New Austro-German Alliance

Official Declarations Regarding It by the

Chief Ministers of Both Empires

The official text of the new treaty of alliance between Germany and

Austria-Hungary--as a result of the meeting of the Emperors, May 12,

1918--was not made public. Baron Burian, Austro-Hungarian Foreign

Minister, made the following declaration regarding it on May 16:

The extension of the alliance, which in long years of peace had

deeply penetrated the minds of the peoples and has stood the test

of hard times, not only corresponds with what has now become a

historic necessity, and is not only an imperative necessity, owing

to the fact that Austria-Hungary and Germany, who are surrounded

by a ring of common enemies, must firmly hold together in the

centre in order to be able to resist the terrible embrace, but it

also corresponds with the requirement of all patriotic Austrians,

Hungarians, and Germans who think clearly about our future.

Austria-Hungary and Germany do not desire to renew or extend the

alliance in order to attack or oppress any one in the world, but

to stand by each other when their vital interests are assailed.

The new alliance will again be a defensive alliance, which

today serves to bring about peace and will in future serve for

its preservation. It will show the world that Austria-Hungary

and Germany united are not to be beaten, and will convert our

opponents to peace by the strength of our will for peace.

Dr. Wekerle, the Premier of Hungary, announced in the Hungarian lower

house that the new alliance was a strengthening of the existing

alliance and was for a considerable period. He added:

I think that it will be a matter for general approval by

Hungarians that our interests are so well looked after, and that

they will be maintained by such a proved alliance. This alliance

is therefore being renewed, and very naturally it will also extend

to those questions which are directly connected with it. Naturally

certain military agreements will also be concluded, but these

cannot be called a military convention.

Count Michael Karolyi here interjected inquiry, "During the war?" Dr.

Wekerle proceeded:

Agreements may be concluded during the war relating to common

action and common equipment, but having no connection with army

organization as such. We shall in no respect give up our right

of decision as regards economic rapprochement. Count Karolyi

continually talks about "Central Europe," but "Central Europe" is

a very vague idea. No one doubts that closer economic ties are

desirable and also possible. I repeat that we shall not give up in

a single respect our independent right of decision. The validity

of the economic agreement will depend on the approval of the

House. War aims were not discussed, for there can be no question

of war aims.

The entire alliance aims only at the maintenance of peace in all

directions. The alliance can but improve the mutual relations

between us allies, but it is not to be regarded in any way as a

hindrance to any eventual relations which may be established in

the economic domain with other nations; neither is it a hindrance

to an eventual entrance into the so-called League of Nations.

The guarantee lies in the fact that we have arranged a purely

defensive alliance.

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918 · 第 186 / 346 题