EXPLANATION OF PRECEDING TABLE

Whenever a sign of any kind appears in the preceding synopsis it means

that there is a proviso in our treaty with that country touching more or

less definitely upon the subject indicated. The sign (†) means that the

subject is covered by the proviso or nearly so; a (‡) means that it is

modified in some measure; a (§) means that it applies only to American

citizens in the consular service, not to foreigners, and a (¶) means

that the requisitions for the extradition of criminals may be made

“through the superior consular officer; otherwise through the diplomatic

service.” A blank space means that the point is not touched upon by any

treaty now in force.

This synopsis of our commercial treaties shows at a glance their

relative fullness or deficiency, and the most remarkable thing about it

is their deficiency. Sometimes, it is true, by virtue of international

comity, much larger discretion is exercised by consuls and diplomats

than is vouchsafed by the terms of the treaty; but it is not to be

inferred that this is always the case.

Treaties are sometimes intended to last forever (_in perpetuo_), and

sometimes they are concluded for only a term of years. Political

treaties, the purposes of which is usually to terminate wars, establish

boundaries, award indemnities, etc., naturally belong, as a rule, to the

first class, while commercial treaties usually have a time limit. This

accounts for a good many of the blank spaces in the above synopsis.

It will be noticed that there are some countries in the above list which

have not at present the treaty making power—such, for instance, as

Egypt, the Hanseatic Republic, Prussia, Hawaii, Samoa, Madagascar,

Borneo, Kongo Free State, etc. In such cases the government which

assumes the sovereignty assumes the treaty obligations, or else

concludes new ones.

It may be noticed, on the other hand, that there are no commercial

treaties with either Mexico, Brazil, Uruguay or Chile. This does not

mean that there are no political treaties with those countries, or that

there never have been any commercial treaties, but merely that in some

cases the latter have been allowed to lapse or have been abrogated, and

no new ones have been concluded. Canada, Australia, India, and all other

colonies have no sovereignty, and therefore are not states in

international law. Hence they cannot appoint or receive ambassadors nor

can they make treaties except through the sovereign power.

Uncle Sam Abroad · 第 54 / 127 题