witness

to what I say: the battle of Creçy, the siege of Calais, the battle

of Poitiers where the King of France was taken; the war in Spain

[1367] where Henry the Bastard, the invader of that kingdom, was put

to flight, and the courageous Peter, the lawful King, was restored to

his dominion; and, finally, that greatest siege of the city of Limoges

(September 19, 1370), and the ruin of that city, where, although he was

weighed down by so great infirmity of body that he could scarcely sit

on his horse at the time, he nevertheless so inspired his men that

they believed it impossible for any city to be able to resist their

strength. His body was borne to Canterbury, there, as he, while living,

had commanded, to be buried, bewailed by the whole realm of England.

O thou untimely, too-eager Death, who bearest away that one of the

English who seemed to be of help! Oh, what sorrow dost thou give to

the old King, his father, taking from him not only his own desire, but

that of the whole people, namely that his first born should sit after

him upon his throne and should judge the people in equity! Oh, what

lamentations dost thou give to the country which believes itself shorn

of a protector now he is no longer present! What tears dost thou give

to the citizens deprived of so great a prince; what exultations to the

enemy, the fear of so great a defender being removed! In truth, unless

God, who protected him in battle, and now took him out of the world

(perchance we English should place a greater hope in the Lord God, lest

the poor English-born be set at variance among themselves) shall raise

his hand, our enemies, who surround us on every side, will surely rage

upon us even to our destruction, and will destroy our place and people.

Rise up, O God, help us and protect us for Thy name's sake.

RENEWAL OF THE WAR (1376-77).

SOURCE.--Froissart's _Chronicle_ (Hafod Press, 1803), ii. 178.

After the feast of Michaelmas, when the funeral of the [Black] Prince

had been performed, in a manner suitable to his birth and merit, the

King of England caused the young Prince Richard to be acknowledged as

his successor to the Crown after his decease, by all his children, the

Duke of Lancaster, the Earl of Cambridge, the Lord Thomas, his youngest

son, as well as by all the barons, earls, prelates, and knights of

England. He made them solemnly swear to observe this, and on Christmas

Day he had him seated next to himself, above all his children, in

Royal state, that it might be seen and declared he was to be King of

England after his death.

The Lord John Cobham, the Bishop of Hereford, and the Dean of London,

were at this time sent to Bruges on the part of the English. The French

had sent thither the Count de Saltzbourg, the Lord de Châtillon, and

Master Philibert l'Espiote. The prelates, ambassadors from the Pope,

had still remained there, and continued the negotiations for peace.

They treated of a marriage between the young son of the Prince and the

Lady Mary, daughter of the King of France: after which the negotiators

of each party separated, and reported what they had done to the

respective Kings.

About Shrovetide a secret treaty was formed between the two Kings for

their ambassadors to meet at Montreuil-sur-Mer, and the King of England

sent to Calais Sir Guiscard d'Angle, Sir Richard Sturey, and Sir

Geoffry Chaucer. On the part of the French were the Lords de Coucy and

De la Rivieres, Sir Nicholas Bragues, and Nicholas Bracier. They for a

long time discussed the subject of the above marriage; and the French,

as I was informed, made some offers, but the others demanded different

terms, or refused treating. These Lords returned, therefore, with their

treaties to their sovereigns; and the truces were prolonged to the

first of May.

The Earl of Salisbury, the Bishop of St. David's, Chancellor of

England, and the Bishop of Hereford, returned to Calais, and with them,

by orders of the King of France, the Lord De Coucy, and Sir William De

Dormans, Chancellor of France.

Notwithstanding all that the prelates could say or argue, they never

could be brought to fix upon any place to discuss these treaties

between Montreuil and Calais, nor between Montreuil and Boulogne, nor

on any part of the frontiers; these treaties, therefore, remained in an

unfinished state. When the war recommenced, Sir Hugh Calverley was sent

Governor of Calais.

JOHN OF GAUNT ATTACKS WILLIAM OF WYKEHAM (1377).

SOURCE.--_Chronicon Angliæ_, 1328-1388 (Rolls Series), 106, 107.

The Duke [of Lancaster] spewed out the venom of serpents which was

in him and directed the sting of his malice against the Bishop of

Winchester, Lord William Wykeham, seeking a knot in a bulrush and an

occasion for condemning him in every way and manner that he could.

At length, among the many things which, as it is said, he falsely

deposed against him, he declared that he had been false to the lord

King at the time when he was discharging the office of Chancellor. And

although the said Bishop would have been prepared to bring forward

sufficient honest witnesses and accounts to prove his innocence,[42]

nevertheless, William Skipworth unjustly sitting as justiciar, he [the

duke] caused him to be condemned without answer, and the temporalities

of his bishopric to be taken from him by royal authority. And, in order

that he might gain popular favour, he demanded, in the power of the

King, that the same goods should be given to the aid of the son of the

[Black] Prince, Richard de Bordeaux, Earl of Chester, who had lately

received by gift of the King the principality and name of his father.

Moreover, he prohibited the same bishop, in place of the King, from

taking it on himself to come within twenty miles of the royal presence.

Thus was he avenged against the said bishop.

Now the cause of all this malice was, as it is said, that the same

Bishop had said that he [John of Gaunt] was not the son of the King or

Queen; but in the time when the Queen was delivered at Gaunt, she had

given birth not to a boy, but to a girl, whom she had overlaid; and,

fearing the royal indignation, she had ordered the son of a certain

Flemish woman, born at the same time, to be put in its place; thus she

had fostered one to whom she had not given birth, namely, this man, the

notorious Duke of Lancaster. These things the Queen, in her last hours,

had related to the bishop under seal of confession; and had prayed

him steadfastly that, if at any time it should happen that he [John

of Gaunt] should either have designs on the kingdom, or if the said

kingdom should in any way whatever devolve on him, he, the said bishop,

should make known his birth, lest he, a false heir, should inherit the

kingdom of England.

FOOTNOTES:

[42] In Harleian MS. 247, fol. 170_b_, we read of the Council of July,

1377, wherein the lords did "greatly debate upon the suppressing of the

Duke of Lancaster and the Lord Latimer by Sir William Wykeham, Bishop

of Winchester, of sundry trespasses and misprisons by him committed,

and charged him with sundry grievous articles and forfeits, which the

King himself had certainly understood and by divers evidences were

known, as also by the common voice of the people; for he had sundry

charges and offices under the King from the xxxv. year of his reign and

had by his writings made sundry defaults to the prejudice, hurt and

reproach of the King and of his realm, and to the oppression of his

people."

MASTER JOHN WICLIF (1377).

SOURCE.--Harleian MS. 2261, fols. 399, 399_b_.

Master John Wiclif, doctor of divinity in the University of Oxford,

began to sustain openly in the said University erroneous conclusions

contrary to the state of the universal Church and conclusions of

heresy, and especially against canons, monks, and religious men

possessionate, which drew to him in this time divers fellows of the

same sect dwelling in Oxford, going barefoot with long gowns of

russet, that they might publish and fortify their errors against men

contrarious to them, preaching openly the said errors. Among whom

they said that the sacrament in the altar after the sacrament or

consecration is not the very body of Christ. Also he said that temporal

lords and men might take away meritoriously the goods [of] men of the

Church sinning or trespassing. Nevertheless, the Pope with his council

damned xxiii conclusions as vain, erroneous and full of heresy, and

sent bulls direct to the Metropolitan of England and to the Bishop

of London that they should cause the said Master John to be arrested

and to examine him of the said conclusions. That inquisition done,

and a declaration made, the Archbishop of Canterbury commanded and

prohibited the said Master John and his co-disciples to use the said

conclusions, and so they were still for a season. But soon after, by

supportation of lords and other noble men, they took to them more

wicked opinions, and had great continuation in their malice.

A TORCHLIGHT PROCESSION (1377).

SOURCE.--Harleian MS. (British Museum) 247, fol. 172_b_.

At the same time the commons of London made great sport and solemnity

to the young prince. For upon the Monday next before the Purification

of our Lady at night and in the night, were 130 men disguisedly

apparelled and well mounted on horseback to go on mumming to the said

prince, riding from Newgate through Cheap[side], where many people

see them, with great noise of minstrelsy trumpets,----,[43] cornets

and shaumes and great plenty of wax and torches lighted. And in the

beginning they rid 48, after the manner of esquires, two and two

together, clothed in coats and cloaks of red say or sendall and their

faces covered with vizards well and handsomely made; after these

esquires came 48 like knights well arrayed after the same manner;

after the knights came one excellently arrayed and well mounted as he

had been an Emperor; after him some 100 paces came one nobly arrayed

as a pope; and after him came 24 arrayed like cardinals; and after

the cardinals came 8 or 10 arrayed and with black vizards like devils

nothing amiable, seeming like legates; riding through London and over

London bridge towards Kenyton (Kennington) where the young prince made

his abode with his mother. And the duke of Lancaster, and the earls

of Cambridge, Hertford, Warwick and Suffolk and many other lords were

there with him to behold the solemnity. And when they were come before

the manor, they alighted on foot and entered into the hall; and soon

after the prince with his mother and the other lords came out of the

chambers into the hall and the said mummers saluted them, showing a

pair of dice upon a table to play with the prince, which dice were

subtly made, so that when the prince should cast he should win. And

the said players and mummers set before the prince three jewels each

after other, the first a ball of gold, then a cup of gold, then a gold

ring, the which the said prince won at three casts, as before it was

appointed; and after that they set before the prince's mother, the duke

of Lancaster and the other earls every one a gold ring and the mother

and the lords won them; and then the prince caused to bring the wine

and they drank with great joy, commanding the minstrels to play; and

the trumpets began to sound and other instruments to pipe etc. and the

prince and the lords danced on the one side and the mummers on the

other a great while. And then they drank and took their leave and so

departed towards London.

FOOTNOTES:

[43] A blank in the manuscript.

THE KING OF FRANCE EQUIPS A FLEET (1377).

SOURCE.--Froissart's _Chronicle_ (Hafod Press, 1803), ii. 181.

During the negotiations for peace, the King of France had been very

active in providing ships and galleys; the King of Spain had sent him

his admiral, Sir Fernando Sausse, who, with Sir John de Vienne, Admiral

of France, had sailed for the Port of Rye, which they burnt, five days

after the decease of King Edward, the vigil of St. Peter, in June, and

put to death the inhabitants, without sparing man or woman.

Upon news of this coming to London, the Earls of Cambridge and

Buckingham were ordered to Dover with a large body of men-at-arms. The

Earl of Salisbury and Sir John Montague, on the other hand, were sent

to the country near Southampton.

After this exploit the French landed in the Isle of Wight. They

afterwards burnt the following towns: Portsmouth, Dartmouth, Plymouth,

and several others. When they had pillaged and burnt all in the Isle

of Wight, they embarked and put to sea, coasting the shores until they

came to a port called Poq (? Pool). The Earl of Salisbury and Sir John

Montague defended the passage, but they burnt a part of the town of

Poq. They again embarked and coasted towards Southampton, attempting

every day to land; but the Earl of Salisbury and his forces, who

followed them along the shore, prevented them from so doing.

The fleet then came before Southampton; but Sir John Arundel, with a

large body of men-at-arms and archers, guarded well the town, otherwise

it would have been taken. The French made sail from thence towards

Dover, and landed near to the Abbey of Lewes, where there were great

numbers of the people of the country assembled. They appointed the

Abbot of Lewes, Sir Thomas Cheney, and Sir John Fuselée their leaders,

who drew up in good array to dispute their landing, and to defend the

country. The French had not the advantage, but lost several of their

men, as well might happen. However, the better to maintain the fight,

they made the land, when a great skirmish ensued, and the English,

being forced to retreat, were finally put to flight. Two hundred at

least were slain, and the two knights with the Abbot of Lewes made

prisoners.

The French re-embarked and remained at anchor before the abbey all that

night. They then heard for the first time, from their prisoners, the

death of King Edward [June 20] and the coronation of King Richard, and

also a part of the regulation of the kingdom, and that great numbers of

men-at-arms were under orders to march to the coast.

CHARACTER OF EDWARD III.

SOURCE.--Harleian MS. 2261, fol. 400_a_.

This noble and mighty King Edward, among all other men of nobility

in the world, was a man of great goodness called gracious, excelling

all his predecessors by virtue and grace given to him of God, a bold

man in heart, dreading not sinister fortune in battles, having great

fortune in them both by sea and land. Also he was meek, benign, and

familiar to all manner of people, devout to God, honouring the church

of God, and having his ministers in great reverence. Also he was

moderate in cures temporal, provide in council, affable and eloquent,

meek in behaviour, having compassion on men in tribulation. Also he

was elegant and beauteous of body, having a comfortable and pleasant

countenance, like to the sight of an angel, for God had endued him with

such excellence of grace that a man would have thought as for a surety

that he should have sped well in the day following after that he had

dreamed of the said King. This noble King governed his reign gloriously

unto his later days, large in gifts, excessive in expenses, endued with

all honesty of manners. Whereof his fame was so increased among people

of Barbary, insomuch that they said there was no land in the world that

had so noble a prince, and that England should never have so noble

again after his death. But the inordinate lust of the flesh used in his

old age helped him much unto death. Also it is to be attended, as the

acts afore express, that like as in his beginning all things enjoyed to

him, and in the midst of his age glorious and fortunate, so the said

King drawing to age and towards death, all things were as unfortunate

to him, for his sins and many incommodities began to spring, having

after him long continuation, which thing was to be sorrowed.

THE PEASANTS' REVOLT (1381).

SOURCE.--_Chronicle of Adam of Usk_ (translated and edited by

Sir E. Maunde Thompson, 1904), 13.

War and Misrule (1307-1399) · 第 5 / 9 段